Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the
roof) this weekend... I'm having new roof installed and want this in prior to new roof so I'm pushed for time.. My current hood is just a "blow steam and grease in the top of your head while cooking type... My length of ducting is well below the max for either.. 7ft of 7" round duct with no turns. Possibly needing a rectangular to round adapter depending on model of hood It's a 30" hood.. I see some with 220 cfm and 390 cfm for twice the money.. Is the 390 cfm needed? $380. for the 390 cfm $130 for the 220 cfm I wouldn't mind the 390 cfm as much if it's strong enough to pull in fresh air if something get's "funky" smelling.. and I open a couple windows..for a few minutes though I know it's not a whole house fan... I guess it's just sticker shock.. Nice hood and fan for %70 of cost of new standard range would cost.. Thanks.. Chuck (in SC) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:13:06 GMT, Chuck wrote:
> Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the > roof) this weekend... > I'm having new roof installed and want this in prior to new roof so > I'm pushed for time.. My current hood is just a "blow steam and grease > in the top of your head while cooking type... > > My length of ducting is well below the max for either.. 7ft of 7" > round duct with no turns. Possibly needing a rectangular to round > adapter depending on model of hood > It's a 30" hood.. I see some with 220 cfm and 390 cfm for twice the > money.. Is the 390 cfm needed? > $380. for the 390 cfm > $130 for the 220 cfm > I wouldn't mind the 390 cfm as much if it's strong enough to pull in > fresh air if something get's "funky" smelling.. and I open a couple > windows..for a few minutes though I know it's not a whole house fan... > I guess it's just sticker shock.. Nice hood and fan for %70 of cost of > new standard range would cost.. You have NO IDEA how expensive ventilation can be if you're in sticker shock over less than $400. Do your calculations.... will this hood move enough air? Kitchens require a minimum of 15 air replacements per hour. -- Practice safe eating. Always use condiments. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
when i bought my husband the VIKING he has always wanted, it came with
special instructions on the kind of exhaust hood it needed. -- BUSHISM "As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself-not here at the hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave me a little scratch."- ......After visiting with wounded veterans from the Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, Jan. 1, 2006 "Chuck" > wrote in message ... > Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the > roof) this weekend... > I'm having new roof installed and want this in prior to new roof so > I'm pushed for time.. My current hood is just a "blow steam and grease > in the top of your head while cooking type... > > My length of ducting is well below the max for either.. 7ft of 7" > round duct with no turns. Possibly needing a rectangular to round > adapter depending on model of hood > It's a 30" hood.. I see some with 220 cfm and 390 cfm for twice the > money.. Is the 390 cfm needed? > $380. for the 390 cfm > $130 for the 220 cfm > I wouldn't mind the 390 cfm as much if it's strong enough to pull in > fresh air if something get's "funky" smelling.. and I open a couple > windows..for a few minutes though I know it's not a whole house fan... > I guess it's just sticker shock.. Nice hood and fan for %70 of cost of > new standard range would cost.. > Thanks.. > Chuck (in SC) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chuck wrote: > Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the > roof) this weekend... Why through the roof, why would you want to cut a big hole in your nice brand new roof? If possible you're always better off with a residential exhaust exiting through a side wall with the ductwork aiming downward. My exhaust duct goes up through a kitchen cabinet and into the attic where it travels horizontally about eight feet and exits downward through the soffit... this arrangement also makes it easy for me to maintain the system myself, I can easily remove all the ductwok from inside the attic and take it outside to clean if necessary. Ductwork exiting a peaked roof tends to suffer from down droughts as even a slight breeze is amplified by the venturi effect as it travels over a pitched roof. For such a system to work properly you'd need a vent pipe that extends at least three feet higher than the roof ridge, very ugly. Those flush mount mushroom looking thingies don't work very well on many counts, the exiting exhaust grease will stain the roof too, badly... within a year you'll have a big ugli stain on your nice new roof, and everytime it rains that stain will expand and also run down to the eves... this won't look pretty. You don't want to place any extra holes in a roof, just another place for a leak to develop. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck" > wrote in message ... > Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the > roof) this weekend... > I'm having new roof installed and want this in prior to new roof so > I'm pushed for time.. My current hood is just a "blow steam and grease > in the top of your head while cooking type... > > My length of ducting is well below the max for either.. 7ft of 7" > round duct with no turns. Possibly needing a rectangular to round > adapter depending on model of hood > It's a 30" hood.. I see some with 220 cfm and 390 cfm for twice the > money.. Is the 390 cfm needed? > $380. for the 390 cfm > $130 for the 220 cfm > I wouldn't mind the 390 cfm as much if it's strong enough to pull in > fresh air if something get's "funky" smelling.. and I open a couple > windows..for a few minutes though I know it's not a whole house fan... > I guess it's just sticker shock.. Nice hood and fan for %70 of cost of > new standard range would cost.. > Thanks.. A 220 cfm is fine if you also install an air source near the stove (a run from the outside to the appliance, usually on a side other than the vent side, to provide make-up" air, with a "trap" in that line.) If you use leaks in your house and the furnace air intake to get make-up air, then the larger size is usually needed, since you won't be moving anywhere near the rating because of extra "head loss". (think four cubic feet vs six cubic feet per second in a 7" pipe - a LOT of air IF there is air available over the stove. A vented stove typically has around 16 cu ft over it, and a typical kitchen has 800 cu ft - and then consider that if the fan actually exhausts 390 CFM, it has sucked ALL the air out of the kitchen EVERY two minutes. Obviously, it doesn't do that if outside air is not provided) It is very important to make sure that your fan does not suck air backwards through your heater and furnace vents - in other words, fans that exhaust to the outside will draw the-air-they-exhaust from any opening - and a vent pipe for a furnace or water heater, and a fireplace chimney, are openings to that fan. The make-up and exhaust-volume sizes should be sized together. fwiw.... > Chuck (in SC) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Jan 2006 09:10:09 -0800, "Sheldon" > wrote:
> >Chuck wrote: >> Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the >> roof) this weekend... > >Why through the roof, why would you want to cut a big hole in your nice >brand new roof? If possible you're always better off with a >residential exhaust exiting through a side wall with the ductwork >aiming downward. My exhaust duct goes up through a kitchen cabinet and >into the attic where it travels horizontally about eight feet and exits >downward through the soffit... this arrangement also makes it easy for >me to maintain the system myself, I can easily remove all the ductwok >from inside the attic and take it outside to clean if necessary. >Ductwork exiting a peaked roof tends to suffer from down droughts as >even a slight breeze is amplified by the venturi effect as it travels >over a pitched roof. For such a system to work properly you'd need a >vent pipe that extends at least three feet higher than the roof ridge, >very ugly. Those flush mount mushroom looking thingies don't work very >well on many counts, the exiting exhaust grease will stain the roof >too, badly... within a year you'll have a big ugli stain on your nice >new roof, and everytime it rains that stain will expand and also run >down to the eves... this won't look pretty. You don't want to place >any extra holes in a roof, just another place for a leak to develop. I've not seen the soffit fixture... Did you use a "wall" fixture there or do they make one just for exiting soffit?... I prefer this option... Chuck (in SC) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chuck wrote: > On 13 Jan 2006 09:10:09 -0800, "Sheldon" > wrote: > > > > >Chuck wrote: > >> Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the > >> roof) this weekend... > > > >Why through the roof, why would you want to cut a big hole in your nice > >brand new roof? If possible you're always better off with a > >residential exhaust exiting through a side wall with the ductwork > >aiming downward. My exhaust duct goes up through a kitchen cabinet and > >into the attic where it travels horizontally about eight feet and exits > >downward through the soffit... this arrangement also makes it easy for > >me to maintain the system myself, I can easily remove all the ductwok > >from inside the attic and take it outside to clean if necessary. > >Ductwork exiting a peaked roof tends to suffer from down droughts as > >even a slight breeze is amplified by the venturi effect as it travels > >over a pitched roof. For such a system to work properly you'd need a > >vent pipe that extends at least three feet higher than the roof ridge, > >very ugly. Those flush mount mushroom looking thingies don't work very > >well on many counts, the exiting exhaust grease will stain the roof > >too, badly... within a year you'll have a big ugli stain on your nice > >new roof, and everytime it rains that stain will expand and also run > >down to the eves... this won't look pretty. You don't want to place > >any extra holes in a roof, just another place for a leak to develop. > > I've not seen the soffit fixture... Did you use a "wall" fixture there > or do they make one just for exiting soffit?... I prefer this > option... It was there when I moved in. The hood is a Sears Kenmore, works very well, has a dual level lamp and the fan is on an infinite rheostat... I typically use it within the lowest range. There are aluminum mesh filters that I send through the dishwasher as needed. I've no idea who did the duct work or who makes the soffit unit... it's quite possible the previous owner did that part himself as he owned (still does) a large machine shop. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Jan 2006 15:49:07 -0800, "Sheldon" > wrote:
> >Chuck wrote: >> On 13 Jan 2006 09:10:09 -0800, "Sheldon" > wrote: >> >> > >> >Chuck wrote: >> >> Going to have to install range hood with outside exhaust (through the >> >> roof) this weekend... >> > >> >Why through the roof, why would you want to cut a big hole in your nice >> >brand new roof? If possible you're always better off with a >> >residential exhaust exiting through a side wall with the ductwork >> >aiming downward. My exhaust duct goes up through a kitchen cabinet and >> >into the attic where it travels horizontally about eight feet and exits >> >downward through the soffit... this arrangement also makes it easy for >> >me to maintain the system myself, I can easily remove all the ductwok >> >from inside the attic and take it outside to clean if necessary. >> >Ductwork exiting a peaked roof tends to suffer from down droughts as >> >even a slight breeze is amplified by the venturi effect as it travels >> >over a pitched roof. For such a system to work properly you'd need a >> >vent pipe that extends at least three feet higher than the roof ridge, >> >very ugly. Those flush mount mushroom looking thingies don't work very >> >well on many counts, the exiting exhaust grease will stain the roof >> >too, badly... within a year you'll have a big ugli stain on your nice >> >new roof, and everytime it rains that stain will expand and also run >> >down to the eves... this won't look pretty. You don't want to place >> >any extra holes in a roof, just another place for a leak to develop. >> >> I've not seen the soffit fixture... Did you use a "wall" fixture there >> or do they make one just for exiting soffit?... I prefer this >> option... > >It was there when I moved in. The hood is a Sears Kenmore, works very >well, has a dual level lamp and the fan is on an infinite rheostat... I >typically use it within the lowest range. There are aluminum mesh >filters that I send through the dishwasher as needed. I've no idea who >did the duct work or who makes the soffit unit... it's quite possible >the previous owner did that part himself as he owned (still does) a >large machine shop. Thanks.. Chuck (in SC) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cheapo range hood | Cooking Equipment | |||
mounting under-cabinet range hood as free standing range hood? | Cooking Equipment | |||
mounting under-cabinet range hood as free standing range hood? | Cooking Equipment | |||
New Range & Hood | Cooking Equipment | |||
New Range & Hood | Cooking Equipment |