BabyJane Hudson wrote:
> Check this out. According to the info I provided, my death of death
> will be 1-13-2009.
>
> Which day will you be dying on?
>
> http://www.deathclock.com/?source=Fi...&key=TopBanner
>
> Jane

Looks like I'll be dying in 2050... which I sincerely doubt as that would
make me 90 years old.

Jill

In article >, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>BabyJane Hudson wrote:
>> Check this out. According to the info I provided, my death of death
>> will be 1-13-2009.
>>
>> Which day will you be dying on?
>>
>> http://www.deathclock.com/?source=Fi...&key=TopBanner
>>
>> Jane
>
>Looks like I'll be dying in 2050... which I sincerely doubt as that would
>make me 90 years old.

You still skiting about being one of the young 'uns here, Jill? ;-)

Cheers, Phred.

--
LID

Phred wrote:
> In article >, "jmcquown"
> > wrote:
>> BabyJane Hudson wrote:
>>> Check this out. According to the info I provided, my death of death
>>> will be 1-13-2009.
>>>
>>> Which day will you be dying on?
>>>
>>> http://www.deathclock.com/?source=Fi...&key=TopBanner
>>>
>>> Jane
>>
>> Looks like I'll be dying in 2050... which I sincerely doubt as that
>> would
>> make me 90 years old.
>
> You still skiting about being one of the young 'uns here, Jill? ;-)
>
> Cheers, Phred.

I'm *only* 45... going on 46 this July. You got a problem with that?

Jill

In article >, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>Phred wrote:
>> In article >, "jmcquown"
>> > wrote:
>>> BabyJane Hudson wrote:
>>>> Check this out. According to the info I provided, my death of death
>>>> will be 1-13-2009.
>>>>
>>>> Which day will you be dying on?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.deathclock.com/?source=Fi...&key=TopBanner
>>>
>>> Looks like I'll be dying in 2050... which I sincerely doubt as that
>>> would make me 90 years old.
>>
>> You still skiting about being one of the young 'uns here, Jill? ;-)
>
>I'm *only* 45... going on 46 this July. You got a problem with that?

Only in the sense that it's been a few years since I could claim the
same. :-)

But how did you get from 37 to 45 in 7 months? If that rate keeps up
it'll be a problem for you quite soon.

Cheers, Phred.

--
LID

"Phred" > wrote

> But how did you get from 37 to 45 in 7 months? If that rate keeps up
> it'll be a problem for you quite soon.

Oh, Phred, you're hopelessly out of it. All the rfc trollops
are 37. All of us, from the head trollop Damsel on down.

Capish?

nancy

i know that's right

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Phred" > wrote
>
> > But how did you get from 37 to 45 in 7 months? If that rate keeps up
> > it'll be a problem for you quite soon.
>
> Oh, Phred, you're hopelessly out of it. All the rfc trollops
> are 37. All of us, from the head trollop Damsel on down.
>
> Capish?
>
> nancy
>
>

"Nancy Young" > writes:
>"Phred" > wrote

>> But how did you get from 37 to 45 in 7 months? If that rate keeps up
>> it'll be a problem for you quite soon.

>Oh, Phred, you're hopelessly out of it. All the rfc trollops
>are 37. All of us, from the head trollop Damsel on down.

Is this where I say I'm not 37 yet so don't call me older than I am?
Even if you're joking. My 30th birthday about killed me and I'm still
not over the shock.
You can call me a trollop, though.

Stacia

In article >, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
>
>"Phred" > wrote
>
>> But how did you get from 37 to 45 in 7 months? If that rate keeps up
>> it'll be a problem for you quite soon.
>
>Oh, Phred, you're hopelessly out of it. All the rfc trollops
>are 37. All of us, from the head trollop Damsel on down.

That's the point I was making. It's why I'm worried about Jill
claiming to be "45 going on 46". Has she reformed? :-)

>Capish?


Cheers, Phred.

--
LID

> BabyJane Hudson wrote:
>> Check this out. According to the info I provided, my death of death
>> will be 1-13-2009.
>>
>> Which day will you be dying on?
>>


No, thanks. I don't plan to die.

gloria p
In serious denial