Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chicken Piccata with Lemon Madeira Sauce & Capers
6 chicken cutlets salt & pepper 1/2 cup flour 1/2 tsp paprika 1/4 cup unsalted butter 1-2 Tbsp olive oil 1/4 Madeira (or you can sub another white wine) 1/2 cup chicken stock 3 Tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice 1 lemon, sliced 3-4 tbsp capers 3 tbsp minced parsley 1 lb linguini, cooked and drained 2 tbsp butter, cold and cut into small cubes Trim chicken and pound if needed to an even 1/4" thickness. (Luckily for me, the butcher did this for me!) Season with salt & pepper. Using a whisk, combine flour and paprika on a plate, then dredge chicken, shaking off any excess. Melt 2 tbsp butter with the olive oil over med-high heat. Brown chicken quickly (1-2 min per side) and remove to a plate. Add 1 tsp of the remaining flour (from dredging) to the pan and combine with remaining butter-oil mixture. Whisk in Madeira and bring to a boil, scraping any brown bits from the pan. Add chicken stock and lemon juice, and simmer briefly. Return chicken to skillet along with lemon sliced and capers. Simmer until chicken is cooked through. (about 5 minutes.) Divide linguini among plates and top with chicken. Whisk cold butter into sauce, then stir in parsley. Pour over chicken & pasta. Green Beans Parmigano 1/2 cup finely chopped shallot 1 clove garlic, minced 3 tbsp olive oil (I use a Meyer lemon infused for this dish) 1.5 lbs green beans, snapped if needed 1/3- 1/2 cup chicken broth or water 1 tsp rosemary salt & pepper 1/4 cup freshly shaved parmesan 2 tbsp finely chopped sundried tomatoes (packed in oil, not the dry kind) In a large heavy skillet (cast iron works great), sauté shallot and garlic in the oil until tender- about 5 min. Add green beans, broth (or water), rosemary, salt & pepper. Cook, covered, over med heat until beans are tender-crisp. Remove lid and cook out any remaining water. Remove from heat and stir in tomatoes, then top with shaved parmesan just prior to serving. Notes: For the beans, I add white pepper instead of black. Also, if you don't want to add the parmesan and tomatoes, you can wait until they're plated, then sprinkle with Murray River flake salt. Awesome. kimberly |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nexis wrote: > Chicken Piccata with Lemon Madeira Sauce & Capers > > 6 chicken cutlets > salt & pepper > 1/2 cup flour > 1/2 tsp paprika > 1/4 cup unsalted butter > 1-2 Tbsp olive oil > 1/4 Madeira (or you can sub another white wine) > 1/2 cup chicken stock > 3 Tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice > 1 lemon, sliced > 3-4 tbsp capers > 3 tbsp minced parsley > 1 lb linguini, cooked and drained > 2 tbsp butter, cold and cut into small cubes > > Trim chicken and pound if needed to an even 1/4" thickness. (Luckily for me, the > butcher did this for me!) Season with salt & pepper. > Using a whisk, combine flour and paprika on a plate, then dredge chicken, shaking off > any excess. > Melt 2 tbsp butter with the olive oil over med-high heat. Brown chicken quickly (1-2 > min per side) and remove to a plate. > Add 1 tsp of the remaining flour (from dredging) to the pan and combine with > remaining butter-oil mixture. Whisk in Madeira and bring to a boil, scraping any > brown bits from the pan. Add chicken stock and lemon juice, and simmer briefly. > Return chicken to skillet along with lemon sliced and capers. Simmer until chicken is > cooked through. (about 5 minutes.) > Divide linguini among plates and top with chicken. Whisk cold butter into sauce, then > stir in parsley. Pour over chicken & pasta. (Snipped) That's one of my husband's very favorite dinners & my recipe is very similar to yours. I do use a bit more butter at the end, but yours is probably a healthier version. Have never tried using Madiera in it - I've always just added dry white Martini & Rossi Vermouth - Madiera might make a nice change. Serve mine over Trader Joe's wide pepperdalle noodles. Although it does sort of alarm the cats, I have to admit I rather enjoy the part where you thwack the devil out of the chicken breasts with a metal meat mallet - a productive way to blow off a little steam after a long day. Why should the butcher have all the fun? Nancy T |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ntantiques" > wrote in message oups.com... > > Nexis wrote: > (Snipped) > > That's one of my husband's very favorite dinners & my recipe is very > similar to yours. I do use a bit more butter at the end, but yours is > probably a healthier version. Have never tried using Madiera in it - > I've always just added dry white Martini & Rossi Vermouth - Madiera > might make a nice change. Serve mine over Trader Joe's wide > pepperdalle noodles. > > Although it does sort of alarm the cats, I have to admit I rather enjoy > the part where you thwack the devil out of the chicken breasts with a > metal meat mallet - a productive way to blow off a little steam after a > long day. Why should the butcher have all the fun? > > Nancy T On days when I have alot of time to cook, I don't mind pounding meats and other prep work. But it sure was nice to know that I can have it all prepped for whatever recipe I am making without my spending time that I would otherwise be enjoying by relaxing after dinner. Start to finish, dinner last night took about 30 minutes ![]() afternoon of kayaking, it's a good thing it didn't take longer lol. By the time we got home, everyone was famished! kimberly > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "L, not -L" > wrote in message news ![]() > > On 8-May-2006, "ntantiques" > wrote: > >> > Chicken Piccata with Lemon Madeira Sauce & Capers >> > >> > 6 chicken cutlets >> > salt & pepper >> > 1/2 cup flour >> > 1/2 tsp paprika >> > 1/4 cup unsalted butter >> > 1-2 Tbsp olive oil >> > 1/4 Madeira (or you can sub another white wine) >> > 1/2 cup chicken stock >> > 3 Tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice >> > 1 lemon, sliced >> > 3-4 tbsp capers >> > 3 tbsp minced parsley >> > 1 lb linguini, cooked and drained >> > 2 tbsp butter, cold and cut into small cubes >> > >> > Trim chicken and pound if needed to an even 1/4" thickness. (Luckily for >> > me, the >> > butcher did this for me!) Season with salt & pepper. >> > Using a whisk, combine flour and paprika on a plate, then dredge >> > chicken, shaking off >> > any excess. >> > Melt 2 tbsp butter with the olive oil over med-high heat. Brown chicken >> > quickly (1-2 >> > min per side) and remove to a plate. >> > Add 1 tsp of the remaining flour (from dredging) to the pan and combine >> > with >> > remaining butter-oil mixture. Whisk in Madeira and bring to a boil, >> > scraping any >> > brown bits from the pan. Add chicken stock and lemon juice, and simmer >> > briefly. >> > Return chicken to skillet along with lemon sliced and capers. Simmer >> > until chicken is >> > cooked through. (about 5 minutes.) >> > Divide linguini among plates and top with chicken. Whisk cold butter >> > into sauce, then >> > stir in parsley. Pour over chicken & pasta. > > This reminds me of a dish I had in a restaurant in Orlando a number of years > ago and loved it; Chicken Piccata ala Milanese. I have not seen it on a > menu elsewhere so I will try this and see if I like it as well. > It's very tasty. If you don't want to use (or just don't have any) wine, you can use all chicken stock (3/4 cup total). Works out well. kimberly |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nexis wrote: > Chicken Piccata with Lemon Madeira Sauce & Capers > > 6 chicken cutlets > salt & pepper > 1/2 cup flour > 1/2 tsp paprika > 1/4 cup unsalted butter > 1-2 Tbsp olive oil > 1/4 Madeira (or you can sub another white wine) > 1/2 cup chicken stock > 3 Tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice > 1 lemon, sliced > 3-4 tbsp capers > 3 tbsp minced parsley > 1 lb linguini, cooked and drained > 2 tbsp butter, cold and cut into small cubes > > Trim chicken and pound if needed to an even 1/4" thickness. Pounded does not equal cutlets... cutlets for piccata are *sliced* thin. If they're pounded you've ruined the dish, asbsolutely RUINED. Blech |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sheldon wrote: > Pounded does not equal cutlets... cutlets for piccata are *sliced* > thin. If they're pounded you've ruined the dish, asbsolutely RUINED. > Blech We are talking 1/4 inch thick paillards of chicken breasts - not something that's been beaten to a pulp with the business side of the meat mallet - and they're ideal for this dish. Nancy T Whose dear Mother used to say, "If you really don't like it, just don't eat it, but do sit politely at the table until the rest of us have finished enjoying our meal." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pussy Katz wrote:
> Pounded does not equal cutlets... cutlets for piccata are *sliced* > thin. If they're pounded you've ruined the dish, asbsolutely RUINED. > Blech Once again, the Pontificating Putz has bent over and farted out his ignorance. Chicken Piccata is made from chicken scallopine, which are BY DEFINITION pounded thin. Pussy is wrong -- again, and as usual. Imagine that. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ntantiques wrote: > Sheldon wrote: > > > Pounded does not equal cutlets... cutlets for piccata are *sliced* > > thin. If they're pounded you've ruined the dish, asbsolutely RUINED. > > Blech > > We are talking 1/4 inch thick paillards of chicken breasts paillards are usually grilled... those awful veal shoulder thingies come to mind. > - not something that's been beaten to a pulp with the business side of the > meat mallet - She said "pounded"... something about the word "pounded" you can't comprehend. > and they're ideal for this dish. Nonsense... pounded is NOT a cutlet. M-W pail·lard noun Etymology: French paillarde, from Paillard, late 19th century French restaurateur : a piece of beef or veal usually pounded thin and grilled --- Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Boob ****williger wrote: > > Chicken Piccata is made from chicken scallopine, which are BY > DEFINITION pounded thin. By definition? It's spelled scaloppini, you dumb ****. Only those inept with a knife pound cutlets to make them thin... which of course RUINS the meat. You watch too much foodtv. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldumb "Pussy" Katz continued his buffoonery:
> By definition? It's spelled scaloppini, you dumb ****. No, the word that *I* used is spelled "scallopine," you dumb ****. Look it up, you dumb ****. Learn from others, you dumb ****. Better yet, just shut the **** up, you dumb ****. > Only those inept with a knife pound cutlets to make them thin... which > of course RUINS the meat. You watch too much foodtv. Only those who have truly dedicated their lives to ignorance refuse to accept the collected wisdom of those greater than themselves -- and in your case, that includes just about the entire human race. You need to learn more about cooking before you presume to tell _anybody_ how to cook, you ignoramus. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Wertz wrote: > On 8 May 2006 17:46:23 -0700, Sheldon wrote: > > > Boob ****williger wrote: > >> > >> Chicken Piccata is made from chicken scallopine, which are BY > >> DEFINITION pounded thin. > > > > By definition? It's spelled scaloppini. > > Then I guess those 55,000 references on Google alone must be > wrong. You should know better than to be using Google as a dictionary... is why you stink at crossword puzzles. He even got me screwing it up with his widdle peepee... it's actually spelled: M-W scallopini noun probably from Middle French, shell : thin slices of meat (as veal) sautéed or coated with flour and fried --- There are plenty of recipes that indicate pounding, BUT they typically insinuate pounding for those who can't use a knife (they typically say if not thin enough pound - which of course is defeating/stupid). Pounding tender cuts of meat ruins it, don't do it... instead learn to use a knife. What did people do before foodtv and plastic wrap. Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pussy Katz released his flatus:
> You should know better than to be using Google as a dictionary... is > why you stink at crossword puzzles. > > scallopini > noun > probably from Middle French, shell > : thin slices of meat (as veal) sautéed or coated with flour and fried I'm not disputing that "scallopini" is a word. But the word that *I* used is also a word, and it means something DIFFERENT than the word you are trying to force upon us. I'm sure you already looked it up, but you're hoping to suppress the information because it clearly exposes your ignorance: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=scallopine scallopine n : sauteed cutlets (usually veal or poultry) that have been pounded thin and coated with flour See? That's what I meant when I said BY DEFINITION scallopine are pounded. Go ahead, take a good long look, and then admit that you were wrong. It's okay, you can admit it freely; we knew you were wrong all along. > There are plenty of recipes that indicate pounding, BUT they typically > insinuate pounding for those who can't use a knife (they typically say if > not thin enough pound - which of course is defeating/stupid). Pounding > tender cuts of meat ruins it, don't do it... instead learn to use a knife. > What did people do before foodtv and plastic wrap. You're wrong, of course. The technique of pounding meat has been in use for millennia. It doesn't ruin the meat at all. Do you believe that machaca got its texture by being thinly sliced? Do you think carpaccio isn't supposed to be pounded? Face it, you're blatantly wrong. And stupid. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger > wrote:
> Do you think carpaccio isn't > supposed to be pounded? I do. Here is the recipe, straight from the source: <http://www.cipriani.com/cipriani/Consigli/carpaccioe.htm> and <http://www.cipriani.com/cipriani/Consigli/salsacarpaccioe.htm>. Victor Carpaccio Ingredients: (serves 6 as a first course) 3 pounds boned shell of beaf (1.350 g), to yield 1 1/2 pounds after trimming (675 g) 1 recipe Carpaccio Sauce salt Recipe: Trim every bit of fat, sinew, or gristle from the boned shell, leaving a small cylinder of tender meat. Chill the meat well. Using a razor-sharp knife, slice the meat paper-thin. Arrange the slices of meat on 6 salad plates to cover the surface completely. Drizzle the sauce decoratively over the meat in ribbons. Serve immediately. Carpaccio Sauce This tasty sauce for Carpaccio is also used for hamburgers. Ingredients: (makes about 2 cups - 250 ml) 3/4 cup homemade mayonnaise 1 to 2 teaspoons Worcestershire sauce, to taste 1 teaspoon fresh lemon juice 2 to 3 tablespoons milk salt freshly ground white pepper Recipe: Put the mayonnaise in a bowl and whisk in the Worcestershire sauce and lemon juice. Whisk in enough milk to make a thin sauce that just coats the back of a wooden spoon. Taste the sauce and adjust the seasoning with some salt and pepper and more Worcestershire sauce and/or lemon juice to taste. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Italy "Carpaccio" sauce is made with lemon, oil and black pepper. Thin
slices of meat are often covered with "rucola" and scales of reggiano cheese. In nothern Italy they often replace cheese with slices of truffles. -- Cheers Pandora "Victor Sack" > ha scritto nel messaggio . .. > Bob Terwilliger > wrote: > >> Do you think carpaccio isn't >> supposed to be pounded? > > I do. Here is the recipe, straight from the source: > <http://www.cipriani.com/cipriani/Consigli/carpaccioe.htm> and > <http://www.cipriani.com/cipriani/Consigli/salsacarpaccioe.htm>. > > Victor > > Carpaccio > > Ingredients: > (serves 6 as a first course) > > 3 pounds boned shell of beaf (1.350 g), to yield 1 1/2 pounds after > trimming (675 g) > 1 recipe Carpaccio Sauce > salt > > Recipe: > > Trim every bit of fat, sinew, or gristle from the boned shell, leaving a > small cylinder of tender meat. Chill the meat well. Using a razor-sharp > knife, slice the meat paper-thin. Arrange the slices of meat on 6 salad > plates to cover the surface completely. Drizzle the sauce decoratively > over the meat in ribbons. Serve immediately. > > > Carpaccio Sauce > > This tasty sauce for Carpaccio is also used for > hamburgers. > > Ingredients: > (makes about 2 cups - 250 ml) > > 3/4 cup homemade mayonnaise > 1 to 2 teaspoons Worcestershire sauce, to taste > 1 teaspoon fresh lemon juice > 2 to 3 tablespoons milk > salt > freshly ground white pepper > > Recipe: > > Put the mayonnaise in a bowl and whisk in the Worcestershire sauce and > lemon juice. Whisk in enough milk to make a thin sauce that just coats > the back of a wooden spoon. Taste the sauce and adjust the seasoning > with some salt and pepper and more Worcestershire sauce and/or lemon > juice to taste. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Terwilliger wrote: > > I'm not disputing that "scallopini" is a word. But the word that *I* used is > also a word, and it means something DIFFERENT than the word you are trying > to force upon us. I'm sure you already looked it up, but you're hoping to > suppress the information because it clearly exposes your ignorance: > > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=scallopine That's not a dictionary... you're as bad as sqwertz using Google for a dictionary. Next yoose imbeciles will be using Wikipeadia as a reference. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora > wrote:
> In Italy "Carpaccio" sauce is made with lemon, oil and black pepper. Thin > slices of meat are often covered with "rucola" and scales of reggiano > cheese. In nothern Italy they often replace cheese with slices of truffles. Yes, I know and I prefer those versions to the real one. However, there is really only one recipe for Carpaccio and its sauce - the original one from Harry's Bar in Venice, Italy, where it was invented and named. That is the recipe I posted. Like some other recipes of this kind, it is cast in stone and, short of resurrecting the old Commendatore and making him change it, it will forever remain the same. For everything else, as in your example, the usage is indeed "Carpaccio", a pretender or a different dish altogether, no matter how good it happens to be. BTW, the names chosen by the Commendatore for the dishes/drinks he invented, Carpaccio and Bellini, reflect his good taste for painters as well. He didn't name them after "those parvenus Titian and Tintoretto", to quote R. W. Apple Jr. Victor P.S. I wonder if you realise that some of your postings are hardly readable. This is not just because of your atrocious posting style (top-posting and failure to snip), but also because of the broken piece of software (Outlook Express) which you have chosen to use and which continues to violate or ignore most every Usenet technical convention. Do you even know that you put the whole quoted text of my message in your .sig? Here is how your post looks like in the article window of my newsreader: <http://vsack.homepage.t-online.de/sig.jpg>. Some people - and there are quite a few of them - may choose to make .sigs totally invisible - good newsreaders make it possible. Why not install a good newsreader? Unlike OE, it also won't strip anything of four characters or fewer followed by a colon in the subject header (like "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:"), effectively sabotaging any attempts to either killfile or highlight such threads. There is not a single OE user posting to rfc that has not done this! Why? What's so hard about installing a good newsreader? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Victor Sack" > wrote in message > > Yes, I know and I prefer those versions to the real one. However, there > is really only one recipe for Carpaccio and its sauce - the original one > from Harry's Bar in Venice, Italy, where it was invented and named. > That is the recipe I posted. It was named after the Venetian painter Vittore Carpaccio, famous for his use of bright red-and-white colors. Harry's is also where the Bellini was first concocted. Bellini was also a painter. We recently stayed a couple of nights at the Hotel Bellini, near the vaporetti stop at the other end of the canal from Harry's. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Victor Sack" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora > wrote: > >> In Italy "Carpaccio" sauce is made with lemon, oil and black pepper. Thin >> slices of meat are often covered with "rucola" and scales of reggiano >> cheese. In nothern Italy they often replace cheese with slices of >> truffles. > > Yes, I know and I prefer those versions to the real one. However, there > is really only one recipe for Carpaccio and its sauce - the original one > from Harry's Bar in Venice, Italy, where it was invented and named. > That is the recipe I posted. Like some other recipes of this kind, it > is cast in stone and, short of resurrecting the old Commendatore and > making him change it, it will forever remain the same. For everything > else, as in your example, the usage is indeed "Carpaccio", a pretender > or a different dish altogether, no matter how good it happens to be. I have never heard of the recipe you have mentioned! > > BTW, the names chosen by the Commendatore for the dishes/drinks he > invented, Carpaccio and Bellini, reflect his good taste for painters as > well. He didn't name them after "those parvenus Titian and Tintoretto", > to quote R. W. Apple Jr. > > Victor > > P.S. I wonder if you realise that some of your postings are hardly > readable. This is not just because of your atrocious posting style > (top-posting and failure to snip), I don't snip, because only few persons in this NG do like that. I see that everybody or the most of them, report every word of the previous post. And it is not a very bad idea, because with all the hundred of post there are, you can't remember what the person has sayed. >but also because of the broken piece > of software (Outlook Express) which you have chosen to use and which > continues to violate or ignore most every Usenet technical convention. > Do you even know that you put the whole quoted text of my message in > your .sig? Here is how your post looks like in the article window of my > newsreader: <http://vsack.homepage.t-online.de/sig.jpg>. Some people - > and there are quite a few of them - may choose to make .sigs totally > invisible - good newsreaders make it possible. Sorry but I Am not very expert with PC. And BTW I do what other persons do in this NG. > > Why not install a good newsreader? Unlike OE, it also won't strip > anything of four characters or fewer followed by a colon in the subject > header (like "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:"), effectively sabotaging any > attempts to either killfile or highlight such threads. There is not a > single OE user posting to rfc that has not done this! Why? What's so > hard about installing a good newsreader? Because I don't understand why I must change. I haven't told you to change somewhat in your computer. I think everybody is free to use what he likes. Don't you think so? And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't answer. It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a day. -- Cheers Pandora > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora > wrote:
> "Victor Sack" > ha scritto > > > > However, there > > is really only one recipe for Carpaccio and its sauce - the original one > > from Harry's Bar in Venice, Italy, where it was invented and named. > > I have never heard of the recipe you have mentioned! Yes, that much is clear. > I don't snip, because only few persons in this NG do like that. Guess again. > I see that > everybody or the most of them, report every word of the previous post. And > it is not a very bad idea, because with all the hundred of post there are, > you can't remember what the person has sayed. The idea is to leave just enough to provide context. You didn't know that? > Sorry but I Am not very expert with PC. Neither are most of those who use good newsreaders, including myself. > And BTW I do what other persons do > in this NG. No, you don't. Very few people put quoted text of the previous message in their .sigs. > > Why not install a good newsreader? Unlike OE, it also won't strip > > anything of four characters or fewer followed by a colon in the subject > > header (like "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:"), effectively sabotaging any > > attempts to either killfile or highlight such threads. There is not a > > single OE user posting to rfc that has not done this! Why? What's so > > hard about installing a good newsreader? > > Because I don't understand why I must change. You didn't read the above? Was the explanation unclear? Here it is again, in somewhat different words: *You* sabotage *my* and other people's efforts to filter out or to highlight postings or threads with the subject matter indicated by "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:" in the subject header. > I haven't told you to change > somewhat in your computer. I think everybody is free to use what he likes. > Don't you think so? No, I don't. Not as long as I live among other people and interact with them. Your don't-care, only-I-count attitude is typical of spoiled brats (of any age). The way you post and the newsreader you use is the exact counterpart to your clothes, personal hygiene, and the way you address people in 'real' life. Wait, I can just see you out in the street... I like the way your hitched-up skirt is showing off the pink colour of the directoire drawers you are wearing. I especially like that they are the exact shade of the curlers in your hair. The way they contrast with that purple stain on your open dressing gown is simply breathtaking. That tattoo on your left breast is cute but was clearly applied a long time ago, and the 'artist' forgot to take the inevitable effects of sagging into account. A pretty large piece of raw onion you ate last week is wedged between your front teeth. It is turned sideways, which is good because it covers the space left by the two missing ones. The last slice of cucumber from the mask you applied Monday night is still sticking to your forehead, giving a certain je-ne-sais-quoi to your otherwise declassé appearance. The miasma of chronic halitosis and body odour emanating from your general direction is somewhat knee-weakening but it also makes my eyes water, with the pleasing effect of softening the visual impression you leave. I just wish your voice weren't that shrill, especially so late at night, and that you would stop bumping me with your behind every time you pass... > And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't answer. > It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a day. Thank God for small favours! Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victor wrote:
> You didn't read the above? Was the explanation unclear? Here it is > again, in somewhat different words: *You* sabotage *my* and other > people's efforts to filter out or to highlight postings or threads with > the subject matter indicated by "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:" in the subject > header. I'm a little unclear about this as well. I use OE and I still have "" in the Subject line. How is your filtering being sabotaged? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger > wrote:
> Victor wrote: > > > You didn't read the above? Was the explanation unclear? Here it is > > again, in somewhat different words: *You* sabotage *my* and other > > people's efforts to filter out or to highlight postings or threads with > > the subject matter indicated by "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:" in the subject > > header. > > I'm a little unclear about this as well. I use OE and I still have "" in > the Subject line. How is your filtering being sabotaged? OK, check out the "PING: Bob Terwilliger (Creamy Greens Soup Rec.)" thread. That is the subject header of the message posted by Jude, the OP. You replied to that message directly, yet your subject header was "Bob Terwilliger (Creamy Greens Soup Rec.)", missing the "PING". So, if I wanted to filter out or highlight all "PING" posts, I'd miss yours. Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victor wrote:
> OK, check out the "PING: Bob Terwilliger (Creamy Greens Soup Rec.)" > thread. That is the subject header of the message posted by Jude, the > OP. You replied to that message directly, yet your subject header was > "Bob Terwilliger (Creamy Greens Soup Rec.)", missing the "PING". So, if > I wanted to filter out or highlight all "PING" posts, I'd miss yours. Yeah, I noticed that right after I my query to you. :-) Being a conscientious netizen, I'll take pains to make sure that if OE changes the Subject line, I'll change it back. It's not a big thing for me to make that check, and I see how it can affect your filters. (But I'm still going to stick with OE.) Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Victor Sack" > ha scritto nel messaggio . .. > Pandora > wrote: > >> "Victor Sack" > ha scritto >> > >> > However, there >> > is really only one recipe for Carpaccio and its sauce - the original >> > one >> > from Harry's Bar in Venice, Italy, where it was invented and named. >> >> I have never heard of the recipe you have mentioned! > > Yes, that much is clear. > >> I don't snip, because only few persons in this NG do like that. > > Guess again. > >> I see that >> everybody or the most of them, report every word of the previous post. >> And >> it is not a very bad idea, because with all the hundred of post there >> are, >> you can't remember what the person has sayed. > > The idea is to leave just enough to provide context. You didn't know > that? > >> Sorry but I Am not very expert with PC. > > Neither are most of those who use good newsreaders, including myself. > >> And BTW I do what other persons do >> in this NG. > > No, you don't. Very few people put quoted text of the previous message > in their .sigs. > >> > Why not install a good newsreader? Unlike OE, it also won't strip >> > anything of four characters or fewer followed by a colon in the subject >> > header (like "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:"), effectively sabotaging any >> > attempts to either killfile or highlight such threads. There is not a >> > single OE user posting to rfc that has not done this! Why? What's so >> > hard about installing a good newsreader? >> >> Because I don't understand why I must change. > > You didn't read the above? Was the explanation unclear? Here it is > again, in somewhat different words: *You* sabotage *my* and other > people's efforts to filter out or to highlight postings or threads with > the subject matter indicated by "OT:", "REC:", or "PING:" in the subject > header. > >> I haven't told you to change >> somewhat in your computer. I think everybody is free to use what he >> likes. >> Don't you think so? > > No, I don't. Not as long as I live among other people and interact with > them. Your don't-care, only-I-count attitude is typical of spoiled > brats (of any age). > > The way you post and the newsreader you use is the exact counterpart to > your clothes, personal hygiene, and the way you address people in 'real' > life. Wait, I can just see you out in the street... > > I like the way your hitched-up skirt is showing off the pink colour of > the directoire drawers you are wearing. I especially like that they are > the exact shade of the curlers in your hair. The way they contrast with > that purple stain on your open dressing gown is simply breathtaking. > That tattoo on your left breast is cute but was clearly applied a long > time ago, and the 'artist' forgot to take the inevitable effects of > sagging into account. A pretty large piece of raw onion you ate last > week is wedged between your front teeth. It is turned sideways, which > is good because it covers the space left by the two missing ones. The > last slice of cucumber from the mask you applied Monday night is still > sticking to your forehead, giving a certain je-ne-sais-quoi to your > otherwise declassé appearance. The miasma of chronic halitosis and body > odour emanating from your general direction is somewhat knee-weakening > but it also makes my eyes water, with the pleasing effect of softening > the visual impression you leave. I just wish your voice weren't that > shrill, especially so late at night, and that you would stop bumping me > with your behind every time you pass... > >> And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't answer. >> It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a day. > > Thank God for small favours! > > Victor I like the cabbage you have on your face ![]() Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>>> And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't answer.
>>> It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a day. >> >> Thank God for small favours! >> >> Victor > > I like the cabbage you have on your face ![]() > Pandora Pandora, here is what I think you intend to say. "It's fortunate for you ...." It took me a while to figure out what you were saying, even though I got the intent. Now, I'm trying to figure out the cabbage. :-))) Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> > "Victor Sack" > ha scritto nel messaggio > . .. >Pandora > wrote: [massive snip] > > > And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't > > > answer. It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a > > > day. > > > > Thank God for small favours! > > > > Victor > > I like the cabbage you have on your face ![]() Steve and Victor are right. You need to start doing some reasonable snipping of your quotes. It's the polite thing to do. You don't want to be rude, do you? Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Randall" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... >>>> And then, if you find that is difficult to answer to me, don't answer. >>>> It's a fortune for you that I don't post 10 or 20 post a day. >>> >>> Thank God for small favours! >>> >>> Victor >> >> I like the cabbage you have on your face ![]() >> Pandora > Pandora, here is what I think you intend to say. > "It's fortunate for you ...." > It took me a while to figure out what you were saying, even though I got > the intent. > Now, I'm trying to figure out the cabbage. :-))) > Dee Dee > > Thank you for the correction: i must say "it's fortunate for you". You should try to figure out the cabbage (ROTFL) because you would understand the funny words that Viktor told me ![]() -- Cheers Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() [CUT]> Brian > > -- > If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who > won't shut up. > -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) Yes.When I remember -- Cheers Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> > [CUT]> Brian > > > > -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian > > who won't shut up. > > -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) > > Yes.When I remember This is a case of overtrimming. You didn't leave enough for context, so the "Yes" remark is meaningless. This isn't that hard. Even Sheldon can usually do that right. One of the main things to remember is that .sigs should always be trimmed unless you are specifically commenting on them. Many newsreaders will do that for you automatically. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Default User" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora wrote: > >> >> [CUT]> Brian I 'll try Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> > "Default User" > ha scritto nel messaggio > ... > > Pandora wrote: > > > > > > >>[CUT]> Brian > > I 'll try I tried to help you, but I'm not going to put up with this kind of crap. You're on your own. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Default User" > wrote > I tried to help you, but I'm not going to put up with this kind of > crap. You're on your own. She's yankin your chain. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Default User" > wrote > > > I tried to help you, but I'm not going to put up with this kind of > > crap. You're on your own. > > She's yankin your chain. I understand that, that's what I mean by "this crap". Her posting style needs to improve, so she doesn't to act like a bitch about it. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz > wrote:
> I don't know why MS can't fix something as simple as that. It's > like they *purposely* designed it that way: to be broken. That's exactly what they did - it was originally localisation gone amok. Some years ago they released localised versions in several languages and saw it fit to localise "Re", even though it is not specifically English but Latin, international, and known to one and all. So, they replaced it with local contractions, such as "Antw", "SV", etc. Then they discovered that people actually communicate with one another and that they use various localised versions, as well as totally unrelated software. So, subject headers with such beautiful strings as "Antw: SV: Antw: SV: This is crazy!" began to appear. After a while, MS started to backpedal and replaced all the local contractions with "Re" again. Still, there were - and still are - a lot of old versions around and MS decided that it would be a good idea to delete automatically anything with four letters or fewer followed by a colon in the subject header. They have a colon in their heads. The only software I know that is remotely as bad as OE in this respect, is Novell GroupWise, but fortunately I have yet to see anyone posting to Usenet with it. ObFood: Rolled pig's spleen. The recipe is from _Nose to Tail Eating_ by the great Fergus Henderson. Victor Rolled Pig's Spleen per person People venting their spleens have been a bad press gastronomically for the organ. Please do not be deterred; spleens are a joy to cook with and eat, and the texture is not dissimilar to liver. 1 pig's spleen (given prior warning, your butcher should have no problem obtaining it) sea salt and pepper 4 sage leaves 2 slices of smoked streaky bacon, not too thin, rind removed chicken stock, enough to cover the spleen Lay your spleen out flat (they are a very neat and easy to use organ), and season. Place your sage leaves along it, then the bacon lengthwise, roll it up, and skewer it. Place in an ovenproof dish, cover with the chicken stock, put in a medium oven for 1 1/2 hours, then let them cool in the stock. When cold they are ready to eat; you can keep them in the stock you need them. To serve, remove the skewer, slice into three or four slices (so you get a cross-section of spleen and bacon spiral), and eat with very thinly sliced raw red onion and cornichons. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REC: Chicken Piccata | General Cooking | |||
Dinner 4/14/08 Chicken Piccata | General Cooking | |||
Chicken Piccata | Recipes | |||
Chicken Piccata | Recipes (moderated) |