Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and one about 2 years ago (Right)
http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg ICK! Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and > one about 2 years ago (Right) > http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg > > ICK! I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't panic. -j |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0
: > I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't > panic. > -j Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced. I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information. There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!! Imho, Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:10:47 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:
>"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0 : > >> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't >> panic. >> -j > > >Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced. > >I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included >haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information. > >There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!! I'm pretty sure that the ingredients are actually the same, but they have to tell you a bit more about where they came from now, ie. processed X instead of just X... lard isn't what I'd call a healthy ingredient at the best of times! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:10:47 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:
>"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0 : > >> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't >> panic. >> -j > > >Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced. > >I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included >haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information. > >There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!! > >Imho, > >Andy There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be more detailed in some of their definitions. I will say I don't like the new photo as much as the old photo. Compared side by side, which muffins would YOU prefer to eat? Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cathy wrote:
>>Andy > There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's > just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be > more detailed in some of their definitions. The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so incomplete! > I will say I don't like the new photo as much as the old photo. > Compared side by side, which muffins would YOU prefer to eat? Are you an advertising executive? I don't do muffins. Cornbread is loafed, since I was a kid! YMMV. All the best, Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andy wrote: > "jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0 > : > > > I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't > > panic. > > -j > > > Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced. > > I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included > haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information. > > There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!! > > Imho, > > Andy Hey, Jiffy conrbread and Johnny cakes are da bomb! Toss in a little white sugar and/or bacon - yummity! Actually, the Jiffy brownie mix is my secret weapon. You make it according to package, but add a T more water. Layer the mix, and a handful of chocolate chips in a 4x8 pan, and then top with a few more chips. Bake until done but not dry/crunchy. People scream in esctasy when eating these. Heh. -L. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-L. wrote:
> Andy wrote: >> "jacqui{JB}" > wrote in >> news:44743e86$0 : >> >>> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. >>> Don't panic. >>> -j >> >> >> Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have >> surfaced. >> >> I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included >> haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional >> information. >> >> There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!! >> >> Imho, >> >> Andy > > Hey, Jiffy conrbread and Johnny cakes are da bomb! Toss in a little > white sugar and/or bacon - yummity! > Oh NO! Jiffy cornbread/muffin mix is already entirely too sweet! When I resort to using it, I add salt to counteract the darned sugar. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
> Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and one about 2 years ago (Right) > http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg > > ICK! > > Andy Oh, interesting! If I had known Jiffy Mix contained lard, I might have tried it. But not with partially hydrogenated lard. I wonder, though, whether it always contained that and just had to relabel for transfat purposes? -- Jean B. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Times have changed | Preserving | |||
Jiffy White Cake Mix | Baking | |||
Jiffy Bread | General Cooking | |||
"Iced Tea" myth again; Historical NY Times, LA Times, Chicago Tribune for $50 | Historic | |||
Jiffy vs Bisquick | General Cooking |