"Just another American" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15497
>
> Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
>
> Human Events
>
> June 12, 2006
>
> Jerome Corsi
>
> Quietly but systematically, the Bush Administration is advancing the
> plan to build a huge NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide,
> through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican
> border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minn.
>
> Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to
> enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas,
> bypassing the Longshoreman's Union in the process. The Mexican trucks,
> without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what
> will be the nation's most modern highway straight into the heart of
> America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked
> only electronically by the new -SENTRI- system. The first customs stop
> will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port
> complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to
> the U.S. taxpayers in Kansas City.
>
> As incredible as this plan may seem to some readers, the first
> Trans-Texas Corridor segment of the NAFTA Super Highway is ready to
> begin construction next year. Various U.S. government agencies, dozens
> of state agencies, and scores of private NGOs (non-governmental
> organizations) have been working behind the scenes to create the NAFTA
> Super Highway, despite the lack of comment on the plan by President
> Bush. The American public is largely asleep to this key piece of the
> coming "North American Union" that government planners in the new
> trilateral region of United States, Canada and Mexico are about to
> drive into reality.
>
> Just examine the following websites to get a feel for the magnitude of
> NAFTA Super Highway planning that has been going on without any new
> congressional legislation directly authorizing the construction of the
> planned international corridor through the center of the country.
>
> NASCO, the North America SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., is a
> "non-profit organization dedicated to developing the world's first
> international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation
> system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation
> Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life
> in North America." Where does that sentence say anything about the
> USA? Still, NASCO has received $2.5 million in earmarks from the U.S.
> Department of Transportation to plan the NAFTA Super Highway as a
> 10-lane limited-access road (five lanes in each direction) plus
> passenger and freight rail lines running alongside pipelines laid for
> oil and natural gas. One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway
> on the front page of the NASCO website will make clear that the design
> is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation
> system.
>
> Kansas City SmartPort Inc. is an "investor based organization
> supported by the public and private sector" to create the key hub on
> the NAFTA Super Highway. At the Kansas City SmartPort, the containers
> from the Far East can be transferred to trucks going east and west,
> dramatically reducing the ground transportation time dropping the
> containers off in Los Angeles or Long Beach involves for most of the
> country. A brochure on the SmartPort website describes the plan in
> glowing terms: "For those who live in Kansas City, the idea of
> receiving containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico may
> sound unlikely, but later this month that seemingly far-fetched notion
> will become a reality."
>
> The U.S. government has housed within the Department of Commerce (DOC)
> an "SPP office" that is dedicated to organizing the many working
> groups laboring within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and
> Canada to create the regulatory reality for the Security and
> Prosperity Partnership. The SPP agreement was signed by Bush,
> President Vicente Fox, and then-Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco,
> Tex., on March 23, 2005. According to the DOC website, a U.S.-Mexico
> Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning has finalized a
> plan such that "(m)ethods for detecting bottlenecks on the U.S.-Mexico
> border will be developed and low cost/high impact projects identified
> in bottleneck studies will be constructed or implemented." The report
> notes that new SENTRI travel lanes on the Mexican border will be
> constructed this year. The border at Laredo should be reduced to an
> electronic speed bump for the Mexican trucks containing goods from the
> Far East to enter the U.S. on their way to the Kansas City SmartPort.
>
> The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is overseeing the
> Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) as the first leg of the NAFTA Super
> Highway. A 4,000-page environmental impact statement has already been
> completed and public hearings are scheduled for five weeks, beginning
> next month, in July 2006. The billions involved will be provided by a
> foreign company, Cintra Concessions de Infraestructuras de Transporte,
> S.A. of Spain. As a consequence, the TTC will be privately operated,
> leased to the Cintra consortium to be operated as a toll-road. The
> details of the NAFTA Super Highway are hidden in plan view. Still,
> Bush has not given speeches to bring the NAFTA Super Highway plans to
> the full attention of the American public. Missing in the move toward
> creating a North American Union is the robust public debate that
> preceded the decision to form the European Union. All this may be for
> calculated political reasons on the part of the Bush Administration.
>
> A good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may
> be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for
> Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the
> heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union
> workers on the docks or in the trucks.
>
> --
> "Historians will one day marvel that, as their Southwest was slipping
> away from the United States - demographically, linguistically and
> culturally - Americans were fighting to keep Iraq together.
> Remarkable. Foreigners are invading and occupying Arizona, while
> Americans are fighting for Anbar province" - Pat Buchanan, April 2006

Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
be on trail for his life. Treason.

Hank

arminius wrote:

>
> Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
> our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
> be on trail for his life. Treason.
>
> Hank

Howdy, Hank!
On trail to where?

> Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
> our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
> be on trail for his life. Treason.
>
> Hank
>
>
Hank, the hand full of illegals isn't the problem. That is just a
distraction. Our big problem is the the ports and airlines. When was the
last time you saw an illegal hijacking a plane? Don't let the Mexican
immigration or *** rights BS distract you.


Lava

wrote:
>"Just another American" > wrote:

>> Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
>> [mucho snippos]
>>
>Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
>our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
>be on trail for his life. Treason.

Is there some reason you included this newsfroup in your response?

--
The trouble with American journalism, in short, isn't that it's too
skeptical, but that it's too willing to throw skepticism to the wind when it
suits the agenda of proclaiming every war a Vietnam and every Republican
president a Nixon.

Whiskeyprayer wrote:
> Ubiquitous wrote:
> > wrote:
> > >"Just another American" > wrote:
> >
> > >> Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
> > >> [mucho snippos]
> > >>
> > >Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
> > >our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
> > >be on trail for his life. Treason.
> >
> > Is there some reason you included this newsfroup in your response?
> >
> > --
> > The trouble with American journalism, in short, isn't that it's too
> > skeptical, but that it's too willing to throw skepticism to the wind when it
> > suits the agenda of proclaiming every war a Vietnam and every Republican
> > president a Nixon.
>
> You're right. Compared to Georgie, Nixon was a pussycat.

Nixon may not have cared about American's killed at Watergate, was a
cheating
SOB, but unlike Bush, who doesn't care about Americans being killed, is
a cheating
SOB, Nixon accomplished some great things. And didn't go from a
surplus to
the largest deficiet in history.

snip
>
> Nixon may not have cared about American's killed at Watergate, was a
> cheating
> SOB, but unlike Bush, who doesn't care about Americans being killed, is
> a cheating
> SOB, Nixon accomplished some great things. And didn't go from a
> surplus to
> the largest deficiet in history.
>

I rarely read these kind of bullshit posts since they are, by and large,
posted by nitwits who have no real life, can't spell or construct a
sentence correctly, and are basically out to see their names in print.
This isn't the place to post such and I apologize for my rant here, but
it just gets to be so tiring. Again, my apologies to all you rational
and faithful readers/posters to this newsgroup.

Jim Davis wrote:
> snip
> >
> > Nixon may not have cared about American's killed at Watergate, was a
> > cheating
> > SOB, but unlike Bush, who doesn't care about Americans being killed, is
> > a cheating
> > SOB, Nixon accomplished some great things. And didn't go from a
> > surplus to
> > the largest deficiet in history.
> >
>
> I rarely read these kind of bullshit posts since they are, by and large,
> posted by nitwits who have no real life, can't spell or construct a
> sentence correctly, and are basically out to see their names in print.
> This isn't the place to post such and I apologize for my rant here, but
> it just gets to be so tiring. Again, my apologies to all you rational
> and faithful readers/posters to this newsgroup.

Nixon was horrid and evil, but Nixon never lied to get us into a war
and used the military for his own private gain.
While Watergate was vile, it can be argued that systamitcally winnowing
out Florida voters based on their race was far worse. Not to mention
that Nixon listened to the American people. Bush went against the will
of the American people and had his daddy's buddies get him yet another
job.
Nixon didn't systematically work as hard as Georgie to deny every
single American citizen their fundimental rights.

Whiskeyprayer wrote:

> Nixon was horrid and evil, but Nixon never lied to get us into a war
> and used the military for his own private gain.
> While Watergate was vile, it can be argued that systamitcally winnowing
> out Florida voters based on their race was far worse. Not to mention
> that Nixon listened to the American people. Bush went against the will
> of the American people and had his daddy's buddies get him yet another
> job.
> Nixon didn't systematically work as hard as Georgie to deny every
> single American citizen their fundimental rights.
>

Very interesting article:

Watergate's 'Deep Throat': William Pierce Broke Felt Story in 1974

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9237

Mel Tingpoint wrote:
> Whiskeyprayer wrote:
>
> > Nixon was horrid and evil, but Nixon never lied to get us into a war
> > and used the military for his own private gain.
> > While Watergate was vile, it can be argued that systamitcally winnowing
> > out Florida voters based on their race was far worse. Not to mention
> > that Nixon listened to the American people. Bush went against the will
> > of the American people and had his daddy's buddies get him yet another
> > job.
> > Nixon didn't systematically work as hard as Georgie to deny every
> > single American citizen their fundimental rights.
> >
>
> Very interesting article:
>
> Watergate's 'Deep Throat': William Pierce Broke Felt Story in 1974
>
> http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9237

And one does have to wonder how much of that was due to Nixon's support
of Project Paperclip. However, Project Paperclip, much like Vietnam,
was something that Nixon was handed, not something he created.

Whiskeyprayer > wrote in message
ups.com...

> Wait, that would
> involve ****ing off someone with oil. Mustn't anger anyone with oil,
> no matter how horribly they treat their citizens or how blatantly they
> support terrorists.

All the above apply to Mexico, so where's your notion now?

In article >,
Ubiquitous > wrote:

> >Yet this butt-sniffing President won't consider putting a wall or fence on
> >our Mexican border to protect American citizens. The little ******* should
> >be on trail for his life. Treason.
>
> Is there some reason you included this newsfroup in your response?

Which of the five groups, you posted this to, are you asking about? Did
you have to repeat the entire post?

YK