"Nancy Young" > wrote:

>
>"~xy~" > wrote
>
>>> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
>>> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>>>
>>> What a ****ing clown you are!
>>
>> pot,
>> kettle,
>> black
>
>I did notice that jelly roll rhymes with troll.

<nods> And the only persons using profanity and confused logic are
those who are proclaiming themselves superior....

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:33:29 GMT, "~xy~"
> wrote:

>> rude
>> childishness
>> repeated
>
>You've certainly served up your share...
><no need to quote>
>

You'll notice that I only did so when attacked.

I'll continue until the attacks cease.

Do you have anything productive to say or did you just want to put
your own two cents in?

The comment I made about repeated childishness was in regards to posts
such as the one you just made.

It served no purpose but to fan the flames.

In other words, your a jackass. Shut up fool.

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 04:56:14 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

>"Nancy Young" > wrote:
>
>>
>>"~xy~" > wrote
>>
>>>> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
>>>> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>>>>
>>>> What a ****ing clown you are!
>>>
>>> pot,
>>> kettle,
>>> black
>>
>>I did notice that jelly roll rhymes with troll.
>
><nods> And the only persons using profanity and confused logic are
>those who are proclaiming themselves superior....

Very typical of your kind of person. I've never even insinuated that I
was superior in any way. It sure made your bullshit sound good though,
didn't it?

You're full of shit. Live with it.

>> rude
>> childishness
>> repeated

~xy~ continued to be:

> >> rude
> >> childishness
> >> repeated

wrote:

> This "search" mentality has permeated many things, newsgroups, mailing lists
> and web forums.
>
> Its unfortunate, I am of the same opinion, if all the questions have been
> answered then why have the group/forum/list.
>
> I agree that if you post here that being told to "google" defeats the purpose of
> the group. I could google it, but the POINT is to get a recipe that some one has
> tried or tried several and found to work or fine tuned a little to perfection.
> Same goes for any myriad of topics. I've come to the group/list/forum to get
> answers from some one who has dealt with the topic before.
>
> On the lists that I operate theres a simple policy.... "No question is stupid,
> and no question to small to ask." Groups/lists/forums have a transient nature
> and people come and go. Some questions are going to get asked over and over,
> such is the nature of the beast. If it annoys you move on to the next
> topic/post. Any one posting to "search archives/google" etc. is advised this is
> not the policy of this list, and to either provide a reponse to the message or
> move along to a topic which they can assist with.

Thank you for your reply. You've said exactly what I too feel is true.

I would add that if one hasn't anything to say that will answer the OP,
then the best pratice is to just skip over the post and continue your
merry way.

To write a post that does nothing but criticize is non-productive and
will more than likely generate a flaming war such as several responces
in this thread have done.

Basically, it follows what most adults already know; "If you have
nothing to say, keep quiet."

Talk2Me > wrote:

>On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:33:29 GMT, "~xy~"
> wrote:
>
>>> rude
>>> childishness
>>> repeated
>>
>>You've certainly served up your share...
>><no need to quote>
>>
>
>You'll notice that I only did so when attacked.

Umm... No. When you didn't get the answers you wanted - you came out
swinging. Like many nowadays, you cannot distinquish between an
attack and an answer you don't like.

That being said, this is my last reply - your amusement value has
dropped below the effort required to enter a reply.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

Derek Lyons wrote:
> Talk2Me > wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:33:29 GMT, "~xy~"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> rude
> >>> childishness
> >>> repeated
> >>
> >>You've certainly served up your share...
> >><no need to quote>
> >>
> >
> >You'll notice that I only did so when attacked.
>
> Umm... No. When you didn't get the answers you wanted - you came out
> swinging. Like many nowadays, you cannot distinquish between an
> attack and an answer you don't like.
>
> That being said, this is my last reply - your amusement value has
> dropped below the effort required to enter a reply.

Anyone stupid enough to use a "sound" at the beginning of a written
sentence is too stupid to listen to anyway.

Go back to sleep moron and next time just learn to keep your big mouth
shut.

Norman Leonski wrote:

> Basically, it follows what most adults already know; "If you have
> nothing to say, keep quiet."

Oh, hush up now, won't you, Norman?

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy