Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?

I'm thinking of blueberry filling....

Norman Leonski wrote:
> Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
>
> I'm thinking of blueberry filling....

Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.

N.

Nancy2 wrote:
> Norman Leonski wrote:
> > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> >
> > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
>
> Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
>
> N.

So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
recipes, no recipes of your own.

Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".

Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?

Norman Leonski wrote:

> So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> recipes, no recipes of your own.
>
> Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
>
> Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
>
Is your google finger broken? YOU can't do a search for jelly roll
recipes on your own?

"Norman Leonski" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Nancy2 wrote:
>> Norman Leonski wrote:
>> > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
>> > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
>> >
>> > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
>>
>> Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
>> like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
>> again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
>>
>> N.
>
> So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> recipes, no recipes of your own.
>
> Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
>
> Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a
> wise-crack,
> why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in
> print?

Once you have the name, your a large step ahead. You can search for
recipes, with a name. If this post of mine is not to your liking, please
feel free to ignore it.

Norman Leonski wrote:
> Nancy2 wrote:
> > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> >
> > Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> > like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> > again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
> >
> > N.
>
> So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> recipes, no recipes of your own.

Well, hmmm, it sounded like you didn't know what to search for. I'm
not a search engine; my favorite recipes come from vintage Better Homes
& Gardens books - I see no need to drag out my book and type in a
recipe when you can Google for one yourself. I don't understand the
almost universal need for people to say, "I don't want one from the
web; I want one YOU recommend." Actually, you can go to many websites
(Food Network, Epicurious, MarthaStewart, etc.) and find recipes that
will always give you a great result. I've never had a bad experience
using a recipe from the web. I gave you the term to search for --
what they are called. The "jelly roll pan" comment was made because I
didn't think about the common name we give those 10" x 15" pans until
right then.

The technique for JRs is the only tricky thing - the cake is a type of
sponge cake - you have to make sure it will come out of the pan easily
(in one piece) immediately when you take it out of the oven - usually
you're instructed to lay it on a cloth dishtowel sprinkled lightly with
powdered sugar, and then roll it up, starting at a long side, along
with the towel - then it cools, then you unroll it, remove the towel,
spread your fruit (or whatever) filling on it, roll it back up, chill
it and then slice it and serve it.

Too bad you're all hung up on someone else's perceived failing instead
of using your time productively to find a recipe. Good luck with that
attitude - I, myself, have never found it very effective.

N.

On 22 Jun 2006 06:35:35 -0700, Norman Leonski wrote:
>
> Nancy2 wrote:
> > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> >
> > Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> > like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> > again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
> >
> > N.
>
> So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> recipes, no recipes of your own.
>
> Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
>
> Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?

That wasn't a wise crack in any way, shape or form. It was useful
information, if you knew what to do with it. You'd make more headway
here if you googled for a recipe and asked for further instructions
about how to make mini-jellyrolls instead of blubbering about the lack
of a recipe.

I want to know if the cake is cut horizontally before rolling because
it seems like a mini would be too thick w/o doing that first.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

sf wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2006 06:35:35 -0700, Norman Leonski wrote:
> >
> > Nancy2 wrote:
> > > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > > > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > > > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> > >
> > > Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> > > like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> > > again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
> > >
> > > N.
> >
> > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > recipes, no recipes of your own.
> >
> > Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
> >
> > Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> > why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
>
> That wasn't a wise crack in any way, shape or form. It was useful
> information, if you knew what to do with it. You'd make more headway
> here if you googled for a recipe and asked for further instructions
> about how to make mini-jellyrolls instead of blubbering about the lack
> of a recipe.
>
> I want to know if the cake is cut horizontally before rolling because
> it seems like a mini would be too thick w/o doing that first.
> --
I dunno - I've never made a "mini" (I'm assuming he means something
like a HoHo, only with a vanilla sponge cake and jelly) - I would think
the cake itself would have to be substantially thinner - like half the
thickness of a regular jelly roll - experimentation is never a bad
thing with sweets. ;-) I'd probably cut the recipe in half and see
what I thought about spreading it in a 10" x 15" pan - if it didn't
look like enough batter, I'd move down to a 9 x 13 loaf pan. The
baking time would obviously have to be decreased - maybe by half, at
least - if using half the batter in the big pan. If you experiment,
call me, I'll eat the rejects ;-)

N.

Goomba38 wrote:
> Norman Leonski wrote:
>
> > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > recipes, no recipes of your own.
> >
> > Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
> >
> > Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> > why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
> >
> Is your google finger broken? YOU can't do a search for jelly roll
> recipes on your own?

You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?

Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?

You can't get a recipe here.
You're told rudely by several people to basically shove off and find it
myself.
More wise-ass remarks like a 5 year old retarded kid "Is your finger
broken?"

I was searching for a recipe when I asked here.

Didn't do me much good did it?

Nancy2 wrote:
> Norman Leonski wrote:
> > Nancy2 wrote:
> > > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > > > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > > > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> > >
> > > Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> > > like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> > > again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
> > >
> > > N.
> >
> > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > recipes, no recipes of your own.
>
> Well, hmmm, it sounded like you didn't know what to search for. I'm
> not a search engine;

I wasn't trying to treat you as if you were one.

> my favorite recipes come from vintage Better Homes
> & Gardens books - I see no need to drag out my book and type in a
> recipe when you can Google for one yourself. I don't understand the
> almost universal need for people to say, "I don't want one from the
> web; I want one YOU recommend."

Then let me explain it to you. I've been using the web since long
before it started using a GUI, (Graphic User Interface, ie: Windows).

I can find a thousand Jelly-Roll recipes on the web in about 50
differenct recipe programs that have been passed around, cut, pasted,
copied incorrectly and posted by idiots.

I was after one that was homemade, tested by the person I was speaking
to and not missing half of the information necessary to make it
properly. I've found I'm in the wrong place for that. You people just
want to make smart-ass remarks and tell someone to go somewhere else to
find something. What exactly is it you do here?

> Too bad you're all hung up on someone else's perceived failing instead
> of using your time productively to find a recipe. Good luck with that
> attitude - I, myself, have never found it very effective.

I have a very healthy attitude for dealing with people who are not
helpful. I tell them so.

It's obvious that you indeed seem to find YOUR attitude invisable. It's
not. You have a smart mouth on you.

I, myself have found that it will cause you more grief than had you
helped in the first place by typing in your favorite recipe.

Enjoy your little group of whatever it is. It's sure not a helpful
cooking group.

sf wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2006 06:35:35 -0700, Norman Leonski wrote:
> >
> > Nancy2 wrote:
> > > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > > > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > > > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> > >
> > > Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
> > > like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
> > > again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
> > >
> > > N.
> >
> > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > recipes, no recipes of your own.
> >
> > Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
> >
> > Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> > why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
>
> That wasn't a wise crack in any way, shape or form. It was useful
> information, if you knew what to do with it. You'd make more headway
> here if you googled for a recipe and asked for further instructions
> about how to make mini-jellyrolls instead of blubbering about the lack
> of a recipe.

Another smart ass. The only blubbering is what you're doing. You whiner.

wrote:

> Would it be better if she came to your house and made one for you
> herself instead?

No, it would please me more if you rolled one up and put it where the
sun doesn't shine, idiot.

It was nice to talk to you however. Please do come by the next time you
can't keep your idiot mouth shut.

Mordechai Housman wrote:

> Once you have the name, your a large step ahead. You can search for
> recipes, with a name.

I was searching in a group called "rec.food.cooking" for a recipe. Most
people would think a recipe would be found in a group named that.
Instead, I seem to have wandered into a group named
"alt.smartasses.net".

> If this post of mine is not to your liking, please
> feel free to ignore it.

As you could have with mine instead of chiming in with your additional
smartass remarks.

"Norman Leonski" > wrote

> You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
>
> Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
> for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?

I can tell you one thing, it's not rec.we'reheretoserveyour.nastyself.

With your attitude, why should anyone stop to key in a recipe?
Who knows if anyone here ever even made little rollups. Surely you
can find a baking newsgroup. Or a moderated group where no one
hurts your feelings.

nancy

On 22 Jun 2006 12:32:09 -0700, Norman Leonski wrote:
>
> Another smart ass. The only blubbering is what you're doing. You whiner.

I have a better idea for you. Welcome to my kill file.

buh bye bubba

--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

"Norman Leonski" > wrote:

>Then let me explain it to you. I've been using the web since long
>before it started using a GUI, (Graphic User Interface, ie: Windows).

That's not very impressive as that period was about .025 seconds long.

I find it much more likely that you are a johhny-come-lately braggart,
who like most folk of small minds confuse the web and the internet.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

Norman Leonski wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote:
> > Norman Leonski wrote:
> >
> > > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > > recipes, no recipes of your own.
> > >
> > > Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
> > >
> > > Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> > > why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
> > >
> > Is your google finger broken? YOU can't do a search for jelly roll
> > recipes on your own?
>
> You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
>
> Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
> for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?
>
> You can't get a recipe here.
> You're told rudely by several people to basically shove off and find it
> myself.
> More wise-ass remarks like a 5 year old retarded kid "Is your finger
> broken?"
>
> I was searching for a recipe when I asked here.
>
> Didn't do me much good did it?

I will agree that some people here do have an atitude problem when it
comes to people asking for recipes here but have you ever thought that
maybe no one here has ever made a jelly roll recipe and can't make any
recommendations? Nancy2 gave you a place to start. At least now you
know what they're called. Maybe if you did a search and found a
couple recipes you could post them here and ask people's opinions as to
which one they think sounds better.

Oh pshaw, on Thu 22 Jun 2006 06:35:35a, Norman Leonski meant to say...

>
> Nancy2 wrote:
>> Norman Leonski wrote:
>> > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
>> > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
>> >
>> > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
>>
>> Just find a recipe for jelly roll .... you can make them any size you
>> like - easy to make a jelly-roll pan size (wow, there's that name
>> again!) and cut them into 4-6 jellyrolls for further slicing.
>>
>> N.
>
> So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> recipes, no recipes of your own.
>
> Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
>
> Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?

You really are a card carrying asshole, aren't you?

--
Wayne Boatwright @¿@¬
_____________________

"Norman Leonski" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
>
> I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
>
I have a chocolate one. I'm sure there are ones for vanilla too.

http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid...n&q=SWISS+ROLL

MoM

wrote:
> Norman Leonski wrote:
> > Goomba38 wrote:
> > > Norman Leonski wrote:
> > >
> > > > So you tell me they are called "Jelly-Rolls" and you offer no links to
> > > > recipes, no recipes of your own.
> > > >
> > > > Just a wise-crack "(wow, there's that name again!)".
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for almost nothing. If you have nothing to say but a wise-crack,
> > > > why not just keep quiet? Or do you just like to see your name in print?
> > > >
> > > Is your google finger broken? YOU can't do a search for jelly roll
> > > recipes on your own?
> >
> > You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
> >
> > Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
> > for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?
> >
> > You can't get a recipe here.
> > You're told rudely by several people to basically shove off and find it
> > myself.
> > More wise-ass remarks like a 5 year old retarded kid "Is your finger
> > broken?"
> >
> > I was searching for a recipe when I asked here.
> >
> > Didn't do me much good did it?
>
> I will agree that some people here do have an atitude problem when it
> comes to people asking for recipes here but have you ever thought that
> maybe no one here has ever made a jelly roll recipe and can't make any
> recommendations? Nancy2 gave you a place to start. At least now you
> know what they're called. Maybe if you did a search and found a
> couple recipes you could post them here and ask people's opinions as to
> which one they think sounds better.

Thank you for your kind reponce. It's nice to hear someone speak
without stooping to the levels I've seen so far. I'll look around and
if I do find a good recipe for them I'd be more than happy to share it
in this cooking group.

Derek Lyons wrote:
> "Norman Leonski" > wrote:
>
> >Then let me explain it to you. I've been using the web since long
> >before it started using a GUI, (Graphic User Interface, ie: Windows).
>
> That's not very impressive as that period was about .025 seconds long.
>
> I find it much more likely that you are a johhny-come-lately braggart,
> who like most folk of small minds confuse the web and the internet.

Well let's see. I was in the thread first. You were last. I'd say that
makes you a "Johnny smartass come lately idiot.

You stupid asshole, the web is nothing but an exression for part of
what the Internet does. I was programming when you were still crapping
in three cornered pants.

Hahahahahahahaahaha. The assholes sure come crawing out fast around
here.

sf wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2006 12:32:09 -0700, Norman Leonski wrote:
> >
> > Another smart ass. The only blubbering is what you're doing. You whiner.
>
> I have a better idea for you. Welcome to my kill file.
>
> buh bye bubba

Very good. At least you're smart enough to know one exists.

Quit whining and use it.

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> You really are a card carrying asshole, aren't you?

No, I haven't recieved mine yet. I have to continue using your card.

It seems that you're an exexutive member, "Senior" asshole.

Now, slither back under your rock and shut the **** up.

MoM wrote:
> "Norman Leonski" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
> > jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?
> >
> > I'm thinking of blueberry filling....
> >
> I have a chocolate one. I'm sure there are ones for vanilla too.
>
> http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid...n&q=SWISS+ROLL
>
> MoM

Thank you "MoM"! You did it! Of all the choices you provided, I liked
"http://www.ellenskitchen.com/recipebox/swissrol.html" this one best.
Knowing the British and French names for them also helped a lot.

Thank you so much! I'll let you know how my first attempt comes out.

Nancy Young wrote:
> "Norman Leonski" > wrote
>
> > You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
> >
> > Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
> > for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?
>
> I can tell you one thing, it's not rec.we'reheretoserveyour.nastyself.

No, I can see that you're here to do nothing but pat your ignorant
little self on the back for doing nothing but being a smartass.

>
> With your attitude, why should anyone stop to key in a recipe?

There! You see? No attitude was given. All I did was ask for a recipe
or instruction from someone who has already done it.

You and your little minded pals came along and started with all the
bullshit. You obviously wouldn't part with one of your precious recipes
unless begged for it. Just where in the hell do you think you are? In a
car repair group? It's a ****ing cooking group, you moron. A normal
person would know recipes should be a common thing here.

> Who knows if anyone here ever even made little rollups.

How about if you put your little tin cap on and tune in later and tell
me.

> Surely you
> can find a baking newsgroup.

This is a COOKING NEWSGROUP, you retarded offspring of a mountain goat.
Do you think everyone should go to a "Sausage" newsgroup to get a
suasage recipe or maybe an "Icing" newsgroup to get an icing recipe for
a flat cake?

Turn your brain back on and try to say something intelligent.

>Or a moderated group where no one
> hurts your feelings.

You haven't hurt anything of mine, little minded one. You've shown me
that all the idiots really are spread around the Usenet groups pretty
good. As a confirmed idiot, you've found a home in a COOKING GROUP
where recipes seem to be forbidden!

Hahahahahahaaha, you dunce!

Oh pshaw, on Fri 23 Jun 2006 03:47:32a, Norman Leonski meant to say...

>
> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> You really are a card carrying asshole, aren't you?
>
> No, I haven't recieved mine yet. I have to continue using your card.
>
> It seems that you're an exexutive member, "Senior" asshole.
>
> Now, slither back under your rock and shut the **** up.

Ah, another "newbie" ****off ripe for plonking.

PLONK!

--
Wayne Boatwright @¿@¬
_____________________

Norman Leonski wrote:
> Nancy Young wrote:
>> "Norman Leonski" > wrote
>>
>>> You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
>>>
>>> Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
>>> for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?
>> I can tell you one thing, it's not rec.we'reheretoserveyour.nastyself.
>
> No, I can see that you're here to do nothing but pat your ignorant
> little self on the back for doing nothing but being a smartass.
>
>> With your attitude, why should anyone stop to key in a recipe?
>
> There! You see? No attitude was given. All I did was ask for a recipe
> or instruction from someone who has already done it.
>
actually, it sounded to me as if you didn't know the name of what you
were looking for and everyone suggesting "jelly rolls" was the exact
answer you sought.

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> Ah, another "newbie" ****off ripe for plonking.
>
> PLONK!

Oh, am I supposed to feel punished because I won't be hearing from your
idiot self any more?

If you'd kept your stupid mouth shut in the first place, you wouldn't
be adding to your massive "killfile" now. I can imagine that not many
people want to stay in contact with you anyway.

In article om>,
"Norman Leonski" > wrote:

> Mordechai Housman wrote:
>
> > Once you have the name, your a large step ahead. You can search for
> > recipes, with a name.
>
> I was searching in a group called "rec.food.cooking" for a recipe. Most
> people would think a recipe would be found in a group named that.

rec.food.recipes is the place to post if you're looking for a recipe.
"rec.food.cooking" is the 'common name' for a newsgroup that *used to
be* about *cooking* (now it's about the health care system, computer
problems, jokes for when you're feeling lousy, and the importance of
regular check-ups <toothbrushing techniques can't be far behind>) --
it's not necessarily about *recipes* for dishes.

Alternatively, you might ask at rec.food.baking.

{ Exported from MasterCook Mac }

Jelly Roll

Recipe By: Posted to rec.food.cooking by Barb Schaller, 6/23/2006
Serving Size: 12
Preparation Time: 0:00
Categories: Cakes/Cake Desserts

Amount Measure Ingredient Preparation Method
3/4 cup sugar
4 egg yolks
1 tsp. vanilla
3/4 cup cake flour
3/4 tsp. baking powder
4 egg whites
1/2 cup finely chopped nuts
1/2 cup jelly (beaten with a fork to soften and loosen it up for
easier spreading)

Line a 10x15" jelly roll pan with parchment paper. Preheat oven to 375
degrees. Sift sugar. Beat egg yolks until light, add the sugar
gradually. Beat until creamy. Add vanilla. Sift cake flour before
measuring; re-sift with baking powder. add flour gradually to egg
mixture, beat until smooth. Whip egg whites until stiff, fold them into
cake batter with nuts. Pour and spread batter into prepared pan. Bake
about 13 minutes; turn out onto towel dusted with powdered sugar; roll
up and cool. When cold, spread with at least 1/2 cup jelly and re-roll.
--
-Barb
<http://jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 6-23-2006; In The Cool, Cool of
the Evening.
"If it's not worth doing to excess, it's not worth doing at all."

Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> > I was searching in a group called "rec.food.cooking" for a recipe. Most
> > people would think a recipe would be found in a group named that.
>
> rec.food.recipes is the place to post if you're looking for a recipe.
> "rec.food.cooking" is the 'common name' for a newsgroup that *used to
> be* about *cooking* (now it's about the health care system, computer
> problems, jokes for when you're feeling lousy, and the importance of
> regular check-ups <toothbrushing techniques can't be far behind>) --
> it's not necessarily about *recipes* for dishes.
>
> Alternatively, you might ask at rec.food.baking.
>
> { Exported from MasterCook Mac }
>
> Jelly Roll

Thank you Melba! That's a quick, simple recipe. Thank you also for the
helpful links.

Nancy2 wrote:

> Well, actually, she googled to find it, which you turned your nose up
> at - and it sounds from the ingredients that it will make a
> regular-sized jelly roll, and won't be a thin enough batter for a
> "mini" size.

Such negitivity! I didn't turn up my nose at anything. I was simply
flabergasted that no one offered a recipe on a cooking site. I'm old
fashioned I guess. If someone came into my parents home and mentioned
that they were curious about some sort of food, they would have left
with a hand written copy of my moms favorite one! She had thosands of
recipes.

To get told to "Google" something is basically being told to look
elsewhere. You're too busy to type a recipe.

We obviously went to different schools.

> However, go for it - the rejects will taste good, in any
> event.
>
> N.

Yes, that is the best difference between wood working and cooking.......

"Norman Leonski" > wrote:
>
>Nancy2 wrote:
>
>> Well, actually, she googled to find it, which you turned your nose up
>> at - and it sounds from the ingredients that it will make a
>> regular-sized jelly roll, and won't be a thin enough batter for a
>> "mini" size.
>
>Such negitivity! I didn't turn up my nose at anything. I was simply
>flabergasted that no one offered a recipe on a cooking site.

A clue for you oh wise and experienced user of the web and the net (at
least one soi-disant)... This isn't a site - it's a group.

>I'm old fashioned I guess. If someone came into my parents home and
>mentioned that they were curious about some sort of food, they would
>have left with a hand written copy of my moms favorite one! She had
>thosands of recipes.

No, you are an ignorant bonehead who entered here with a preconcieved
notion as to how we are 'supposed' to behave, and the unsupported
assumption that we sit around with little to do but provide recipies
for random strangers.

>To get told to "Google" something is basically being told to look
>elsewhere. You're too busy to type a recipe.

No, it's the very definition of "give a man a fish/teach a man to
fish".

>We obviously went to different schools.

Yes, mine taught manners.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:26:02 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote:

>Norman Leonski wrote:
>> Nancy Young wrote:
>>> "Norman Leonski" > wrote
>>>
>>>> You just couldn't pass up the chance to say something could you?
>>>>
>>>> Let's see, if I just Google for it, then what exactly is this group
>>>> for? rec.food.cooking, what in the world could one do here?
>>> I can tell you one thing, it's not rec.we'reheretoserveyour.nastyself.
>>
>> No, I can see that you're here to do nothing but pat your ignorant
>> little self on the back for doing nothing but being a smartass.
>>
>>> With your attitude, why should anyone stop to key in a recipe?
>>
>> There! You see? No attitude was given. All I did was ask for a recipe
>> or instruction from someone who has already done it.
>>
>actually, it sounded to me as if you didn't know the name of what you
>were looking for and everyone suggesting "jelly rolls" was the exact
>answer you sought.

Then you would be mistaken. Let me refresh your memory:

"Everyone has seen those yummy little cakes that have the spiraling
jelly in them. How would those be made? Can they be made at home?"

I didn't ask what they were called even once. I did however ask how
they are made.

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:30:44 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

>"Norman Leonski" > wrote:
>>
>>Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>>> Well, actually, she googled to find it, which you turned your nose up
>>> at - and it sounds from the ingredients that it will make a
>>> regular-sized jelly roll, and won't be a thin enough batter for a
>>> "mini" size.
>>
>>Such negitivity! I didn't turn up my nose at anything. I was simply
>>flabergasted that no one offered a recipe on a cooking site.
>
>A clue for you oh wise and experienced user of the web and the net (at
>least one soi-disant)... This isn't a site - it's a group.
>
>>I'm old fashioned I guess. If someone came into my parents home and
>>mentioned that they were curious about some sort of food, they would
>>have left with a hand written copy of my moms favorite one! She had
>>thosands of recipes.
>
>No, you are an ignorant bonehead

So much better than to be as you are. You're an asshole. Pure and
simple. No doubt about it. No misconceptions. You're a simple asshole.

>who entered here with a preconcieved
>notion as to how we are 'supposed' to behave, and the unsupported
>assumption that we sit around with little to do but provide recipies
>for random strangers.

Listen idiot, you actually DO sound like you've got nothing better to
do. You want to trade shots with me? No problem. You think you speak
for some "WE" that you refer to? You don't. You speak for your own
small minded self.

>
>>To get told to "Google" something is basically being told to look
>>elsewhere. You're too busy to type a recipe.
>
>No, it's the very definition of "give a man a fish/teach a man to
>fish".

No, idiot, it's exactly as I said.
>
>>We obviously went to different schools.
>
>Yes, mine taught manners.

No, I don't think you passed the course then. You are a rude asshole.
You've probably been that way your entire life.

Mind your own business asshole. If you don't like my posts, then put
me in one of your filters. Otherwise, why don't you just shut the ****
up?

Did you understand that?

Talk2Me > wrote:

>Listen idiot, you actually DO sound like you've got nothing better to
>do.

Right. That's why I answer every day or so. You truly do have a self
inflated sense of your own place in the universe.

>You want to trade shots with me? No problem. You think you speak
>for some "WE" that you refer to? You don't. You speak for your own
>small minded self.

Hmm... Given the preponderance of replies from various members of
this group match my own - I'd question that conclusion myself. But
that would require the capacity for abstract thought and the ability
to consider things that might not reflect gracefully upon oneself.
(The lack of the latter is probably what lead you to snip the part
where I deflated your claim about being a longtime and clueful user of
the 'net. Either that, or it's because I used a big word and it was
too much trouble to Google it and discover it's meaning.)

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:40:51 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

>Talk2Me > wrote:
>
>>Listen idiot, you actually DO sound like you've got nothing better to
>>do.
>
>Right. That's why I answer every day or so. You truly do have a self
>inflated sense of your own place in the universe.
>
>>You want to trade shots with me? No problem. You think you speak
>>for some "WE" that you refer to? You don't. You speak for your own
>>small minded self.
>
>Hmm... Given the preponderance of replies from various members of
>this group match my own - I'd question that conclusion myself. But
>that would require the capacity for abstract thought and the ability
>to consider things that might not reflect gracefully upon oneself.
>(The lack of the latter is probably what lead you to snip the part
>where I deflated your claim about being a longtime and clueful user of
>the 'net. Either that, or it's because I used a big word and it was
>too much trouble to Google it and discover it's meaning.)

Is that the best you can do? I've heard ****ed off choirboys make more
of a statement.

You think you speak for someone else? What an ego! You're an over
inflated piece of shit, Sherlock.

You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa

What a ****ing clown you are!

Why don't you go to the nearest *** bar and find yourself some relief?

See if you can find someone you DON'T know.

> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>
> What a ****ing clown you are!

pot,
kettle,
black

"~xy~" > wrote

>> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
>> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>>
>> What a ****ing clown you are!
>
> pot,
> kettle,
> black

I did notice that jelly roll rhymes with troll.

nancy

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:42:51 GMT, "~xy~"
> wrote:

>> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
>> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>>
>> What a ****ing clown you are!
>
>pot,
>kettle,
>black
>

This is a very funny place.

When you come here you get:

rude
childishness
repeated

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:20:28 -0400, "Nancy Young"
> wrote:

>
>"~xy~" > wrote
>
>>> You're nobody. You're nothing. You post snide remarks on Usenet in a
>>> ****ing cooking group. Hhaahahahahahaahahahaa
>>>
>>> What a ****ing clown you are!
>>
>> pot,
>> kettle,
>> black
>
>I did notice that jelly roll rhymes with troll.
>
>nancy
>

Yes, and bitch rhymes with itch. Keep trying nancy. One day you'll
have a complete thought.