..
arminius wrote:
> "Don Gabacho" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> Border experiences surge in child smuggling
>
> BY BRITTNEY BOOTH
> The Monitor
>
> REYNOSA - July 23, 2006 - Juana de Miguel Pasquel left her
> parents' home in late April, headed to Arkansas, where an uncle
> promised her work.
>
> The petite 12-year-old from the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, near the
> border of Belize, didn't think much of her journey.
>
> That is, until eight days after it began, when it ended somewhere in
> McAllen and she was suddenly abandoned by her smuggler.
>
> "The driver left me alone in the car," she said in Spanish during a
> recent stay at a children's shelter in Reynosa, where she awaited her
> return home.
>
> To many Mexican children like Juana, who are making their way north to
> find work or meet their family members, the Rio Grande is merely a
> river to pass.
>
> "Nada mas," Juana said.
>
> But the highly polarized immigration debate on this side of Rio Grande
> has, in recent months, prompted a surge in children and teens illegally
> smuggled across the border.
>
> It's a particularly delicate situation for U.S. Customs and Border
> Protection agents, who reported nearly 100 cases of child smuggling at
> the Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge alone, between November and
> March.
>
> "I would say the numbers (of children being smuggled) have
> increased," said local Customs spokesman Felix Garza.
>
> Smuggled minors are turned over to the Mexican immigration agency and
> the Mexican Consulate Office, which handles the repatriation process.
> Most are from the interior of Tamaulipas, the Mexican state bordering
> Hidalgo County, or the Mexican states of Guanajuato, Guerrero or
> Michoacan and San Luis Potosi, said Sandra Mendoza, spokeswoman for the
> Mexican Consulate's office in McAllen.
>
> In the first three months of 2006, the Mexican consulate's office saw
> 464 cases of Mexican minors detained at the port of entry or inside the
> United States, in either Hidalgo, Starr or Brooks counties. The number
> reflects more than half of the 850 detained during the entire year of
> 2005, Mendoza said.
>
> "It's a little high," she said.
>
> Agents typically find an adult driver who claims the children in their
> car as their own and who can usually produce documents, such as an
> authentic birth certificate. But while the age and the sex on the birth
> certificate may match the child, it's up to Customs agents to detect
> whether the child is who the adult says they are.
>
> Guided by their law enforcement training, agents question the child to
> decide whether to refer the car for secondary questioning.
>
> "It does require a lot of skill and focus," Garza said. "We only
> have so many seconds to make quick decisions."
>
> Often, the smuggler is a relative of the children, bringing them over
> as "a favor," Garza said. The children's parents often have
> already illegally crossed, and the children are coming to meet them.
> Older teens come over to find work or to go to school here.
>
> Rarely do smugglers hide children.
>
> Most of the time, they pretend "to be one big happy family," Garza
> said.
>
> The adults responsible for smuggling the children are arrested and
> charged with federal smuggling charges.
>
> After Juana, the young teen from Quintana Roo, was caught, she was
> turned over to the Desarollo Integral de Familia. The Mexican federal
> agency is comparable to the Department of Health and Human Services and
> is in charge of returning children caught illegally crossing the border
> to their homes.
>
> Juana spent two weeks at the agency's Centro de Atención a Menores
> Migrantes y Repatriados in Reynosa, a shelter for youth migrating
> through Mexico or who have been caught in the United States and
> returned to Mexico. From there, she was returned to her home state and
> by late May was back at home with her parents.
>
> The shelter's numbers echo the influx seen by U.S. and Mexican
> agencies.
>
> In April and May, the center handled more than 200 cases of Mexican
> children either caught trying to illegally cross alone or with
> smugglers, while 823 children were repatriated to the center in 2005,
> said the center's director, Fernando Javier Lopez Garcia.
>
> And while Juana was not successful in her first attempt to cross, she
> said she plans to try again because she wants to see what the United
> States is like.
>
> "I went to work for a few months," said Juana, not even aware of
> the work she would be doing. "I was going to come back to my
> parents."
>
> This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border was
> protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>
> Hank
>
> http://www.numbersusa.com/ Numbers USA

"Don Gabacho" > wrote in message
ps.com...
Border experiences surge in child smuggling

BY BRITTNEY BOOTH
The Monitor

REYNOSA - July 23, 2006 - Juana de Miguel Pasquel left her
parents' home in late April, headed to Arkansas, where an uncle
promised her work.

The petite 12-year-old from the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, near the
border of Belize, didn't think much of her journey.

That is, until eight days after it began, when it ended somewhere in
McAllen and she was suddenly abandoned by her smuggler.

"The driver left me alone in the car," she said in Spanish during a
recent stay at a children's shelter in Reynosa, where she awaited her
return home.

To many Mexican children like Juana, who are making their way north to
find work or meet their family members, the Rio Grande is merely a
river to pass.

"Nada mas," Juana said.

But the highly polarized immigration debate on this side of Rio Grande
has, in recent months, prompted a surge in children and teens illegally
smuggled across the border.

It's a particularly delicate situation for U.S. Customs and Border
Protection agents, who reported nearly 100 cases of child smuggling at
the Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge alone, between November and
March.

"I would say the numbers (of children being smuggled) have
increased," said local Customs spokesman Felix Garza.

Smuggled minors are turned over to the Mexican immigration agency and
the Mexican Consulate Office, which handles the repatriation process.
Most are from the interior of Tamaulipas, the Mexican state bordering
Hidalgo County, or the Mexican states of Guanajuato, Guerrero or
Michoacan and San Luis Potosi, said Sandra Mendoza, spokeswoman for the
Mexican Consulate's office in McAllen.

In the first three months of 2006, the Mexican consulate's office saw
464 cases of Mexican minors detained at the port of entry or inside the
United States, in either Hidalgo, Starr or Brooks counties. The number
reflects more than half of the 850 detained during the entire year of
2005, Mendoza said.

"It's a little high," she said.

Agents typically find an adult driver who claims the children in their
car as their own and who can usually produce documents, such as an
authentic birth certificate. But while the age and the sex on the birth
certificate may match the child, it's up to Customs agents to detect
whether the child is who the adult says they are.

Guided by their law enforcement training, agents question the child to
decide whether to refer the car for secondary questioning.

"It does require a lot of skill and focus," Garza said. "We only
have so many seconds to make quick decisions."

Often, the smuggler is a relative of the children, bringing them over
as "a favor," Garza said. The children's parents often have
already illegally crossed, and the children are coming to meet them.
Older teens come over to find work or to go to school here.

Rarely do smugglers hide children.

Most of the time, they pretend "to be one big happy family," Garza
said.

The adults responsible for smuggling the children are arrested and
charged with federal smuggling charges.

After Juana, the young teen from Quintana Roo, was caught, she was
turned over to the Desarollo Integral de Familia. The Mexican federal
agency is comparable to the Department of Health and Human Services and
is in charge of returning children caught illegally crossing the border
to their homes.

Juana spent two weeks at the agency's Centro de Atención a Menores
Migrantes y Repatriados in Reynosa, a shelter for youth migrating
through Mexico or who have been caught in the United States and
returned to Mexico. From there, she was returned to her home state and
by late May was back at home with her parents.

The shelter's numbers echo the influx seen by U.S. and Mexican
agencies.

In April and May, the center handled more than 200 cases of Mexican
children either caught trying to illegally cross alone or with
smugglers, while 823 children were repatriated to the center in 2005,
said the center's director, Fernando Javier Lopez Garcia.

And while Juana was not successful in her first attempt to cross, she
said she plans to try again because she wants to see what the United
States is like.

"I went to work for a few months," said Juana, not even aware of
the work she would be doing. "I was going to come back to my
parents."

This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border was
protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.

Hank

http://www.numbersusa.com/ Numbers USA

arminius wrote:
> "Don Gabacho" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> Border experiences surge in child smuggling
>
> BY BRITTNEY BOOTH
> The Monitor
>
I am truly sorry to learn of children being used in this fashion. I
had not heard of it before. What a difficult job our border patrol
agents have!

> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
> > wrote:
>
> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border was
> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>
> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire them
> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the rich
> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer. Go
> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.

That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?

--
In retrospect, the real victims of Fox News weren't the liberals it
attacked but the conservatives who believed it. -- NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
> wrote:
>
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>> >was
>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>
>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>> them
>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the rich
>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer. Go
>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>
>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>
>
> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
> and racists you address.
>
> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
> cooking, doesn't it?

I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.

Jim

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
>> wrote:
>>
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>>> >was
>>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>>
>>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>>> them
>>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the rich
>>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer. Go
>>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>>
>>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>>
>>
>> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
>> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
>> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
>> and racists you address.
>>
>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>> cooking, doesn't it?
>
>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>
>Jim

So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
> wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>
>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
>>> wrote:
>>>
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>>>> >was
>>>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>>>> them
>>>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the rich
>>>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer. Go
>>>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>>>
>>>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
>>> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
>>> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
>>> and racists you address.
>>>
>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>
>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>
>>Jim
>
>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?

Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.


jim

"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
> > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>
>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>>>>> >was
>>>>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>>>>> them
>>>>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the
>>>>>> rich
>>>>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer.
>>>>>> Go
>>>>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>>>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>>>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>>>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
>>>> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
>>>> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
>>>> and racists you address.
>>>>
>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>
>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>
>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>
> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.

What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?

Jim

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:52:37 -0700, ensenadajim
> wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>
>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>>>>> >was
>>>>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>>>>> them
>>>>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the rich
>>>>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer. Go
>>>>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>>>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>>>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>>>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
>>>> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
>>>> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
>>>> and racists you address.
>>>>
>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>
>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>
>>>Jim
>>
>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>
>Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>
>
>jim
>
<G>

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:48 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:03:03 -0700, (Paul Mitchum)
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:50:22 -0700, "arminius" <richard
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >This would not be happening if the third-worlders thought our border
>>>>>>> >was
>>>>>>> >protected. They know the US Government has failed, hence they come.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nah, they come because they know they will get jobs, people will hire
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> and the government will do nothing to discourage business and the
>>>>>>> rich
>>>>>>> from hiring them. They punish the immigrant, but not the employer.
>>>>>>> Go
>>>>>>> after the illegal employers and watch illegal immigration dry up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's something I've never quite understood about the most radical
>>>>>>anti-immigrant folks: How can there possibly be such a blind spot that
>>>>>>they don't realize the immigrants are willing to risk dealing with
>>>>>>assholes like them in order to pursue economic prosperity?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm, do not denigrate assholes - last I heard, that muscle system has
>>>>> to be able to tell the difference in what is there and how to deal
>>>>> with it, liguid, solid, gas. That is definitely well above the bigots
>>>>> and racists you address.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>
>>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>>
>> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>
>What does that have to do with


STFU Clam asshole!

"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:48 -0700, "Clave"
> > wrote:
>
>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
om...

<...>

>>>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>>
>>>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>>>
>>> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>>
>>What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?
>>
>>Jim
>>
>
> Which is what I originally asked, but that went over your head.

What are you, retarded? Anyone with a room-temperature IQ can look up there
and see that I understood your ****y little meaning completely.

Jim

"Joseph Welch" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ensenadajim" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?
>
>> Which is what I originally asked, but that went over your head.
>
> That thing you felt whizzing past your left ear was a burst of irony.

I've yet to encounter a Topic Tightass capable of recognizing it.

Jim

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:57 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:48 -0700, "Clave"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
>>>>>>news:51p7c2lk6cubbdcu9f7ctpda07qekfp29s@4ax. com...
>
><...>
>
>>>>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>>>>
>>>> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>>>
>>>What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?
>>>
>>>Jim
>>>
>>
>> Which is what I originally asked, but that went over your head.
>
>What are you, retarded? Anyone with a room-temperature IQ can look up there
>and see that I understood your ****y little meaning completely.
>
>Jim
>

Further proof you misssed my point. Wanna keep on posting loser-ass
comments? Last word is yours (I always give morons the last word):


jim

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:57 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

>What are you, retarded?

Looking for a mate?

"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:57 -0700, "Clave"
> > wrote:
>
>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:48 -0700, "Clave"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:51p7c2lk6cubbdcu9f7ctpda07qekfp29s@4ax .com...
>>
>><...>
>>
>>>>>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>>>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>>>>
>>>>What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?
>>>
>>> Which is what I originally asked, but that went over your head.
>>
>>What are you, retarded? Anyone with a room-temperature IQ can look up
>>there and see that I understood your ****y little meaning completely.
>
> Further proof you misssed my point.

Further evidence of your obsessive-compulsive disorder, control freak.


> Wanna keep on posting loser-ass
> comments? Last word is yours (I always give morons the last word):

Oh, my heavens! The bad scary Usenet tightass says I'm a moron. However
will I deal?

*yawn*

Here's some news, Slappy -- you *ceded* the last word when you ran out of
things to say, something which, if you were really as smart as you think you
are, you'd have realized you'd done at *least* two posts ago.

You really, *truly* suck at this.

CYa.

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:51:58 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:57 -0700, "Clave"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:48 -0700, "Clave"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:39:22 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"ensenadajim" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:51p7c2lk6cubbdcu9f7ctpda07qekfp29s@4a x.com...
>>>
>>><...>
>>>
>>>>>>>>> And it shows more thought than your reply to a group about food and
>>>>>>>>> cooking, doesn't it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't know what's more irritating -- bigots or net nannies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So you're bothered by yourself, or the people who critique you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah, he's into child smuggling and likes to see it everywhere he goes.
>>>>>
>>>>>What does that have to do with food or cooking, asshole?
>>>>
>>>> Which is what I originally asked, but that went over your head.
>>>
>>>What are you, retarded? Anyone with a room-temperature IQ can look up
>>>there and see that I understood your ****y little meaning completely.
>>
>> Further proof you misssed my point.
>
>Further evidence of your obsessive-compulsive disorder, control freak.
>
>
>> Wanna keep on posting loser-ass
>> comments? Last word is yours (I always give morons the last word):
>
>Oh, my heavens! The bad scary Usenet tightass says I'm a moron. However
>will I deal?
>
>*yawn*
>
>Here's some news, Slappy -- you *ceded* the last word when you ran out of
>things to say, something which, if you were really as smart as you think you
>are, you'd have realized you'd done at *least* two posts ago.
>
>You really, *truly* suck at this.
>
>CYa.
>
A clammie slapdown?

I love to watch hos fight.

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:51:58 -0700, "Clave"
> wrote:

> your obsessive-compulsive disorder, control freak.

Pot/kettle/clammie.