Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() smokeyJoe wrote: > OP here. > Yup I screwed up royally and sincerly appologize. I hate spammers too > and > I wasn't intending it to be spam but I am involved with the site. I was > trying to get people's honest opinions of the product and the idea. > > I didn't try to say it's a great product, with a million links. I was > hoping to get people who have heard of it to pass on their objective > views, so I can make sugegstions where we need to improve or change the > product and or the marketing. > > Obviously I should have not tried to disguise who I was and again I > appologise. Well, you've been skewered, fried, broiled and roasted here. Crucifiction is next, no doubt. And I got some of the same for saying that it looked to me like your product was well designed in spite of your sales approach. Seems to me we've both been sufficiently punished for our sins, but my guess it that our detractors aren't done yet, and no amount of apologizing will save you. I, for one, appreciate your candor and accept your apology. Best of luck with some of the others here! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salgud wrote:
> Never did argue that, only the jump some of you made that the product > must be junk if the sales tecnique was disingenuous. But I think that > all went over your head. Again, *I* never did say anything about it being junk. If you reply to my posts, then you are addressing what I said, not what everyone else said. But I think that all went over your head. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salgud wrote:
> I guess if you can't read, much less comprehend, this would be your > reply. Gee, this from someone who completely screwed the pooch and misrepresented my postings due to an inability to keep track of who said what. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.food.cooking, jay > wrote:
> The thang is designed well ..for a shmuck who knows nothing about outdoor > cooking. Amen. -- A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. --Edward R. Murrow |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:17:13 -0700, salgud wrote:
> > smokeyJoe wrote: >> OP here. >> Yup I screwed up royally and sincerly appologize. > Well, you've been skewered, fried, broiled and roasted here. > Crucifiction is next, no doubt. And I got some of the same for saying > that it looked to me like your product was well designed in spite of > your sales approach. Seems to me we've both been sufficiently punished > for our sins, but my guess it that our detractors aren't done yet, and > no amount of apologizing will save you. I, for one, appreciate your > candor and accept your apology. Best of luck with some of the others > here! Engineers sometimes miss the forest for the trees. Anyone that starts to design a fire burning container and starts with a polymer plastic base needs to go back to engineering school. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > > Engineers sometimes miss the forest for the trees. Anyone that starts to > design a fire burning container and starts with a polymer plastic base > needs to go back to engineering school. Hey Jay. The polymer base is no longer. It is now a fully stainless steel mesh. The weight is the same, it is cool to the touch while cooking and a lot more sturdy than the plastic base. However I have to say, the plastic base served really well and in fact was 1 of time magazine's inventions of the year for 2001. I understand that there were a few issues where people removed the heat proof spacers between the chamber and the plastic, and this caused the case to crack. The stainless steel mesh base solved this problem. The idea for the polymer base was for safety and is part of what made it so unique. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Bugg wrote: > salgud wrote: > > > Never did argue that, only the jump some of you made that the product > > must be junk if the sales tecnique was disingenuous. But I think that > > all went over your head. > > Again, *I* never did say anything about it being junk. If you reply to my > posts, then you are addressing what I said, not what everyone else said. But > I think that all went over your head. > > -- > Dave > www.davebbq.com Like I said, I was replying to you and your buddy. Sorry if it's hard for me to tell all you **** folks apart! ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roasted Corn on the Cobb? | General Cooking | |||
Potato Cobb Salad | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Cobb Salad | Recipes | |||
Anone know the Cobb Grill? | Barbecue | |||
Ditalini Cobb Salad | Recipes (moderated) |