Walter Traprock wrote:

>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to mammoth:
>
>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>
I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from

In article >,
Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:

> Walter Traprock wrote:
>
> >did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
> >just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
> >meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
> >no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
> >by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to mammoth:
> >
> >"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
> >out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
> >for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
> >more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
> >
> I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from

An old girlfriend, perhaps?

bill van wrote:

>In article >,
> Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>
>
>>Walter Traprock wrote:
>>
>>
>>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to mammoth:
>>>
>>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>>>
>>>
>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>
>
>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>

you wish, maybe???

In article >,
Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:

> bill van wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Walter Traprock wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
> >>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
> >>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
> >>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
> >>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to mammoth:
> >>>
> >>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
> >>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
> >>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
> >>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
> >>
> >
> >An old girlfriend, perhaps?
> >
>
> you wish, maybe???

Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:

> I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from

is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.

bill

"bill van" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>
>> bill van wrote:
>>
>> >In article >,
>> > Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Walter Traprock wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>> >>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>> >>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>> >>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>> >>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to
>> >>>mammoth:
>> >>>
>> >>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>> >>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>> >>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>> >>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>> >>
>> >
>> >An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>> >
>>
>> you wish, maybe???
>
> Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
> post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>
>> I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
>
> is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>

This is true, except for the important "taco" codicil.

--
M C Hamster "Big Wheel Keep on Turnin'" -- Creedence Clearwater Revival

M C Hamster wrote:

> "bill van" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>In article >,
>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>bill van wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Walter Traprock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>>>>>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>>>>>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>>>>>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>>>>>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to
>>>>>>mammoth:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>>>>>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>>>>>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>>>>>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>
>>>you wish, maybe???
>>
>>Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
>>post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>>
>>
>>>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>
>>is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>>
>
>
> This is true, except for the important "taco" codicil.
>


Is this the one you were referring to?

The once was a man from Morocco,
Known to all by his first name of Rocco.
He said, "to be blunt
God decreed we eat ****,
Why else would it look like a taco?"


Jeff

--
Jeffry Wisnia

(W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)

"Truth exists; only falsehood has to be invented."

M C Hamster wrote:

>"bill van" > wrote in message
...
>
>>In article >,
>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>bill van wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Walter Traprock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>>>>>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>>>>>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>>>>>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>>>>>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to
>>>>>>mammoth:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>>>>>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>>>>>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>>>>>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>you wish, maybe???
>>>
>>Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
>>post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>>
>>
>>>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>
>>is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>>
>>
>
>This is true, except for the important "taco" codicil.
>
>
what's important about taco?

"Dilbert Firestorm" > wrote in message
...
>M C Hamster wrote:
>
>>
>>This is taco, except for the important "taco" taco.
>>
> what's taco about taco?

Well, you can taco it or you can leave it.

--
M C Hamster "Big Wheel Keep on Turnin'" -- Creedence Clearwater Revival

bill van wrote:

>In article >,
> Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>
>
>>bill van wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article >,
>>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Walter Traprock wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>>>>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of Russia,
>>>>>meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of years. there was
>>>>>no comment on the taste of he meat. book: sea devil's fo'c'sle,
>>>>>by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll quote all of it relating to mammoth:
>>>>>
>>>>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in Siberia
>>>>>out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally refrigerated
>>>>>for thousands of years. Eating that ancient mammoth's meat is
>>>>>more common now, but then it was something new and startling."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>>
>>>>
>>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>>>
>>>
>>you wish, maybe???
>>
>
>Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
>post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>
>
>>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>
>
>is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>
>bill
>
I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.

one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...

Dilbert Firestorm wrote:

> bill van wrote:
>
>>In article >,
>> Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>bill van wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>>Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Walter Traprock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>did people use to eat mammoth meat early last century? i've
>>>>>>just read about being served mammoth meat by the Czar of
>>>>>>Russia, meat dug up that's been frozen for thousands of
>>>>>>years. there was no comment on the taste of he meat. book:
>>>>>>sea devil's fo'c'sle, by lowell thomas (1929). OK, i'll
>>>>>>quote all of it relating to mammoth:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"and then there was mammoth's meat. It had been dug up in
>>>>>>Siberia out of the ice, where it had been kept naturally
>>>>>>refrigerated for thousands of years. Eating that ancient
>>>>>>mammoth's meat is more common now, but then it was something
>>>>>>new and startling."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came
>>>>>from
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>you wish, maybe???
>>>
>>
>>Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your
>>original post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>>
>>
>>>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came
>>>from
>>>
>>
>>is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>>
>>bill
>>
> I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor
> correction I made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.

You changed it. Then you represented the doctored version *as
original*.


--
Blinky
Killing all Google Groups posts.
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Dilbert Firestorm > writes:



>I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
>made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.

>one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...


Oh yeah? What about the medieval heretical sect that was
founded because a monk mistakeny wrote "The LORD is immoral"?

I mean, they had a good time and all, right up until the
Inquisition, but it didn't work out well for them.

Joseph Michael Bay wrote:

>Dilbert Firestorm > writes:
>
>
>
>
>>I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
>>made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.
>>
>
>>one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...
>>
>
>
>Oh yeah? What about the medieval heretical sect that was
>founded because a monk mistakeny wrote "The LORD is immoral"?
>
>I mean, they had a good time and all, right up until the
>Inquisition, but it didn't work out well for them.
>
>
after its been corrected??????

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:27:42 +0000 (UTC), (Joseph
Michael Bay) wrote:

>Dilbert Firestorm > writes:
>
>
>
>>I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
>>made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.
>
>>one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...
>
>
>Oh yeah? What about the medieval heretical sect that was
>founded because a monk mistakeny wrote "The LORD is immoral"?
>
>I mean, they had a good time and all, right up until the
>Inquisition, but it didn't work out well for them.


The monk came out of the archives, his face ashen.".... the word was
CelebRate...."

In article >,
Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:

> bill van wrote:

> >>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
> >>>>
> >>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
> >>>
> >>you wish, maybe???
> >
> >Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
> >post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
> >
> >>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
> >
> >is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
> >
> >bill
> >
> I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
> made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.
>
> one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...

Sorry, no joke. The subject material wasn't serious. But like many posts
here, my response was a riff on an obvious typo. For you to pretend you
never made the typo by fixing it in your subsequent response is
dishonest. It violates a basic trust we need to be able to talk to each
other in this forum.

bill

bill van wrote:

>In article >,
> Dilbert Firestorm > wrote:
>
>
>>bill van wrote:
>>
>
>>>>>>I heard that it was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>An old girlfriend, perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>you wish, maybe???
>>>>
>>>Dilbert, for you to go back and edit quoted material -- your original
>>>post, as preserved on everyone's news server, said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I heard that i was good... dunno where that reference came from
>>>>
>>>is ****ing dishonest. You don't do that.
>>>
>>>bill
>>>
>>>
>>I don't know why you're making a big stink over a minor correction I
>>made. don't see correcting a typo as dishonest.
>>
>>one little ol' letter never hurt anyone anyways...
>>
>
>Sorry, no joke. The subject material wasn't serious. But like many posts
>here, my response was a riff on an obvious typo. For you to pretend you
>never made the typo by fixing it in your subsequent response is
>dishonest. It violates a basic trust we need to be able to talk to each
>other in this forum.
>
>bill
>
ok,

I was thoughtless in fixing that typo.

prolly should have left alone, but I didn't think anyone would make a
big whoo-ha over a letter, least all from you!

calling someone dishonest & lying is really going too far with that
insinuation and over a god damn letter!