Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:48:22 +0100, "Christophe Bachmann"
> wrote: > >"Frogleg" > a écrit >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:50:05 +0100, "Christophe Bachmann" >> > wrote: >> >Let's not forget that conditions of life were quite different then from >> >now, and that people knew far better what could be held, in what >> >conditions, and how long. >> >> Hmmm. They knew "far better" about the causes and effects of >> food-borne illness (and death)? I don't think so. Scientists and >> researchers had a hard time selling the 'germ theory' about the cause >> and spread of disease -- how could something you can't see hurt you? >> The world before knowledge of 'germs' was far from germ-free. > >Don't make me say what I didn't. >They knew far better than today what can be held and how long, before >contamination goes from anecdotic or tolerable to dangerous. They didn't >know about germs but they knew that one wouldn't come ill after X days but >most certainly would after Y days and so they could take risks until X-1 >days. Today, and mostly in the US the motto is *no risk* and so nobody >knows anymore what the limits are because when the first bacteria appear in >mostly harmless amounts the products are already thrown away. I disagree on the matter of 'wisdom of the Old Ones.' While chewing on willow bark for pain and fevers turned out to be a good idea, myth and superstition were, I believe, far more common. Since much foodborne illness doesn't strke immediately, but after a delay that may be days or even weeks, it would take a very clever Old One to associate, say, hemorrhagic colitis with food eaten 3-4 days previously. They knew how long to keep food? Yes, in terms of what point it "went off" -- smelled or tasted funny -- or grew fur. I agree completely, however, that a 'no risk' attidude is ridiculous. When risk can be reduced by modest means, it makes sense. Keeping cold food cold and hot food hot. Hand-washing. My chances of dying from a medium-rare burger are infinitesimal, but I'd like to keep those short bouts of "stomach flu" down to a minimum, too. "When in doubt, throw it out" makes sense to me. I don't take 'sell by' dates as 'eat by', but I don't keep ground beef in a "cool spot," either. We know a *lot* more about how to avoid common, even mild, food-related illness, and I want to take advantage. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
refrigeration of starter | Sourdough | |||
Celebration & Refrigeration | Beer | |||
LG Refrigeration? | Cooking Equipment | |||
Refrigeration times | Wine | |||
Does miso need refrigeration? | Asian Cooking |