Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a question about an abstruse item of food, but goes to the
point of registering the name of a commonplace object as a trademark. An Australian company is claiming the word "Freekeh" as a trademark. It is starting to manufacture it with a government grant.. See http://www.greenwheatfreekeh.com.au/gwfabout.htm and associated links. Freekeh is a preparation of dried green wheat used in eastern Mediterranean lands. Many brands of freekeh exist and are imported into Australia. However the name frekeh is not fixed in the English of Australian cuisine, as are the words 'puffed wheat', 'bulgur' or 'couscous' for other products of wheat. Internationally, other users of the word freekeh don't acknowledge it as a trademark, for example on the web: http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/pe...ticleID=109426 and in print "A cook’s guide to grains" by Jenni Muir. What kind of preemptive challenge can be made to the successful registration of a commonplace name? Or do you just have to wait for a letter from the company's solicitors? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pecorino Romano trademark? | General Cooking | |||
Commonplace chemicals & their health effects | General Cooking | |||
How Commonplace Is Psoriasis Among Vegans? | Vegan | |||
Cheesesteak Trademark Battle | General Cooking | |||
Registering For Wedding Gifts To Outfit A Kitchen | General Cooking |