Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting. When I encounter claims that this or that country's food
is or is not a cuisine, your(Belasco's) first component, "a limited number of 'edible' foods" seems to be just the opposite in other people's minds. For instance, France has a cuisine because its foods and preparation are varied and sophisticated. On the other hand Germany does not have a cuisine because it is a cold climate where the "limited number of 'edible' foods" are potatoes, turnips, cabbage and sausage. One writer declared that Spain did not have a cuisine because Spaniards lived on snack foods. Although I find it hard to believe that Spaniards subsist on tapas at the home dining table, if they indeed do, then it seems to me that tapas would fall under "a preference for particular food (techniques)" and would indicate that Spain did, indeed, have a cuisine. Andy & Bob -- Belasco's definition seems designed for scientists to evaluate the food systems of primitive cultures to determine if one society can be singled out as different when compared to its neighbors. The definition does not seem to lend itself easily to comparisons among, say, European countries that have somewhat different foods and cooking techniques and whether the cookery of one meets some abstract definition of "cuisine" and another does not. Cookie ASmith1946 wrote: > There are several definitions of cuisine. I like Warren Belasco's best: > > "Drawing largely on anthropological sources, I define cuisine as a set of > socially situated food behaviors with these components: a limited number of > "edible" foods (selectivity); a preference for particular food (techniques); a > distinctive set of flavor, textural, and visual characteristics (Aesthetics); a > set of rules for consuming food (ritual); and an organized system of producing > and distributing the food (infrastructure). Embedded in these components are a > set of ideas, images, and values (ideology) that can be "read" just like any > other cultural "text." > > Source: Warren Belasco, "Food and the Countercultu A Story of Bread and > Politics," in Raymond, Grew, ed., Food in Global History. Boulder, CO: Westview > Press, 1999. 276. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Taking a crack at defining and explalinin barbecue was Simplebarbecue sauce | Barbecue | |||
Defining Seared Steak? Hood up or down? | Barbecue | |||
The defining taste of Sencha | Tea | |||
RESOURCE POST: To Be an RRR Cultist, a Person MUST Have this DEFINING Flaw...your last name must be CHILTON.... | Winemaking | |||
Defining chili?? | General Cooking |