Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victory's Hop Wallop finally showed up here and after hearing all the
kudos it's gotten, I was eager to try some. Great beer, great balance of malt/hops, nicely bittered..but where's the wallop? I don't _think_ it's just a case of PNW hop burnout. I expected to be assaulted by hops and I had to really work to find much more than a nicely balanced bitterness in the beer. Followed that up with a Terminal Gravity IPA. Now, THERE'S a hop wallop, but still with a strong malt backbone to it! Anybody else been a little disappointed in Hop Wallop? Agaian, I'm not saying it's in any manner a bad beer, but I wanna get walloped! --------->Denny -- Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is. Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny Conn" > wrote in message ... > Anybody else been a little disappointed in Hop Wallop? Agaian, I'm not > saying it's in any manner a bad beer, but I wanna get walloped! > Please indicate the Wallop Level (4 being the highest) desired: 1. Mom just caught you enjoying Dad's Playboy collection 2. Dad just caught you enjoying Mom's Playgirl collection 3. Mom and Dad just realized those weren't sage plants growing in your room. 4. A carboy in the hands of Denny ;-) Brian |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Lundeen wrote:
> Please indicate the Wallop Level (4 being the highest) desired: > > 1. Mom just caught you enjoying Dad's Playboy collection > 2. Dad just caught you enjoying Mom's Playgirl collection > 3. Mom and Dad just realized those weren't sage plants growing in your room. > 4. A carboy in the hands of Denny ;-) Probabaly just below 1! I realize that my post may look like a troll, but I'd really like to hear opinions about this beer, if anyob=ne has one. Am I totally wrong and missing the beauty of this beer? -------->Denny -- Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is. Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny Conn wrote:
> I realize that my post may look like a troll, but I'd really like to > hear opinions about this beer, if anyob=ne has one. Maybe yours lost something in transit? I have some at home and it's mighty hoppy all right, but is too unbalanced for my palate. I prefer either Hop Devil or Old Horizontal, which have enough malt to push back against the hops... Bill G |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Goodman wrote:
> Maybe yours lost something in transit? I have some at home and it's > mighty hoppy all right, but is too unbalanced for my palate. I prefer > either Hop Devil or Old Horizontal, which have enough malt to push back > against the hops... Maybe so..if it was unbalanced, it was toward the malt side, not the hops. But overall, I'd have to say it was superbly balanced...it's just that I don't expect balance in a beer aleed "Hop Wallop"! OTOH, there's no reason they have to brew to my expectations... Thanks, Bill. --------->Denny -- Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is. Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wasn't even vaguely impressed by Hop Wallop. Thought it was
uninteresting and a bit harsh, malt and hops didn't blend well at all. I wanted to be impressed as I'm a big Victory fan, but it's not a beer I ever need to visit again. -- ************************************************** *************** Dan Iwerks thinks that the beer you're drinking probably sucks. The fundamental problem with Solipsism is it makes me responsible for the fact that you're a complete idiot. ************************************************** *************** |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Iwerks wrote:
> > I wasn't even vaguely impressed by Hop Wallop. Thought it was > uninteresting and a bit harsh, malt and hops didn't blend well at all. I > wanted to be impressed as I'm a big Victory fan, but it's not a beer I ever > need to visit again. Pretty much the same wway I felt, Dan, although I didn't notice the harshness. Thanks for your thougvhts. ---------->Denny -- Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is. Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny Conn wrote:
> Victory's Hop Wallop finally showed up here and after hearing all the > kudos it's gotten, I was eager to try some. Great beer, great balance > of malt/hops, nicely bittered..but where's the wallop? I don't _think_ > it's just a case of PNW hop burnout. I expected to be assaulted by hops > and I had to really work to find much more than a nicely balanced > bitterness in the beer. Followed that up with a Terminal Gravity IPA. > Now, THERE'S a hop wallop, but still with a strong malt backbone to it! > Anybody else been a little disappointed in Hop Wallop? Agaian, I'm not > saying it's in any manner a bad beer, but I wanna get walloped! Jeez, I tried it and found it basically undrinkably hoppy. It was painful. I don't think I finished the pint. I much prefer the Hop Devil. Dave |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mmmm Hops. I enjoyed the Victory's Hop Wallop even though it was not quite
as hoppy a I had expected. I am still searching for a beer that I consider too hoppy. Any suggestions out there? The Wyerbacher Hops Infusion is the closest that I have come, the highest IBU that is, while maintaining a balance. "Dave Stallard" > wrote in message ... > Denny Conn wrote: > > Victory's Hop Wallop finally showed up here and after hearing all the > > kudos it's gotten, I was eager to try some. Great beer, great balance > > of malt/hops, nicely bittered..but where's the wallop? I don't _think_ > > it's just a case of PNW hop burnout. I expected to be assaulted by hops > > and I had to really work to find much more than a nicely balanced > > bitterness in the beer. Followed that up with a Terminal Gravity IPA. > > Now, THERE'S a hop wallop, but still with a strong malt backbone to it! > > Anybody else been a little disappointed in Hop Wallop? Agaian, I'm not > > saying it's in any manner a bad beer, but I wanna get walloped! > > Jeez, I tried it and found it basically undrinkably hoppy. It was > painful. I don't think I finished the pint. > > I much prefer the Hop Devil. > > Dave |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stoller wrote:
> mmmm Hops. I enjoyed the Victory's Hop Wallop even though it was not quite > as hoppy a I had expected. > > I am still searching for a beer that I consider too hoppy. Any suggestions > out there? The Wyerbacher Hops Infusion is the closest that I have come, > the highest IBU that is, while maintaining a balance. The hoppiest beer I've had thus far is Dogsbody Ale. (I had it at the Winking Judge in Hamilton, Ontario.) There's a link for it in the 3rd paragraph at the site given below. It is described there as "a refreshing hop field in a glass". http://scotchirishbrewing.ca/ I've not had any of the other brews mentioned in this thread, so can't say how they compare. I can say, however, that Dogsbody was a bit too hoppy for me. -- Bruce Weaver www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stallard > wrote in
: > Denny Conn wrote: >> Victory's Hop Wallop finally showed up here and after hearing all the >> kudos it's gotten, I was eager to try some. Great beer, great >> balance of malt/hops, nicely bittered..but where's the wallop? I >> don't _think_ it's just a case of PNW hop burnout. I expected to be >> assaulted by hops and I had to really work to find much more than a >> nicely balanced bitterness in the beer. Followed that up with a >> Terminal Gravity IPA. Now, THERE'S a hop wallop, but still with a >> strong malt backbone to it! Anybody else been a little disappointed >> in Hop Wallop? Agaian, I'm not saying it's in any manner a bad beer, >> but I wanna get walloped! > > Jeez, I tried it and found it basically undrinkably hoppy. It was > painful. I don't think I finished the pint. > > I much prefer the Hop Devil. To me it wasn't the hops (I've enjoyed much hoppier beers), just that Hop Wallop didn't have an adequate malt profile to back it up. Beers like Ruination, Hop Rod Rye, or Dreadnaught all seemed hoppier than Hop Wallop, but they had a malt backbone. -- ************************************************** *************** Dan Iwerks thinks that the beer you're drinking probably sucks. The fundamental problem with Solipsism is it makes me responsible for the fact that you're a complete idiot. ************************************************** *************** |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce Weaver > wrote in news:3719roF57qsu7U1
@individual.net: > The hoppiest beer I've had thus far is Dogsbody Ale. .... > I can say, however, that Dogsbody was a bit too hoppy for me. As that beer is quite likely under 40 IBU, you'll definitely want to stay FAR away from IPAs from Stone, Bear Republic, Pizza Port, Oggi's, Three Floyds, LaConner, Diamond Knot, etc., etc., etc. Cheers, Ern |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce Weaver" > wrote in message
> The hoppiest beer I've had thus far is Dogsbody Ale. (I had it at the > Winking Judge in Hamilton, Ontario.) God, I love that bar. -- Lew Bryson "GOOD or SHITE?" -- Michael Jackson, "Thriller", 1982 www.lewbryson.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This Humble Pie carried quite a wallop! | Baking | |||
ask for a wallop invitation | Beer | |||
Victory Hop Wallop | Beer | |||
Victory Hop Wallop | Beer |