I am seeking to replace an 18" electric range, where the space is
simply too tight for a 20" current model.

I'm not adverse to buying a used one that's in reasonably good shape.

Any leads as to where I might procure one would be greatly
appreciated.

I'm in NYC.

A_C

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:36:49 -0400, Agent_C
> wrote:

>I am seeking to replace an 18" electric range, where the space is
>simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
>I'm not adverse to buying a used one that's in reasonably good shape.
>
>Any leads as to where I might procure one would be greatly
>appreciated.
>
>I'm in NYC.

I *love* Google. Plug in "20 inch kitchen stove" and see what comes
up. For instance http://www.nextag.com/20-inch-gas-range/search-html
and http://tinyurl.com/5qrnhu

If you're thinking about a dish washer too, you have both the drawer
style and an 18 inch wide version to choose from.

OTOH, *I* want to replace my 48 inch electric Thermadore cooktop (that
has a built in barbecue) with a newer version. Unfortunately every
cooktop with a BBQ these days seems to be GAS. Don't want it and my
mind is closed mind on the subject. Obviously, I haven't found what I
want in electric - so I'll rebuild what I have.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:35:12 -0700, sf <.> wrote:

>I *love* Google. Plug in "20 inch kitchen stove" and see what comes
>up.

I see your problem; reading comprehension... As I said, "I am
seeking to replace an 18" electric range, where the space is simply
too tight for a 20" current model."

But thanks for the insight...

A_C

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:10:35 -0400, Agent_C
> wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:35:12 -0700, sf <.> wrote:
>
>>I *love* Google. Plug in "20 inch kitchen stove" and see what comes
>>up.
>
>I see your problem; reading comprehension... As I said, "I am
>seeking to replace an 18" electric range, where the space is simply
>too tight for a 20" current model."
>
>But thanks for the insight...
>
I understand your problem too. You're a complete asshole. Sorry I
tried to play nice with you. Too bad, so sad, that in the *entire*
city of New York where small kitchens are the norm, YOU can't seem to
find what you're looking for.

sf
setting filters on this arrogant boob

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:13:11 -0700, sf <.> wrote:

>Sorry I tried to play nice with you.

You didn't... You played sarcastic ["I *love* Google" ] and you got
it thrown back in your pompous, ignorant face!

A_C

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:44:53 -0400, Agent_C
> wrote:

>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:13:11 -0700, sf <.> wrote:
>
>>Sorry I tried to play nice with you.
>
>You didn't... You played sarcastic ["I *love* Google" ] and you got
>it thrown back in your pompous, ignorant face!
>
>A_C

It didn't you long to figure her out.

Lou

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:10:51 -0500, Lou Decruss >
wrote:

>It didn't [take] you long to figure her out.

Fat & frustrated most likely...

A_C

Agent_Cooze wrote:
> Lou Decruss wrote:
>
> >It didn't [take] you long to figure her out.
>
> Fat & frustrated most likely...

I seriously doubt that.

What kind of Noo Yawker has to ask on a Newsgroup about where to
acquire a stoopid widdle toys r us stove... a most STOOPID Noo
Yawker... have you no shame, like there ain't any friggin' appliance
stores in all them five boros... if you can't do google hows about da
yellow pages, Agent_Cooze. Yoose are one dumb douchebag.

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:59:46 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>What kind of Noo Yawker has to ask on a Newsgroup about where to
>acquire a stoopid widdle toys r us stove... a most STOOPID Noo
>Yawker... have you no shame, like there ain't any friggin' appliance
>stores in all them five boros... if you can't do google hows about da
>yellow pages, Agent_Cooze. Yoose are one dumb douchebag.

<yawn>

Agent_Cooze wrote:
>
> I am seeking to replace an �18" electric range, where the space is
> simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
> I'm not adverse to buying a used one that's in reasonably good shape.
>
> Any leads as to where I might procure one would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> I'm in NYC.


Procure... what... you gonna cook on that stove or **** it... are you
a friggin' pimp... procuing for your momma, eh?

BUY a stove you cheap no good piece of shit *******.

You can't be in NYC, staten island maybe.

Agent_Cooze wrote:
>
> I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
> simply too tight for a 20" current model.

Took a bit to find anything!

http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...rbyatwood.html
(Wedgewood 17 inch there)

http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
(couple of different ones here)

More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:49:09 -0400, "cshenk" > wrote:

>
>More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
>smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.

Brilliant! Thanks so much!

BTW, how many Sockpuppets does "<.>" have???

A_C

Agent_C wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:49:09 -0400, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
>> smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>
> Brilliant! Thanks so much!
>
> BTW, how many Sockpuppets does "<.>" have???

All of them, evidently.

Matthew

--
"All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of
people". Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936):

"Agent_C" wrote
"cshenk" <cs> wrote:
>
>>
>>More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
>>smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>
> Brilliant! Thanks so much!

Heheh it sparked my interest to see what was there.

> BTW, how many Sockpuppets does "<.>" have???

Apologies but I'm a simple sort and have no idea what a 'sockpuppet' is,
unless you mean the real one made of tube socks and you put yarn hair and
eyeballs on it etc!

On Apr 17, 5:49�pm, "cshenk" > wrote:
> Agent_Cooze wrote:
>
> > I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
> > simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
> Took a bit to find anything!
>
> http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...ndcoverbyatwoo...
> (Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>
> http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
> (couple of different ones here)
>
> More seraches will probably do better. �It wasnt til I thought about the
> smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.

The RV units may not be legal for in home use, probably not in NYC.
And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
to natural gas.

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:59:46 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>Agent_Cooze wrote:
>> Lou Decruss wrote:
>>
>> >It didn't [take] you long to figure her out.
>>
>> Fat & frustrated most likely...
>
>I seriously doubt that.
>
>What kind of Noo Yawker has to ask on a Newsgroup about where to
>acquire a stoopid widdle toys r us stove... a most STOOPID Noo
>Yawker... have you no shame, like there ain't any friggin' appliance
>stores in all them five boros... if you can't do google hows about da
>yellow pages, Agent_Cooze. Yoose are one dumb douchebag.
>

Thank you, Sheldon. I think that's the first time in all the years
we've been together that you "got my back".

Please don't sexualize my comment because you'll ruin the moment.



--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:49:09 -0400, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Agent_Cooze wrote:
>>
>> I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
>> simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
>Took a bit to find anything!
>
>http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...rbyatwood.html
>(Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>
>http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
>(couple of different ones here)
>
>More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
>smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>
OH, so what you're really saying is "If you really *tried* to find
one online, you could"? LOL! What a discovery!


--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:40:00 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> wrote:

>Agent_C wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:49:09 -0400, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> More seraches will probably do better. It wasnt til I thought about the
>>> smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>>
>> Brilliant! Thanks so much!
>>
>> BTW, how many Sockpuppets does "<.>" have???
>
>All of them, evidently.
>
>Matthew

Obviously, you don't know us very well.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:07:34 -0700, sf <.> wrote:

>Obviously, you don't know [*** us ***] very well.

Shall we start calling you Sybil?

A_C

On Apr 18, 1:58�am, sf <.> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:59:46 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> wrote:
>
> >Agent_Cooze wrote:
> >> Lou Decruss wrote:
>
> >> >It didn't [take] you long to figure her out.
>
> >> Fat & frustrated most likely...
>
> >I seriously doubt that.
>
> >What kind of Noo Yawker has to ask on a Newsgroup about where to
> >acquire a stoopid widdle toys r us stove... a most STOOPID Noo
> >Yawker... have you no shame, like there ain't any friggin' appliance
> >stores in all them five boros... if you can't do google hows about da
> >yellow pages, Agent_Cooze. �Yoose are one dumb douchebag.
>
> Thank you, Sheldon. �I think that's the first time in all the years
> we've been together that you "got my back". �


I'm the best back watcher you'll ever know... it's a Brooklyn thing.

"Sheldon" wrote
> Agent_Cooze wrote:
>
> > I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
> > simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
> Took a bit to find anything!
>
> http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...ndcoverbyatwoo...
> (Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>
> http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
> (couple of different ones here)
>
> More seraches will probably do better. ?It wasnt til I thought about the
> smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.

>The RV units may not be legal for in home use, probably not in NYC.
>And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
>to natural gas.

They come in gas and electric types and yes, they are legal for home use.
They are simply smaller than one would normally use in a house.

"sf" wrote
cshenk" wrote:

>>smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>>
> OH, so what you're really saying is "If you really *tried* to find
> one online, you could"? LOL! What a discovery!

sf, you may want to track who said what. He didnt find them and I found it
interesting so hunted about and found'em so sent him a few links.

I'll add if you can read Japanese, you'll find more of them easily. An 18
inch stove there is considered a big one. It's western-think to assume
everyone has a stove (with oven).

On Apr 18, 1:22�pm, "cshenk" > wrote:
> "Sheldon" wrote
>
>
>
>
>
> > Agent_Cooze wrote:
>
> > > I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
> > > simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>
> > Took a bit to find anything!
>
> >http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...ndcoverbyatwoo...
> > (Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>
> >http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
> > (couple of different ones here)
>
> > More seraches will probably do better. ?It wasnt til I thought about the
> > smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
> >
> >The RV units may not be legal for in home use, probably not in NYC.
> >And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
> >to natural gas.
>
> They come in gas and electric types and yes, they are legal for home use.


You didn't read what I wrote. RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
burg but not NYC. And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
gas in an RV. But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.

"Sheldon" wrote

> >http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...ndcoverbyatwoo...
> > (Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>
> >http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
> > (couple of different ones here)
>
> > More seraches will probably do better. ?It wasnt til I thought about the
> > smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
> >
> >The RV units may not be legal for in home use, probably not in NYC.
> >And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
> >to natural gas.
>
> They come in gas and electric types and yes, they are legal for home use.


>You didn't read what I wrote. RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
> burg but not NYC.

I did read what you wrote and these are just small units as i said.

> And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>gas in an RV. But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.

You look very foolish due to not checking the links. These are electric
units.\

On Apr 18, 1:28�pm, "cshenk" > wrote:
> "sf" wrote
>
> cshenk" wrote:
> >>smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>
> > OH, so what �you're really saying is "If you really *tried* to find
> > one online, you could"? �LOL! �What a discovery!
>
> sf, you may want to track who said what. �He didnt find them and I found it
> interesting so hunted about and found'em so sent him a few links.
>
> I'll add if you can read Japanese, you'll find more of them easily. An 18
> inch stove there is considered a big one. �It's western-think to assume
> everyone has a stove (with oven).

Reading Japanese and Japanese life style has nothing to do with it...
there are plenty of small stoves available in the US. Any commercial
cooking supply emporium will have many configurations of small
electric and gas stoves, and only like 12" wide.

http://store.bowerykitchens.com/gaselshorsto.html

If the OP had a functioning brain it would have contacted the maker of
the stove that died, or at least mentioned it here... but I strongly
suspect it never looked anywhere, instead dumped it's entire
responsiblity here and showed no apprecation whatsoever... the OP is
an ingrate and a douchebag.

Sheldon wrote:
> On Apr 18, 1:22�pm, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> "Sheldon" wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Agent_Cooze wrote:
>>>> I am seeking to replace an ?18" electric range, where the space is
>>>> simply too tight for a 20" current model.
>>> Took a bit to find anything!
>>> http://www.rvstuffusa.com/wedgewoodv...ndcoverbyatwoo...
>>> (Wedgewood 17 inch there)
>>> http://www.ducktec.com/index.html
>>> (couple of different ones here)
>>> More seraches will probably do better. ?It wasnt til I thought about the
>>> smaller ones for RV use that I was able to find any.
>>>
>>> The RV units may not be legal for in home use, probably not in NYC.
>>> And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
>>> to natural gas.
>> They come in gas and electric types and yes, they are legal for home use.
>
>
> You didn't read what I wrote. RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
> burg but not NYC. And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
> likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
> gas in an RV. But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
> seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.

Converting back and forth from propane to natural gas is trivial. Kits
are sold all over the place for doing just that:

<http://www.google.com/search?q=propane+natural+gas+conversion++kit&ie=ut f-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a>

Matthew

--
"All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of
people". Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936):

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>On Apr 18, 1:58?am, sf <.> wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:59:46 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Agent_Cooze wrote:
>> >> Lou Decruss wrote:
>>
>> >> >It didn't [take] you long to figure her out.
>>
>> >> Fat & frustrated most likely...
>>
>> >I seriously doubt that.
>>
>> >What kind of Noo Yawker has to ask on a Newsgroup about where to
>> >acquire a stoopid widdle toys r us stove... a most STOOPID Noo
>> >Yawker... have you no shame, like there ain't any friggin' appliance
>> >stores in all them five boros... if you can't do google hows about da
>> >yellow pages, Agent_Cooze. ?Yoose are one dumb douchebag.
>>
>> Thank you, Sheldon. ?I think that's the first time in all the years
>> we've been together that you "got my back". ?
>
>
>I'm the best back watcher you'll ever know... it's a Brooklyn thing.

Watching the back of a bitch who sounds like a cross between someone
on a life-alert and reverse mortgage commercial can't be something to
be proud of...Is it? Even in Brokeland? Please say it aint so!!!!!!

Lou

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:22:20 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>And RV units will be built for propane and probably can't be converted
>to natural gas.

Why not? Because you don't know how to?

Lou

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>
>You didn't read what I wrote. RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>burg but not NYC. And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>gas in an RV. But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.

"rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
done. The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
your backyard.

Lou

On Apr 18, 9:59�pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >You didn't read what I wrote. �RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
> >burg but not NYC. �And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
> >likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
> >gas in an RV. �But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
> >seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>
> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
> done. �The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
> your backyard. �

I don't live in NYC. The codes are far more strict in NYC.

Lou Decruss wrote:
> Sheldon wrote:
>
> >And RV units will be built for propane and probably
> > can't be converted to natural gas.
>
> Why not? �Because you don't know how (to)?

Has nothing to do knowing how... not all gas appliances are designed
to be converted... of course there'll always be some moron like you
who'll jury rig something that'll probably cause excess carbon
monixide and/or an explosion.

And speaking of knowing how (to), you don't write English properly...
that's how I immediately knew that you're an uneducated pompous fool.
We don't need to worry about converting gas with you, Lou... the same
gas that comes out of your ass comes out of your mouth.

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>On Apr 18, 9:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >You didn't read what I wrote. ?RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>> >burg but not NYC. ?And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>> >likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>> >gas in an RV. ?But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>> >seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>>
>> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
>> done. ?The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
>> your backyard. ?
>
>I don't live in NYC. The codes are far more strict in NYC.

I'm well aware of where you live Shemp. I read this group. Are you
saying propane becomes dangerous only on NYC?

Lou

Lou Decruss wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 18, 9:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> You didn't read what I wrote. ?RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>>>> burg but not NYC. ?And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>>>> likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>>>> gas in an RV. ?But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>>>> seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>>> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
>>> done. ?The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
>>> your backyard. ?
>> I don't live in NYC. The codes are far more strict in NYC.
>
> I'm well aware of where you live Shemp. I read this group. Are you
> saying propane becomes dangerous only on NYC?

I think what he is saying is that he doesn't know that any gas appliance
with removable jets can be converted from propane to natural gas (or the
other way) with complete safety.

Matthew

--
"All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of
people". Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936):

On Apr 19, 6:59�pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 18, 9:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >You didn't read what I wrote. ?RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
> >> >burg but not NYC. ?And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
> >> >likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
> >> >gas in an RV. ?But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
> >> >seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>
> >> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
> >> done. ?The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
> >> your backyard. ?
>
> >I don't live in NYC. �The codes are far more strict in NYC.
>
> I'm well aware of where you live Shemp. �I read this group. �Are you
> saying propane becomes dangerous only on NYC?

Any densely populated city... oh' dence one.

And that would be *in* NYC.

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:02:58 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> wrote:

>Lou Decruss wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 18, 9:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You didn't read what I wrote. ?RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>>>>> burg but not NYC. ?And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>>>>> likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>>>>> gas in an RV. ?But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>>>>> seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>>>> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
>>>> done. ?The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
>>>> your backyard. ?
>>> I don't live in NYC. The codes are far more strict in NYC.
>>
>> I'm well aware of where you live Shemp. I read this group. Are you
>> saying propane becomes dangerous only on NYC?
>
>I think what he is saying is that he doesn't know that any gas appliance
>with removable jets can be converted from propane to natural gas (or the
>other way) with complete safety.

He's known for yappin about things he knows nothing about.

Lou

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>On Apr 19, 6:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Apr 18, 9:59?pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >You didn't read what I wrote. ?RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>> >> >burg but not NYC. ?And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>> >> >likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>> >> >gas in an RV. ?But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>> >> >seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>>
>> >> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
>> >> done. ?The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
>> >> your backyard. ?
>>
>> >I don't live in NYC. ?The codes are far more strict in NYC.
>>
>> I'm well aware of where you live Shemp. ?I read this group. ?Are you
>> saying propane becomes dangerous only on NYC?
>
>Any densely populated city... oh' dence one.
>
>And that would be *in* NYC.

That woooosh you hear above isn't the wind.

Lou

Sheldon wrote:
> On Apr 18, 9:59�pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> You didn't read what I wrote. �RV stoves may be fine in some backwater
>>> burg but not NYC. �And RV stoves will be rigged for propane and most
>>> likely not adaptable for natural gas because no one will have natural
>>> gas in an RV. �But NYC has natural gas throughout by default, awdn I
>>> seriouly doubt the NYC fire codes will permit propane indoors.
>> "rigging" a stove in ANY situation is pretty silly, but it can be
>> done. �The propane is not the problem or you wouldn't have a tank in
>> your backyard. �
>
> I don't live in NYC. The codes are far more strict in NYC.
>

Right. Six cats would get you a rubber room.