Hmmmm, me thinks someone is trying to get around my killfile..

"The Tex Mex" > wrote in message
...
It seems A1 is the one to look to for recipes on this news group. Very few
are brave enough to put one out there, because everyone is so quick to
flame. This news group needs to be called the alt.food flame.mexican-flame.
Where are all those good tasting recipes. I would think there would be at
least a half dozen new recipes every day.

"David Wright" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:26:24 GMT, "The Tex Mex"
> > wrote:
>
> >It seems A1 is the one to look to for recipes on this news group. Very
few are brave enough to put one out there, because everyone is so quick to
flame. This news group needs to be called the alt.food flame.mexican-flame.
Where are all those good tasting recipes. I would think there would be at
least a half dozen new recipes every day.
> >
> >Guisado de Cerdo(stewed pig)
>
> Mind telling us where you got that recipe that includes an Italian
> pork product?
>
> BTW, there are hundreds of recipes in the archives of this ng. Those
> of us who have been around for a few years know how to search for
> them. Just use Google Groups, which is easy to do.
>
> Or did you have another point in mind?
>
> David

and actually the group is not only for recipes but rather for the
discussions of Mexican Cooking.
There is a group alt.recipes, that has nothing but recipes posted to it.
Perhaps Mr. A1 (aka Tex-Mex) would feel more comfortable over there.

Linda

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 02:50:27 GMT, "A1 WBarfieldsr"
> wrote:

>
>Baked Red Snapper with Garlic
>
I don't know what all the yelling is about. I put Green or Red Chilli
on just about everything! Which turns it too just the right flavor for
me!
But what do I know. I'm just a stupied Mexican from New Mexico....

It this newsroom for recipes or for copyrighted stuff? Live that for the
Court, Thank you!

Douglas S. Ladden wrote:

> Jim Lane on 05 Nov 2003 suggested:
>
>
>>Douglas S. Ladden wrote:
>>
>>>Jim Lane on 04 Nov 2003 suggested:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>If it says it is copyrighted, then it is by common copyright. You
>>>>are jerk A-1 (noticing you're hiding out now with a different
>>>>identity).
>>>>
>>>
>>> To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "common
>>> copyright", nor
>>>a "common law copyright", if that's what you meant. At least not in
>>>the United States, I am not familiar with the laws of other
>>>jurisdictions. All Copyright Law in the United States is enabled by
>>>the U.S. Constitution, and established by Federal Law, pre-empting
>>>any State laws which may speak to the issue.
>>>
>>>--Douglas
>>
>>Here's your own reply from below talking about what I was referring
>>to:
>>
>>Since 1978, all original works affixed in a tangible medium are
>>automatically protected by Copyright. Since most websites didn't
>>exist prior to 1978, they would be protected. The recipes themselves
>>would might also be Copyright depending on the factual basis
>>surrounding them.
>>
>
> Okay, Jim! I had never heard the term "common copyright", much
> less applied to the above. I think "automatic copyright" is a better
> and more commonly used term. The above law was established by the
> Copyright Act of 1976. Usually "common law" is that law established by
> (long standing) common usage or case decisions. All Copyright law is
> based in Federal Statute.
>
> --Douglas