-L. wrote:
> Otto Bahn wrote:
>> "-L." > wrote
>>
>>>> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
>>>> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>>> I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
>>> ****ing Fundies are everywhere.
>> Bigot!
>
> When it comes to shit-assed Fundies who shove their religion down your
> throat, you're goddamned right. I hate every single one of the
> mother****ers.

I believe the vocabulary challenged individual is trying to say he would treat
Falwell and Robertson the same as he'd treat bin Laden. He would dispatch them
to find out about their maker.

Matt J. McCullar wrote:
> "Glenn" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> Boy did you open the gate, but WHAT IS AN IN-N-OUT BURGER??? I live in
>> the 4th largest city in the nation and we have never heard of it.
>
>
> It's a fast food chain, found primarily in Southern California. Take heart
> in not knowing about it; I've spent practically my whole life in Texas and
> never heard of In-n-Out Burger either, until I visited Los Angeles just a
> couple of years ago. It's absolutely unknown over here because we've got
> Whataburger, and California folks don't.
>

Whataburger tried to make it out here in CA, but didn't.

-L. wrote:
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
>> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>
> I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
> ****ing Fundies are everywhere.
>


It's totally unobtrusive, and if it's what they believe, so what? It
doesn't hurt anyone.

Jon Nadelberg wrote:
> -L. wrote:
> > Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> >> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
> >> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
> >
> > I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
> > ****ing Fundies are everywhere.
> >
>
>
> It's totally unobtrusive,

It's not toally unobtrusive.

>and if it's what they believe, so what? It
> doesn't hurt anyone.

So you want your kid subjected to uninvited, religious proselytization
when they're eating a burger? I sure as hell don't.

-L.

Golden California Girls wrote:
>
> I believe the vocabulary challenged individual is trying to say he would treat
> Falwell and Robertson the same as he'd treat bin Laden.

They're worse than Bin Laden. They are exactly the same but have the
sheeple fooled into thinking they're right.

-L.

Jon Nadelberg wrote:

> Matt J. McCullar wrote:
>
>> "Glenn" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>>
>>> Boy did you open the gate, but WHAT IS AN IN-N-OUT BURGER??? I live in
>>> the 4th largest city in the nation and we have never heard of it.
>>
>>
>>
>> It's a fast food chain, found primarily in Southern California. Take
>> heart
>> in not knowing about it; I've spent practically my whole life in Texas
>> and
>> never heard of In-n-Out Burger either, until I visited Los Angeles just a
>> couple of years ago. It's absolutely unknown over here because we've got
>> Whataburger, and California folks don't.
>>
>
> Whataburger tried to make it out here in CA, but didn't.
>
There's something wrong with their time line, or else there
was another chain with the same name:
"Eventually, in 1959, Harmon Dobson would expand outside Texas with
Whataburger #21 opening in Pensacola, Florida."

I distinctly remember eating at Whataburger in Gainesville,
Florida when they opened a new store on NW 13th street in
very late 1958. At 35 cents for a full quarter-pounder, with
lots of lettuce, tomato, and onion, on a 5-inch bun, it made
a lunch within my student budget. If I was feeling particularly
rich I would top it off by going across the street and getting
a banana split for 65 cents.

Charles

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>
>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-L.
>>>
>>>
>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>
>>
>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>
>>Neal
>
>
>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>it.
>
>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>yourself.
>

Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
little ribbing, then you should find another group.

Neal

On 14 Sep 2006 14:39:58 -0400, Rich Holmes wrote:

(David DeLaney) writes:
>
>> But ... but they WANT to go back to Fundyland!
>>
>> Dave "not sure if it's where they came from, but man do they want to go there"
>> DeLaney
>
>They want it so bad, they're fit to be tide.

Probably tidally bored, too.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>
>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-L.
>>>
>>>
>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>
>>
>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>
>>Neal
>
>
>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>it.
>
>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>yourself.

Oh, I'm certain he didn't mean to imply any such thing. To the
contrary, he most likely meant to imply that you stole it from
Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, or some other cess-pool of bumper-sticker
political "thought."

Your inferrence that it is original to you is indeed laughable,
though. You and the rest of the parrots of FM talk radio aren't
exactly known for originality or creativity, and with good reason.

--
If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

On 14 Sep 2006 22:11:01 -0700, "-L." > wrote:

>
>Jon Nadelberg wrote:
>> -L. wrote:
>> > Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>> >> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
>> >> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>> >
>> > I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
>> > ****ing Fundies are everywhere.
>> >
>>
>>
>> It's totally unobtrusive,
>
>It's not toally unobtrusive.

Yes it is!
No it's not!
Nuh-uh!
Uh-huh!
Says who?
MOM!!!!!

>>and if it's what they believe, so what? It
>> doesn't hurt anyone.
>
>So you want your kid subjected to uninvited, religious proselytization
>when they're eating a burger? I sure as hell don't.

Oh boy. Sure didn't take you long to get to "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF
THE CHILDREN????"

Here's a thought: If YOU don't want YOUR kid "subjected to uninvited,
religious proselytization," don't take him to In-and-Out. If you find
that concept confusing, please google on "personal responsibility."

--
If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2006 22:11:01 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>
>
>>Jon Nadelberg wrote:
>>
>>>-L. wrote:
>>>
>>>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
>>>>>a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>>>>
>>>>I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
>>>>****ing Fundies are everywhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>It's totally unobtrusive,
>>
>>It's not toally unobtrusive.
>
>
> Yes it is!
> No it's not!
> Nuh-uh!
> Uh-huh!
> Says who?
> MOM!!!!!

Don't make me stop this newsgroup!

--
Shelly (Warning: see label for details)
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

-L. wrote:
> Jon Nadelberg wrote:
>> -L. wrote:
>>> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>>> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
>>>> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>>> I don't care if they are black. What I hate is proselytization. The
>>> ****ing Fundies are everywhere.
>>>
>>
>> It's totally unobtrusive,
>
> It's not toally unobtrusive.
>

You have to go looking for it. Most people don't even know it is there.

>> and if it's what they believe, so what? It
>> doesn't hurt anyone.
>
> So you want your kid subjected to uninvited, religious proselytization
> when they're eating a burger? I sure as hell don't.
>


He doesn't get any proselytizing. It's a set of tiny letters on the
inside of the bottom of a soda cup that is in 5 point type.

And if they want to put it there, that's their business. They have
every right to. Just like you have a right to overreact and not eat there.

Charles Wm. Dimmick wrote:
> Jon Nadelberg wrote:
>
>> Matt J. McCullar wrote:
>>
>>> "Glenn" > wrote in message
>>> . ..
>>>
>>>> Boy did you open the gate, but WHAT IS AN IN-N-OUT BURGER??? I live in
>>>> the 4th largest city in the nation and we have never heard of it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's a fast food chain, found primarily in Southern California. Take
>>> heart
>>> in not knowing about it; I've spent practically my whole life in
>>> Texas and
>>> never heard of In-n-Out Burger either, until I visited Los Angeles
>>> just a
>>> couple of years ago. It's absolutely unknown over here because we've
>>> got
>>> Whataburger, and California folks don't.
>>>
>>
>> Whataburger tried to make it out here in CA, but didn't.
>>
> There's something wrong with their time line, or else there
> was another chain with the same name:
> "Eventually, in 1959, Harmon Dobson would expand outside Texas with
> Whataburger #21 opening in Pensacola, Florida."
>

I recall in maybe the early 70s going to a Whataburger in Los Angeles.
I don't know if it is the same chain or not. It was quite busy for a while.

White Castle also tried to come out to LA, too. They had an outlet on
Ventura Blvd. Another bust.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
> Oh boy. Sure didn't take you long to get to "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF
> THE CHILDREN????"

As long as parents rule the world, this will be a fact of life for you.
Get over it.

>
> Here's a thought: If YOU don't want YOUR kid "subjected to uninvited,
> religious proselytization," don't take him to In-and-Out.

I don't and I wouldn't. Doesn't mean I have to support proselytization
by anyone.

-L.

Bob Ward wrote:
>
> Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.

Sure it does. I have the right to be free from YOUR religion.

>
> If you are offended, vote with your feet and/or your wallet. That's
> about the only options I can see that would be realistic.

As I do.

-L.

"-L." > wrote

>> Oh boy. Sure didn't take you long to get to "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF
>> THE CHILDREN????"
>
> As long as parents rule the world, this will be a fact of life for you.
> Get over it.
>
>>
>> Here's a thought: If YOU don't want YOUR kid "subjected to uninvited,
>> religious proselytization," don't take him to In-and-Out.
>
> I don't and I wouldn't. Doesn't mean I have to support proselytization
> by anyone.

Who said you did? Is there a talking frog in here?

--oTTo--

On 2006-09-15, -L. > wrote:

> I don't and I wouldn't. Doesn't mean I have to support proselytization
> by anyone.

Isn't it bad enough that people lose limbs, without nuts like you
opposing artificial ones?

--
When Toad found himself immured in a dank and noisome dungeon, ... he
flung himself at full length on the floor, and shed bitter tears, and
abandoned himself to dark despair. [Kenneth Grahame]

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:35:57 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson >
wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-L.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>
>>>Neal
>>
>>
>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>it.
>>
>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>yourself.
>
>Oh, I'm certain he didn't mean to imply any such thing. To the
>contrary, he most likely meant to imply that you stole it from
>Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, or some other cess-pool of bumper-sticker
>political "thought."
>
>Your inferrence that it is original to you is indeed laughable,
>though. You and the rest of the parrots of FM talk radio aren't
>exactly known for originality or creativity, and with good reason.
>
>--
>If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
>would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
>--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

Hmmm, don't have much FM talk radio around here.

Neal

On 15 Sep 2006 09:32:31 -0700, "-L." > wrote:

>
>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Oh boy. Sure didn't take you long to get to "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF
>> THE CHILDREN????"
>
>As long as parents rule the world, this will be a fact of life for you.
> Get over it.

You mean there's only so many windmills you're willing to tilt at? For
someone who's going to rid the world of proselytization, you sure do
roll over and whimper in the face of the Parents Who Rule the World.

>> Here's a thought: If YOU don't want YOUR kid "subjected to uninvited,
>> religious proselytization," don't take him to In-and-Out.
>
>I don't and I wouldn't. Doesn't mean I have to support proselytization
>by anyone.

Um . . . yeah. That was kind of my point, my reading-challenged
friend. You don't have to support it. Don't like it? Don't eat there.

--
If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:44 GMT,
(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-L.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>
>>>Neal
>>
>>
>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>it.
>>
>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>yourself.
>>
>
>Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
>used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
>little ribbing, then you should find another group.
>


Get over yourself.

Jon Nadelberg wrote:
> White Castle also tried to come out to LA, too. They had an outlet on
> Ventura Blvd. Another bust.

I remember the opening promotion. Gave away burgers for a week I think it was.
As soon as it wasn't free, it wasn't anything that a native wanted.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>
>
>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>
>>>Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>with Bible citations.
>>
>>Oh Jesus.
>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>
>
> Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
> a disparaging phrase like "these people."
>

"the founder of In-and-Out were black"?

Try adding an "s" or changing "were" to "was", pro. Keep trying.
You'll get it eventually.

"Glenn" > wrote in message
. ..
> Boy did you open the gate, but WHAT IS AN IN-N-OUT BURGER??? I live in
> the 4th largest city in the nation and we have never heard of it.

4th largest. Hmm. I'm deficient about this information as it keeps changing.
NYC is 1st. LA is 2nd. Chicago is 3rd., then I have a gap. Sandy Eggo used
to be 6th but is now 7th as Phoenix took over 6th place. I'm sure that Las
Vegas will eventuall bump us down to 8th. And San Antonio is coming up too.
So. Is the 4th largest city Dallas?

As I live in Sandy Eggo, I have aquaintance with In-N-Out. I think it is
over rated and very poor. In short nasty. It is, perhaps, a notch above
McDonalds, etc. but it is well behind Tommy's Chili Burgers. In Sandy Eggo
we have a local chain that serves un-fast hamburgers where you have to go
inside to eat. It is Boll Weevel. Super hamburgers. Actually the best
hamburger in town is at a very small Ethopian resturant that has produced
the same burgers through many owners for the last 45 years. No new owner
dared change the hamburger. Even the Ethopian owners know better and they,
according to the Ethopians I know, serve the best Ethopian food in Sandy
Eggo! It still has it's original name "Granger's". It is located just next
to Texas Street on El Cajon Blvd. I used to live just a few yards away on
Texas St. and visited Granger's often for hamburgers to take home. It is a
very small place with maybe 4 or 5 tables.

Charliam, who hopes he is right about Dallas!

Charles Gifford wrote:
> "Glenn" > wrote in message
> . ..
> > Boy did you open the gate, but WHAT IS AN IN-N-OUT BURGER??? I live in
> > the 4th largest city in the nation and we have never heard of it.
>
> 4th largest. Hmm. I'm deficient about this information as it keeps changing.
> NYC is 1st. LA is 2nd. Chicago is 3rd., then I have a gap. Sandy Eggo used
> to be 6th but is now 7th as Phoenix took over 6th place. I'm sure that Las
> Vegas will eventuall bump us down to 8th. And San Antonio is coming up too.
> So. Is the 4th largest city Dallas?

I'm pretty sure it's Houston

"Joe Gillis" > wrote in message
>>
>> 4th largest. Hmm. I'm deficient about this information as it keeps
>> changing.
>> NYC is 1st. LA is 2nd. Chicago is 3rd., then I have a gap. Sandy Eggo
>> used
>> to be 6th but is now 7th as Phoenix took over 6th place. I'm sure that
>> Las
>> Vegas will eventuall bump us down to 8th. And San Antonio is coming up
>> too.
>> So. Is the 4th largest city Dallas?
>
> I'm pretty sure it's Houston
>

Yes
For the US http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html

For the world http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762524.html

Dan Krueger wrote:
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> > On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Bermuda999 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
> >>>with Bible citations.
> >>
> >>Oh Jesus.
> >>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
> >>
> >
> > Just because the founder of In-and-Out were black is no reason to use
> > a disparaging phrase like "these people."
> >
>
> "the founder of In-and-Out were black"?
>
> Try adding an "s" or changing "were" to "was", pro. Keep trying.
> You'll get it eventually.

It was close. It could have been....The founder of In & Out be black.

Wayno wrote:
> Sonoran Dude wrote:
> > As far as taste, I admit the In and Out is a "tasty burger" but in LA
> > there are many small joints owned by Greeks, Arabs and other immigrants
> > that would kick ass on most in and out burgers.
>
> This reminds me of that burger joint in LA on Santa Monica Blvd. at
> Robertson. Can't remember the name of the place but the burgers they
> sold were fantastically tasty!
>
> Wayno
> http://www.nstmyosenji.org

Is this the same Doyle ass licker from RGP? Sadly we meet on a
celebrity gossip usenet. I just moved to Vegas 2 weeks ago. On my
first night I played at the Wynn and saw the worst live cheating event
in my poker history. It was almost the first cheating I have seen
live. Of course according to you there is no cheating in poker.
Since my 1st night in Vegas experience every local person I have told
the Wynn story to has related several other cheating stories. Even
Doyle admitted the poker hall of fame Johnny Moss was a cheat. Why did
Doyle play so many years with a CHEAT? Hard to guess - you piece of
shit. How did Chip make sure Spilatro got his money every month? They
are both great poker players even if they pulled a few moves/cheats.
You on the other hand are a repeat - piece of shit - who makes me sick.
I hope Gordan Gano smashes you over the head with a guitar.

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:36:18 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:44 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-L.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>>
>>>>Neal
>>>
>>>
>>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>>it.
>>>
>>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>>yourself.
>>>
>>
>>Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
>>used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
>>little ribbing, then you should find another group.
>>
>
>
>Get over yourself.
>

Nothing for me to get over.

Neal

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:

>>Get over yourself.
>>
>
>Nothing for me to get over.

Ah. A modest man with much to be modest about. A legend in his own
lunchtime.

(Those two statements seem particularly appropriate, since we were
just talking about you palming off someone else's pithy remarks as
your own. Neither one are mine.)

--
If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:33:37 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>>Get over yourself.
>>>
>>
>>Nothing for me to get over.
>
>Ah. A modest man with much to be modest about. A legend in his own
>lunchtime.
>
>(Those two statements seem particularly appropriate, since we were
>just talking about you palming off someone else's pithy remarks as
>your own. Neither one are mine.)

Notice how cold and clammy it got in here over the weekend? Must be
the only day it gets computer access in the asylum's library. And it
can't recall who had a head wound. Sad, innit?

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:36:18 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:44 GMT,
>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-L.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>>>
>>>>>Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>>>it.
>>>>
>>>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>>>yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
>>>used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
>>>little ribbing, then you should find another group.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Get over yourself.
>>
>
>Nothing for me to get over.
>
>Neal


You seem to be taking it upon yourself to determine who should post in
AFCA...

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:29:29 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:36:18 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:44 GMT,
>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked (inobtrusively)
>>>>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-L.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Neal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>>>>it.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>>>>yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
>>>>used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
>>>>little ribbing, then you should find another group.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Get over yourself.
>>>
>>
>>Nothing for me to get over.
>>
>>Neal
>
>
>You seem to be taking it upon yourself to determine who should post in
>AFCA...
>

Never said OR implied that. Just recommended that if you can't take a
little ribbing, maybe you're in the wrong group. People make and
receive comments like mine every day of the week. In relation to this
group, mine was pretty mild. Most people are thick skinned enough that
they don't let it bother them.

But then again YMMV.

Neal

"Neal Eckhardt" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:29:29 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:36:18 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:44 GMT,
>>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:12:59 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:37:17 GMT,
>>>>>>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:08:00 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 13 Sep 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "-L." > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Bermuda999 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Semi-famous for using cups and burger wrappers marked
>>>>>>>>>> (inobtrusively)
>>>>>>>>>> with Bible citations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh Jesus.
>>>>>>>>>Isn't anything off-limits to these people?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-L.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Freedom OF religion in no way requires freedom FROM religion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gee. That sounds familiar. I wonder where I heard that before?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Neal
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Take the Ginko Biloba more often - if you can remember where you keep
>>>>>>it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you are implying that I stole it from you or something, get over
>>>>>>yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Never said anybody STOLE it as it was done long before my time. But I
>>>>>used the quote several times in a previous thread. If you can't take a
>>>>>little ribbing, then you should find another group.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Get over yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nothing for me to get over.
>>>
>>>Neal
>>
>>
>>You seem to be taking it upon yourself to determine who should post in
>>AFCA...
>>
>
> Never said OR implied that. Just recommended that if you can't take a
> little ribbing, maybe you're in the wrong group. People make and
> receive comments like mine every day of the week. In relation to this
> group, mine was pretty mild. Most people are thick skinned enough that
> they don't let it bother them.
>
> But then again YMMV.
>
> Neal

Neal, do you know of a good newsreader that filters out
cross-posting bozos?

Chris McGonnell > wrote in
:

> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:33:37 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:13:32 GMT,
(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>>
>>>>Get over yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nothing for me to get over.
>>
>>Ah. A modest man with much to be modest about. A legend in
>>his own lunchtime.
>>
>>(Those two statements seem particularly appropriate, since
>>we were just talking about you palming off someone else's
>>pithy remarks as your own. Neither one are mine.)
>
> Notice how cold and clammy it got in here over the weekend?
> Must be the only day it gets computer access in the
> asylum's library. And it can't recall who had a head wound.
> Sad, innit?
>

I'm just happy that
i. I have it killfiled
2. Few folks reply to it anymore
c. I was out of town when it reappeared


--
TeaLady (mari)

"The principle of Race is meant to embody and express the
utter negation of human freedom, the denial of equal rights, a
challenge in the face of mankind." A. Kolnai
Avast ye scurvy dogs ! Thar be no disease in this message.

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:24:17 GMT,
(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:

>
>Never said OR implied that. Just recommended that if you can't take a
>little ribbing, maybe you're in the wrong group. People make and
>receive comments like mine every day of the week. In relation to this
>group, mine was pretty mild. Most people are thick skinned enough that
>they don't let it bother them.
>
>But then again YMMV.
>
>Neal


I've been here since at least 1999, according to Google Groups - I'm
pretty sure I was posting here awhile before that under a different
email addresses. In all that time, I've never stomped out,
threatening to never return. I think I can handle anything you or the
group might throw at me, even if you don't approve of the way I choose
to respond.

If you didn't know that, you know what they say about you and the
horse you rode in on.

anyone who has not been to In-N-Out has missed out. does anyone know
all the dishes on the secret menu? i've seen someone eat a 16 by 16
before...


FingYoJeMa #414373

Cool Games
<a href=http://www.gamestotal.com/>Multiplayer Online Games</a> <a
href=http://www.gamestotal.com/>Strategy Games</a><br><a
href=http://uc.gamestotal.com/>Unification Wars</a> - <a
href=http://uc.gamestotal.com/>Massive Multiplayer Online
Games</a><br><a href=http://gc.gamestotal.com/>Galactic Conquest</a> -
<a href=http://gc.gamestotal.com/>Strategy Games</a><br><a
href=http://www.stephenyong.com/runescape.htm>Runescape</a><br><a
href=http://www.stephenyong.com/kingsofchaos.htm>Kings of chaos</a><br>

Terry wrote:
> Joe Gillis wrote:
>
> > Enshrine This Burger
> > If the site of the first McDonald's is commemorated, why not In-N-Out?
> >
> We had an arcade/restaurant here in Georgia. It was called the Dog
> Patch. They had a small selection. The sign out front read......The
> Dog Patch, under one million sold.
>
> I am guessing that he never made it to a million, although, the patch
> burger was a hamburger with homemade cole slaw. It was quite good.

In article .com>,
wrote:

> anyone who has not been to In-N-Out has missed out. does anyone know
> all the dishes on the secret menu? i've seen someone eat a 16 by 16
> before...


There's a secret menu on their web site.

--
Dan Abel

Petaluma, California, USA

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:49:41 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:24:17 GMT,
>(Neal Eckhardt) wrote:
>
>>
>>Never said OR implied that. Just recommended that if you can't take a
>>little ribbing, maybe you're in the wrong group. People make and
>>receive comments like mine every day of the week. In relation to this
>>group, mine was pretty mild. Most people are thick skinned enough that
>>they don't let it bother them.
>>
>>But then again YMMV.
>>
>>Neal
>
>
>I've been here since at least 1999, according to Google Groups - I'm
>pretty sure I was posting here awhile before that under a different
>email addresses. In all that time, I've never stomped out,
>threatening to never return. I think I can handle anything you or the
>group might throw at me, even if you don't approve of the way I choose
>to respond.
>
>If you didn't know that, you know what they say about you and the
>horse you rode in on.
>

Personally, I have never stomped out either. I don't let minor things
bother me. I can take a joke aimed at me without getting all huffy.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion. You know what they say
about opinions, they are like assholes, everybody has one.

Neal

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:49:41 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:

>If you didn't know that, you know what they say about you and the
>horse you rode in on.

Are we still talking about the meaning of "a stitch in time saves
nine"?

--
If we could live without passion maybe we'd know some kind of peace, but we
would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion we'd be truly dead.
--David Boreanaz as Angel in "Buffy The Vampire Slayer"

"Kevin S. Wilson" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ...
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:49:41 GMT, Bob Ward > wrote:
>
>>If you didn't know that, you know what they say about you and the
>>horse you rode in on.
>
> Are we still talking about the meaning of "a stitch in time saves
> nine"?
>
I guess that you're posting from alt.gossip.celebrities.

Please be advised that the state of Chers' and Pamelas' tits is off-topic
in the other groups.
I also find it distasteful that the choice of women to inflate or deflate their
boobs is gossiped about ! Plus, if the doctor does good work, you won't see
the stitches.

Get a live ! Listen to an Elton John concert, for example, instead of just gossiping
about him.

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner