Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just some food for thought. I ran an experiment comparing the pH of
two samples of the same starter refreshed with different flours. Both samples consisted of 10g of starter + 50g water + 50g flour. Both ran at the same temperature (75°F to 78°F). One was made with fresh ground whole wheat flour, the other was made with enriched, bleached high gluten white flour. I think this demonstrates the phenomena of whole grain flour buffering the starter and allowing the accumulation of more total acid before the LAB growth shuts down at a pH below 4.0. The most interesting result is the increase in pH during the first hour. Anybody care to speculate on why this happens? Look here for data: http://picasaweb.google.com/DocDough/StarterPH/photo?authkey=W5xf8wUEzog#5217143234399849442"><im gsrc="http://lh5.ggpht.com/DocDough/SGcEIUy8S-I/AAAAAAAABEI/OoT2ArgoJQs/s144/Starter%20pH.jpg Doc |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:06:17 -0700 (PDT), Doc >
wrote: >Just some food for thought. I ran an experiment comparing the pH of >two samples of the same starter refreshed with different flours. Both >samples consisted of 10g of starter + 50g water + 50g flour. Both ran >at the same temperature (75°F to 78°F). One was made with fresh >ground whole wheat flour, the other was made with enriched, bleached >high gluten white flour. I think this demonstrates the phenomena of >whole grain flour buffering the starter and allowing the accumulation >of more total acid before the LAB growth shuts down at a pH below 4.0. >The most interesting result is the increase in pH during the first >hour. Anybody care to speculate on why this happens? > >Look here for data: >http://picasaweb.google.com/DocDough/StarterPH/photo?authkey=W5xf8wUEzog#5217143234399849442"><im gsrc="http://lh5.ggpht.com/DocDough/SGcEIUy8S-I/AAAAAAAABEI/OoT2ArgoJQs/s144/Starter%20pH.jpg > >Doc Hi Doc, I don't mean to sound like a smart-a-s here but this is about the same thing as saying "These two loaves of bread were made with different ingredients yet they taste different." What would be a surprise is if the starting and ending pH of the two samples were the same. Jack |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say, this is a potential measuring error asking for attention.
How often did you do the test or do you have some soap left in the container which dissolves after a while? What is the pH of the flours you use? That would be your baseline and when you add some acid with the starters, it would go down. That would be an interesting number to see the effect of 10 % of starter. One effect may be happening. If you grow one starter on a particular flour and then on another flour, there may be a higher time of "retooling" used by the critters to adjust to the new goodies. I was measuring SD pH's until it got too boring and never saw anything like it - pH increasing after starter was mixed. Sam Doc wrote: > Just some food for thought. I ran an experiment comparing the pH of > two samples of the same starter refreshed with different flours. Both > samples consisted of 10g of starter + 50g water + 50g flour. Both ran > at the same temperature (75°F to 78°F). One was made with fresh > ground whole wheat flour, the other was made with enriched, bleached > high gluten white flour. I think this demonstrates the phenomena of > whole grain flour buffering the starter and allowing the accumulation > of more total acid before the LAB growth shuts down at a pH below 4.0. > The most interesting result is the increase in pH during the first > hour. Anybody care to speculate on why this happens? > > Look here for data: > http://picasaweb.google.com/DocDough/StarterPH/photo?authkey=W5xf8wUEzog#5217143234399849442"><im gsrc="http://lh5.ggpht.com/DocDough/SGcEIUy8S-I/AAAAAAAABEI/OoT2ArgoJQs/s144/Starter%20pH.jpg > > Doc > > _______________________________________________ > Rec.food.sourdough mailing list > > http://www.mountainbitwarrior.com/ma...food.sourdough > > |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 3:46 pm, Sam > wrote:
> What is the pH of the flours you use? That would be your baseline and > when you add some acid with the starters, it would go down. > That would be an interesting number to see the effect of 10 % of starter. The white flour when mixed without any starter at 100% hydration yields a pH of 5.91, but this is a point measurement and I did not let it sit and repeat it for the same batch over time. I will do that next weekend and we will see what it does. Each data point is the minimum of at least three measurements. The ISFET sensor was calibrated (2-point) at the beginning and at the end of the series (and just prior to the second calibration it was reading 4.08 in the 4.01 buffer so it had not drifted too far). I agree that it looks like a small amount of something (a buffer of some kind) is slowly dissolving. I suppose it could be something leaching out of the bran as it hydrates, but the phenomena is not limited to whole wheat flour. I have two other time series on larger batch sizes (but with longer intervals between data points) that show the same behavior, an increase in pH over the first hour, then a monotonic decrease. Of the four data sets, two were collected from samples in glass jars and two from samples in stainless steel bowls. Today I did a batch that started with starter at pH 4.1; added water and dispersed the starter - pH stayed at 4.1; added salt and high gluten white flour and mixed - pH 5.07 at end of mix; an hour later the pH was 5.82; after another hour 4.55. Doc |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 3:46 pm, Sam > wrote:
> I'd say, this is a potential measuring error asking for attention. Yes, after rerunning the experiment with closer attention, it was probably a measurement error associated with a small area ISFET in a recess where it is easy to retain a small air bubble when the sample is viscous. When I went to 200% hydration sample, the problem became easier to avoid, but the sensor is still very sensitive. Look he http://picasaweb.google.com/DocDough...ighGlutenWhite for a new data set. The high gluten white starter was mixed at 100% hydration while the whole wheat was 200%, and I think that both of the excursions from smooth curves could be reflections of the "bubble" phenomenon. For each data point, two calibration samples were read (at pH 4.01 and 7.00) after measuring both starter samples. These calibration samples were used to remove sensor bias drift (all adjustments were in the range of .02 to .04). It is still possible that there is a small pH increase after the initial mixing of starter, water, and flour, but it is on the order of the sensor bias drift. There was no apparent scale factor change over the test interval. See: http://picasaweb.google.com/DocDough...onsInHydration for a data set illustrating the stability (at a pH of 6) of the pH of a sample of flour and water (no starter), the corresponding calibration measurements, and the effect of increased sample hydration. These curves have not been corrected for the sensor offset drift which can be seen in the top and bottom curves (and also in the flour/water data). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
corn flour versus wheat flour | General Cooking | |||
corn flour versus wheat flour | General Cooking | |||
corn flour versus wheat flour | General Cooking | |||
Rye Starter - fed with White Flour? | Sourdough | |||
Using whole wheat flour in recipes from The Italian Baker by Carol Field? Which whole wheat flour? | Baking |