Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am thinking I should get a scale for the kitchen if I am to
seriously get into my bread fascination. At least, to get a true result to fine tune. When scooping by the cup of fraction of a cup, there's a margin of error a bit higher than I would like as it's getting packed at times depending on the scoop. I could scoop-and- level, but this can also vary the exact weight. Should I be worried about being this precise? One thing I've noticed about my sourdoughs...they always end up so much more dense than regular yeast risen and salt risen breads. Any tips to adjust that it may get lighter/more spongey? |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:38:48 -0700 (PDT), rob norman
> wrote: >I am thinking I should get a scale for the kitchen if I am to >seriously get into my bread fascination. At least, to get a true >result to fine tune. When scooping by the cup of fraction of a cup, >there's a margin of error a bit higher than I would like as it's >getting packed at times depending on the scoop. I could scoop-and- >level, but this can also vary the exact weight. Should I be worried >about being this precise? >One thing I've noticed about my sourdoughs...they always end up so >much more dense than regular yeast risen and salt risen breads. Any >tips to adjust that it may get lighter/more spongey? Howdy, Indeed, weighing your ingredients is likely to be (somewhat) more accurate, but that is not the reason I suggest it to folks. I have been using a scale for many years simply because it is incredibly convenient: I just put a container on the scale, touch the tare button, and dump stuff in until I see the weight I seek. It takes moments. About the density: Are you using pans, or free-form loaves? It is easier if using pans... Whatever you are doing now with regard to ingredients, time, and temperature; do the same thing, but allow for a longer final fermentation, that is, just let the loaf "rise a bit longer." With that, you should have a "lighter" loaf. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rob norman wrote:
> I am thinking I should get a scale for the kitchen if I am to > seriously get into my bread fascination. At least, to get a true > result to fine tune. When scooping by the cup of fraction of a cup, > there's a margin of error a bit higher than I would like as it's > getting packed at times depending on the scoop. I could scoop-and- > level, but this can also vary the exact weight. Should I be worried > about being this precise? > One thing I've noticed about my sourdoughs...they always end up so > much more dense than regular yeast risen and salt risen breads. Any > tips to adjust that it may get lighter/more spongey? I have found the humidity changes make a difference in how much water the flour soaks up so I never really use the same amount twice. I work the last in while kneading and it is usually close, but... I also find if I work my dough as soft as I can handle it, it makes a softer end product that usually needs a pan for shape. I also was getting a lot denser and heavier bread which my market does like and still asks for, but figured out how to make really light fluffy sourdough from a link Dicky posted. http://home.att.net/~carlsfriends/di...ctions_Rev.doc The trick is to let it grow... and grow... and grow.... I can easily get a 5X volume grow using Dicky's method which gives an amazingly light and airy loaf. Basically instead of looking for the 2X volume grow commercial yeast gives, Dicky's and mine at least, SD culture will keep on growing for at least 8 hours. More than that and I start to get a 'flying crust' or big air bubbles right under the crust line. Here are a couple photos of my version of a 'billowy' SD loaf: http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...f/thestart.jpg http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n.../thefinish.jpg http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...tuff/crumb.jpg http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...ff/ASDloaf.jpg Mike Some bread photos: http://www.mikeromain.shutterfly.com |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Romain" > wrote in message ng.com... > ... I can easily get a 5X volume grow using Dicky's method which gives an > amazingly light and airy loaf. ... Maybe so, but I do not think your photos are as convincing as some of mine, like http://home.att.net/~dick.adams/bread.html (Well, that was a while back, and I no longer use extreme measures to achieve a rounded loaf, nor an incubator other than a cover to prevent drying. I have mentioned that, with the flours I have been able to get in the Northeast, the one that gives the best rise is bromated (GM50111).) -- Dicky |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick Adams wrote:
> "Mike Romain" > wrote in message ng.com... >> ... I can easily get a 5X volume grow using Dicky's method which gives an >> amazingly light and airy loaf. ... > > Maybe so, but I do not think your photos are as convincing as some of mine, like > http://home.att.net/~dick.adams/bread.html > > that gives the best rise is bromated (GM50111).) > I also like the foil pan for holding shape until it sets in the oven. I use that for my baguettes sometimes instead of a canvas strip and dowel poles some bakers use as troughs for the rise. I also have some nice low sided 'Pyrex' style casserole dishes that shape the loaf nice. Next time I make a tube loaf in a coffee can I will take nice photos if I can. The tube shape makes the volume difference very easy to see because it is just a height difference. No real matter, your method works very well and I only use generic Canadian 'all purpose' flour, either unbleached or bleached with my homemade starter. I want to try for some 'billowy' bagels soon. :-) Mike |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WOW!
I expected a response or maybe two, but this was absolutely great! Thank you all so much for your input, and I do so appreciate the photos. That makes me just feel like my efforts are right there and spot on. I don't photo much of my food, I am too busy munching on it! The baguettes Mike, they look totally professional. And Dicky, the boule loaves were very artsy; I like the color. I am curious, I've come across recipes that identify a basic SD starter as just about a 1:1 ratio of flour (unbleached) and water, but have also seen recipes calling for 1:1 flour to milk. ?? Any insight on which provides for a stronger "sour"? I got a good flavor out of the last batch, but I cannot describe what was done. The starter was my own, it was actually the 50% scrap to toss as I had replenished it that day, just wanted to see what my starter was tasting like. A buddy came over and she resumed my progress on the recipe whilest I manned the grill outdoors [nobody touches the grill except my wife or I!]...so the bread didn't come out super dense, though I am still gunning for the lighter, billowy boule loaf of SD. Also, the inside was a nice, almost tart sour...but the crust, to my dissatisfaction, was relatively bland. I am *******izing recipes and plugging in the parts I want to make work. I just didn't want to stand on the shoulders of those who had already accomplished the good bread without "earning" it for myself. Next attempt at my SD loaves, will most definitely take pics. Thanks for all yours! It's a fun hobby!! Appreciatively, ~Rob |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob,
you should bake the way the suits you as far as your taste goes and don't bother asking for other peoples advice on that. Why would you? It's your taste. As soon as you get someone suggesting 'putting milk the starter is crazy' someone else will come in and accuse them of being a 'purist' which is a polite way of dismissing their opinion as narrow minded bigotry. There's a lot of people that add milk for all kinds of reasons and they'd probably be adding sugar and potatoes and cheese and all kinds of things. There's a school of thought that goes 'it's called 'sour-dough' not 'sour-bread' so why are you trying to get your bread sour'? You could argue that if you're going to add milk, something that is by the way alakaline to get sour bread then why not just dip your baked bread in vinegar before you eat it? You could even buy lactic, acetic, malic, citric, tartaric or tanic acids and try adding that to your dough. Personally I think your question is akin to asking what you should put on your pizza. What are you looking for? French, German, British, East coast, West coast, Mid west, Mad Mom, Ditzy Dad, High brow, low brow, educated, uneducated, trailor trash, Stepford Wife? What anlge are you going for? Jim On 23 Jul, 10:24, rob norman > wrote: ... > *I am curious, I've come across recipes that identify a basic SD > starter as just about a 1:1 ratio of flour (unbleached) and water, but > have also seen recipes calling for 1:1 flour to milk. ?? Any insight > on which provides for a stronger "sour"? ... > Appreciatively, > ~Rob |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rob norman wrote:
> I am curious, I've come across recipes that identify a basic SD > starter as just about a 1:1 ratio of flour (unbleached) and water, but > have also seen recipes calling for 1:1 flour to milk. ?? Any insight > on which provides for a stronger "sour"? I find 'both' work well. I make SD English muffins that call for an overnight ferment of starter and milk and flour as well as I use milk in lots of loaves of bread, depending on what texture I am aiming for. The muffins turned out beautiful and we had eggs Benedict for supper last night. I find the best 'sour' taste comes from a long ferment. I can get half decent 'sour' from a long ferment overnight of the starter, but not near as nice as a long last rise. I just pulled a loaf out of the oven now at 10:15 AM that I started growing at 9:30 PM last night. I took a tbsp of my active sponge and added 500 ml water with enough flour stirred in to ball up and a tsp of salt. I then kneaded the dough and let it rest in a ball covered on the counter until about 11:30, then loafed it and let it rise until 9:30 AM this morning when I baked it. I might have let it rise more, except it 'escaped' the pyrex dish it was in and was starting to spread over the cookie sheet I had the dish on. It 'mushroomed' big time. LOL. Turned out really nice with a crispy sour crust. I loosely base my 'sour' loaves on Dick's 'Billowly' SD loaf. His method of using one small amount of starter with lots of food for growing works very well for me. Mike |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 4:29*am, Mike Romain > wrote:
> rob norman wrote: > > *I am curious, I've come across recipes that identify a basic SD > > starter as just about a 1:1 ratio of flour (unbleached) and water, but > > have also seen recipes calling for 1:1 flour to milk. ?? Any insight > > on which provides for a stronger "sour"? > > I find 'both' work well. *I make SD English muffins that call for an > overnight ferment of starter and milk and flour as well as I use milk in > lots of loaves of bread, depending on what texture I am aiming for. *The > muffins turned out beautiful and we had eggs Benedict for supper last > night. > > I find the best 'sour' taste comes from a long ferment. *I can get half > decent 'sour' from a long ferment overnight of the starter, but not near > as nice as a long last rise. > > I just pulled a loaf out of the oven now at 10:15 AM that I started > growing at 9:30 PM last night. *I took a tbsp of my active sponge and > added 500 ml water with enough flour stirred in to ball up and a tsp of > salt. *I then kneaded the dough and let it rest in a ball covered on the > counter until about 11:30, then loafed it and let it rise until 9:30 AM > this morning when I baked it. *I might have let it rise more, except it > 'escaped' the pyrex dish it was in and was starting to spread over the > cookie sheet I had the dish on. *It 'mushroomed' big time. *LOL. *Turned > out really nice with a crispy sour crust. > > I loosely base my 'sour' loaves on Dick's 'Billowly' SD loaf. *His > method of using one small amount of starter with lots of food for > growing works very well for me. > > Mike Mike, I totally know that mushroom loaf feeling from the time as a loaf of non-SD bread was baking and it had already risen a bit too high; still came out great though and the crust was delicious! Your posts have been very informative and I appreciate your info. I will take pics this next time, I just actually need to make the time...seems in short supply these days ![]() Dicky, thank you as well...I like the bounce back and forth between your and Mike's input. It's very fun to watch a bit of friendly competition. All in all, as a beginner of this food...I made it pretty clear how I am trying to achieve the sour flavor of the bread as well as a sour crust. It seems to me the pessimistic view came from the one input about "dismissing an opinion" and "bigotry"...it's cooking. Lighten up and have some fun with it...the minute you take it as seriously as you are, there's no fun left in it. But Mike, Dicky and Kenneth; thank you for your inputs and I look forward to showing you my next attempt...hopefully with tastier results! Show ya soon, take care all! |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:00:38 -0700 (PDT), rob norman
> wrote: >>SNIP<< >It seems to me the pessimistic view came from the one input >about "dismissing an opinion" and "bigotry"...it's cooking. Lighten up >and have some fun with it...the minute you take it as seriously as you >are, there's no fun left in it. >But Mike, Dicky and Kenneth; thank you for your inputs and I look >forward to showing you my next attempt...hopefully with tastier >results! Show ya soon, take care all! Hi Rob, Thanks for your kind comments... A suggestion I would add (in case you might not already be doing it) is to keep careful notes. When I started out, I neglected to do that, and often found that I could not duplicate something I liked, or avoid something that went wrong. Now, I am quite a bit more careful to note the temperature of my ingredients, their weights, and the times of various stages in the process. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kenneth" > wrote in message ... > [ ... ] > Now, I am quite a bit more careful to note the temperature > of my ingredients, their weights, and the times of various > stages in the process. Kenneth, now that you are writing down everything in exactitude, do you find that your results are better? Do you, perchance, have any before-and-after photos? Ol' "Boron", you know, just wings it -- not even a recipe! Her photos imply that she is making presentable bread, in spite of her apparent contempt for exactitude. For instance, see http://www.flickr.com/photos/25648800@N04/ -- Dicky |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to agree Dick,
I can honestly say that all my mistakes were fixed by knowing what the dough should look like when it needs to go to the next stage. Sure I could do the same with thermometers and stop watches, but you'd need to know what the best time is and the best temp for that time. How long is it going to take you to work that out, especially if you aren't already an accomplished baker, add in you made your starter yourself...? So much easier to let the dough tell you when it's time. Jim On 7 Aug, 18:15, "Dick Adams" > wrote: > "Kenneth" > wrote in messagenews:fi8m94du3b1p5opld7748sfbduqkvdagsc@4ax .com... > > [ ... ] > > Now, I am quite a bit more careful to note the temperature > > of my ingredients, their weights, and the times of various > > stages in the process. > > Kenneth, now that you are writing down everything in exactitude, > do you find that your results are better? *Do you, perchance, have > any before-and-after photos? > > Ol' "Boron", you know, just wings it -- not even a recipe! *Her > photos imply that she is making presentable bread, in spite of her > apparent contempt for exactitude. *For instance, seehttp://www.flickr.com/photos/25648800@N04/ > > -- > Dicky |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TG" > wrote in message ... > I can honestly say that all my mistakes were fixed ... Honesty, of course, is paramount! |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rob norman wrote:
> Mike, > I totally know that mushroom loaf feeling from the time as a loaf of > non-SD bread was baking and it had already risen a bit too high; I kinds figure the bread didn't actually rise too high, I just used too small of a container. :-) > still > came out great though and the crust was delicious! Your posts have > been very informative and I appreciate your info. I will take pics > this next time, I just actually need to make the time...seems in short > supply these days ![]() Thanks, I did get a couple photos of that mushroomed loaf, just didn't have HD space to store them until now. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...oomedbread.jpg http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...eCJ7/crumb.jpg Mike |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 11:29 am, Kenneth > wrote:
> A suggestion I would add (in case you might not already be > doing it) is to keep careful notes. I'd add: a) Get that scale. It really is much easier than fiddle-futzing with a cup. b) get a yogurt thermometer so you can keep track of the ferment. c) reproduce <exactly> several breads from a good baker. Jeff Hamelman has a good book out. Peter Reinhard has several. d) download one of the dough spreadsheets at sourdoughhome.com and learn to use it. Watch the excellent stretch and fold video there too. You can learn to make excellent bread in 10 years with patient anarchy, or, you can defer your creativity and let a professional baker teach you (via his/her book/video) rather quickly. Bread baking is 5% creativity and 95% execution. Measuring tools and sound technique are good to have. |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Aug, 17:35, Will > wrote:
.... > You can learn to make excellent bread in 10 years with patient > anarchy, ... If you're lucky. The chances are you'll forget what good bread is and think the crap that you've been bragging about is actually something to post photos of. Oh, no, that's... Jim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I weighed the chicken | General Cooking | |||
Vanilla vice | General Cooking | |||
Vanilla vice | General Cooking | |||
Vanilla vice | General Cooking | |||
Vanilla vice | General Cooking |