Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G'day all;
I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) someone (that mostly being me!) would gobble it right up, so storing it for a few days was a non-issue. Even though I've been reading here for many years, I still seem to have a hole in this portion of my understanding of bread. I've done a Google search on past posts about this subject, looking for some enlightenment. As you might expect, most of the 5,800 or so responses I found was something like: "Do it this way! No! Your way sux, do it the other way. No it doesn't! Yes it does...", and so on. For too many years America has been the land of "wonder bread" wrapped in plastic. Obviously, for those of us reading and posting here, we've moved into the world of 'real' breads. But none of us brought along the knowledge on how to properly care for 'real' bread once it's baked (at least speaking for myself, that is). In my experience I found that leaving a freshly baked loaf out for at least a day seems to "cure" it about right. But leave it out any longer and the words "hockey puck" come to mind. Anybody have any good ideas on how to store a loaf or two of bread for let's say up to a week? I tried heavy Kraft paper. That didn't make the cut. The loaf was hard enough that the ducks wouldn't even eat it in 4-days (15-20% humidity & a 95F day aren't conducive to long bread life). I've tried waxed papers. But if you wrap it tightly, it's no better than plastic. Wrap it loosely, and the only difference between it and Kraft paper is the cost. Is there such a thing as a finely (tightly) woven bag perhaps? Maybe a leather carry pouch? Since we need to be able to put/use/get this container into an RV, please don't suggest a "bread-box!" I was wondering if anyone had ever used a kind of "Ziploc" bag that had a sea of tiny holes punched into it? I don't recall the name--can't seem to find it on any shelves, either--but I believe it was touted to be "best" for storing veggies. It would seem that a finely perforated plastic bag would solve this problem just about right. Tyvek, perhaps? I was hoping that maybe some of our European readership would chime in on this matter? After all, the notion of 'real' bread being a part of their daily staple is a far more ingrained event than our instant bread sealed in plastic culture. I mean, after all, 200 years ago folks baked once a week or so...they must have had a way to store their bread so that it would last a week anyway. I can bake their bread, now. I just haven't managed to figure out quite how they managed to keep it... Regards to all, Dusty San Jose, Ca. -- Remove STORE to reply |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 02:43 PM 7/6/2004, "Dusty" > wrote:
>G'day all; > >I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few >slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) (excuse me - IMO, that low carb frenzy is <censored> - seems to me that folks in US need some kind of induced stimulation by the means of a fad to enjoy their life) - I had to say that since you really seem to be on it;-) I suspected this to be the case for a long time and recently, after watching (not having done so for over 6 years) a US basketball game (LA Lakers ./. Detroit Pistons) on TV with all the quick commercial interruptions flashing by and the content communicated, it dawned on me that humans being exposed repeatedly to this kind of sensory input must take a hit in their nervous systems. I mean, that input is going somewhere, even if one blocks it out at one level. I strongly suspect the fads have something to do with it. (This was severely OT, I beg forgiveness) Now, to your bread aging issue: - all temperature in Celsius, I am sure you can handle it: - below -20, no (aging) -20 - -7: almost none - 7 .. 0 slow just above 0: very fast about 3 -> 20: fast above 20 slow above 55 no translated: don't put it in the fridge, freeze it instead or keep it at room temperature. Condensation at room temperature in airtight containers is an issue, I use zip-loc plastic bags but leave the seal open an inch or so to allow some air circulation. Freeaing works great - I either bake small loafs or cut large one's in pieces and freeze them right after baking. Thawing in microwave, then allow to air for a while to avoid condensation. Very minor difference to freshly baked bread. The minimum storage life for bread is very much dependent on the variety: White wheat bread (white flour): 2 - 3 days Wheat/rye mix breads 2 - 5 Rye/Wheat mix breads 5 - 7 rye breads 6 - 10 rye meal breads 8 - 12 all that number info is from Schuenemann/Treu Baking Technology book. Samartha remove "-nospam" when replying, and it's in my email address |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dusty" wrote in message ...
> I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few > slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) someone > (that mostly being me!) would gobble it right up, so storing it for a few > days was a non-issue. Even though I've been reading here for many years, I > still seem to have a hole in this portion of my understanding of bread. > <snip some "how do I store it" stuff> Dusty: I think this is what I'd do in your situation: Option 1: Give some of it away to your friends and neighbors. I bet they would like that. (I think this is the best option) Option 2: Make smaller loaves that you'd use before they'd go bad. I know that this would not necessarily be a reasonable option depending on how you are using the bread and the type of loaves. I would have a hard time figuring out how to make a pan loaf small enough to make just a couple of sandwiches. Option 3: Make your usual loaf. After baking, let the bread cool down for three or four hours to make sure it was down to room temperature. I'd then cut off what I think I would use over the next couple of days and put that aside. I'd then double bag in plastic the remainder and throw it in the freezer. Though it's not quite the same as bread that's never been frozen, I've found that freezing bread that is not long out of the oven works out pretty well. I've tried freezing after I've let it sit (cure) for a day or so, but haven't liked the results as much as bread I've frozen sooner after baking. When you are ready to use the frozen portion just let it defrost at room temperature. With the portion I'd cut off and not frozen I'd just sit it cut-side down on my cutting board for a while so it would "cure" and use it over the next day or so. I'm in a similar situation, but it has to do more with whole loaves. I will usually make three or four loaves at a time. If I'm not giving any away, I'll keep one out to use fresh which I will bag after it's been sitting out somewhere between 12 and 24 hours. The others I will double bag and freeze after they've cooled down and defrost as needed. I hope some of this was helpful. Thanks, -Mike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Samartha" wrote in message
news:mailman.1089151324.18964.rec.food.sourdough@w ww.mountainbitwarrior.com... >after > watching (not having done so for over 6 years) a US basketball game (LA > Lakers ./. Detroit Pistons) on TV Well, at least you were watching a pretty good game. Well, I thought those games were pretty good. I love good defensive basketball. OT stuff, so I'll stop now. Take care, -Mike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > wrote in message ... > G'day all; > > I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few > slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) someone > (that mostly being me!) would gobble it right up, so storing it for a few > days was a non-issue. Even though I've been reading here for many years, I > still seem to have a hole in this portion of my understanding of bread. > > I've done a Google search on past posts about this subject, looking for some > enlightenment. As you might expect, most of the 5,800 or so responses I > found was something like: "Do it this way! No! Your way sux, do it the > other way. No it doesn't! Yes it does...", and so on. For too many years > America has been the land of "wonder bread" wrapped in plastic. Obviously, > for those of us reading and posting here, we've moved into the world of > 'real' breads. But none of us brought along the knowledge on how to > properly care for 'real' bread once it's baked (at least speaking for > myself, that is). > > In my experience I found that leaving a freshly baked loaf out for at least > a day seems to "cure" it about right. But leave it out any longer and the > words "hockey puck" come to mind. Anybody have any good ideas on how to > store a loaf or two of bread for let's say up to a week? I tried heavy > Kraft paper. That didn't make the cut. The loaf was hard enough that the > ducks wouldn't even eat it in 4-days (15-20% humidity & a 95F day aren't > conducive to long bread life). I've tried waxed papers. But if you wrap it > tightly, it's no better than plastic. Wrap it loosely, and the only > difference between it and Kraft paper is the cost. Is there such a thing as > a finely (tightly) woven bag perhaps? Maybe a leather carry pouch? Since > we need to be able to put/use/get this container into an RV, please don't > suggest a "bread-box!" > > I was wondering if anyone had ever used a kind of "Ziploc" bag that had a > sea of tiny holes punched into it? I don't recall the name--can't seem to > find it on any shelves, either--but I believe it was touted to be "best" for > storing veggies. It would seem that a finely perforated plastic bag would > solve this problem just about right. Tyvek, perhaps? > > I was hoping that maybe some of our European readership would chime in on > this matter? After all, the notion of 'real' bread being a part of their > daily staple is a far more ingrained event than our instant bread sealed in > plastic culture. I mean, after all, 200 years ago folks baked once a week > or so...they must have had a way to store their bread so that it would last > a week anyway. I can bake their bread, now. I just haven't managed to > figure out quite how they managed to keep it... > > Regards to all, > Dusty > San Jose, Ca. > -- > Remove STORE to reply > > I don't know about your bread but my bread is usually stale in about 6-8 hours after it comes out of the oven. Never liked the taste of preservatives. Freezing is the only way toI know of to keep bread for week without staling. Fred Foodie Forums http://www.foodieforums.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fred" > wrote in message
... .... > I don't know about your bread but my bread is usually stale in about 6-8 > hours after it comes out of the oven. Never liked the taste of > preservatives. Freezing is the only way toI know of to keep bread for week > without staling. Hmmmm. Interesting. I guess we need to start by you defining for me *your* definition of "stale". Cuz I don't ever recall a bread getting "stale" within a 6-8 hour window. Perhaps your standards are simply higher than mine? (:-)! Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply > > Fred > Foodie Forums > http://www.foodieforums.com > > > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Samartha" > wrote in message
news:mailman.1089151324.18964.rec.food.sourdough@w ww.mountainbitwarrior.com... .... > >I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few > >slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) > > (excuse me - IMO, that low carb frenzy is <censored> - seems to me that Fortunately it's only your own self-inflated opinion--so no big deal! > folks in US need some kind of induced stimulation by the means of a fad to > enjoy their life) - I had to say that since you really seem to be on it;-) Frenzy? Fad? Methinks that one of us doesn't understand either term. A *fad* would be the, "Let's all get on the lo-fat, high-carb _fad_," as promulgated by most everybody downstream of the AMA since the late '60's. In case you've been living under a rock, the instances of juvenile and adult onset diabetes, and obesity in this country has sky-rocketed since this "fad" took hold in the '70's. The "frenzy" you're probably referring to is probably the loud, obnoxious [frenzied] braying of ignorant, ill-informed detractors of a less sugars and carbohydrate based (the usual fare of fast or other highly processed foods) way of life. The human organism was NOT designed to ingest such quantities of carbohydrates--if you can show me *any* peer-reviewed evidence in any internationally recognized medical journal from any country in the world--and I am incorrect--I'll gladly apologize. Until then, you might try reading and researching your way through JAMA, NEJM, CDC, NIDDK, PubMed, and lots of others... BTDT! Found nada! I have chosen to alter my way of eating to reflect what the best evidence says is what we were designed to eat. Although it's well known, I did not and do not proselytize this concept to the ignorant masses all around me. I don't care what you eat. So I'll thank you to keep your shallow, biased, ill-informed opinions to yourself. .... > interruptions flashing by and the content communicated, it dawned on me > that humans being exposed repeatedly to this kind of sensory input must > take a hit in their nervous systems. I mean, that input is going somewhere, Trust me, not all "humans" are as simple or easily manipulated as those you're referring to. I don't internalize others opinions--I read them and think about them and what they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form one. A concept apparently alien to some reading and posting here... .... > Now, to your bread aging issue: Finally! > > - all temperature in Celsius, I am sure you can handle it: I'm sure it's tough, but I'll do my best to keep up... > - below -20, no (aging) > -20 - -7: almost none > - 7 .. 0 slow > just above 0: very fast > about 3 -> 20: fast > above 20 slow > above 55 no Can this be correct? How does one go from slow aging between -7 & 0C, and then jump to "very fast" with the application of a few more degrees. That doesn't seem correct... > translated: don't put it in the fridge, freeze it instead or keep it at > room temperature. Condensation at room temperature in airtight containers > is an issue, I use zip-loc plastic bags but leave the seal open an inch or > so to allow some air circulation. > > Freeaing works great - I either bake small loafs or cut large one's in > pieces and freeze them right after baking. Thawing in microwave, then allow > to air for a while to avoid condensation. Very minor difference to freshly > baked bread. Hmmm. This could be useful. I also got lots of other, similar comments as well. It's just that freezer space, like counter space, is at a premium in an RV. There must be a way that bread was stored, day-to-day, that didn't require freezing. That would have been hard to do even just a 100 years ago... > The minimum storage life for bread is very much dependent on the variety: > > White wheat bread (white flour): 2 - 3 days > Wheat/rye mix breads 2 - 5 > Rye/Wheat mix breads 5 - 7 > rye breads 6 - 10 > rye meal breads 8 - 12 Now that's a good point. My breads seem to go more than a week w/o getting moldy or going bad. But, as you've pointed out, the kind of bread almost certainly makes a major contribution to loaf longevity. Since I usually do rustic style breads exclusively with sourdough, that would explain why they tend to age well (unless they dry out!). Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply > Samartha > > > > > > remove "-nospam" when replying, and it's in my email address > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 08:10 PM 7/6/2004, "Dusty" > wrote:
many words - I now you love me anyway:-) > > - all temperature in Celsius, I am sure you can handle it: >I'm sure it's tough, but I'll do my best to keep up... I paste a conversion table at the end - it would be very boring here (I think). > > - below -20, no (aging) > > -20 - -7: almost none > > - 7 .. 0 slow > > just above 0: very fast > > about 3 -> 20: fast > > above 20 slow > > above 55 no >Can this be correct? How does one go from slow aging between -7 & 0C, and >then jump to "very fast" with the application of a few more degrees. That >doesn't seem correct... Well, many people live in different realities and often things just don't make sense which does not necessarily make them incorrect. Incorrectness to apply requires a system of agreed values - since we don't seem to run on agreed values, you should not say such words (by my standards, with your's, of cause you may). Since you are such a nice guy, I've made you a pictu http://samartha.net/SD/images/BYDATE...6/P7061663.JPG with the following Celsius/Fahrenheit (or the other way around - I don't know yet) and the following translation, it should be easier: Heading: Aging of baking products at different temperatures unterbunden - suppressed langsam - slow schnell - quick sehr schnell - very quick fast unterbunden - almost suppressed unterbunden - suppressed As you can (hopefully) easily see, the aging speed maximum (a few degrees above 0 C) and where they determined the slow aging areas in the lower (-7 C) and higher (+20 C) temperature range are asymmetric (7 versus 20). Let's further assume that the folks doing the measuring (I do - you may choose as you please) knew what they were doing (with the aging measuring) one could conclude from this that stuff like that happens, accept it and have fun with something else. Samartha before I forget, the fahr table: -100 -73 -98 -72 -96 -71 -94 -70 -92 -68 -90 -67 -88 -66 -86 -65 -84 -64 -82 -63 -80 -62 -78 -61 -76 -60 -74 -58 -72 -57 -70 -56 -68 -55 -66 -54 -64 -53 -62 -52 -60 -51 -58 -50 -56 -48 -54 -47 -52 -46 -50 -45 -48 -44 -46 -43 -44 -42 -42 -41 -40 -40 -38 -38 -36 -37 -34 -36 -32 -35 -30 -34 -28 -33 -26 -32 -24 -31 -22 -30 -20 -28 -18 -27 -16 -26 -14 -25 -12 -24 -10 -23 -8 -22 -6 -21 -4 -20 -2 -18 0 -17 2 -16 4 -15 6 -14 8 -13 10 -12 12 -11 14 -10 16 -8 18 -7 20 -6 22 -5 24 -4 26 -3 28 -2 30 -1 32 0 34 1 36 2 38 3 40 4 42 5 44 6 46 7 48 8 50 10 52 11 54 12 56 13 58 14 60 15 62 16 64 17 66 18 68 20 70 21 72 22 74 23 76 24 78 25 80 26 82 27 84 28 86 30 88 31 90 32 92 33 94 34 96 35 98 36 100 37 102 38 104 40 106 41 108 42 110 43 112 44 114 45 116 46 118 47 120 48 122 50 124 51 126 52 128 53 130 54 132 55 134 56 136 57 138 58 140 60 142 61 144 62 146 63 148 64 150 65 152 66 154 67 156 68 158 70 160 71 162 72 164 73 166 74 168 75 170 76 172 77 174 78 176 80 178 81 180 82 182 83 184 84 186 85 188 86 190 87 192 88 194 90 196 91 198 92 200 93 202 94 204 95 206 96 208 97 210 98 212 100 214 101 216 102 218 103 220 104 222 105 224 106 226 107 228 108 230 110 232 111 234 112 236 113 238 114 240 115 242 116 244 117 246 118 248 120 250 121 252 122 254 123 256 124 258 125 260 126 262 127 264 128 266 130 268 131 270 132 272 133 274 134 276 135 278 136 280 137 282 138 284 140 286 141 288 142 290 143 292 144 294 145 296 146 298 147 300 148 302 150 304 151 306 152 308 153 310 154 312 155 314 156 316 157 318 158 320 160 322 161 324 162 326 163 328 164 330 165 332 166 334 167 336 168 338 170 340 171 342 172 344 173 346 174 348 175 350 176 352 177 354 178 356 180 358 181 360 182 362 183 364 184 366 185 368 186 370 187 372 188 374 190 376 191 378 192 380 193 382 194 384 195 386 196 388 197 390 198 392 200 394 201 396 202 398 203 400 204 402 205 404 206 406 207 408 208 410 210 412 211 414 212 416 213 418 214 420 215 422 216 424 217 426 218 428 220 430 221 432 222 434 223 436 224 438 225 440 226 442 227 444 228 446 230 448 231 450 232 452 233 454 234 456 235 458 236 460 237 462 238 464 240 466 241 468 242 470 243 472 244 474 245 476 246 478 247 480 248 482 250 484 251 486 252 488 253 490 254 492 255 494 256 496 257 498 258 500 260 502 261 504 262 506 263 508 264 510 265 512 266 514 267 516 268 518 270 520 271 522 272 524 273 526 274 528 275 530 276 532 277 534 278 536 280 538 281 540 282 542 283 544 284 546 285 548 286 550 287 552 288 554 290 556 291 558 292 560 293 562 294 564 295 566 296 568 297 570 298 572 300 574 301 576 302 578 303 580 304 582 305 584 306 586 307 588 308 590 310 592 311 594 312 596 313 598 314 600 315 602 316 604 317 606 318 608 320 610 321 612 322 614 323 616 324 618 325 620 326 622 327 624 328 626 330 628 331 630 332 632 333 634 334 636 335 638 336 640 337 642 338 644 340 646 341 648 342 650 343 652 344 654 345 656 346 658 347 660 348 662 350 664 351 666 352 668 353 670 354 672 355 674 356 676 357 678 358 680 360 682 361 684 362 686 363 688 364 690 365 692 366 694 367 696 368 698 370 700 371 702 372 704 373 706 374 708 375 710 376 712 377 714 378 716 380 718 381 720 382 722 383 724 384 726 385 728 386 730 387 732 388 734 390 736 391 738 392 740 393 742 394 744 395 746 396 748 397 750 398 752 400 754 401 756 402 758 403 760 404 762 405 764 406 766 407 768 408 770 410 772 411 774 412 776 413 778 414 780 415 782 416 784 417 786 418 788 420 790 421 792 422 794 423 796 424 798 425 800 426 802 427 804 428 806 430 808 431 810 432 812 433 814 434 816 435 818 436 820 437 822 438 824 440 826 441 828 442 830 443 832 444 834 445 836 446 838 447 840 448 842 450 844 451 846 452 848 453 850 454 852 455 854 456 856 457 858 458 860 460 862 461 864 462 866 463 868 464 870 465 872 466 874 467 876 468 878 470 880 471 882 472 884 473 886 474 888 475 890 476 892 477 894 478 896 480 898 481 900 482 902 483 904 484 906 485 908 486 910 487 912 488 914 490 916 491 918 492 920 493 922 494 924 495 926 496 928 497 930 498 932 500 934 501 936 502 938 503 940 504 942 505 944 506 946 507 948 508 950 510 952 511 954 512 956 513 958 514 960 515 962 516 964 517 966 518 968 520 970 521 972 522 974 523 976 524 978 525 980 526 982 527 984 528 986 530 988 531 990 532 992 533 994 534 996 535 998 536 1000 537 1002 538 1004 540 1006 541 1008 542 1010 543 1012 544 1014 545 1016 546 1018 547 1020 548 1022 550 1024 551 1026 552 1028 553 1030 554 1032 555 1034 556 1036 557 1038 558 1040 560 1042 561 1044 562 1046 563 1048 564 1050 565 1052 566 1054 567 1056 568 1058 570 1060 571 1062 572 1064 573 1066 574 1068 575 1070 576 1072 577 1074 578 1076 580 1078 581 1080 582 1082 583 1084 584 1086 585 1088 586 1090 587 1092 588 1094 590 1096 591 1098 592 1100 593 1102 594 1104 595 1106 596 1108 597 1110 598 1112 600 1114 601 1116 602 1118 603 1120 604 1122 605 1124 606 1126 607 1128 608 1130 610 1132 611 1134 612 1136 613 1138 614 1140 615 1142 616 1144 617 1146 618 1148 620 1150 621 1152 622 1154 623 1156 624 1158 625 1160 626 1162 627 1164 628 1166 630 1168 631 1170 632 1172 633 1174 634 1176 635 1178 636 1180 637 1182 638 1184 640 1186 641 1188 642 1190 643 1192 644 1194 645 1196 646 1198 647 1200 648 1202 650 1204 651 1206 652 1208 653 1210 654 1212 655 1214 656 1216 657 1218 658 1220 660 1222 661 1224 662 1226 663 1228 664 1230 665 1232 666 1234 667 1236 668 1238 670 1240 671 1242 672 1244 673 1246 674 1248 675 1250 676 1252 677 1254 678 1256 680 1258 681 1260 682 1262 683 1264 684 1266 685 1268 686 1270 687 1272 688 1274 690 1276 691 1278 692 1280 693 1282 694 1284 695 1286 696 1288 697 1290 698 1292 700 1294 701 1296 702 1298 703 1300 704 1302 705 1304 706 1306 707 1308 708 1310 710 1312 711 1314 712 1316 713 1318 714 1320 715 1322 716 1324 717 1326 718 1328 720 1330 721 1332 722 1334 723 1336 724 1338 725 1340 726 1342 727 1344 728 1346 730 1348 731 1350 732 1352 733 1354 734 1356 735 1358 736 1360 737 1362 738 1364 740 1366 741 1368 742 1370 743 1372 744 1374 745 1376 746 1378 747 1380 748 1382 750 1384 751 1386 752 1388 753 1390 754 1392 755 1394 756 1396 757 1398 758 1400 760 1402 761 1404 762 1406 763 1408 764 1410 765 1412 766 1414 767 1416 768 1418 770 1420 771 1422 772 1424 773 1426 774 1428 775 1430 776 1432 777 1434 778 1436 780 1438 781 1440 782 1442 783 1444 784 1446 785 1448 786 1450 787 1452 788 1454 790 1456 791 1458 792 1460 793 1462 794 1464 795 1466 796 1468 797 1470 798 1472 800 1474 801 1476 802 1478 803 1480 804 1482 805 1484 806 1486 807 1488 808 1490 810 1492 811 1494 812 1496 813 1498 814 1500 815 1502 816 1504 817 1506 818 1508 820 1510 821 1512 822 1514 823 1516 824 1518 825 1520 826 1522 827 1524 828 1526 830 1528 831 1530 832 1532 833 1534 834 1536 835 1538 836 1540 837 1542 838 1544 840 1546 841 1548 842 1550 843 1552 844 1554 845 1556 846 1558 847 1560 848 1562 850 1564 851 1566 852 1568 853 1570 854 1572 855 1574 856 1576 857 1578 858 1580 860 1582 861 1584 862 1586 863 1588 864 1590 865 1592 866 1594 867 1596 868 1598 870 1600 871 1602 872 1604 873 1606 874 1608 875 1610 876 1612 877 1614 878 1616 880 1618 881 1620 882 1622 883 1624 884 1626 885 1628 886 1630 887 1632 888 1634 890 1636 891 1638 892 1640 893 1642 894 1644 895 1646 896 1648 897 1650 898 1652 900 1654 901 1656 902 1658 903 1660 904 1662 905 1664 906 1666 907 1668 908 1670 910 1672 911 1674 912 1676 913 1678 914 1680 915 1682 916 1684 917 1686 918 1688 920 1690 921 1692 922 1694 923 1696 924 1698 925 1700 926 1702 927 1704 928 1706 930 1708 931 1710 932 1712 933 1714 934 1716 935 1718 936 1720 937 1722 938 1724 940 1726 941 1728 942 1730 943 1732 944 1734 945 1736 946 1738 947 1740 948 1742 950 1744 951 1746 952 1748 953 1750 954 1752 955 1754 956 1756 957 1758 958 1760 960 1762 961 1764 962 1766 963 1768 964 1770 965 1772 966 1774 967 1776 968 1778 970 1780 971 1782 972 1784 973 1786 974 1788 975 1790 976 1792 977 1794 978 1796 980 1798 981 1800 982 1802 983 1804 984 1806 985 1808 986 1810 987 1812 988 1814 990 1816 991 1818 992 1820 993 1822 994 1824 995 1826 996 1828 997 1830 998 1832 1000 1834 1001 1836 1002 1838 1003 1840 1004 1842 1005 1844 1006 1846 1007 1848 1008 1850 1010 1852 1011 1854 1012 1856 1013 1858 1014 1860 1015 1862 1016 1864 1017 1866 1018 1868 1020 1870 1021 1872 1022 1874 1023 1876 1024 1878 1025 1880 1026 1882 1027 1884 1028 1886 1030 1888 1031 1890 1032 1892 1033 1894 1034 1896 1035 1898 1036 1900 1037 1902 1038 1904 1040 1906 1041 1908 1042 1910 1043 1912 1044 1914 1045 1916 1046 1918 1047 1920 1048 1922 1050 1924 1051 1926 1052 1928 1053 1930 1054 1932 1055 1934 1056 1936 1057 1938 1058 1940 1060 1942 1061 1944 1062 1946 1063 1948 1064 1950 1065 1952 1066 1954 1067 1956 1068 1958 1070 1960 1071 1962 1072 1964 1073 1966 1074 1968 1075 1970 1076 1972 1077 1974 1078 1976 1080 1978 1081 1980 1082 1982 1083 1984 1084 1986 1085 1988 1086 1990 1087 1992 1088 1994 1090 1996 1091 1998 1092 2000 1093 2002 1094 2004 1095 2006 1096 2008 1097 2010 1098 2012 1100 2014 1101 2016 1102 2018 1103 2020 1104 2022 1105 2024 1106 2026 1107 2028 1108 2030 1110 2032 1111 2034 1112 2036 1113 2038 1114 2040 1115 2042 1116 2044 1117 2046 1118 2048 1120 2050 1121 2052 1122 2054 1123 2056 1124 2058 1125 2060 1126 2062 1127 2064 1128 2066 1130 2068 1131 2070 1132 2072 1133 2074 1134 2076 1135 2078 1136 2080 1137 2082 1138 2084 1140 2086 1141 2088 1142 2090 1143 2092 1144 2094 1145 2096 1146 2098 1147 2100 1148 2102 1150 2104 1151 2106 1152 2108 1153 2110 1154 2112 1155 2114 1156 2116 1157 2118 1158 2120 1160 2122 1161 2124 1162 2126 1163 2128 1164 2130 1165 2132 1166 2134 1167 2136 1168 2138 1170 2140 1171 2142 1172 2144 1173 2146 1174 2148 1175 2150 1176 2152 1177 2154 1178 2156 1180 2158 1181 2160 1182 2162 1183 2164 1184 2166 1185 2168 1186 2170 1187 2172 1188 2174 1190 2176 1191 2178 1192 2180 1193 2182 1194 2184 1195 2186 1196 2188 1197 2190 1198 2192 1200 2194 1201 2196 1202 2198 1203 2200 1204 2202 1205 2204 1206 2206 1207 2208 1208 2210 1210 2212 1211 2214 1212 2216 1213 2218 1214 2220 1215 2222 1216 2224 1217 2226 1218 2228 1220 2230 1221 2232 1222 2234 1223 2236 1224 2238 1225 2240 1226 2242 1227 2244 1228 2246 1230 2248 1231 2250 1232 2252 1233 2254 1234 2256 1235 2258 1236 2260 1237 2262 1238 2264 1240 2266 1241 2268 1242 2270 1243 2272 1244 2274 1245 2276 1246 2278 1247 2280 1248 2282 1250 2284 1251 2286 1252 2288 1253 2290 1254 2292 1255 2294 1256 2296 1257 2298 1258 2300 1260 2302 1261 2304 1262 2306 1263 2308 1264 2310 1265 2312 1266 2314 1267 2316 1268 2318 1270 2320 1271 2322 1272 2324 1273 2326 1274 2328 1275 2330 1276 2332 1277 2334 1278 2336 1280 2338 1281 2340 1282 2342 1283 2344 1284 2346 1285 2348 1286 2350 1287 2352 1288 2354 1290 2356 1291 2358 1292 2360 1293 2362 1294 2364 1295 2366 1296 2368 1297 2370 1298 2372 1300 2374 1301 2376 1302 2378 1303 2380 1304 2382 1305 2384 1306 2386 1307 2388 1308 2390 1310 2392 1311 2394 1312 2396 1313 2398 1314 2400 1315 2402 1316 2404 1317 2406 1318 2408 1320 2410 1321 2412 1322 2414 1323 2416 1324 2418 1325 2420 1326 2422 1327 2424 1328 2426 1330 2428 1331 2430 1332 2432 1333 2434 1334 2436 1335 2438 1336 2440 1337 2442 1338 2444 1340 2446 1341 2448 1342 2450 1343 2452 1344 2454 1345 2456 1346 2458 1347 2460 1348 2462 1350 2464 1351 2466 1352 2468 1353 2470 1354 2472 1355 2474 1356 2476 1357 2478 1358 2480 1360 2482 1361 2484 1362 2486 1363 2488 1364 2490 1365 2492 1366 2494 1367 2496 1368 2498 1370 2500 1371 2502 1372 2504 1373 2506 1374 2508 1375 2510 1376 2512 1377 2514 1378 2516 1380 2518 1381 2520 1382 2522 1383 2524 1384 2526 1385 2528 1386 2530 1387 2532 1388 2534 1390 2536 1391 2538 1392 2540 1393 2542 1394 2544 1395 2546 1396 2548 1397 2550 1398 2552 1400 2554 1401 2556 1402 2558 1403 2560 1404 2562 1405 2564 1406 2566 1407 2568 1408 2570 1410 2572 1411 2574 1412 2576 1413 2578 1414 2580 1415 2582 1416 2584 1417 2586 1418 2588 1420 2590 1421 2592 1422 2594 1423 2596 1424 2598 1425 2600 1426 2602 1427 2604 1428 2606 1430 2608 1431 2610 1432 2612 1433 2614 1434 2616 1435 2618 1436 2620 1437 2622 1438 2624 1440 2626 1441 2628 1442 2630 1443 2632 1444 2634 1445 2636 1446 2638 1447 2640 1448 2642 1450 2644 1451 2646 1452 2648 1453 2650 1454 2652 1455 2654 1456 2656 1457 2658 1458 2660 1460 2662 1461 2664 1462 2666 1463 2668 1464 2670 1465 2672 1466 2674 1467 2676 1468 2678 1470 2680 1471 2682 1472 2684 1473 2686 1474 2688 1475 2690 1476 2692 1477 2694 1478 2696 1480 2698 1481 2700 1482 2702 1483 2704 1484 2706 1485 2708 1486 2710 1487 2712 1488 2714 1490 2716 1491 2718 1492 2720 1493 2722 1494 2724 1495 2726 1496 2728 1497 2730 1498 2732 1500 2734 1501 2736 1502 2738 1503 2740 1504 2742 1505 2744 1506 2746 1507 2748 1508 2750 1510 2752 1511 2754 1512 2756 1513 2758 1514 2760 1515 2762 1516 2764 1517 2766 1518 2768 1520 2770 1521 2772 1522 2774 1523 2776 1524 2778 1525 2780 1526 2782 1527 2784 1528 2786 1530 2788 1531 2790 1532 2792 1533 2794 1534 2796 1535 2798 1536 2800 1537 2802 1538 2804 1540 2806 1541 2808 1542 2810 1543 2812 1544 2814 1545 2816 1546 2818 1547 2820 1548 2822 1550 2824 1551 2826 1552 2828 1553 2830 1554 2832 1555 2834 1556 2836 1557 2838 1558 2840 1560 2842 1561 2844 1562 2846 1563 2848 1564 2850 1565 2852 1566 2854 1567 2856 1568 2858 1570 2860 1571 2862 1572 2864 1573 2866 1574 2868 1575 2870 1576 2872 1577 2874 1578 2876 1580 2878 1581 2880 1582 2882 1583 2884 1584 2886 1585 2888 1586 2890 1587 2892 1588 2894 1590 2896 1591 2898 1592 2900 1593 2902 1594 2904 1595 2906 1596 2908 1597 2910 1598 2912 1600 2914 1601 2916 1602 2918 1603 2920 1604 2922 1605 2924 1606 2926 1607 2928 1608 2930 1610 2932 1611 2934 1612 2936 1613 2938 1614 2940 1615 2942 1616 2944 1617 2946 1618 2948 1620 2950 1621 2952 1622 2954 1623 2956 1624 2958 1625 2960 1626 2962 1627 2964 1628 2966 1630 2968 1631 2970 1632 2972 1633 2974 1634 2976 1635 2978 1636 2980 1637 2982 1638 2984 1640 2986 1641 2988 1642 2990 1643 2992 1644 2994 1645 2996 1646 2998 1647 3000 1648 and no, I am not going to fix the picture rotation |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Samartha" > wrote in message
news:mailman.1089175626.23324.rec.food.sourdough@w ww.mountainbitwarrior.com... .... > > > - below -20, no (aging) > > > -20 - -7: almost none > > > - 7 .. 0 slow > > > just above 0: very fast > > > about 3 -> 20: fast > > > above 20 slow > > > above 55 no > >Can this be correct? How does one go from slow aging between -7 & 0C, and > >then jump to "very fast" with the application of a few more degrees. That > >doesn't seem correct... > > Well, many people live in different realities and often things just don't > make sense which does not necessarily make them incorrect. Incorrectness to > apply requires a system of agreed values - since we don't seem to run on > agreed values, you should not say such words (by my standards, with your's, > of cause you may). > > Since you are such a nice guy, I've made you a pictu > > http://samartha.net/SD/images/BYDATE...6/P7061663.JPG > > with the following Celsius/Fahrenheit (or the other way around - I don't > know yet) and the following translation, it should be easier: > > Heading: Aging of baking products at different temperatures > > unterbunden - suppressed > langsam - slow > schnell - quick > sehr schnell - very quick > fast unterbunden - almost suppressed > unterbunden - suppressed > > As you can (hopefully) easily see, the aging speed maximum (a few degrees > above 0 C) and where they determined the slow aging areas in the lower (-7 > C) and higher (+20 C) temperature range are asymmetric (7 versus 20). Very interesting! The the aging process is 'unterbunden' (prevented or suppressed) at the upper temperatures is nothing short of astounding. The lower temps I could see, but that aging is prevented at the higher temps is certainly interesting news. > Let's further assume that the folks doing the measuring (I do - you may > choose as you please) knew what they were doing (with the aging measuring) > one could conclude from this that stuff like that happens, accept it and > have fun with something else. I had asked about the veracity of that statement because it seemed to fly in the face of other, more typical temperature involved events. Very interesting. Thank you. Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply > > before I forget, the fahr table: > > -100 -73 Oh darn it all! Now I'll have to convert everything to Kelvin anyway! .... |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:00:44 -0500, "Fred" >
wrote: >I don't know about your bread but my bread is usually stale in about 6-8 >hours after it comes out of the oven. Never liked the taste of >preservatives. Freezing is the only way toI know of to keep bread for week >without staling. Hi Fred, I know nothing about the chemistry of staling, but I do know that my breads are fine for 4-5 days (at least.) I also know that Lionel Poilne often said that he believed that his breads were at their best of taste and texture three days after they were baked. In both cases, I am describing lean breads... Nothing in 'em but flour, water, salt, and culture. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > G'day all; > > I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few > slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) someone > (that mostly being me!) would gobble it right up, so storing it for a few > days was a non-issue. Even though I've been reading here for many years, I > still seem to have a hole in this portion of my understanding of bread. > > I've done a Google search on past posts about this subject, looking for some > enlightenment. As you might expect, most of the 5,800 or so responses I > found was something like: "Do it this way! No! Your way sux, do it the > other way. No it doesn't! Yes it does...", and so on. For too many years > America has been the land of "wonder bread" wrapped in plastic. Obviously, > for those of us reading and posting here, we've moved into the world of > 'real' breads. But none of us brought along the knowledge on how to > properly care for 'real' bread once it's baked (at least speaking for > myself, that is). > > In my experience I found that leaving a freshly baked loaf out for at least > a day seems to "cure" it about right. But leave it out any longer and the > words "hockey puck" come to mind. Anybody have any good ideas on how to > store a loaf or two of bread for let's say up to a week? I tried heavy > Kraft paper. That didn't make the cut. The loaf was hard enough that the > ducks wouldn't even eat it in 4-days (15-20% humidity & a 95F day aren't > conducive to long bread life). I've tried waxed papers. But if you wrap it > tightly, it's no better than plastic. Wrap it loosely, and the only > difference between it and Kraft paper is the cost. Is there such a thing as > a finely (tightly) woven bag perhaps? Maybe a leather carry pouch? Since > we need to be able to put/use/get this container into an RV, please don't > suggest a "bread-box!" > > I was wondering if anyone had ever used a kind of "Ziploc" bag that had a > sea of tiny holes punched into it? I don't recall the name--can't seem to > find it on any shelves, either--but I believe it was touted to be "best" for > storing veggies. It would seem that a finely perforated plastic bag would > solve this problem just about right. Tyvek, perhaps? > > I was hoping that maybe some of our European readership would chime in on > this matter? After all, the notion of 'real' bread being a part of their > daily staple is a far more ingrained event than our instant bread sealed in > plastic culture. I mean, after all, 200 years ago folks baked once a week > or so...they must have had a way to store their bread so that it would last > a week anyway. I can bake their bread, now. I just haven't managed to > figure out quite how they managed to keep it... > > Regards to all, > Dusty > San Jose, Ca. > -- > Remove STORE to reply > Dusty, why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. Here in Europe there are two sizes available. I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread often was too hard to bite. They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. Ulrike from Germany |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > G'day all; > > I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few > slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) someone > (that mostly being me!) would gobble it right up, so storing it for a few > days was a non-issue. Even though I've been reading here for many years, I > still seem to have a hole in this portion of my understanding of bread. > > I've done a Google search on past posts about this subject, looking for some > enlightenment. As you might expect, most of the 5,800 or so responses I > found was something like: "Do it this way! No! Your way sux, do it the > other way. No it doesn't! Yes it does...", and so on. For too many years > America has been the land of "wonder bread" wrapped in plastic. Obviously, > for those of us reading and posting here, we've moved into the world of > 'real' breads. But none of us brought along the knowledge on how to > properly care for 'real' bread once it's baked (at least speaking for > myself, that is). > > In my experience I found that leaving a freshly baked loaf out for at least > a day seems to "cure" it about right. But leave it out any longer and the > words "hockey puck" come to mind. Anybody have any good ideas on how to > store a loaf or two of bread for let's say up to a week? I tried heavy > Kraft paper. That didn't make the cut. The loaf was hard enough that the > ducks wouldn't even eat it in 4-days (15-20% humidity & a 95F day aren't > conducive to long bread life). I've tried waxed papers. But if you wrap it > tightly, it's no better than plastic. Wrap it loosely, and the only > difference between it and Kraft paper is the cost. Is there such a thing as > a finely (tightly) woven bag perhaps? Maybe a leather carry pouch? Since > we need to be able to put/use/get this container into an RV, please don't > suggest a "bread-box!" > > I was wondering if anyone had ever used a kind of "Ziploc" bag that had a > sea of tiny holes punched into it? I don't recall the name--can't seem to > find it on any shelves, either--but I believe it was touted to be "best" for > storing veggies. It would seem that a finely perforated plastic bag would > solve this problem just about right. Tyvek, perhaps? > > I was hoping that maybe some of our European readership would chime in on > this matter? After all, the notion of 'real' bread being a part of their > daily staple is a far more ingrained event than our instant bread sealed in > plastic culture. I mean, after all, 200 years ago folks baked once a week > or so...they must have had a way to store their bread so that it would last > a week anyway. I can bake their bread, now. I just haven't managed to > figure out quite how they managed to keep it... > > Regards to all, > Dusty > San Jose, Ca. > -- > Remove STORE to reply > Dusty, why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. Here in Europe there are two sizes available. I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread often was too hard to bite. They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. Ulrike from Germany |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Ulrike!
I was hoping that some of our European readers would chime in. It's certainly always good to hear from you... "Ulrike Westphal" > wrote in message ... .... > Dusty, > why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel > and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. > Here in Europe there are two sizes available. More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that something like that will become necessary. Somehow I must find the room, always a problem in an RV. <big sigh!> I know that I must protect the bread from drying out, as that seems to be the most serious impediment to long shelf-life in my area (albeit as I travel that will surely change). Can you describe your "linen towel" a bit more? In particular; size, shape? Then do you wrap it around the bread or just drape it? What purpose does it serve inside a plastic box? Soak up condensation? > I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread often > was too hard to bite. They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now Yes. I'm sure this was the case. I had failed to consider that the last few days may well have been a challenge to eat. As Samartha's graph clearly laid bare, it would seem that either freezing or storage at room-temp would be the best solutions. Obviously the RT storage is most useful...now it's just the matter of finding some convenient storage space... > you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. That will almost certainly be my option. Freezing is too expensive for an RV (in terms of both space and energy), and one can't grab the loaf for a quick slice. So ready-to-go at RT would seem to be the way to fly. Looks like I'll hafta dig up my local Tupperware dealer and see what wares they might have... Good to hear from you again, Ulrike. Dusty Remove STORE to reply > Ulrike from Germany > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 07:31 AM 7/7/2004, "Ulrike Westphal" > wrote:
>Dusty, >why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel >and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. >Here in Europe there are two sizes available. In US, they are available as well - in different varieties: http://www.epinions.com/hmgd-Housewares-All-Bread_Boxes The one on the back on this pictu http://samartha.net/SD/procedures/DM3/ I got from Target Now, a breadbox may help to keep the moisture and kitchen tidy, the moisture keeping can also accomplished with brown paper bags possibly increasing the untidy factor. If there is an abundance of white bread, conversion to bread crumbs (for braiding) and croutons (various applications) are options. Actually my main reason to make white bread is to get it into those conditions. >I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread often >was too hard to bite. I understand that in northern Italy, in some alpine areas, they baked once a year - (rye :-) flat bread which could be consumed hard since it was very thin. >They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now >you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. >Ulrike from Germany That's interesting - the pictures you posted recently: http://mysite.verizon.net/res7gfb9/B...lrikeLoaf.html is that type of bread common in your area - white, pan and all? Thanks, Samartha remove "-nospam" when replying, and it's in my email address |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > Hello Ulrike! > > I was hoping that some of our European readers would chime in. It's > certainly always good to hear from you... > > "Ulrike Westphal" > wrote in message > ... > ... > > Dusty, > > why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel > > and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. > > Here in Europe there are two sizes available. > More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that something like that will > become necessary. Somehow I must find the room, always a problem in an RV. > <big sigh!> > > I know that I must protect the bread from drying out, as that seems to be > the most serious impediment to long shelf-life in my area (albeit as I > travel that will surely change). Can you describe your "linen towel" a bit > more? In particular; size, shape? Then do you wrap it around the bread or > just drape it? What purpose does it serve inside a plastic box? Soak up > condensation? > > > I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread > often > > was too hard to bite. They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now > Yes. I'm sure this was the case. I had failed to consider that the last > few days may well have been a challenge to eat. As Samartha's graph clearly > laid bare, it would seem that either freezing or storage at room-temp would > be the best solutions. Obviously the RT storage is most useful...now it's > just the matter of finding some convenient storage space... > > > you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. > That will almost certainly be my option. Freezing is too expensive for an > RV (in terms of both space and energy), and one can't grab the loaf for a > quick slice. So ready-to-go at RT would seem to be the way to fly. Looks > like I'll hafta dig up my local Tupperware dealer and see what wares they > might have... > > Good to hear from you again, Ulrike. > > Dusty > Remove STORE to reply > > Ulrike from Germany > > Dusty, I don't know what the linen towel does exactly, I only know that it works. Maybe brown paper-bags work als well, but the North of Germay is not a good area to get brown paper-bags. It's an ordinary linen dish towel, 51 cm x 75 cm. I wrap my loaf into the towel. Ulrike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > Hello Ulrike! > > I was hoping that some of our European readers would chime in. It's > certainly always good to hear from you... > > "Ulrike Westphal" > wrote in message > ... > ... > > Dusty, > > why not using a bread-box?? I wrap my sourdough bread into a linen towel > > and then into the "Tupperware" bread-box. > > Here in Europe there are two sizes available. > More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that something like that will > become necessary. Somehow I must find the room, always a problem in an RV. > <big sigh!> > > I know that I must protect the bread from drying out, as that seems to be > the most serious impediment to long shelf-life in my area (albeit as I > travel that will surely change). Can you describe your "linen towel" a bit > more? In particular; size, shape? Then do you wrap it around the bread or > just drape it? What purpose does it serve inside a plastic box? Soak up > condensation? > > > I previous times the people baked only once a week, but the last bread > often > > was too hard to bite. They often use bread-boxes from wood or pottery. Now > Yes. I'm sure this was the case. I had failed to consider that the last > few days may well have been a challenge to eat. As Samartha's graph clearly > laid bare, it would seem that either freezing or storage at room-temp would > be the best solutions. Obviously the RT storage is most useful...now it's > just the matter of finding some convenient storage space... > > > you can use Tupperware if you don't want to freeze your Bread. > That will almost certainly be my option. Freezing is too expensive for an > RV (in terms of both space and energy), and one can't grab the loaf for a > quick slice. So ready-to-go at RT would seem to be the way to fly. Looks > like I'll hafta dig up my local Tupperware dealer and see what wares they > might have... > > Good to hear from you again, Ulrike. > > Dusty > Remove STORE to reply > > Ulrike from Germany > > Dusty, I don't know what the linen towel does exactly, I only know that it works. Maybe brown paper-bags work als well, but the North of Germay is not a good area to get brown paper-bags. It's an ordinary linen dish towel, 51 cm x 75 cm. I wrap my loaf into the towel. Ulrike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Samartha" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag [snip] > I understand that in northern Italy, in some alpine areas, they baked once > a year - (rye :-) flat bread which could be consumed hard since it was very > thin. That's not the kind of bread I meant. I'm from the "Schwarzbrotregion". They baked black bread rye or rye/wheat once a week. > >Ulrike from Germany > > That's interesting - the pictures you posted recently: > > http://mysite.verizon.net/res7gfb9/B...lrikeLoaf.html > > is that type of bread common in your area - white, pan and all? Baking with a starter from wheat was not common in my area. I'm from Schleswig-Holstein, the rye-eating people. I love very dense whole rye-breads. In previous times black breads or brown breads were common. They are so sticky, that you have to use pans. > Thanks, > > Samartha > Now two typical "Bauernbrote" (Farmhouse Loaves??) do their proof. If you are interested, I'll send you the pictures. Gruesse aus Schleswig-Holstein Ulrike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Samartha" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag [snip] > I understand that in northern Italy, in some alpine areas, they baked once > a year - (rye :-) flat bread which could be consumed hard since it was very > thin. That's not the kind of bread I meant. I'm from the "Schwarzbrotregion". They baked black bread rye or rye/wheat once a week. > >Ulrike from Germany > > That's interesting - the pictures you posted recently: > > http://mysite.verizon.net/res7gfb9/B...lrikeLoaf.html > > is that type of bread common in your area - white, pan and all? Baking with a starter from wheat was not common in my area. I'm from Schleswig-Holstein, the rye-eating people. I love very dense whole rye-breads. In previous times black breads or brown breads were common. They are so sticky, that you have to use pans. > Thanks, > > Samartha > Now two typical "Bauernbrote" (Farmhouse Loaves??) do their proof. If you are interested, I'll send you the pictures. Gruesse aus Schleswig-Holstein Ulrike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ulrike Westphal" > wrote in message
... .... > Dusty, > I don't know what the linen towel does exactly, I only know that it works. > Maybe brown paper-bags work als well, but the North of Germay is not a good > area to get brown paper-bags. > It's an ordinary linen dish towel, 51 cm x 75 cm. I wrap my loaf into the > towel. Okay, thanks, Ulrike. I'll give that shot. I haven't yet obtained my storage container, but I shall pick up a few new dish towels when I do that. All of mine are a miniature "Terry" type material, and that probably won't work as well. At the moment I'm having a blast deep in the throes of making a SD based "Coccodrillo". That darn John Wright has caused me no end of sleepless nights! I find myself mired in HH (high hydration) dough's...no end to S&F (stretch & fold)...no end to Ciabattas and Francesci's and all sorts of wonderful Italian breads...*&^%$#@!~ (;-o)! Later all, Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ulrike Westphal" > wrote in message
... .... > Dusty, > I don't know what the linen towel does exactly, I only know that it works. > Maybe brown paper-bags work als well, but the North of Germay is not a good > area to get brown paper-bags. > It's an ordinary linen dish towel, 51 cm x 75 cm. I wrap my loaf into the > towel. Okay, thanks, Ulrike. I'll give that shot. I haven't yet obtained my storage container, but I shall pick up a few new dish towels when I do that. All of mine are a miniature "Terry" type material, and that probably won't work as well. At the moment I'm having a blast deep in the throes of making a SD based "Coccodrillo". That darn John Wright has caused me no end of sleepless nights! I find myself mired in HH (high hydration) dough's...no end to S&F (stretch & fold)...no end to Ciabattas and Francesci's and all sorts of wonderful Italian breads...*&^%$#@!~ (;-o)! Later all, Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 02:43 PM 7/6/2004, "Dusty" > wrote:
>G'day all; > >I had another fine loaf of 100% SD ruined before I could eat more than a few >slices of it by our dry climate. In the old days (pre-low carb) seems there is some change lately (and hope): http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._uc/nq20040710 S. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > wrote in message = ... > [ ... ] > I read (various opinions) and think about them and what=20 > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things=20 > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form=20 > one. Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this:=20 Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling rack for this period. Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be=20 consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may=20 have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. =20 For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. =20 Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a=20 sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of bread. All bagging is in tightly-closed plastic bags. Veggie bags from the supermarket do fine, or one quart food bags for small portions. (D'ja ever notice that most bread (except from some fancy boutiques) comes in plastic. That's cuz it works. Not every- thing done by the commercial establishment is bad, just most things.) Interval A can be quite short. If the bread is bagged, or covered with a tight cover, when it is warm, the loaf, including crust, will be soft and chewy, and cracking/dimpling of the crust will be avoided. (Good for folks who are insecure about their dental work.)=20 Conceivably the loaves could sit out, or in paper bags to keep the flies off, for several days to please the old-world, hair-shirt crowd. Such bread will tend to be hard and dry and just a=20 step away from being fodder for making bread crumbs. Interval B may be arbitrarily long. Not many people can tell the difference between loaves which have been frozen and loaves which have not-. No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these=20 mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any=20 bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, cannot not be convincingly refuted. --=20 Dick Adams (Sourdough minimalist) <firstname> dot <lastname> at bigfoot dot com ___________________ Sourdough FAQ guide at=20 http://www.nyx.net/~dgreenw/sourdoughfaqs.html |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > wrote in message = ... > [ ... ] > I read (various opinions) and think about them and what=20 > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things=20 > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form=20 > one. Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this:=20 Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling rack for this period. Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be=20 consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may=20 have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. =20 For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. =20 Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a=20 sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of bread. All bagging is in tightly-closed plastic bags. Veggie bags from the supermarket do fine, or one quart food bags for small portions. (D'ja ever notice that most bread (except from some fancy boutiques) comes in plastic. That's cuz it works. Not every- thing done by the commercial establishment is bad, just most things.) Interval A can be quite short. If the bread is bagged, or covered with a tight cover, when it is warm, the loaf, including crust, will be soft and chewy, and cracking/dimpling of the crust will be avoided. (Good for folks who are insecure about their dental work.)=20 Conceivably the loaves could sit out, or in paper bags to keep the flies off, for several days to please the old-world, hair-shirt crowd. Such bread will tend to be hard and dry and just a=20 step away from being fodder for making bread crumbs. Interval B may be arbitrarily long. Not many people can tell the difference between loaves which have been frozen and loaves which have not-. No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these=20 mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any=20 bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, cannot not be convincingly refuted. --=20 Dick Adams (Sourdough minimalist) <firstname> dot <lastname> at bigfoot dot com ___________________ Sourdough FAQ guide at=20 http://www.nyx.net/~dgreenw/sourdoughfaqs.html |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dick Adams" > wrote in message
... .... > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form > one. Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. [I work at fleshing out the input. That often means doing ancillary research and reading--as opposed to those that can only seem to manage to use comics as input...(:-o)!] As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this: Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling rack for this period. Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of bread. .... <good descriptions snipped for brevity> No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, cannot not be convincingly refuted. [No. Actually you've summed it up pretty well. I'd not thought about the issue in terms of intervals. But I think that you've pretty effectively laid out the "natural" sequence of events. I had hoped to get a more historic perspective on how this was done in years past from our European readership. Ulrike pretty much outlined how to impose a storage system over your defined "interval" concept. Tupperware & linen seems to be the ticket. Although I'm pretty sure that my grandmother, living in rural south German farm country--a century ago, didn't use that...(:-o)! Before I forget; I want to thank all of you for your replies both here and off-line. Some have been very useful--some not at all. But that's not to say that they weren't useful to others--so I'm grateful none-the-less. One of the reasons I've worked so hard to recapture "the old days" in baking is that retirement is finding me far from modern facilities--not, as my kids tell me, just because I'm a contrary cuss and hardcore curmudgeon in training... At any rate, being "off-grid" all of the time does impact how one uses their resources. When a freezer is the size of a shoebox, it's frightfully hard to "just bag it and put it in the freezer". What do I do with next weeks dinner in the mean time? This is made even more difficult when you begin to appreciate that freezing isn't free. It takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze it one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and efficient as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on battery power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power system that I developed. Same goes for some of the purists posting here, you think nothing of heating your ovens nearly hot enough to melt lead for 3 or 4 hours as you seek the perfect stone temperature. I don't so much begrudge the gas necessary to do that--that's cheap! It's the 300 mile round trip in a big truck over rocks, through mud, and along road-less track to get the LP tank refilled that makes it really dear! And, FWIW; I've found a cold start to be far more effective than hot so far. This may not hold true for all types of baking. But it has for the loaves I've been making. Case in point: our friend "Wcsjohn" roped me into making high-hydration breads (made me buy a power mixer and digital scale too, damn it! (:-)). A wonderful change from the dense, dry, hand-made, rustic loaves I'd grown to love. After making rave Ciabatta's from the recipe he posted here, I was ready for more (yes, I know, a real glutton for punishment). Consequently, I pulled a SD conversion of a Coccodrillo recipe out of the oven yesterday. Due to a small oven, I had to bake it in two portions. I split the dough (if you can call it that) into two relatively equal portions. The first went into a cold oven, the second--with about 35 minutes more "rising" time--obviously went into a hot one. The first loaf rose _nearly_ twice as much as the second. For me, that's: game, set, match! These results seem to track exactly with *all* of my previous experiences. That some mixes, techniques, or recipes fare better from different handling than mine is almost certainly a given. And, if you're happy with your results (long, deep pre-heats), I'm happy for you--keep doing them! But in my experience (albeit limited) I've not found an advantage in doing so...] Later all, Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dick Adams" > wrote in message
... .... > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form > one. Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. [I work at fleshing out the input. That often means doing ancillary research and reading--as opposed to those that can only seem to manage to use comics as input...(:-o)!] As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this: Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling rack for this period. Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of bread. .... <good descriptions snipped for brevity> No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, cannot not be convincingly refuted. [No. Actually you've summed it up pretty well. I'd not thought about the issue in terms of intervals. But I think that you've pretty effectively laid out the "natural" sequence of events. I had hoped to get a more historic perspective on how this was done in years past from our European readership. Ulrike pretty much outlined how to impose a storage system over your defined "interval" concept. Tupperware & linen seems to be the ticket. Although I'm pretty sure that my grandmother, living in rural south German farm country--a century ago, didn't use that...(:-o)! Before I forget; I want to thank all of you for your replies both here and off-line. Some have been very useful--some not at all. But that's not to say that they weren't useful to others--so I'm grateful none-the-less. One of the reasons I've worked so hard to recapture "the old days" in baking is that retirement is finding me far from modern facilities--not, as my kids tell me, just because I'm a contrary cuss and hardcore curmudgeon in training... At any rate, being "off-grid" all of the time does impact how one uses their resources. When a freezer is the size of a shoebox, it's frightfully hard to "just bag it and put it in the freezer". What do I do with next weeks dinner in the mean time? This is made even more difficult when you begin to appreciate that freezing isn't free. It takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze it one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and efficient as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on battery power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power system that I developed. Same goes for some of the purists posting here, you think nothing of heating your ovens nearly hot enough to melt lead for 3 or 4 hours as you seek the perfect stone temperature. I don't so much begrudge the gas necessary to do that--that's cheap! It's the 300 mile round trip in a big truck over rocks, through mud, and along road-less track to get the LP tank refilled that makes it really dear! And, FWIW; I've found a cold start to be far more effective than hot so far. This may not hold true for all types of baking. But it has for the loaves I've been making. Case in point: our friend "Wcsjohn" roped me into making high-hydration breads (made me buy a power mixer and digital scale too, damn it! (:-)). A wonderful change from the dense, dry, hand-made, rustic loaves I'd grown to love. After making rave Ciabatta's from the recipe he posted here, I was ready for more (yes, I know, a real glutton for punishment). Consequently, I pulled a SD conversion of a Coccodrillo recipe out of the oven yesterday. Due to a small oven, I had to bake it in two portions. I split the dough (if you can call it that) into two relatively equal portions. The first went into a cold oven, the second--with about 35 minutes more "rising" time--obviously went into a hot one. The first loaf rose _nearly_ twice as much as the second. For me, that's: game, set, match! These results seem to track exactly with *all* of my previous experiences. That some mixes, techniques, or recipes fare better from different handling than mine is almost certainly a given. And, if you're happy with your results (long, deep pre-heats), I'm happy for you--keep doing them! But in my experience (albeit limited) I've not found an advantage in doing so...] Later all, Dusty -- Remove STORE to reply |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > wrote in message=20 ... > ... Freezing takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze = it > one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and = efficient > as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on = battery > power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power = system > that I developed. ... Compared to heating with electricity, for instance, freezing is a = relatively=20 efficient process, as it is based on the Carnot cycle. Take heat at one = temperature and dump it at a higher temperature. Thermodynamically very elegant! Microwaving is a process of heating with electricity, but, compared to = resistive heating in an enclosure, it is quite efficient as only the item needed = to be heated is heated. Microwaving a daily portion of frozen bread is entirely = optional, as the bread will thaw rapidly at room temperature. Over the years, gas of one kind or another, or petroleum fuels, have = been a very cheap kind of energy. But clearly those days are coming to an end. = Possibly another age of artisanal ovens on the countryside is coming. I do not know how refrigeration and freezing works in a trailer home, = but I assume that it is gas (i.e., propane) fueled. That should still be relatively = cheap, if space will allow. The expense is to be compared with more frequent bakes, assuming = one uses the same fuel for the bakes, as opposed to gathering wood in the = forests. --- DickA |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > wrote in message=20 ... > ... Freezing takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze = it > one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and = efficient > as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on = battery > power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power = system > that I developed. ... Compared to heating with electricity, for instance, freezing is a = relatively=20 efficient process, as it is based on the Carnot cycle. Take heat at one = temperature and dump it at a higher temperature. Thermodynamically very elegant! Microwaving is a process of heating with electricity, but, compared to = resistive heating in an enclosure, it is quite efficient as only the item needed = to be heated is heated. Microwaving a daily portion of frozen bread is entirely = optional, as the bread will thaw rapidly at room temperature. Over the years, gas of one kind or another, or petroleum fuels, have = been a very cheap kind of energy. But clearly those days are coming to an end. = Possibly another age of artisanal ovens on the countryside is coming. I do not know how refrigeration and freezing works in a trailer home, = but I assume that it is gas (i.e., propane) fueled. That should still be relatively = cheap, if space will allow. The expense is to be compared with more frequent bakes, assuming = one uses the same fuel for the bakes, as opposed to gathering wood in the = forests. --- DickA |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > "Dick Adams" > wrote in message > ... > ... > > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things > > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form > > one. > > Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed > opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. > [I work at fleshing out the input. That often means doing ancillary > research and reading--as opposed to those that can only seem to manage to > use comics as input...(:-o)!] > > As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this: > > Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling > rack for this period. > > Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further > cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be > consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may > have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. > For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. > > Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. > Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is > no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a > sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. > A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of > bread. > > ... <good descriptions snipped for brevity> > > No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these > mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any > bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, > cannot not be convincingly refuted. > [No. Actually you've summed it up pretty well. I'd not thought about the > issue in terms of intervals. But I think that you've pretty effectively > laid out the "natural" sequence of events. > > I had hoped to get a more historic perspective on how this was done in years > past from our European readership. Ulrike pretty much outlined how to > impose a storage system over your defined "interval" concept. Tupperware & > linen seems to be the ticket. Although I'm pretty sure that my grandmother, > living in rural south German farm country--a century ago, didn't use > that...(:-o)! I'm sure she used a bread-box!!!! Ulrike > Before I forget; I want to thank all of you for your replies both here and > off-line. Some have been very useful--some not at all. But that's not to > say that they weren't useful to others--so I'm grateful none-the-less. One > of the reasons I've worked so hard to recapture "the old days" in baking is > that retirement is finding me far from modern facilities--not, as my kids > tell me, just because I'm a contrary cuss and hardcore curmudgeon in > training... > > At any rate, being "off-grid" all of the time does impact how one uses their > resources. When a freezer is the size of a shoebox, it's frightfully hard > to "just bag it and put it in the freezer". What do I do with next weeks > dinner in the mean time? > > This is made even more difficult when you begin to appreciate that freezing > isn't free. It takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze it > one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and efficient > as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on battery > power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power system > that I developed. > > Same goes for some of the purists posting here, you think nothing of heating > your ovens nearly hot enough to melt lead for 3 or 4 hours as you seek the > perfect stone temperature. I don't so much begrudge the gas necessary to do > that--that's cheap! It's the 300 mile round trip in a big truck over rocks, > through mud, and along road-less track to get the LP tank refilled that > makes it really dear! And, FWIW; I've found a cold start to be far more > effective than hot so far. This may not hold true for all types of baking. > But it has for the loaves I've been making. > > Case in point: our friend "Wcsjohn" roped me into making high-hydration > breads (made me buy a power mixer and digital scale too, damn it! (:-)). A > wonderful change from the dense, dry, hand-made, rustic loaves I'd grown to > love. After making rave Ciabatta's from the recipe he posted here, I was > ready for more (yes, I know, a real glutton for punishment). Consequently, > I pulled a SD conversion of a Coccodrillo recipe out of the oven yesterday. > Due to a small oven, I had to bake it in two portions. I split the dough > (if you can call it that) into two relatively equal portions. The first > went into a cold oven, the second--with about 35 minutes more "rising" > time--obviously went into a hot one. The first loaf rose _nearly_ twice as > much as the second. > > For me, that's: game, set, match! These results seem to track exactly with > *all* of my previous experiences. That some mixes, techniques, or recipes > fare better from different handling than mine is almost certainly a given. > And, if you're happy with your results (long, deep pre-heats), I'm happy for > you--keep doing them! But in my experience (albeit limited) I've not found > an advantage in doing so...] > > > Later all, > Dusty > -- > Remove STORE to reply > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > "Dick Adams" > wrote in message > ... > ... > > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things > > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form > > one. > > Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed > opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. > [I work at fleshing out the input. That often means doing ancillary > research and reading--as opposed to those that can only seem to manage to > use comics as input...(:-o)!] > > As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this: > > Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling > rack for this period. > > Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further > cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be > consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may > have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. > For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. > > Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. > Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is > no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a > sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. > A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of > bread. > > ... <good descriptions snipped for brevity> > > No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these > mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any > bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, > cannot not be convincingly refuted. > [No. Actually you've summed it up pretty well. I'd not thought about the > issue in terms of intervals. But I think that you've pretty effectively > laid out the "natural" sequence of events. > > I had hoped to get a more historic perspective on how this was done in years > past from our European readership. Ulrike pretty much outlined how to > impose a storage system over your defined "interval" concept. Tupperware & > linen seems to be the ticket. Although I'm pretty sure that my grandmother, > living in rural south German farm country--a century ago, didn't use > that...(:-o)! I'm sure she used a bread-box!!!! Ulrike > Before I forget; I want to thank all of you for your replies both here and > off-line. Some have been very useful--some not at all. But that's not to > say that they weren't useful to others--so I'm grateful none-the-less. One > of the reasons I've worked so hard to recapture "the old days" in baking is > that retirement is finding me far from modern facilities--not, as my kids > tell me, just because I'm a contrary cuss and hardcore curmudgeon in > training... > > At any rate, being "off-grid" all of the time does impact how one uses their > resources. When a freezer is the size of a shoebox, it's frightfully hard > to "just bag it and put it in the freezer". What do I do with next weeks > dinner in the mean time? > > This is made even more difficult when you begin to appreciate that freezing > isn't free. It takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze it > one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and efficient > as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on battery > power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power system > that I developed. > > Same goes for some of the purists posting here, you think nothing of heating > your ovens nearly hot enough to melt lead for 3 or 4 hours as you seek the > perfect stone temperature. I don't so much begrudge the gas necessary to do > that--that's cheap! It's the 300 mile round trip in a big truck over rocks, > through mud, and along road-less track to get the LP tank refilled that > makes it really dear! And, FWIW; I've found a cold start to be far more > effective than hot so far. This may not hold true for all types of baking. > But it has for the loaves I've been making. > > Case in point: our friend "Wcsjohn" roped me into making high-hydration > breads (made me buy a power mixer and digital scale too, damn it! (:-)). A > wonderful change from the dense, dry, hand-made, rustic loaves I'd grown to > love. After making rave Ciabatta's from the recipe he posted here, I was > ready for more (yes, I know, a real glutton for punishment). Consequently, > I pulled a SD conversion of a Coccodrillo recipe out of the oven yesterday. > Due to a small oven, I had to bake it in two portions. I split the dough > (if you can call it that) into two relatively equal portions. The first > went into a cold oven, the second--with about 35 minutes more "rising" > time--obviously went into a hot one. The first loaf rose _nearly_ twice as > much as the second. > > For me, that's: game, set, match! These results seem to track exactly with > *all* of my previous experiences. That some mixes, techniques, or recipes > fare better from different handling than mine is almost certainly a given. > And, if you're happy with your results (long, deep pre-heats), I'm happy for > you--keep doing them! But in my experience (albeit limited) I've not found > an advantage in doing so...] > > > Later all, > Dusty > -- > Remove STORE to reply > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dusty" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > "Dick Adams" > wrote in message > ... > ... > > they mean in that portion of the grand scheme of things > > within my ken. Then, when I _want_ an opinion, I form > > one. > > Me, I do pretty much the same thing. Except the formed > opinion is usually wrong, but a place to start testing. > [I work at fleshing out the input. That often means doing ancillary > research and reading--as opposed to those that can only seem to manage to > use comics as input...(:-o)!] > > As to storing bread, I came up eventually with this: > > Interval A is the critical one: The loaves sit on the cooling > rack for this period. > > Interval B is where the loaves are bagged in plastic, further > cooled when necessary, divided into portions which can be > consumed in a day, and frozen. Slicing before freezing may > have some advantage, esp. for single people living alone. > For slicing soft loaves, an electric knife is good. > > Interval C is where the loaves are defrosted and eaten. > Defrosting in a microwave oven makes sense. There is > no reason to defrost more bread than can be eaten at a > sitting, but, for convenience, we defrost a day's worth. > A minute in our microwave is suitable for a half pound of > bread. > > ... <good descriptions snipped for brevity> > > No doubt purists of the various persuasions will resent these > mumblings, but I believe that my contention, that practically any > bread-storage situation can be emulated by this A-B-C routine, > cannot not be convincingly refuted. > [No. Actually you've summed it up pretty well. I'd not thought about the > issue in terms of intervals. But I think that you've pretty effectively > laid out the "natural" sequence of events. > > I had hoped to get a more historic perspective on how this was done in years > past from our European readership. Ulrike pretty much outlined how to > impose a storage system over your defined "interval" concept. Tupperware & > linen seems to be the ticket. Although I'm pretty sure that my grandmother, > living in rural south German farm country--a century ago, didn't use > that...(:-o)! I'm sure she used a bread-box!!!! Ulrike > Before I forget; I want to thank all of you for your replies both here and > off-line. Some have been very useful--some not at all. But that's not to > say that they weren't useful to others--so I'm grateful none-the-less. One > of the reasons I've worked so hard to recapture "the old days" in baking is > that retirement is finding me far from modern facilities--not, as my kids > tell me, just because I'm a contrary cuss and hardcore curmudgeon in > training... > > At any rate, being "off-grid" all of the time does impact how one uses their > resources. When a freezer is the size of a shoebox, it's frightfully hard > to "just bag it and put it in the freezer". What do I do with next weeks > dinner in the mean time? > > This is made even more difficult when you begin to appreciate that freezing > isn't free. It takes energy--a considerable amount. Too much to freeze it > one day, and then thaw it out in the "mikey" the next. Modern and efficient > as they are, it's still damned difficult to run a microwave oven on battery > power alone--at least not for long, even with the batteries and power system > that I developed. > > Same goes for some of the purists posting here, you think nothing of heating > your ovens nearly hot enough to melt lead for 3 or 4 hours as you seek the > perfect stone temperature. I don't so much begrudge the gas necessary to do > that--that's cheap! It's the 300 mile round trip in a big truck over rocks, > through mud, and along road-less track to get the LP tank refilled that > makes it really dear! And, FWIW; I've found a cold start to be far more > effective than hot so far. This may not hold true for all types of baking. > But it has for the loaves I've been making. > > Case in point: our friend "Wcsjohn" roped me into making high-hydration > breads (made me buy a power mixer and digital scale too, damn it! (:-)). A > wonderful change from the dense, dry, hand-made, rustic loaves I'd grown to > love. After making rave Ciabatta's from the recipe he posted here, I was > ready for more (yes, I know, a real glutton for punishment). Consequently, > I pulled a SD conversion of a Coccodrillo recipe out of the oven yesterday. > Due to a small oven, I had to bake it in two portions. I split the dough > (if you can call it that) into two relatively equal portions. The first > went into a cold oven, the second--with about 35 minutes more "rising" > time--obviously went into a hot one. The first loaf rose _nearly_ twice as > much as the second. > > For me, that's: game, set, match! These results seem to track exactly with > *all* of my previous experiences. That some mixes, techniques, or recipes > fare better from different handling than mine is almost certainly a given. > And, if you're happy with your results (long, deep pre-heats), I'm happy for > you--keep doing them! But in my experience (albeit limited) I've not found > an advantage in doing so...] > > > Later all, > Dusty > -- > Remove STORE to reply > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Storing Bread? | General Cooking | |||
Storing bread question | General Cooking | |||
storing Indian spice; storing raw and roasted sesame seeds | General Cooking | |||
Storing | Winemaking | |||
Storing Pu-erh | Tea |