![]() |
Starter flour question
Rookie question... for best results, should I be feeding my starter bakers
flour, or is all purpose flour just as good? Thanks, Chris |
Starter flour question
On Jun 27, 9:20*am, "Chris" > wrote:
> The protein level in the flour has far less (if anything) > to do with the rise than the hydration and handling... I think you should consider inoculation levels and temperature management. One trick to getting lofty bread with large holes is to match the maturity of the dough, to the maturity of the ferment. If you can slow the initial, or bulk phase, down (less starter, cooler temperature... most typically a combination of both), the dough will have sufficient time to more fully develop gluten before the ferment phase becomes active. To put it another way... your goal is to have well developed gluten BEFORE the active fermentation step. It is also well established that machine kneading is not the best way to develop gluten. Put the machine away. A lot of bakers retard their dough (keep it cold) to develop their gluten, shape their loaves gently to avoid degassing, then push their final proof with heat to maximize gas production. This works well. Your hydration level should be somewhere between 68 and 72 percent, until you get really good handling wet dough. Then you can move it to 75%... but you need strong flour to do this. |
Starter flour question
Thanks Will, good interesting info to add to my experimenting.
Don't worry, the machine hasn't played any part in my sourdough, I only use it to bake our daily bread (laziness is my only excuse). Chris "Will" > wrote in message ... On Jun 27, 9:20 am, "Chris" > wrote: > The protein level in the flour has far less (if anything) > to do with the rise than the hydration and handling... I think you should consider inoculation levels and temperature management. One trick to getting lofty bread with large holes is to match the maturity of the dough, to the maturity of the ferment. If you can slow the initial, or bulk phase, down (less starter, cooler temperature... most typically a combination of both), the dough will have sufficient time to more fully develop gluten before the ferment phase becomes active. To put it another way... your goal is to have well developed gluten BEFORE the active fermentation step. It is also well established that machine kneading is not the best way to develop gluten. Put the machine away. A lot of bakers retard their dough (keep it cold) to develop their gluten, shape their loaves gently to avoid degassing, then push their final proof with heat to maximize gas production. This works well. Your hydration level should be somewhere between 68 and 72 percent, until you get really good handling wet dough. Then you can move it to 75%... but you need strong flour to do this. |
Starter flour question
On 6/27/2010 03:16, Chris wrote:
> Thanks Sam. So we're not interested in the strength of the flour in the > starter, only that it is healthy and active, is that correct? > Yes, that's true. High germ count of active organisms in the right proportion (yeasts, LB's). It may be of interest that the highest activity does not indicate the peak of active organisms - that's right after. And - if one does not use baker's yeast to rise bread and the starter is lacking, any dough technique won't make up for it. One major mistake seeming to come up here is that people don't realize feeding requirements of starters which - when in good shape double their population in something like 2 - 3 hours. That goes exponential 2 4 8. If feeding - flour multiplication of flour in inoculation (previous step in multi-step starter growing) is not matched to growth rate, starter looses. Good luck with your project. Sam |
Starter flour question
Since the guys have provided plenty of science, here's some anecdote:
I thought big holes and/or low density were the hallmarks of a great loaf, and I was discouraged that my 65% rye loaf with a full rye starter was too dense. That was until several Germans and Polish folks tried my bread and nearly wept for home. There is no correct answer to the perfect loaf. Just have fun eating your results. |
Starter flour question
Great post Matt!
"Matt Fitz" > wrote in message ... > Since the guys have provided plenty of science, here's some anecdote: > I thought big holes and/or low density were the hallmarks of a great > loaf, and I was discouraged that my 65% rye loaf with a full rye > starter was too dense. That was until several Germans and Polish folks > tried my bread and nearly wept for home. There is no correct answer to > the perfect loaf. Just have fun eating your results. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter