Samartha Deva wrote:
> Dusty wrote:
>> Samartha Deva wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> Well, first of all, the rise is not coming alone from the yeasts
>>> with sourdough - somewhere it was written that up to 50 % of the
>>> CO2 can be coming from the LB's - or something to that extent.
>>
>> Huh? You got a cite for this, Samartha? I've never read that the
>> LB's generated CO2. As far as I know, they make cycloheximides, not
>> gas...
>
> Oh man - can't know everything.
One can aspire to...(:-o)?

Some good links, thanks, Samartha.

....
> http://samartha.net/SD/docs/DW-post1-4n.html#463
>
> you should have studied by now.
So many books...so little time...so much bread to bake...(:-o)! I guess I
spent too much time baking and converting recipes back to SD to catch it
all...

> You really disappoint me there. You probably fell victim of the yeast
> industries propaganda and me thinks that listening to Alex Carey's

Not likely! I'm about the last person on this planet that would recommend
using commercial yeast. I don't spend a nanosecond of my time collecting
and converting old recipes to recapture the glory of commercial yeast. It's
SD all the way for me, baby.

> manuscript would greatly widen your horizon:
>
> http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=4041
Utter, unfettered, fact free, opinionated tripe! It wasn't worth 0.1 of the
36 seconds it took to download that garbage.

> to see how endangered real sourdough usage is. Maybe someone gets a
> patent soon and starts filing John Doe suits against infringers or
> they gen-modify the LB's for single use. Then we would all have to
> secretely grow your outlawed starters in the basement behind closed
> curtains (this alone would be suspicious already, so it's gonna be
Cool! I'm already set up for it...(:-o)!

> closet growing time in the dark). I think we need some general
> uprising soon to prevent this from happening. Who wants to grow his
> starter in a dark closet?
<snerk!>


Later all,
Dusty
--
Remove STORE to reply