 |
|
| Sushi (alt.food.sushi) For talking sushi. (Sashimi, wasabi, miso soup, and other elements of the sushi experience are valid topics.) Sushi is a broad topic; discussions range from preparation to methods of eating to favorite kinds to good restaurants. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
Healthy Food = A Longer Life
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Questions wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, > (Wholefood Farmacy) wrote: > > >> >>http://www.take.wholefoodfarmacy.com So why are you posting non-sushi related spam? -- Dan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:41:06 -0500, Dan Logcher
> wrote: >Questions wrote: > >> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, >> (Wholefood Farmacy) wrote: >> >> >>> >>>http://www.take.wholefoodfarmacy.com > >So why are you posting non-sushi related spam? Actually Dan, I was attempting to let others in the group know that the posting just above mine was SPAM, and didn't need to be opened. This is so obvious, I wonder why you would bother to ask. Are you baiting me or just being funny? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In ,
Questions > typed: > On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:41:06 -0500, Dan Logcher > > wrote: > >> Questions wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> So why are you posting non-sushi related spam? > > Actually Dan, I was attempting to let others in the group know > that > the posting just above mine was SPAM, and didn't need to be > opened. > This is so obvious, I wonder why you would bother to ask. Are > you > baiting me or just being funny? I don't know what Dan had in mind, but let me point out that when you answer a spam message and repost the URL that the spammer posted, you are reposting and spreading the spam for him. If you must do this, at least obliterate the company name, URL, etc. -- Ken Blake Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:56:00 -0700, "Ken Blake"
> wrote: >In , >Questions > typed: > >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:41:06 -0500, Dan Logcher >> > wrote: >> >>> Questions wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> So why are you posting non-sushi related spam? >> >> Actually Dan, I was attempting to let others in the group know >> that >> the posting just above mine was SPAM, and didn't need to be >> opened. >> This is so obvious, I wonder why you would bother to ask. Are >> you >> baiting me or just being funny? > > >I don't know what Dan had in mind, but let me point out that when >you answer a spam message and repost the URL that the spammer >posted, you are reposting and spreading the spam for him. > >If you must do this, at least obliterate the company name, URL, >etc. So, his answer to me was also "reposting and spreading the spam", as it also contained the URL that was posted by the spammer? Get real guys. I've been using the Internet since the days of UNIX only. I know what I'm doing. In this case, I was warning of a spam message and it makes no difference if the damn url was in it or not. Stop with the nit-picking. I'm sure you are way too old for it. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:56:00 -0700, "Ken Blake"
> wrote: >In , >Questions > typed: > >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:41:06 -0500, Dan Logcher >> > wrote: >> >>> Questions wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> So why are you posting non-sushi related spam? >> >> Actually Dan, I was attempting to let others in the group know >> that >> the posting just above mine was SPAM, and didn't need to be >> opened. >> This is so obvious, I wonder why you would bother to ask. Are >> you >> baiting me or just being funny? > > >I don't know what Dan had in mind, but let me point out that when >you answer a spam message and repost the URL that the spammer >posted, you are reposting and spreading the spam for him. > >If you must do this, at least obliterate the company name, URL, >etc. So, his answer to me was also "reposting and spreading the spam", as it also contained the URL that was posted by the spammer? Get real guys. I've been using the Internet since the days of UNIX only. I know what I'm doing. In this case, I was warning of a spam message and it makes no difference if the damn url was in it or not. Stop with the nit-picking. I'm sure you are way too old for it. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Healthy Food = A Longer Life | Mexican Cooking | |||
| Healthy Food = A Longer Life | Recipes | |||
| Healthy Food = A Longer Life | Baking | |||
| Healthy Food = A Longer Life | Tea | |||
| Healthy Food = A Longer Life | Vegan | |||
Hybrid Mode
