Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What exactly is orange pekoe? It is what is used by Tim Hortons (
http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/tea.html ). The taste is great. When I went to a specialty tea shop and asked for it, they said it's not really a type of tea and that they don't carry it. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Why not just Google it?
2. If a "specialty tea shop" has no idea what an "orange pekoe" is, not only its not a "specialty" tea shop, but not a tea shop at all. Its like a car shop that has no idea what a "sedan" is. One cannot spend more than 10 minutes on reading about black tea without learning about orange pekoe, fannings, tippery, flowery and other basic black tea terminology. Sasha. "-" > wrote in message news:lYkoh.577247$1T2.79580@pd7urf2no... > What exactly is orange pekoe? It is what is used by Tim Hortons ( > http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/tea.html ). The taste is great. > > When I went to a specialty tea shop and asked for it, they said it's not > really a type of tea and that they don't carry it. > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "-" > wrote in message news:lYkoh.577247$1T2.79580@pd7urf2no... > What exactly is orange pekoe? It is what is used by Tim Hortons ( > http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/tea.html ). The taste is great. > > When I went to a specialty tea shop and asked for it, they said it's not > really a type of tea and that they don't carry it. Right. OP is actually a designation of leaf size, not a type of tea as some companies would have you believe. From the link, Tim Hortons created its own blend, so you'd have to ask for Tim Hortons, not OP. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well they're sort of right.. it's not a "type of tea" it's a "grade" of tea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe I'm just glad you didn't ask for some Super Fine Tippy Golden Flowery Orange Pekoe. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Wiki's article is a bit confusing, IMHO.
Try this forum's FAQ, its a much better source. Sasha. "Zarky Zork" > wrote in message . net... > Well they're sort of right.. it's not a "type of tea" it's a "grade" of > tea. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe > > I'm just glad you didn't ask for some Super Fine Tippy Golden Flowery > Orange > Pekoe. > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how do you access the forum faq?
"Alex Chaihorsky" > wrote in message . net... > Well, Wiki's article is a bit confusing, IMHO. > Try this forum's FAQ, its a much better source. > > Sasha. > > > "Zarky Zork" > wrote in message > . net... >> Well they're sort of right.. it's not a "type of tea" it's a "grade" of >> tea. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe >> >> I'm just glad you didn't ask for some Super Fine Tippy Golden Flowery >> Orange >> Pekoe. >> >> > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By Google.
Sasha. "-" > wrote in message news:wpEoh.588441$5R2.302607@pd7urf3no... > how do you access the forum faq? > > "Alex Chaihorsky" > wrote in message > . net... >> Well, Wiki's article is a bit confusing, IMHO. >> Try this forum's FAQ, its a much better source. >> >> Sasha. >> >> >> "Zarky Zork" > wrote in message >> . net... >>> Well they're sort of right.. it's not a "type of tea" it's a "grade" of >>> tea. >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe >>> >>> I'm just glad you didn't ask for some Super Fine Tippy Golden Flowery >>> Orange >>> Pekoe. >>> >>> >> >> > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"-" > writes:
> how do you access the forum faq? http://pages.ripco.net/~c4ha2na9/tea/faq.html /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article <lYkoh.577247$1T2.79580@pd7urf2no>, - > wrote:
>What exactly is orange pekoe? It is what is used by Tim Hortons ( >http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/tea.html ). The taste is great. It's whatever you want it to be. >When I went to a specialty tea shop and asked for it, they said it's not >really a type of tea and that they don't carry it. It's not really a type of tea. But you can get a box of Assam or Ceylon black, Yunnan black, or Kenya black, and write ORANGE PEKOE on the box and you'd be right on the money. Orange Pekoe is a sort of grade of tea... it's one of the lowest sorts of grade of tea. It's like saying "table wine." It doesn't tell you what it is or where it comes from, but it establishes some minimum standard. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, Scott,
I do not agree with you at all. You may not believe each and every label on a tea box, but that does not change the meaning of the words. You are right - ITS NOT A TYPE OF TEA, because it never was and it never claimed to be such. It always was and still is an attempt to describe the TYPE OF LEAF from the point of view of it being mostly whole, broken or fannings plus the presence and quantity of tips, etc. OP has to be at least a large part leaf and at least some - whole leaf teas. Majority of " box of Assam or Ceylon black, Yunnan black, or Kenya black," - will be fannings or broken leaf. If you put an OP label on such a box it will be a... hm... misrepresentation. Sasha. "Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message ... > In article <lYkoh.577247$1T2.79580@pd7urf2no>, - > wrote: >>What exactly is orange pekoe? It is what is used by Tim Hortons ( >>http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/tea.html ). The taste is great. > > It's whatever you want it to be. > >>When I went to a specialty tea shop and asked for it, they said it's not >>really a type of tea and that they don't carry it. > > It's not really a type of tea. But you can get a box of Assam or Ceylon > black, Yunnan black, or Kenya black, and write ORANGE PEKOE on the box > and you'd be right on the money. > > Orange Pekoe is a sort of grade of tea... it's one of the lowest sorts of > grade of tea. It's like saying "table wine." It doesn't tell you what it > is or where it comes from, but it establishes some minimum standard. > --scott > -- > "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
[Sasha] > It [OP (orange pekoe)] always was and still is an attempt to describe the TYPE OF LEAF from the point of view of it being mostly whole, broken or fannings plus the presence and quantity of tips, etc. > OP has to be at least a large part leaf and at least some - whole leaf teas. > Majority of " box of Assam or Ceylon black, Yunnan black, or Kenya black," - > will be fannings or broken leaf. If you put an OP label on such a box it > will be a... hm... misrepresentation. My instincts say you are right here, but what about the fact that Assam and Darjeeling leaves, even excellent ones, are cut to smaller uniform sizes as part of the production process? I *think* the FOP and more elaborate designations refer to the leaves not as they appear in your package when you buy it, but rather to a condition of the leaf in an earlier stage, back at the ranch as it were. Otherwise, traditionally (whatever that means), there would be *NO* OP at all from those two regions, save for some variations on Oolong themes that are quite new on the tea scene. Basic Assam and Darjeeling are *always* "broken." Am I making any sense here? Or did I miss a crucial point you made? Michael |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael -
I included the following description of the Darjeeling process which I find to be the most clear in describing it. http://www.thunderbolttea.com/pages/...rocessing.html Please, notice that at the end of the description they mention the sieve grading stage. That is when size grading (P-OP-BP) happens. It is my understanding that F, T and other grade designations that has nothing to do with the size and integrity of the leaf are made even earlier when different ways of picking up the tea (a bud with 1 leaf, 2 leaves, etc) is being ordered from the plantation crew. Sasha. "Michael Plant" > wrote in message ... > snip > > [Sasha] >> It [OP (orange pekoe)] always was and still is an attempt to describe the >> TYPE > OF LEAF from the point of view of it being mostly whole, broken or > fannings > plus the presence and quantity of tips, etc. > >> OP has to be at least a large part leaf and at least some - whole leaf >> teas. >> Majority of " box of Assam or Ceylon black, Yunnan black, or Kenya >> black," - >> will be fannings or broken leaf. If you put an OP label on such a box it >> will be a... hm... misrepresentation. > > My instincts say you are right here, > but what about the fact that Assam and > Darjeeling leaves, even excellent ones, > are cut to smaller uniform sizes as part > of the production process? I *think* the > FOP and more elaborate designations refer > to the leaves not as they appear in your > package when you buy it, but rather to a > condition of the leaf in an earlier stage, > back at the ranch as it were. Otherwise, > traditionally (whatever that means), there > would be *NO* OP at all from those two > regions, save for some variations on Oolong > themes that are quite new on the tea scene. > Basic Assam and Darjeeling are *always* > "broken." Am I making any sense here? > Or did I miss a crucial point you made? > Michael > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would agree with you here Michael, I have to say that even if a black tea
(say assam or ceylon) is labled as OP, or FOP, it's always broken somehwhat in the bag. The only full-leaf teas that steep and unfurl as actual whole leaves that I've seen are the oolongs and greens from Taiwan and China (also maybe some puerh leaves). Even sencha is a bit fragmented in the bags I've bought. Melinda "Michael Plant" > wrote in message ... > snip > > [Sasha] >> It [OP (orange pekoe)] always was and still is an attempt to describe the >> TYPE > OF LEAF from the point of view of it being mostly whole, broken or > fannings > plus the presence and quantity of tips, etc. > >> OP has to be at least a large part leaf and at least some - whole leaf >> teas. >> Majority of " box of Assam or Ceylon black, Yunnan black, or Kenya >> black," - >> will be fannings or broken leaf. If you put an OP label on such a box it >> will be a... hm... misrepresentation. > > My instincts say you are right here, > but what about the fact that Assam and > Darjeeling leaves, even excellent ones, > are cut to smaller uniform sizes as part > of the production process? I *think* the > FOP and more elaborate designations refer > to the leaves not as they appear in your > package when you buy it, but rather to a > condition of the leaf in an earlier stage, > back at the ranch as it were. Otherwise, > traditionally (whatever that means), there > would be *NO* OP at all from those two > regions, save for some variations on Oolong > themes that are quite new on the tea scene. > Basic Assam and Darjeeling are *always* > "broken." Am I making any sense here? > Or did I miss a crucial point you made? > Michael > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Twinings Ceylon Orange Pekoe | Tea | |||
Orange Pekoe - as a kind of tea? | Tea | |||
Orange Pekoe? | Tea | |||
My favourite tea is orange pekoe! | Tea | |||
Orange pekoe | Tea |