Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are teas that reward many steeps. And, for me, there are teas
that only get interesting *after* many steeps. Chief among these, I find, are many - most! - cooked Pu'ers and border teas (Lubiancha.) I usually find them kind of muddy and afflicted by off notes, for seven, eight, or nine steeps. Then, around the time when the liquor loses its opacity, a corresponding transparency comes over the taste, often with a delightful sweetness reminiscent of dried fruit. I often wonder how it might be possible to change my brewing protocol to reach the taste I prefer more quickly. Obviously, I could just discard the early steeps, but that seems wasteful, and besides, I like caffeine as much as the next guy. I suppose I could also lengthen the early steeps, but I think that would make them worse than they already are. (I use a lot of leaf, and quite short steeps early on.) Any ideas? /Lew --- Lew Perin / World's first ISO 9003 sig! |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 4:34 pm, Lewis Perin > wrote:
> There are teas that reward many steeps. And, for me, there are teas > that only get interesting *after* many steeps. Chief among these, I > find, are many - most! - cooked Pu'ers and border teas (Lubiancha.) I > usually find them kind of muddy and afflicted by off notes, for seven, > eight, or nine steeps. Then, around the time when the liquor loses > its opacity, a corresponding transparency comes over the taste, often > with a delightful sweetness reminiscent of dried fruit. > > I often wonder how it might be possible to change my brewing protocol > to reach the taste I prefer more quickly. Obviously, I could just > discard the early steeps, but that seems wasteful, and besides, I like > caffeine as much as the next guy. I suppose I could also lengthen the > early steeps, but I think that would make them worse than they already > are. (I use a lot of leaf, and quite short steeps early on.) > > Any ideas? > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / > World's first ISO 9003 sig! I've wondered the exact same thing about a bunch of teas. The best I have found to approximate it is to actually use less tea to the same amount of water and the weaker brew tend to taste like the later steeps sooner. Outside of that I never find rushing brewings helpful to reach the end product. One it "feels" wrong, and two I think it is because my heart isn't into the discard brews they are either rushed or not properly completed which actually doesn't result in the same end product for me many times. I guess this is just one of those pain/pleasure things that you just have to endure to get to the good stuff. However, I too am all for a more pleasure less pain system ![]() - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like you just need to use less leaves Lew!
MarshalN http://www.xanga.com/MarshalN Lewis Perin wrote: > There are teas that reward many steeps. And, for me, there are teas > that only get interesting *after* many steeps. Chief among these, I > find, are many - most! - cooked Pu'ers and border teas (Lubiancha.) I > usually find them kind of muddy and afflicted by off notes, for seven, > eight, or nine steeps. Then, around the time when the liquor loses > its opacity, a corresponding transparency comes over the taste, often > with a delightful sweetness reminiscent of dried fruit. > > I often wonder how it might be possible to change my brewing protocol > to reach the taste I prefer more quickly. Obviously, I could just > discard the early steeps, but that seems wasteful, and besides, I like > caffeine as much as the next guy. I suppose I could also lengthen the > early steeps, but I think that would make them worse than they already > are. (I use a lot of leaf, and quite short steeps early on.) > > Any ideas? > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / > World's first ISO 9003 sig! |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MarshalN > writes:
> > Lewis Perin wrote: > > There are teas that reward many steeps. And, for me, there are teas > > that only get interesting *after* many steeps. Chief among these, I > > find, are many - most! - cooked Pu'ers and border teas (Lubiancha.) I > > usually find them kind of muddy and afflicted by off notes, for seven, > > eight, or nine steeps. Then, around the time when the liquor loses > > its opacity, a corresponding transparency comes over the taste, often > > with a delightful sweetness reminiscent of dried fruit. > > > > I often wonder how it might be possible to change my brewing protocol > > to reach the taste I prefer more quickly. Obviously, I could just > > discard the early steeps, but that seems wasteful, and besides, I like > > caffeine as much as the next guy. I suppose I could also lengthen the > > early steeps, but I think that would make them worse than they already > > are. (I use a lot of leaf, and quite short steeps early on.) > > > > Any ideas? > > > Sounds like you just need to use less leaves Lew! Wow, coming from you a recommendation to use less leaf has to be taken seriously. I can't remember you ever saying that before in any context. I'll try that and report back. But in the meantime, since posting my original query, I've tried lengthening the early steeps with cooked Pu'er. To my surprise, it hasn't worsened the taste, because shu basically doesn't get harsh no matter how hard you push it. And it does seem to get me to the qualities I like in fewer steeps. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 2:34*am, Lewis Perin > wrote:
> There are teas that reward many steeps. *And, for me, there are teas > that only get interesting *after* many steeps. *Chief among these, I > find, are many - most! - cooked Pu'ers and border teas (Lubiancha.) *I > usually find them kind of muddy and afflicted by off notes, for seven, > eight, or nine steeps. *Then, around the time when the liquor loses > its opacity, a corresponding transparency comes over the taste, often > with a delightful sweetness reminiscent of dried fruit. > > I often wonder how it might be possible to change my brewing protocol > to reach the taste I prefer more quickly. *Obviously, I could just > discard the early steeps, but that seems wasteful, and besides, I like > caffeine as much as the next guy. *I suppose I could also lengthen the > early steeps, but I think that would make them worse than they already > are. *(I use a lot of leaf, and quite short steeps early on.) > > Any ideas? > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / > World's first ISO 9003 sig! Try with lesser quantity say half the quantity of tea that you were using and increase the steeping time, if required. How much increase in steeping time you are the best judge. And please let us know the results in details/ or simple confirmation that with this little change in your brewing protocol,you reached the taste you prefer more quickly. S. M.Changoiwala Gopaldhara tea Company Pvt Ltd India |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MarshalN > writes:
> Sounds like you just need to use less leaves Lew! OK, here are some notes from tastings I did recently using a sample kindly sent me by someone who's been known to lurk here. (Thanks!) I should say a few things first. Steep times are in seconds. BLA = brewed leaf aroma. SBF = similar but fainter. All steeps were in a 4-oz. gaiwan. "Preheated" means that as soon as the previous steep was poured off, the new steep began with boiling water, i.e. the gaiwan was preheated. What isn't obvious is that my normal brewing parameters, the ones I was trying to improve upon, are not represented here. I've been in the habit of using 7g of leaf (like the first setup below) with a lot of very quick steeps at first (like the last one below.) OK, here are the notes: * 2007 Boyou Xian Ting Zhi Xing shu from '05 leaves ** boiling/7g/4 oz/double rinse,5,30,30,60,preheated 90,120,180,300,450,600,900,1200 BLA burnt caramel and mulch. Cup aroma similar but more integrated. Taste very nice, burnt caramel with matching bitterness and good houyun from the first steep, which is unusual. 2: Aroma more twiggy now but still has burnt caramel; taste blunter now, with sweetness mainly in the houyun. 3: Same. 4: Now woody, more interesting again, but hardly sweet at all. 5: A little sweetness creeping back into the main taste, having never left the houyun, plus a little herbality. 6: Aroma, too, is better now. 7: Maybe houyun has perked up after declining for a couple of steeps? Main taste still woody, herbal, fairly sweet, but still no late-steep fruit. 8: Just a hint of dried fruit now. 9: Arrival of dried fruit; quite nice now, but less intense than corresponding times with some other shus. 10: Same. 11: Plummy tianshui is somehow more focused now; possibly the best steep though the thinnest. 12: Thinner but preserving its character. ** boiling/9g/4 oz/double rinse,5,30,30,60,90,preheated 120,180,300,450,600,900,1200 Pretty much like 7g in first steep, though bitterness is stronger. 2: Same as 1. 3: Balance shifts toward more sweetness; best so far. 4: Wood comes in, sweetness recedes. 5: Same as 4. 6: Some sweetness back now. 7: Still has sweetness, plus herbality now; houyun is back strong after having receded. 8-9: Same as 7. 10: Some dried fruit now. 11: Now the dried fruit dominates. 12: Actually somewhat weaker in the fruit department. ** boiling/4g/4 oz/double rinse,5,5,5,5,5,60,preheated boil:120,180,300,450,600,900 BLA caramely, clean, mulchy. Cup aroma SBF. Taste sweet, clean, immediate houyun. 2: A cereal note along with the caramel. 3: About the same, but cereal's gone, houyun's faded somewhat. 4: Same. 5: Liquor's lost most of its opacity; taste weaker now; houyun gone. 6: Taste brighter again with more steep time, pretty much the same in character though; no revival of houyun. 7: Similar but actually a little weaker. 8: Now just starting to get the dried fruit, plus a little cereal. 9: Just a bit more fruit now. 10: Actually losing fruit now, getting blander. 11: Pretty nice tianshui but kind of bland. 12: Same. I think I got the best results with 7g and relatively long steeps (the first trial.) It had the best combination of houyun, late sweetness, and interesting variations from steep to steep. The 9g/long steep setup was blunter on the whole. The 4g setup was blander. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 3:16 pm, Lewis Perin > wrote:
> MarshalN > writes: > > Sounds like you just need to use less leaves Lew! > > OK, here are some notes from tastings I did recently using a sample > kindly sent me by someone who's been known to lurk here. (Thanks!) > > I should say a few things first. Steep times are in seconds. BLA = > brewed leaf aroma. SBF = similar but fainter. All steeps were in a > 4-oz. gaiwan. "Preheated" means that as soon as the previous steep > was poured off, the new steep began with boiling water, i.e. the > gaiwan was preheated. > > What isn't obvious is that my normal brewing parameters, the ones I > was trying to improve upon, are not represented here. I've been in > the habit of using 7g of leaf (like the first setup below) with a lot > of very quick steeps at first (like the last one below.) > > OK, here are the notes: > > * 2007 Boyou Xian Ting Zhi Xing shu from '05 leaves > > ** boiling/7g/4 oz/double rinse,5,30,30,60,preheated 90,120,180,300,450,600,900,1200 > > BLA burnt caramel and mulch. Cup aroma similar but more integrated. > Taste very nice, burnt caramel with matching bitterness and good > houyun from the first steep, which is unusual. 2: Aroma more twiggy > now but still has burnt caramel; taste blunter now, with sweetness > mainly in the houyun. 3: Same. 4: Now woody, more interesting again, > but hardly sweet at all. 5: A little sweetness creeping back into the > main taste, having never left the houyun, plus a little herbality. 6: > Aroma, too, is better now. 7: Maybe houyun has perked up after > declining for a couple of steeps? Main taste still woody, herbal, > fairly sweet, but still no late-steep fruit. 8: Just a hint of dried > fruit now. 9: Arrival of dried fruit; quite nice now, but less > intense than corresponding times with some other shus. 10: Same. 11: > Plummy tianshui is somehow more focused now; possibly the best steep > though the thinnest. 12: Thinner but preserving its character. > > ** boiling/9g/4 oz/double rinse,5,30,30,60,90,preheated 120,180,300,450,600,900,1200 > > Pretty much like 7g in first steep, though bitterness is stronger. 2: > Same as 1. 3: Balance shifts toward more sweetness; best so far. 4: > Wood comes in, sweetness recedes. 5: Same as 4. 6: Some sweetness > back now. 7: Still has sweetness, plus herbality now; houyun is back > strong after having receded. 8-9: Same as 7. 10: Some dried fruit > now. 11: Now the dried fruit dominates. 12: Actually somewhat weaker > in the fruit department. > > ** boiling/4g/4 oz/double rinse,5,5,5,5,5,60,preheated boil:120,180,300,450,600,900 > > BLA caramely, clean, mulchy. Cup aroma SBF. Taste sweet, clean, > immediate houyun. 2: A cereal note along with the caramel. 3: About > the same, but cereal's gone, houyun's faded somewhat. 4: Same. 5: > Liquor's lost most of its opacity; taste weaker now; houyun gone. 6: > Taste brighter again with more steep time, pretty much the same in > character though; no revival of houyun. 7: Similar but actually a > little weaker. 8: Now just starting to get the dried fruit, plus a > little cereal. 9: Just a bit more fruit now. 10: Actually losing > fruit now, getting blander. 11: Pretty nice tianshui but kind of > bland. 12: Same. > > I think I got the best results with 7g and relatively long steeps (the > first trial.) It had the best combination of houyun, late sweetness, > and interesting variations from steep to steep. The 9g/long steep > setup was blunter on the whole. The 4g setup was blander. > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / Hey Lew, Thanks for sharing and conducting the 'speriment... and I agree with your findings as that pretty much sums up my experience, however, I do tend to find I hit the flavors I'm looking for about 1 to 2 steeps sooner with less leaf even though your notes differ. Maybe it is just the less intense flavor that I equate with the later steeps coming sooner with less leaf, I'll have to perform a similar test and see what I find. I think on the whole I am frugal with my leaf as I came from a fairly poor background and have a built in instinct to stretch it as far as possible, so maybe I am just more tolerant of the "blander" taste. I do know that sometimes when I have someone prepare me gong fu tea I find it a bit too strong and different than what I would have prepared. Again not that they are "wrong" or I am "right" just my personal (conditioned?) taste and preference I guess. - Dominic |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|