Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone seen these guys before?
http://www.teahub.com/puerhtea.htm Seems to be a tea company out of Yunnan. They posted something on teamail the other day, indicating that they "now" take retail orders from North America. Inquiring about a price list, they responded promptly (overnight), and the prices on their tea seem somewhat high ($50 for young green cake to $1000 for top 1952 bingcha, some grades of loose pu-erh are more reasonable). Oh, yes, and shipping is high: $10 per kilo, and you pay shipping for at least 2 kilos. Has anyone out there had any experience with these folks? ZBL |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Plant > wrote in message >...
> 3/27/04 > > > > Has anyone seen these guys before? > > > > http://www.teahub.com/puerhtea.htm > > > > Seems to be a tea company out of Yunnan. They posted something on > > teamail the other day, indicating that they "now" take retail orders > > from North America. Inquiring about a price list, they responded > > promptly (overnight), and the prices on their tea seem somewhat high > > ($50 for young green cake to $1000 for top 1952 bingcha, some grades > > of loose pu-erh are more reasonable). Oh, yes, and shipping is high: > > $10 per kilo, and you pay shipping for at least 2 kilos. > > > > Has anyone out there had any experience with these folks? > > > > ZBL > > I got the same response you did. Otherwise, I have no further information. > Were you able to determine the *quantity* on sale for the thousand > smackaroos, etc? > > Michael As far as I can tell, compressed teas are priced per unit (so $50 is one young green cake, $1000 is one 1952 cake), and the really expensive one seems to be a standard-sized bingcha (375g). Loose stuff seems Z |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> Has anyone out there had any experience with these folks?
No, but just by looking at their webpage I am a bit suspicious. Note the description of their first green tea, "One research in 1991 showed that this tea could lower blood pressure by 33.53%, and the effect could last for over 20 minutes after drinking." Sounds like B.S. to me. Not only are their claiming something that sounds impossible, but they are implicitly claiming as well that of the only 30 Kg a year of this tea that is produced a non-trivial amount went to medical research. Why would you use something so pricey for research, especially if when there are only 30Kg a year produced it effects only a few tens of people? Sounds suspicious to me. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Alex,
I read your message regarding our Purple Lady. Here are some answers. Purple Lady was first found in the plantation of the Yunnan Tea Research Institute. There were only vey few of them. As a research institute, they conducted a research on the tea, and found the results we quoted on our web site. After many years' research, they now can produce larger quatity of this tea. We have gained exclusive right to sell this tea. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our products. Thanks! Linda JinYuXuan Tea House www.teahub.com Alex Krupp > wrote in message news:<2004032908373916807%alex3917@hotmailcom>... > > Has anyone out there had any experience with these folks? > > No, but just by looking at their webpage I am a bit suspicious. Note > the description of their first green tea, "One research in 1991 showed > that this tea could lower blood pressure by 33.53%, and the effect > could last for over 20 minutes after drinking." Sounds like B.S. to me. > Not only are their claiming something that sounds impossible, but they > are implicitly claiming as well that of the only 30 Kg a year of this > tea that is produced a non-trivial amount went to medical research. Why > would you use something so pricey for research, especially if when > there are only 30Kg a year produced it effects only a few tens of > people? Sounds suspicious to me. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am somewhat suspicious myself (I usually am about internet vendors,
particularly foreign). Then again, lots of tea sites (even trusted US ones) have been prone to misinformation and extravagantly bogus claims. E.g., Rishi tea used to offer pu-erh bingchas supposedly from 1930 and 1942 for about $150, which is far, far too cheap for a tea this old. Also, Upton (from which I have ordered many times) tries to hock a $12 TKY as "the finest grade of traditional Chinese Ti Kwan Yin." Now, with award-winning TKYs going for thousands of dollars per pound on the Asian market, that claim's fairly implausible. Also, keeping in mind that "in 2003" only 30kg were made, and the study was in 1991, who knows how production of this particular tea might have changed since then? Perhaps the study pertained to a wider class of tea that this tea fit into. (Just some ideas--I've got no more clue than you have). However, what I noted about the site is that most obvious bogus claims about pu-erh involve really "old" teas for prices that seem expensive to the newbie, but are ridiculously cheap given context (cf. abovementioned Rishi example). However, these folks obviously charge a lot for their "good" stuff, which one would think would drive customers *away*--not the idea of a scam artist. I'm probably not going to test them out (the $20 shipping is enough to drive me away), but I think they don't deserve to be dismissed off the bat as a scam. Z Alex Krupp > wrote in message news:<2004032908373916807%alex3917@hotmailcom>... > > Has anyone out there had any experience with these folks? > > No, but just by looking at their webpage I am a bit suspicious. Note > the description of their first green tea, "One research in 1991 showed > that this tea could lower blood pressure by 33.53%, and the effect > could last for over 20 minutes after drinking." Sounds like B.S. to me. > Not only are their claiming something that sounds impossible, but they > are implicitly claiming as well that of the only 30 Kg a year of this > tea that is produced a non-trivial amount went to medical research. Why > would you use something so pricey for research, especially if when > there are only 30Kg a year produced it effects only a few tens of > people? Sounds suspicious to me. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Zephyrus" > wrote in message
om... > I am somewhat suspicious myself (I usually am about internet vendors, > particularly foreign). I almost exclusively use foreign vendors - living in Norway really don't have a choice. I try to order tea from their country of origin, usually I get better grades for a better price. It does take some detective work to find good vendors, but to this day I have never had any problems. > Then again, lots of tea sites (even trusted US ones) have been prone > to misinformation and extravagantly bogus claims. Very true. Also many vendors don't use the traditional classification systems and add or change the original name of the teas to fancy ones, making it very difficult to event try to compare. Living in Europe, it isn't attractive to order samples, as the price of shipping from US or Asia doubles or triples the cost of the tea. <snip marketing stories> > However, what I noted about the site is that most obvious bogus claims > about pu-erh involve really "old" teas for prices that seem expensive > to the newbie, but are ridiculously cheap given context (cf. > abovementioned Rishi example). I am really a puerh newbie, but I don't think their prices is that out of line with other puerh vendors in China or Hong Kong that I have been in contact with. It seems that there are many grades of leaves used to make puerh , and the price of the tea at any time of it's life reflects this. Most vendors doesn't put the grade of the leaves on their website, though. > However, these folks obviously charge a > lot for their "good" stuff, which one would think would drive > customers *away*--not the idea of a scam artist. > > I'm probably not going to test them out (the $20 shipping is enough to > drive me away), but I think they don't deserve to be dismissed off the > bat as a scam. You are lucky if you think10 per kg shipping is expensive. That is what I have to pay for *domestic* shipping in Norway! Lars |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> I try to order tea from their country of origin, usually I
> get better grades for a better price. Really? Sounds interesting. Could you mention some of your vendors, exp. Chinese? > > Then again, lots of tea sites (even trusted US ones) have been prone > > to misinformation and extravagantly bogus claims. > > Very true. Also many vendors don't use the traditional classification > systems and add or change the original name of the teas to fancy ones, > making it very difficult to event try to compare. Living in Europe, it isn't > attractive to order samples, as the price of shipping from US or Asia > doubles or triples the cost of the tea. > > <snip marketing stories> > > > However, what I noted about the site is that most obvious bogus claims > > about pu-erh involve really "old" teas for prices that seem expensive > > to the newbie, but are ridiculously cheap given context (cf. > > abovementioned Rishi example). > > I am really a puerh newbie, but I don't think their prices is that out of > line with other puerh vendors in China or Hong Kong that I have been in > contact with. It seems that there are many grades of leaves used to make > puerh , and the price of the tea at any time of it's life reflects this. > Most vendors doesn't put the grade of the leaves on their website, though. I was going off of something WS posted a while back (note that I was invoking that as something that the site in question *didn't* do). "5) Tea thats claimed to be very old and sold for a hundred dollars to two hundred dollars might not be good bargain. This is because tea is always value for money, you pay more money for a better aged product. For a tea above fifty years old, expect the price to be fivehundred to a few thousand dollars. Tongqing tea cakes, which is about at least 80years to a hundred years old sells for tens of thousand dollars. do not expect to buy something really old for very little money, e.g. 70year old tea selling for $200? impossible." http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...e .com&rnum=3 > You are lucky if you think10 per kg shipping is expensive. That is what I > have to pay for *domestic* shipping in Norway! Really? Wow. That helps put things in perspective. Maybe that's not so bad after all... > Lars ZBL |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Zephyrus" > wrote in message
om... > > I try to order tea from their country of origin, usually I > > get better grades for a better price. > > Really? Sounds interesting. Could you mention some of your vendors, > exp. Chinese? I have the impression that mentioning vendors is extremly unpopular by some the participants of this forum. Anyway... Chinese retailers that send abroad are notoriously difficult to find. I don't know if that has something to do with Chinese legislation or just the fact that most Chinese don't speak (very well) English. I have been very satisfied with the products and the service I have got from Michael Ryan's company which is located in China. I have also been very happy with the teas and service from Sun Sing Tea of Hong Kong. They do sell some old puerh, I see on their website that they are at the moment offering pieces of a teacake from 1920 for $HKD 880(~US$ 112) per 10 grams. Teaspring is located in the US, but they ship from China. Their service is also very good. In the hopefully near future I and some friends plan to import larger amounts of teas from a wholesale export firm, which is much easier to find. > I was going off of something WS posted a while back (note that I was > invoking that as something that the site in question *didn't* do). That's right. I read that too quickly. Thanks for the link to his very interesting post! > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...e .com&rnum=3 > > > You are lucky if you think10 per kg shipping is expensive. That is what I > > have to pay for *domestic* shipping in Norway! > > Really? Wow. That helps put things in perspective. Maybe that's not so > bad after all... The same friends that I hope to import teas together with, recently stayed 6 months in China, and they tell me that $10 per kg is actually a very reasonable rate. But as always, shipping and taxes have to be included in the total cost of the tea. So is it worth it? Maybe not if you have a good tea store nearby. Lars |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An old vendor returns | Tea | |||
tea vendor question | Tea | |||
Are teas the same from vendor to vendor? | Tea | |||
Vendor Recommendations | Tea | |||
Vendor Experiences | Tea |