Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Hay > wrote:
>Blair P. Houghton wrote: > >> ** lag in measurement due to lack of convection; I didn't >> stir this; once the heat builds up it begins convecting >> itself; the boiling happens well below 100C measurement >> because (1) this isn't sea level and (2) the probe is >> still delayed a bit compared to the heating element; >> while the absolute times are off because of these delays, >> the differentials average out > >Pretty interesting. I remember hearing about chinese bubble-counting >techniques. Given a constant or known heat flux, one can count the rate >of bubble formation to determine the temperature. It is interesting, >usually when something starts to boil, the heat transfer rate starts to >go up due to the mass transport of steam bubbles into the cooler bulk. >That effect would probably be hard to measure. You get an inversion layer (hot water at the bottom, cooler above) and convective flow as soon as the element starts to heat. Bubble counting might be a reasonably calibrated temperature guide, but only for a given vessel. The availability of cavitation sites makes a huge difference and they are, of course, random. I've been boiling water in clean smooth vessels in the microwave at work a lot, lately*, and it's kind of fun seeing the bubbles appearing right in the middle of the cup. The water must be superheating in there. This is the sort of water that bubbles up dramatically when you add anything to it like a spoon or a teabag. I give it 10 seconds or so to equilibrate after I remove it now, because I don't know what tea might do if it hits a pocket of 230-degree water. * - interesting tip: this nuker is clearly designed so that the turntable returns the food to the front exactly every 10 seconds, probably on the presumption that almost all cooking times will be a multiple of 10 seconds; clever *******s. But now I'd rather heat the water an extra 5 seconds than save that 5 seconds and have to reach to the back (it's a *big* nuker). --Blair "The next 200 years of tea had better be more interesting." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|