Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today:
Almond Tea with Blanched Almonds 1/4 lb. 1 $4.45 Decaf Darjeeling 1/4 lb. 1 $7.95 Pu-erh Tuo Cha 1/4 lb. 1 $5.95 Tsar's Blend 1/4 lb. 1 $6.95 Tukdah FTGFOP-1 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Goomtee FTGFOP-1S First Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $3.00 Makaibari FTGFOP-1S First Flush (Organic) 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Shipping: $4.95 (USPS priority mail) Grand Total: $39.25 I got quarter-pound quantities of the cheap ones, and samplers of the expensive ones so I can decide which I'll like best. $40 is some scratch, but it still seems like a screaming deal for half-a-Key of the good stuff, considering a week or two ago I paid $8 each for those two 10-gram tins of Te' tea (the silver needles and the keemun), which I have no doubt (because I've tasted them) were extraordinarily good, but let's get real, even at $18 for the 50-gram canister, they're priced way above market... --Blair "I mean, it's just vegetable soup, right?" |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton > writes:
> [...buying tea short of nosebleed prices...] > --Blair > "I mean, it's just vegetable soup, right?" Yes, made from dried vegetables. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton > writes:
> [...buying tea short of nosebleed prices...] > --Blair > "I mean, it's just vegetable soup, right?" Yes, made from dried vegetables. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Sun, 30 May 2004
21:31:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: > > [...] > Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Is that 2004 Sungma? I had a 2 oz. sample last year and thought it was very good. (I'm reduced to Lipton Connoisseur which, fortunately, runs about $9.00/lb.) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Sun, 30 May 2004
21:31:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: > > [...] > Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Is that 2004 Sungma? I had a 2 oz. sample last year and thought it was very good. (I'm reduced to Lipton Connoisseur which, fortunately, runs about $9.00/lb.) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
>In article > (Sun, 30 May 2004 >21:31:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > >> I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >> >> [...] >> Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 > >Is that 2004 Sungma? I had a 2 oz. sample last year and thought it was >very good. (I'm reduced to Lipton Connoisseur which, fortunately, runs >about $9.00/lb.) > Hard to tell. Here's the page: http://www.specialteas.com/cgi-bin/S...e+bqxm5634+143 It says "compared to last year's," but of course, that page could have been installed last year. It also says "second flush", and, if I'm not mistaken, this part of May would be an "in-between" and not a "second flush", or at least so near the beginning of the second flush that it would be unlikely they've got any to market here yet. I added that one to the list specifically because it was a second flush, because I kind of wanted to see if it could be distinguished. Although now it occurs I wish I'd got both a first and a second from a single estate. Maybe in a couple of months. --Blair "If I haven't turned a deep amber myself..." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
>In article > (Sun, 30 May 2004 >21:31:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > >> I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >> >> [...] >> Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 > >Is that 2004 Sungma? I had a 2 oz. sample last year and thought it was >very good. (I'm reduced to Lipton Connoisseur which, fortunately, runs >about $9.00/lb.) > Hard to tell. Here's the page: http://www.specialteas.com/cgi-bin/S...e+bqxm5634+143 It says "compared to last year's," but of course, that page could have been installed last year. It also says "second flush", and, if I'm not mistaken, this part of May would be an "in-between" and not a "second flush", or at least so near the beginning of the second flush that it would be unlikely they've got any to market here yet. I added that one to the list specifically because it was a second flush, because I kind of wanted to see if it could be distinguished. Although now it occurs I wish I'd got both a first and a second from a single estate. Maybe in a couple of months. --Blair "If I haven't turned a deep amber myself..." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: > >Almond Tea with Blanched Almonds 1/4 lb. 1 $4.45 >Decaf Darjeeling 1/4 lb. 1 $7.95 >Pu-erh Tuo Cha 1/4 lb. 1 $5.95 >Tsar's Blend 1/4 lb. 1 $6.95 >Tukdah FTGFOP-1 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 >Goomtee FTGFOP-1S First Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $3.00 >Makaibari FTGFOP-1S First Flush (Organic) 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 >Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Well that was quick. I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. The whole oreder fit a box about 4x6x9. The teas are in stiff plastic envelopes. The larger ones are opaque and black and come with tear-open/zip-closed tops. The smaller sample-sizes have clear fronts and tear open, but have no zip-closure. S'okay. I keep a couple of boxes of various sizes of zip-locs around because a great invention is a great invention. Ironically, the one tea that made me kick off the buying spree, the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the Makaibari. Which is okay, I guess, except for the irony. On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if you miss horse farms. And authentic enough that it makes you wonder if you aren't being had by the great pu-erh practiacl joke team. But I've read the flavor doesn't follow the aroma, and I've had Durian so I understand how that works. One knob went into 6 oz water poured from a boiling vessel into a small pot. The knob pretty much discorporates within the first minute. 6 minutes after that, I decanted through a strainer. It didn't look so much like tea as coffee. Espresso with no crema. And the flavor is kind of flat. Like a tea with little sweetness and no astringency. A little of the earthiness comes through on the edges, and the aroma is still there with every sip. But it's not unpleasant. Rather the same sort of result as the first time you have a non-skunky stout. I'm not sure how this will grow on me. Seems a bit bland, almost, except for the scent, which isn't its greatest quality. I just threw a couple of pinches of sugar in the last half of the cuppa, and it laughed. Might be a good tea for cleaning up cloyingly sweet things that come into my responsibility. I hope the rest of the teas are okay (you couldn't kill the pu-erh with a nuclear weapon, I don't think); it got to about 108 today, and the inside of the mailbox was probably near 140, and the box was in there for at least an hour, possibly three. That kind of heat is too low to make tea efficiently, so hopefully it didn't bloom the oils out of the leaves too much. --Blair "Life ain't no fun without they ain't no unknown variables." P.S. Maybe it isn't Horse Farm. I keep getting the Madeleine effect with an Elephant House at the fore. Maybe it's a general Zoo aroma. Coddled herbivores in close spaces. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: > >Almond Tea with Blanched Almonds 1/4 lb. 1 $4.45 >Decaf Darjeeling 1/4 lb. 1 $7.95 >Pu-erh Tuo Cha 1/4 lb. 1 $5.95 >Tsar's Blend 1/4 lb. 1 $6.95 >Tukdah FTGFOP-1 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 >Goomtee FTGFOP-1S First Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $3.00 >Makaibari FTGFOP-1S First Flush (Organic) 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 >Sungma FTGFOP-1 Second Flush 1/2 oz. Sample 1 $2.00 Well that was quick. I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. The whole oreder fit a box about 4x6x9. The teas are in stiff plastic envelopes. The larger ones are opaque and black and come with tear-open/zip-closed tops. The smaller sample-sizes have clear fronts and tear open, but have no zip-closure. S'okay. I keep a couple of boxes of various sizes of zip-locs around because a great invention is a great invention. Ironically, the one tea that made me kick off the buying spree, the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the Makaibari. Which is okay, I guess, except for the irony. On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if you miss horse farms. And authentic enough that it makes you wonder if you aren't being had by the great pu-erh practiacl joke team. But I've read the flavor doesn't follow the aroma, and I've had Durian so I understand how that works. One knob went into 6 oz water poured from a boiling vessel into a small pot. The knob pretty much discorporates within the first minute. 6 minutes after that, I decanted through a strainer. It didn't look so much like tea as coffee. Espresso with no crema. And the flavor is kind of flat. Like a tea with little sweetness and no astringency. A little of the earthiness comes through on the edges, and the aroma is still there with every sip. But it's not unpleasant. Rather the same sort of result as the first time you have a non-skunky stout. I'm not sure how this will grow on me. Seems a bit bland, almost, except for the scent, which isn't its greatest quality. I just threw a couple of pinches of sugar in the last half of the cuppa, and it laughed. Might be a good tea for cleaning up cloyingly sweet things that come into my responsibility. I hope the rest of the teas are okay (you couldn't kill the pu-erh with a nuclear weapon, I don't think); it got to about 108 today, and the inside of the mailbox was probably near 140, and the box was in there for at least an hour, possibly three. That kind of heat is too low to make tea efficiently, so hopefully it didn't bloom the oils out of the leaves too much. --Blair "Life ain't no fun without they ain't no unknown variables." P.S. Maybe it isn't Horse Farm. I keep getting the Madeleine effect with an Elephant House at the fore. Maybe it's a general Zoo aroma. Coddled herbivores in close spaces. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton rose and spake the following:
> On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of > the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they > always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do > describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've > smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. > Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if > you miss horse farms. Been there. Mucked that. And totally agree. The aroma of Pu-erh reminds me of the thoroughbred horse farms I worked on while in college. And it's not a happy memory. ![]() -- Derek If I'm "crippled by a lack of ethics", can I draw disability? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blair P. Houghton rose and spake the following:
> On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of > the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they > always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do > describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've > smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. > Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if > you miss horse farms. Been there. Mucked that. And totally agree. The aroma of Pu-erh reminds me of the thoroughbred horse farms I worked on while in college. And it's not a happy memory. ![]() -- Derek If I'm "crippled by a lack of ethics", can I draw disability? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
02:21:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > Blair P. Houghton > wrote: >>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >> >>[list of teas] > > Well that was quick. Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! > I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. That's standard for Special Teas. I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because > they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the > Makaibari. You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
02:21:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > Blair P. Houghton > wrote: >>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >> >>[list of teas] > > Well that was quick. Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! > I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. That's standard for Special Teas. I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because > they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the > Makaibari. You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
.. . > On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of > the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they > always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do > describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've > smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. > Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if > you miss horse farms. And authentic enough that it makes > you wonder if you aren't being had by the great pu-erh > practiacl joke team. But I've read the flavor doesn't > follow the aroma, and I've had Durian so I understand how > that works. The first pu-erh I had was from specialteas. I like it though I wouldn't buy it again. It seems to be made from pu-erh dust and maybe some good, clean earth for good measure. It's different from any other pu-erh I've had since. The most annoying thing is trying to strain it, it ends up more like espresso grounds than leaves. It's not a bad tea, and I would certainly drink it if it was offered, though I wouldn't buy it again. -ben |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
.. . > On pure curiousity, I immediately brewed up a knob of > the Pu-erh tuo-cha. The smell in the bag was, as they > always describe it, "earthy", but they never really do > describe where the earth is from. I can report that I've > smelled that exact smell several times. It's horse-farm. > Well-kept horse farm. Quite a nice thing to smell if > you miss horse farms. And authentic enough that it makes > you wonder if you aren't being had by the great pu-erh > practiacl joke team. But I've read the flavor doesn't > follow the aroma, and I've had Durian so I understand how > that works. The first pu-erh I had was from specialteas. I like it though I wouldn't buy it again. It seems to be made from pu-erh dust and maybe some good, clean earth for good measure. It's different from any other pu-erh I've had since. The most annoying thing is trying to strain it, it ends up more like espresso grounds than leaves. It's not a bad tea, and I would certainly drink it if it was offered, though I wouldn't buy it again. -ben |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
>In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004 >02:21:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: >> Blair P. Houghton > wrote: >>>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >>> >>>[list of teas] >> >> Well that was quick. > >Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of >us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! Sir. Put down the Internet and walk away. >> I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. > >That's standard for Special Teas. I decided to try Upton, for the first >time. And what happened? >> the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because >> they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the >> Makaibari. > >You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? I guess. It's free, as they didn't charge anything for the replacement; they could have just said "out of stock" and deleted the price and done nothing to make up. I like their idea better. The website still has the Maikabari listed, so maybe they just didn't have the $2 sample sizes. I've got lots of tea to try, or I'd call them and see what the deal with it is. --Blair "Step *away* from the interaction." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
>In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004 >02:21:45 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: >> Blair P. Houghton > wrote: >>>I did a little shopping online at SpecialTeas.Com today: >>> >>>[list of teas] >> >> Well that was quick. > >Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of >us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! Sir. Put down the Internet and walk away. >> I ordered it Sunday and it was in my mailbox today. > >That's standard for Special Teas. I decided to try Upton, for the first >time. And what happened? >> the Makaibari, must have been out of stock, because >> they substitued Kenilworth OP and deducted the price of the >> Makaibari. > >You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? I guess. It's free, as they didn't charge anything for the replacement; they could have just said "out of stock" and deleted the price and done nothing to make up. I like their idea better. The website still has the Maikabari listed, so maybe they just didn't have the $2 sample sizes. I've got lots of tea to try, or I'd call them and see what the deal with it is. --Blair "Step *away* from the interaction." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
23:52:35 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > Hamilcar Barca > wrote: >> >>Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of >>us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! > > Sir. Put down the Internet and walk away. No way! >>I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > > And what happened? I placed the order late Wednesday night, and expect to see the package Monday or perhaps Saturday. >>You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? > > I guess. It's free, as they didn't charge anything for the replacement; I missed the part about it being a sample. > I like their idea better. Yes, it sounds good. > I've got lots of tea > to try, or I'd call them and see what the deal with it is. Happy brewing. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
23:52:35 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: > Hamilcar Barca > wrote: >> >>Please don't post any more lists of yummy teas. They're causing some of >>us hardship, as we feel compelled to order some for ourselves! > > Sir. Put down the Internet and walk away. No way! >>I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > > And what happened? I placed the order late Wednesday night, and expect to see the package Monday or perhaps Saturday. >>You ordered a Darjeeling and they sent a Ceylon? > > I guess. It's free, as they didn't charge anything for the replacement; I missed the part about it being a sample. > I like their idea better. Yes, it sounds good. > I've got lots of tea > to try, or I'd call them and see what the deal with it is. Happy brewing. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
23:52:35 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: [second follow-up] > Hamilcar Barca > wrote: >> >>I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > > And what happened? I ordered late Wednesday night and the package arrived Saturday morning. I got Darjeeling: Sungma second-flush DJ-170, SFTGFOP1S Ceylon: Kenilworth "Wilson Select", OP1 Java: Sperata "high-grown", OP Kenya: "Golden Kenya", TGFOP Sungma: I don't really have the words to describe the taste other than to say it's as good as I remembered. It's tiny leaves and tips and feels quite fluffy when I measure it. Unfortunately, it costs six or seven times as much as Lipton Premium but, as a consolation, I can't get Lipton Premium or Brooke-Bond Supreme in town any more. It's exactly what I wanted. What is that DJ-170 anyway? Kenilworth: It has a "darker" flavor than I'm used to, perhaps with a hint of chocolate. I think next time I'll order a variety described as lemony or citrusy. It's not extraordinarily better than the cheap stuff in a box ($6/lb) but, as a consolation again, I can't get the cheap stuff in town any more, either. I certainly won't have any problem drinking it. I haven't tried Upton's Kenya or Java yet; having been quite pleased with Special Tea's varieties in the past, I know I'll like them. Unless someone wants to hear about it (or them), I won't provide another of these superficial reviews. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Fri, 04 Jun 2004
23:52:35 +0000), Blair P. Houghton wrote: [second follow-up] > Hamilcar Barca > wrote: >> >>I decided to try Upton, for the first time. > > And what happened? I ordered late Wednesday night and the package arrived Saturday morning. I got Darjeeling: Sungma second-flush DJ-170, SFTGFOP1S Ceylon: Kenilworth "Wilson Select", OP1 Java: Sperata "high-grown", OP Kenya: "Golden Kenya", TGFOP Sungma: I don't really have the words to describe the taste other than to say it's as good as I remembered. It's tiny leaves and tips and feels quite fluffy when I measure it. Unfortunately, it costs six or seven times as much as Lipton Premium but, as a consolation, I can't get Lipton Premium or Brooke-Bond Supreme in town any more. It's exactly what I wanted. What is that DJ-170 anyway? Kenilworth: It has a "darker" flavor than I'm used to, perhaps with a hint of chocolate. I think next time I'll order a variety described as lemony or citrusy. It's not extraordinarily better than the cheap stuff in a box ($6/lb) but, as a consolation again, I can't get the cheap stuff in town any more, either. I certainly won't have any problem drinking it. I haven't tried Upton's Kenya or Java yet; having been quite pleased with Special Tea's varieties in the past, I know I'll like them. Unless someone wants to hear about it (or them), I won't provide another of these superficial reviews. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
> Darjeeling: Sungma second-flush DJ-170, SFTGFOP1S > Ceylon: Kenilworth "Wilson Select", OP1 > Java: Sperata "high-grown", OP > Kenya: "Golden Kenya", TGFOP > >Sungma: I don't really have the words to describe the taste other than to >say it's as good as I remembered. It's tiny leaves and tips and feels >quite fluffy when I measure it. Unfortunately, it costs six or seven >times as much as Lipton Premium but, as a consolation, I can't get Lipton >Premium or Brooke-Bond Supreme in town any more. It's exactly what I >wanted. I just realized the Sungma is the last one of my goodie box that I haven't tried yet... >What is that DJ-170 anyway? No idea. Looking through Upton's catalog (what a mess*) that sort of number seems to appear only on the Estate Darjeelings, but not on all of them. They have a whole separate system of product numbering, so the "DJ" numbers have to be something else. * - they have so many teas that they really should either add more hierarchy or at least widen the list displays so I could get more of them on the screen to compare them...that "0-20...21-40" stuff is NEVER the solution to breaking up lists, especially where number 137, say, could be a better choice than number 14. >I haven't tried Upton's Kenya or Java yet; having been quite pleased with >Special Tea's varieties in the past, I know I'll like them. Unless >someone wants to hear about it (or them), I won't provide another of these >superficial reviews. "Java tea". Love the irony. --Blair "Something about a tippy-flowery arabica that wants a smirk." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hamilcar Barca > wrote:
> Darjeeling: Sungma second-flush DJ-170, SFTGFOP1S > Ceylon: Kenilworth "Wilson Select", OP1 > Java: Sperata "high-grown", OP > Kenya: "Golden Kenya", TGFOP > >Sungma: I don't really have the words to describe the taste other than to >say it's as good as I remembered. It's tiny leaves and tips and feels >quite fluffy when I measure it. Unfortunately, it costs six or seven >times as much as Lipton Premium but, as a consolation, I can't get Lipton >Premium or Brooke-Bond Supreme in town any more. It's exactly what I >wanted. I just realized the Sungma is the last one of my goodie box that I haven't tried yet... >What is that DJ-170 anyway? No idea. Looking through Upton's catalog (what a mess*) that sort of number seems to appear only on the Estate Darjeelings, but not on all of them. They have a whole separate system of product numbering, so the "DJ" numbers have to be something else. * - they have so many teas that they really should either add more hierarchy or at least widen the list displays so I could get more of them on the screen to compare them...that "0-20...21-40" stuff is NEVER the solution to breaking up lists, especially where number 137, say, could be a better choice than number 14. >I haven't tried Upton's Kenya or Java yet; having been quite pleased with >Special Tea's varieties in the past, I know I'll like them. Unless >someone wants to hear about it (or them), I won't provide another of these >superficial reviews. "Java tea". Love the irony. --Blair "Something about a tippy-flowery arabica that wants a smirk." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message .. . > > >What is that DJ-170 anyway? It's the invoice number. Meaning that teas with the same invoice number was picked at the same time at the same area of the tea garden, and usually sold together at an auction. So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden can be rather different. >> * - they have so many teas that they really should either > add more hierarchy or at least widen the list displays so I > could get more of them on the screen to compare them...that > "0-20...21-40" stuff is NEVER the solution to breaking up > lists, especially where number 137, say, could be a better > choice than number 14. They do give you the option to sort the teas by price etc, and also to have wider breaks. But I agree that they could arrange their online catalogue a little less messy. Lars (Bergen,Norway) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message .. . > > >What is that DJ-170 anyway? It's the invoice number. Meaning that teas with the same invoice number was picked at the same time at the same area of the tea garden, and usually sold together at an auction. So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden can be rather different. >> * - they have so many teas that they really should either > add more hierarchy or at least widen the list displays so I > could get more of them on the screen to compare them...that > "0-20...21-40" stuff is NEVER the solution to breaking up > lists, especially where number 137, say, could be a better > choice than number 14. They do give you the option to sort the teas by price etc, and also to have wider breaks. But I agree that they could arrange their online catalogue a little less messy. Lars (Bergen,Norway) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Tue, 08 Jun 2004
21:22:17 +0000), Lars I. Mehlum wrote: > > "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message > .. . >> >> >What is that DJ-170 anyway? > > It's the invoice number. Meaning that teas with the same invoice number was > picked at the same time at the same area of the tea garden, and usually sold > together at an auction. Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have EX- numbers, and don't have either. > So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden > can be rather different. I assume you mean two from different invoices? >> [Upton web-site listings] > > They do give you the option to sort the teas by price etc, and also to > have wider breaks. I saw the wider breaks but I'd also like have have choices such as 50/page and everything-at-once. > But I agree that they could arrange their online > catalogue a little less messy. It's not bad as online catalogs go but it could use improvement. It won't give me any pause in ordering from them again. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > (Tue, 08 Jun 2004
21:22:17 +0000), Lars I. Mehlum wrote: > > "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message > .. . >> >> >What is that DJ-170 anyway? > > It's the invoice number. Meaning that teas with the same invoice number was > picked at the same time at the same area of the tea garden, and usually sold > together at an auction. Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have EX- numbers, and don't have either. > So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden > can be rather different. I assume you mean two from different invoices? >> [Upton web-site listings] > > They do give you the option to sort the teas by price etc, and also to > have wider breaks. I saw the wider breaks but I'd also like have have choices such as 50/page and everything-at-once. > But I agree that they could arrange their online > catalogue a little less messy. It's not bad as online catalogs go but it could use improvement. It won't give me any pause in ordering from them again. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hamilcar Barca" > wrote in message ... > > Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair > Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have > EX- numbers, and don't have either. I'm not sure, I wonder if it has something to do at which auction it is sold? Anyway, I'm going to visit Darjeeling and some tea gardens in a weeks time, so I will find out! Those without numbers might be blends, or just that the vendor (or broker) didn't bother to inform the customer about it. > > So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden > > can be rather different. > > I assume you mean two from different invoices? Exactly. Two different invoices can have rather different character. Lars (Bergen, Norway) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hamilcar Barca" > wrote in message ... > > Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair > Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have > EX- numbers, and don't have either. I'm not sure, I wonder if it has something to do at which auction it is sold? Anyway, I'm going to visit Darjeeling and some tea gardens in a weeks time, so I will find out! Those without numbers might be blends, or just that the vendor (or broker) didn't bother to inform the customer about it. > > So two first flush SFTGFOP's from the same garden > > can be rather different. > > I assume you mean two from different invoices? Exactly. Two different invoices can have rather different character. Lars (Bergen, Norway) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > >"Hamilcar Barca" > wrote in message . .. >> >> Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair >> Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have >> EX- numbers, and don't have either. > >I'm not sure, I wonder if it has something to do at which auction it is >sold? Anyway, I'm going to visit Darjeeling and some tea gardens in a weeks >time, so I will find out! Those without numbers might be blends, or just >that the vendor (or broker) didn't bother to inform the customer about it. > Well, I did ask about about the invoice numbers. It seems that gardens can choose whatever numbering system they want, but it is usual to precede the number with DJ and a a number. The numbering is usually serial, so DJ-1 is the first tea produced and sold that year, DJ-4 the fourth batch etc. DJ-1 fetches fantastic prices in Japan, but is usually notamong the best first flush invoices. They usually comes a few weeks later. Some special productions get differenttypes of invoice numbers, EX-.. probably means a production espescially meant for export. Some importers pre-order teas, and this may be one such tea. Sometimes they do funny things with the classification too, at the moment I am drinking a Sungma YMTGFOP1! YM means it comes from a special section of the Sungma estate, called Yamadabari (bari = garden). Lars (Bergen, Norway) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > >"Hamilcar Barca" > wrote in message . .. >> >> Hey, thanks. Are the EX-### codes also invoice numbers? As Blair >> Houghton points out, some of the Darjeelings have DJ- numbers, some have >> EX- numbers, and don't have either. > >I'm not sure, I wonder if it has something to do at which auction it is >sold? Anyway, I'm going to visit Darjeeling and some tea gardens in a weeks >time, so I will find out! Those without numbers might be blends, or just >that the vendor (or broker) didn't bother to inform the customer about it. > Well, I did ask about about the invoice numbers. It seems that gardens can choose whatever numbering system they want, but it is usual to precede the number with DJ and a a number. The numbering is usually serial, so DJ-1 is the first tea produced and sold that year, DJ-4 the fourth batch etc. DJ-1 fetches fantastic prices in Japan, but is usually notamong the best first flush invoices. They usually comes a few weeks later. Some special productions get differenttypes of invoice numbers, EX-.. probably means a production espescially meant for export. Some importers pre-order teas, and this may be one such tea. Sometimes they do funny things with the classification too, at the moment I am drinking a Sungma YMTGFOP1! YM means it comes from a special section of the Sungma estate, called Yamadabari (bari = garden). Lars (Bergen, Norway) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Loaded nachos | Diabetic |