Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cameron wrote:
> The speckles are a sign of very coarse mixed clay, which has high > porousity and acquires tea fragrance well. I'm not sure that I'll > even bother with smooth clay from now on. It's more a matter of > function than aesthetics for me. I wanted a black-dragon pot for my > wulong. The speckles are certainly a sign of coarser admixture, whether fired and crushed clay "grog" or sand or something else. Rather less certain is their effect, probably just another tea-myth propagated as advertising hype. I would bet that there aren't a thousand people in China - if any! - who could taste a difference due to such grains in otherwise similar pots. The porosity difference from a 1~2% addition of material that doesn't even bridge the wall thickness is not going to affect either retention of flavor materials in the pot or "breathing" to any great degree. So I'd go for aesthetics. -DM YMMV ( Your Mouthfeel May Vary) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cameron wrote:
> The speckles are a sign of very coarse mixed clay, which has high > porousity and acquires tea fragrance well. I'm not sure that I'll > even bother with smooth clay from now on. It's more a matter of > function than aesthetics for me. I wanted a black-dragon pot for my > wulong. The speckles are certainly a sign of coarser admixture, whether fired and crushed clay "grog" or sand or something else. Rather less certain is their effect, probably just another tea-myth propagated as advertising hype. I would bet that there aren't a thousand people in China - if any! - who could taste a difference due to such grains in otherwise similar pots. The porosity difference from a 1~2% addition of material that doesn't even bridge the wall thickness is not going to affect either retention of flavor materials in the pot or "breathing" to any great degree. So I'd go for aesthetics. -DM YMMV ( Your Mouthfeel May Vary) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Well, actually the difference is very noticeable. My coarser mixed
>clay pots keep a lingering tea fragrance that is obvious even after >rinsing with boiling water. With one pot which I wanted to >re-dedicate to a different tea, the identifiable aroma of dancong >remained after boiling several hours in distilled water. It took long >and rigorous boiling to get it completely empty of smell again. With >my smooth clay pots it has been very easy to remove the lingering >traces of a given tea. The black dragon pot is not quite as good as >my Zhang Quan Lin pot, but it's coming along. > >Cheers, > >Cameron > Hmm, that's interesting. I have one smooth, thin-walled yixing pot that I had dedicated to light oolongs but crazily used once for a dancong. The scent of the dancong is noticeable in the (dry) pot months later, though that pot has gone back to use for light oolongs (it doesn't make any difference to the tea's flavor though). Joe Kubera |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Well, actually the difference is very noticeable. My coarser mixed
>clay pots keep a lingering tea fragrance that is obvious even after >rinsing with boiling water. With one pot which I wanted to >re-dedicate to a different tea, the identifiable aroma of dancong >remained after boiling several hours in distilled water. It took long >and rigorous boiling to get it completely empty of smell again. With >my smooth clay pots it has been very easy to remove the lingering >traces of a given tea. The black dragon pot is not quite as good as >my Zhang Quan Lin pot, but it's coming along. > >Cheers, > >Cameron > Hmm, that's interesting. I have one smooth, thin-walled yixing pot that I had dedicated to light oolongs but crazily used once for a dancong. The scent of the dancong is noticeable in the (dry) pot months later, though that pot has gone back to use for light oolongs (it doesn't make any difference to the tea's flavor though). Joe Kubera |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Kubera and Cameron Lewis wrote:
> >Well, actually the difference is very noticeable. My coarser mixed > >clay pots keep a lingering tea fragrance that is obvious even after > >rinsing with boiling water. With one pot which I wanted to > >re-dedicate to a different tea, the identifiable aroma of dancong > >remained after boiling several hours in distilled water. It took long > >and rigorous boiling to get it completely empty of smell again. With > >my smooth clay pots it has been very easy to remove the lingering > >traces of a given tea. The black dragon pot is not quite as good as > >my Zhang Quan Lin pot, but it's coming along. > > Hmm, that's interesting. I have one smooth, thin-walled yixing pot that I had > dedicated to light oolongs but crazily used once for a dancong. The scent of > the dancong is noticeable in the (dry) pot months later, though that pot has > gone back to use for light oolongs (it doesn't make any difference to the tea's > flavor though). I don't want to start a micturition melee here, and am also aware that many on this list have far more sensitive palates than I. So I would never challenge someone's direct experience. Causality, though, can be a bit more subtle and objective. Having spent much of the past few decades working with functional liquid-solid interfaces, I find this effect a little implausible - but reality does not depend on my opinions! I questioned the difference a small volume of speckles would make in "otherwise similar pots." So I'll ask he has anyone experienced such dramatic differences between two pots the same shape, size and thickness, and (critically) made from the same base clay fired the same way, differing only in the addition of 1~2% of coarse grog or sand? I only have a few of the "speckled" pots, hence can't claim general knowledge. But all of mine have a rather different base mix from my other Yixings, and (probably much more important) were clearly fired under conditions that leave them more porous. So seasoning/carry-over are very different, but (I think) not from a little grit. Not impossible, just not the simplest explanation. I anticipate further education from you experts. -DM |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Kubera and Cameron Lewis wrote:
> >Well, actually the difference is very noticeable. My coarser mixed > >clay pots keep a lingering tea fragrance that is obvious even after > >rinsing with boiling water. With one pot which I wanted to > >re-dedicate to a different tea, the identifiable aroma of dancong > >remained after boiling several hours in distilled water. It took long > >and rigorous boiling to get it completely empty of smell again. With > >my smooth clay pots it has been very easy to remove the lingering > >traces of a given tea. The black dragon pot is not quite as good as > >my Zhang Quan Lin pot, but it's coming along. > > Hmm, that's interesting. I have one smooth, thin-walled yixing pot that I had > dedicated to light oolongs but crazily used once for a dancong. The scent of > the dancong is noticeable in the (dry) pot months later, though that pot has > gone back to use for light oolongs (it doesn't make any difference to the tea's > flavor though). I don't want to start a micturition melee here, and am also aware that many on this list have far more sensitive palates than I. So I would never challenge someone's direct experience. Causality, though, can be a bit more subtle and objective. Having spent much of the past few decades working with functional liquid-solid interfaces, I find this effect a little implausible - but reality does not depend on my opinions! I questioned the difference a small volume of speckles would make in "otherwise similar pots." So I'll ask he has anyone experienced such dramatic differences between two pots the same shape, size and thickness, and (critically) made from the same base clay fired the same way, differing only in the addition of 1~2% of coarse grog or sand? I only have a few of the "speckled" pots, hence can't claim general knowledge. But all of mine have a rather different base mix from my other Yixings, and (probably much more important) were clearly fired under conditions that leave them more porous. So seasoning/carry-over are very different, but (I think) not from a little grit. Not impossible, just not the simplest explanation. I anticipate further education from you experts. -DM |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|