Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And one in the eye for the trolls!
Adding milk to a cup of tea can destroy its ability to protect against heart disease, according to research. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6241139.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5405686.stm |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
![]() nemo wrote: > And one in the eye for the trolls! > > Adding milk to a cup of tea can destroy its ability to protect against heart > disease, according to research. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6241139.stm > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5405686.stm http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/hea...out600813.html On Nutritious Drink Studies, Consider the Funding Source 01.08.07, 12:00 AM ET TUESDAY, Jan. 9 (HealthDay News) -- Before you take to heart any research about the health effects of beverages such as milk, fruit juice or soft drinks, find out who paid for the study. If a beverage manufacturer or industry group funded the research, the finding may be biased, researchers report. "When a food company sponsors a study, it is much more likely to be positive" about the health effects of the product, said Dr. David Ludwig. He's the study's senior author and director of the Optimal Weight for Life program at Children's Hospital Boston, the pediatric teaching hospital for Harvard Medical School. Ludwig and his colleagues analyzed 206 articles from medical journals that evaluated the health benefits or effects of soft drinks, juice and milk. The studies were published from 1999 to 2003. Of the 206 studies, 111 supplied information on funding. To prevent bias in Ludwig's review, one researcher selected the articles for inclusion in the study. Another two researchers who were not told the funding sources classified each study as favorable, not favorable or neutral toward the beverage studied. A fourth researcher who didn't know the conclusions of the study determined the funding source and classified the studies, based on whether they would be beneficial, negative or neutral to the funder's bottom line. In all, 22 percent of the studies were funded totally by industry, while 32 percent had both industry and independent funding. "We found when a food company pays for a study, the results are about eight times more likely to be favorable to the company's financial interest than when the studies are funded independently," Ludwig said. "It is a strong association. It raises concern for bias." The same association has been found in studies of medications funded by drug companies, Ludwig said. But, he added, bias in studies of beverages could have a greater impact because nearly everyone drinks milk, juices or soft drinks. "This is the first time this issue has been investigated systematically in the area of nutrition," Ludwig said. "More research needs to be done. No one study can prove an issue. This [conclusion] argues for the need for more independent funding" of research. The results of Ludwig's study are published in the Jan. 9 online issue of the journal PloS Medicine. Susan K. Neely, president and chief executive officer of the American Beverage Association, took exception to the study. "This is yet another attack on industry by activists who demonstrate their own biases in their review by looking only at the funding source and not judging the research on its merits. The science is what matters -- nothing else," she said in a prepared statement. In an accompanying perspective article in the journal, Martijn Katan, professor of nutrition at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands, noted that a "blanket condemnation of industry-supported research" isn't the answer. He said collaboration with industry allowed him "to discover things that I could not have found otherwise." For instance: "We discovered the effects of trans fatty acids on heart-disease risk thanks to the expertise of Unilever, and the cholesterol-raising factor in unfiltered coffee thanks to Nestle." In the Netherlands, Katan wrote, "The Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences has put forth an innovative proposal on how to supervise relations between researchers and their sponsors." Until more guidance is available, another expert, Connie Diekman, director of university nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis, has a suggestion. "The [Ludwig] study reminds consumers and the media that all research studies should be viewed as one part of the puzzle about food and health and not conclusive answers to questions." Any conclusions must come from several studies, not one, she added. ********* TC |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message oups.com... > > nemo wrote: > > And one in the eye for the trolls! > > > > Adding milk to a cup of tea can destroy its ability to protect against heart > > disease, according to research. > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6241139.stm > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5405686.stm > > http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/hea...out600813.html > Interesting. When the Vegan Society, the Vegetarian Society, myself and many others used to say that studies sponsored by the food industry years ago which used to state over and over again that there was no link between Coronary Heart Disease and what passed for a 'normal' omnivorous diet in those days were biased, we were told we were wrong and sometimes even ridiculed! Look what the opinion is nowadays - and at that time, my relations who followed such a 'normal' diet were dropping like flies from coronaries and strokes. The evidence from Finland where even miscarried foetuses were found to have coronary arteries already furred up with cholesterol was also ignored - fortunately not by the Finnish government. And while they were busy instituting a government-lead dietary health education scheme which has saved a huge number of lives, our miserable apology for a government was still saying that there was no link, nothing to worry about and that such a scheme here in the UK would be unconstitutional! Meat etc. industry leaders and MPs in the same Masonic Lodges, obviously! And anyway - I *like* black tea, so there! ![]() that a squeeze of lemon damages its health-giving properties as well. Nemo |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
![]() nemo wrote: > > wrote in message > oups.com... > > > > nemo wrote: > > > And one in the eye for the trolls! > > > > > > Adding milk to a cup of tea can destroy its ability to protect against > heart > > > disease, according to research. > > > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6241139.stm > > > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5405686.stm > > > > > http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/hea...out600813.html > > > > Interesting. > > When the Vegan Society, the Vegetarian Society, myself and many others used > to say that studies sponsored by the food industry years ago which used to > state over and over again that there was no link between Coronary Heart > Disease and what passed for a 'normal' omnivorous diet in those days were > biased, we were told we were wrong and sometimes even ridiculed! > > Look what the opinion is nowadays - and at that time, my relations who > followed such a 'normal' diet were dropping like flies from coronaries and > strokes. > > The evidence from Finland where even miscarried foetuses were found to have > coronary arteries already furred up with cholesterol was also ignored - > fortunately not by the Finnish government. And while they were busy > instituting a government-lead dietary health education scheme which has > saved a huge number of lives, our miserable apology for a government was > still saying that there was no link, nothing to worry about and that such a > scheme here in the UK would be unconstitutional! Meat etc. industry leaders > and MPs in the same Masonic Lodges, obviously! > > And anyway - I *like* black tea, so there! ![]() > that a squeeze of lemon damages its health-giving properties as well. > > Nemo On Nutritious Drink Studies, Consider the Funding Source 01.08.07, 12:00 AM ET TUESDAY, Jan. 9 (HealthDay News) -- Before you take to heart any research about the health effects of beverages such as milk, fruit juice or soft drinks, find out who paid for the study. If a beverage manufacturer or industry group funded the research, the finding may be biased, researchers report. TC |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ups.com... > > nemo wrote: > > > wrote in message > > oups.com... > > > > > > nemo wrote: > > > > And one in the eye for the trolls! > > > > > > > > Adding milk to a cup of tea can destroy its ability to protect against > > heart > > > > disease, according to research. > > > > > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6241139.stm > > > > > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5405686.stm > > > > > > > > http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/hea...out600813.html > > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > When the Vegan Society, the Vegetarian Society, myself and many others used > > to say that studies sponsored by the food industry years ago which used to > > state over and over again that there was no link between Coronary Heart > > Disease and what passed for a 'normal' omnivorous diet in those days were > > biased, we were told we were wrong and sometimes even ridiculed! > > > > Look what the opinion is nowadays - and at that time, my relations who > > followed such a 'normal' diet were dropping like flies from coronaries and > > strokes. > > > > The evidence from Finland where even miscarried foetuses were found to have > > coronary arteries already furred up with cholesterol was also ignored - > > fortunately not by the Finnish government. And while they were busy > > instituting a government-lead dietary health education scheme which has > > saved a huge number of lives, our miserable apology for a government was > > still saying that there was no link, nothing to worry about and that such a > > scheme here in the UK would be unconstitutional! Meat etc. industry leaders > > and MPs in the same Masonic Lodges, obviously! > > > > And anyway - I *like* black tea, so there! ![]() find > > that a squeeze of lemon damages its health-giving properties as well. > > > > Nemo > > On Nutritious Drink Studies, Consider the Funding Source > 01.08.07, 12:00 AM ET > > > TUESDAY, Jan. 9 (HealthDay News) -- Before you take to heart any > research about the health effects of beverages such as milk, fruit > juice or soft drinks, find out who paid for the study. > If a beverage manufacturer or industry group funded the research, the > finding may be biased, researchers report. > > Don't worry. I always take everything with a small pinch of salt. Sea salt of course because they put a cyanide compound in ordinary table salt as an anti-caking agent!! It's true. Sodium Hexacyanoferrate, using the form of the chemical name where the word 'cyanide' isn't all that obvious to the average member of the public. They used a calcium compound up to a decade or so ago but the new stuff is probably cheaper - probably a waste product from some industrial process or other. Nemo I wouldn't say I'm paranoid, but if someone tells me 2+2=4, the first thought that comes into my head is: Why does he want me to believe that? ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rabbi's nail down a cool 20 million in Kosher food scam. | General Cooking | |||
The final nail in the mailbox coffin! | General Cooking | |||
The final nail in the mailbox coffin! | General Cooking | |||
The final nail in the mailbox coffin! | General Cooking | |||
Cake Nail? | General Cooking |