Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From a post back in November 2001:
"Whatever": > Do you really think that talking it over with these people > would work? Karen Winter, traitor: Well, we will have to talk in [sic] over with "these people" at some point, unless we want to see the U.S. become a country under permanent siege like Isreal [sic]. "Whatever": > The [9/11] terrorists want to kill YOU and your way of > life and they will settle for nothing less. There > is nothing to discuss with this type of group. Karen Winter, traitor: But we must discuss the grievances which led to the actions with the population in general, or we will only encourage more terrorists. http://tinyurl.com/xl58 That is support for criminal terrorists. It is saying that their attack was justified, and that the correct way to deal with them is to "talk it over" with them and, implicitly, cave in to their demands. Failure to talk it over with them and, implicitly, cave in to their demands will result in more terrorism, and in the traitor Karen Winter's eyes, we will have brought it on ourself. From the same post: "Whatever": > There you go again. You just can't help yourself even after > you said it is a childish whine. > US policy isn't responsible. The terrorists are. Karen Winter, traitor: Of course the terrorists are responsible for their own actions, but it would be absurd to say they were completely "unprovoked." The traitor Karen Winter is trying, any way she can, to justify the terrorist attacks. She wants to claim that they were "provoked". The unambiguous and unavoidable implication is that because the U.S. "provoked" the terrorists, the attacks were justified. As a lifelong hater of the U.S. and all things western, the traitor Karen Winter simply cannot condemn, unambiguously, the terrorist attacks. She claims not to find them justified, but EVERY comment she makes about them is preceded or followed by some other comment that indicates, unambiguously, that she feels the attacks were justified. Her statement that we "must" discuss their "grievances" with the Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists is support for them. There is nothing to discuss with them. They have no standing. As outlaws, they should be tracked down and exterminated. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rat & Swan wrote:
> > You just don't get it I do get it. You support criminal, murderous terrorists. The quotations found in the link prove it: Well, we will have to talk in [sic] over with "these people" at some point, unless we want to see the U.S. become a country under permanent siege like Isreal [sic]. But we must discuss the grievances which led to the actions with the population in general, or we will only encourage more terrorists. Of course the terrorists are responsible for their own actions, but it would be absurd to say they were completely "unprovoked." Anything less than unqualified, unambiguous condemnation of them is open support. You refuse to condemn them. Your phony attempts are laden with qualifiers and bullshit, proving you support them. > >> http://tinyurl.com/xl58 |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message hlink.net... > Rat & Swan wrote: > > > > > You just don't get it > > I do get it. You support criminal, murderous > terrorists. The quotations found in the link prove it: > > Well, we will have to talk in [sic] over with "these > people" at some point, unless we want to see the > U.S. become a country under permanent siege like > Isreal [sic]. > > But we must discuss the grievances which led to > the actions with the population in general, or > we will only encourage more terrorists. > > Of course the terrorists are responsible for > their own actions, but it would be absurd to > say they were completely "unprovoked." > > Anything less than unqualified, unambiguous > condemnation of them is open support. You refuse to > condemn them. Your phony attempts are laden with > qualifiers and bullshit, proving you support them. > > > > >> http://tinyurl.com/xl58 A dialogue must be established Jonathan, we must listen to their views and objectives - then shoot the *******s. > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question for Karen Winter and other Episcopalians | Vegan | |||
The astonishing lunacy of Karen Winter | Vegan | |||
Karen Winter, the crown princess of smear | Vegan | |||
Karen Winter, the crown princess of smear | Vegan | |||
Karen Winter, the Rush Limbaugh of t.p.a./a.a.e.v. | Vegan |