pearl wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
>>>news >>>
>>>
>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
>>>>> evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
>>>>
>>>>Show it,
>>>
>>>
>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
>>>
>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
>>
>>Wild, conspiratorial bullshit; not a shred of evidence.
>
>
> Wild, shameless, ballshite ipse dixit.

Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
anything even close. It was nothing but wild
allegations by a crackpot.

"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> pearl wrote:
> > "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >
> >>pearl wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> >>>news > >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
> >>>>> evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
> >>>>
> >>>>Show it,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
> >>>
> >>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
> >>
> >>Wild, conspiratorial bullshit; not a shred of evidence.
> >
> > Wild, shameless, ballshite ipse dixit.
>
> Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
> anything even close. It was nothing but wild
> allegations by a crackpot.

And again.

pearl wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
thlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
>>>>>news >>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
>>>>>>> evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Show it,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
>>>>
>>>>Wild, conspiratorial bullshit; not a shred of evidence.
>>>
>>>Wild, shameless, ballshite ipse dixit.
>>
>>Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
>>anything even close. It was nothing but wild
>>allegations by a crackpot.
>
>
> And again.

Yes, again: there was no evidence, only the ravings of
a crackpot. Just your style.

"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> pearl wrote:
> > "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >
> >>pearl wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> thlink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> >>>>>news > >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
> >>>>>>> evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Show it,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
> >>>>>
> >>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
> >>>>
> >>>>Wild, conspiratorial bullshit; not a shred of evidence.
> >>>
> >>>Wild, shameless, ballshite ipse dixit.
> >>
> >>Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
> >>anything even close. It was nothing but wild
> >>allegations by a crackpot.
> >
> >
> > And again.
>
> Yes, again: there was no evidence, only the ravings of
> a crackpot. Just your style.

No. The raving crackpot is you, ball.

pearl wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
thlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
arthlink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>news >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
>>>>>>>>>evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Show it,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wild, conspiratorial bullshit; not a shred of evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Wild, shameless, ballshite ipse dixit.
>>>>
>>>>Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
>>>>anything even close. It was nothing but wild
>>>>allegations by a crackpot.
>>>
>>>
>>>And again.
>>
>>Yes, again: there was no evidence, only the ravings of
>>a crackpot. Just your style.
>
>
> No. The raving crackpot is you, ball.

That is really stupid of you. Can't you do something
more creative than simply to try to redirect the
well-founded accusations about you? You sound like a
bratty school kid.

That moron's page offers no evidence, just his
irrational ravings. It figures you'd believe it. The
page is bullshit, just like all your "inner earth"
bullshit.

--

"If you step back and look at the data, the optimum amount
of red meat you eat should be zero."
-- Walter Willett, M.D., of Brigham and Women's Hospital,
director of a study that found a close correlation between
red meat consumption and colon cancer.

http://www.mcspotlight.org/media/reports/beyond.html
"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> pearl wrote:
> > "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> > nk.net...
> >
> >>pearl wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> thlink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> arthlink.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news > >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
> >>>>>>>>>evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Show it,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html

> That moron's page offers no evidence, just his
> irrational ravings

Who are you trying to smear exactly???

Why did you snip these links, ball?
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...=bush+knew+911
http://www.activeopposition.com/911exposed.htm

Lesley the pathological liar and conspiracy believing
twit wrote:

> http://www.mcspotlight.org/media/reports/beyond.html
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>

>>>>>>>>>>>our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
>>>>>>>>>>>evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Show it,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
>
>
>>That moron's page offers no evidence, just his
>>irrational ravings
>
>
> Who are you trying to smear exactly???

No one, skank.

>
> Why did you snip these links

Because they are just MORE irrational, unsupported
conspiracy bullshit. They're taking well known, well
publicized bits and pieces of intelligence, and trying
to suggest that the *specific* 9/11 attack that
happened was known in advance by the Bush
administration and by Bush himself. It's shit. U.S.
and other western intelligence knew al Qaeda were up to
something, but they didn't know exactly what, when or
where.

That filthy slag Karen Winter has claimed that the Bush
administration staged the attacks. She's as full of
shit as you, but she doesn't even have any of her own
bullshit links to support her paranoid claims.

pearl wrote:

>>Your page was bullshit. There was no evidence; not
>>anything even close. It was nothing but wild
>>allegations by a crackpot.

> And again.

The page itself mentions having the evidence for complicity but in the
next breath simply suggests that it presents circumstances (or
coincidences) that should be investigated. Which is about all you can
say of alleged 'evidence' if you value the principal that someone is
innocent until proven guilty. Seems like a grab for headlines; right or
wrong (or right or left.)

Regards

Ian