Ron wrote:

> In article et>,
> Jay Santos > wrote:
>
>
>>Ron wrote:
>>
>>>In article .net>,
>>> Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article .net>,
>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"If the spices I needed were available locally I would
>>>>>>[consume only locally grown produce]."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- Skanky Carpetmuncher, 27 Dec 2004
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The issue is why "vegans" don't make more effort not to
>>>>>>cause the death of animals. First we need to recap the
>>>>>>argument.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Why, oh why can't vegans be perfect?
>>>>
>>>>Sophomore Ron, do you believe sodomizing small children
>>>>with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes or no,
>>>>Sophomore Ron - dispense with your usual blowhard windy
>>>>equivocation.
>>>>
>>>>If you do, Sophomore Ron, do you think someone who
>>>>sodomizes small children with a broom handle only two
>>>>or three times a week is entitled to feel virtuous in
>>>>comparison with his neighbor who sodomizes small
>>>>children with a broom handle on a daily basis?
>>>
>>>
>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
>>
>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
>>
>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
>
>
> Do you?

Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
morally wrong?

Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
reading yet more of your trite sophistry.

In article .net>,
Jay Santos > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
>
> > In article et>,
> > Jay Santos > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ron wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article .net>,
> >>> Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article .net>,
> >>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>"If the spices I needed were available locally I would
> >>>>>>[consume only locally grown produce]."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>- Skanky Carpetmuncher, 27 Dec 2004
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>The issue is why "vegans" don't make more effort not to
> >>>>>>cause the death of animals. First we need to recap the
> >>>>>>argument.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Why, oh why can't vegans be perfect?
> >>>>
> >>>>Sophomore Ron, do you believe sodomizing small children
> >>>>with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes or no,
> >>>>Sophomore Ron - dispense with your usual blowhard windy
> >>>>equivocation.
> >>>>
> >>>>If you do, Sophomore Ron, do you think someone who
> >>>>sodomizes small children with a broom handle only two
> >>>>or three times a week is entitled to feel virtuous in
> >>>>comparison with his neighbor who sodomizes small
> >>>>children with a broom handle on a daily basis?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
> >>
> >>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
> >>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
> >>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
> >>
> >>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
> >>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
> >>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
> >>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
> >
> >
> > Do you?
>
> Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
> sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
> morally wrong?
>
> Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
> reading yet more of your trite sophistry.

We both must think it okay. Since we have time to discuss anything here.
Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must
not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong. Since neither of us is
doing everything possible, we both must think it okay. Since both of us
are not doing everything possible, we both must be complicit.

Join the club, wit**** or bagshit, or whatever those cute expressions are

roflmao

Sophomore Ron wrote:
> In article .net>,
> Jay Santos > wrote:
>
>
>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article et>,
>>> Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
>>>>
>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
>>>>
>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you?
>>
>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
>>morally wrong?
>>
>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry.
>
>
> We both must think it okay.

No, don't speak for me, cocksucker.

Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron
believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize
children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm
not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long
to answer, cocksucker?

> Since we have time to discuss anything here.
> Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must
> not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong.

****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to
stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing
children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it
is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop
you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you
evil for doing it.

The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get
Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe
it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all.
It isn't about me preventing you from doing
something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what
your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to
YOU about YOUR behavior.

Do you get it, cocksucker? You stupid, brick-headed,
pouncing homo cocksucker.

In article . net>,
Jay Santos > wrote:

> Sophomore Ron wrote:
> > In article .net>,
> > Jay Santos > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article et>,
> >>> Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
> >>>>
> >>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
> >>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
> >>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
> >>>>
> >>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
> >>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
> >>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
> >>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Do you?
> >>
> >>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
> >>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
> >>morally wrong?
> >>
> >>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
> >>reading yet more of your trite sophistry.
> >
> >
> > We both must think it okay.
>
> No, don't speak for me, cocksucker.
>
> Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron
> believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize
> children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm
> not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long
> to answer, cocksucker?
>
> > Since we have time to discuss anything here.
> > Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must
> > not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong.
>
> ****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to
> stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing
> children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it
> is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop
> you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you
> evil for doing it.
>
> The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get
> Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe
> it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all.
> It isn't about me preventing you from doing
> something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what
> your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to
> YOU about YOUR behavior.

You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything.

> Do you get it, cocksucker? You stupid, brick-headed,
> pouncing homo cocksucker.

Projection is a terrible thing to waste! *winks*

Ron wrote:

> In article . net>,
> Jay Santos > wrote:
>
>
>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>
>>>In article .net>,
>>> Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article et>,
>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
>>>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
>>>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
>>>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
>>>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
>>>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you?
>>>>
>>>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
>>>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
>>>>morally wrong?
>>>>
>>>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
>>>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry.
>>>
>>>
>>>We both must think it okay.
>>
>>No, don't speak for me, cocksucker.
>>
>>Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron
>>believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize
>>children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm
>>not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long
>>to answer, cocksucker?
>>
>>
>>>Since we have time to discuss anything here.
>>>Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must
>>>not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong.
>>
>>****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to
>>stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing
>>children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it
>>is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop
>>you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you
>>evil for doing it.
>>
>>The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get
>>Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe
>>it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all.
>>It isn't about me preventing you from doing
>>something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what
>>your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to
>>YOU about YOUR behavior.
>
>
> You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything.

That's probably false, but beside the point. It isn't
my personal and direct obligation to stop you from
committing evil acts.

>
>
>>Do you get it, cocksucker? You stupid, brick-headed,
>>pouncing homo cocksucker.

In article t>,
Jay Santos > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
>
> > In article . net>,
> > Jay Santos > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article .net>,
> >>> Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article et>,
> >>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
> >>>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
> >>>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
> >>>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
> >>>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
> >>>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Do you?
> >>>>
> >>>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
> >>>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
> >>>>morally wrong?
> >>>>
> >>>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
> >>>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>We both must think it okay.
> >>
> >>No, don't speak for me, cocksucker.
> >>
> >>Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron
> >>believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize
> >>children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm
> >>not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long
> >>to answer, cocksucker?
> >>
> >>
> >>>Since we have time to discuss anything here.
> >>>Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must
> >>>not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong.
> >>
> >>****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to
> >>stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing
> >>children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it
> >>is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop
> >>you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you
> >>evil for doing it.
> >>
> >>The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get
> >>Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe
> >>it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all.
> >>It isn't about me preventing you from doing
> >>something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what
> >>your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to
> >>YOU about YOUR behavior.
> >
> >
> > You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything.
>
> That's probably false, but beside the point. It isn't
> my personal and direct obligation to stop you from
> committing evil acts.

Nor is it the vegan's responsibility to stop others from killing animals
-- if we accept your reasoning.

LOL.