Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article t>,
Jay Santos > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > > In article t>, > > Jay Santos > wrote: > > > > > >>Ron wrote: > >> > >> > >>>In article . net>, > >>> Jay Santos > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>In article .net>, > >>>>>Jay Santos > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>In article et>, > >>>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric > >>>>>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with > >>>>>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation." > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with > >>>>>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small > >>>>>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes > >>>>>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Do you? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe > >>>>>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be > >>>>>>morally wrong? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in > >>>>>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>We both must think it okay. > >>>> > >>>>No, don't speak for me, cocksucker. > >>>> > >>>>Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron > >>>>believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize > >>>>children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm > >>>>not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long > >>>>to answer, cocksucker? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Since we have time to discuss anything here. > >>>>>Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must > >>>>>not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong. > >>>> > >>>>****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to > >>>>stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing > >>>>children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it > >>>>is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop > >>>>you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you > >>>>evil for doing it. > >>>> > >>>>The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get > >>>>Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe > >>>>it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all. > >>>>It isn't about me preventing you from doing > >>>>something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what > >>>>your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to > >>>>YOU about YOUR behavior. > >>> > >>> > >>>You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything. > >> > >>That's probably false, but beside the point. It isn't > >>my personal and direct obligation to stop you from > >>committing evil acts. > > > > > > Nor is it the vegan's responsibility to stop others from killing animals > > -- if we accept your reasoning. > > I never suggested it was, homo. I said it is the > "vegan's" responsibility not to participate in the > process, in any way, that leads to killing animals. > Buying from a producer who you know kills animals is > participating. You can't believe the killing of > animals is wrong and participate in the process. Of course, she can. We participate in the process of pollution and migrant worker exploitation. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron wrote:
> In article t>, > Jay Santos > wrote: > > >>Ron wrote: >> >> >>>In article t>, >>> Jay Santos > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Ron wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>In article . net>, >>>>>Jay Santos > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>In article .net>, >>>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In article et>, >>>>>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric >>>>>>>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with >>>>>>>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with >>>>>>>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small >>>>>>>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes >>>>>>>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Do you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe >>>>>>>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be >>>>>>>>morally wrong? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in >>>>>>>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>We both must think it okay. >>>>>> >>>>>>No, don't speak for me, cocksucker. >>>>>> >>>>>>Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron >>>>>>believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize >>>>>>children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm >>>>>>not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long >>>>>>to answer, cocksucker? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Since we have time to discuss anything here. >>>>>>>Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed children, we must >>>>>>>not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>>****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to >>>>>>stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing >>>>>>children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it >>>>>>is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop >>>>>>you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you >>>>>>evil for doing it. >>>>>> >>>>>>The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get >>>>>>Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe >>>>>>it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all. >>>>>>It isn't about me preventing you from doing >>>>>>something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what >>>>>>your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to >>>>>>YOU about YOUR behavior. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything. >>>> >>>>That's probably false, but beside the point. It isn't >>>>my personal and direct obligation to stop you from >>>>committing evil acts. >>> >>> >>>Nor is it the vegan's responsibility to stop others from killing animals >>>-- if we accept your reasoning. >> >>I never suggested it was, homo. I said it is the >>"vegan's" responsibility not to participate in the >>process, in any way, that leads to killing animals. >>Buying from a producer who you know kills animals is >>participating. You can't believe the killing of >>animals is wrong and participate in the process. > > > Of course, she can. No, she can't. To participate means one doesn't really believe it's wrong. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The perfect G&T.... | General Cooking | |||
The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
Perfect BBQ was had | Barbecue | |||
The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
The perfect foil (and her moral confusion) | Vegan |