"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> usual suspect > wrote:
>
>> Fudge-packed Ron wrote:
>> >>>>>I have no way of knowing what farmers do what.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Stop feigning ignorance and innocence. You know they intentionally
>> >>>>poison them and less intentionally run over and flood them.
>> >>>
>> >>>I don't know which do this, if they really do.
>> >>
>> >>Bullshit. You know that most farmers don't employ the tactics of the
>> >>Lundbergs to clear the fields of migratory birds (but not rodents,
>> >>amphibians, etc.). You know that the use of pesticides kills a variety
>> >>of non-targeted species. You know that storage facilities like
>> >>granaries
>> >>and warehouses pro-actively employ pest control measures in accordance
>> >>with health agency requirements.
>> >
>> > Well then, any educated fool
>>
>> Glad you're here to speak for the educated fool community.
>>
>> > can see the difficulty is not in veganism
>>
>> It *is*, but an educated fool is still a fool.
>>
>> > but in the whores who are the growers and farmers.
>>
>> Whores who cut certain corners to fulfill even *more whorish* consumer
>> demand for the least expensive products possible. Most consumers care
>> nothing about dead mice or rats or frogs, they just want their food.
>> Vegans, who brazenly lie about the impact their diet has on animals,
>> have failed to address the issue of alternative production which might
>> actually help their consumption match their rhetoric. They're hypocrites
>> of the grandest magnitude.
>
> You still suffer the delusion that other must follow your standards.
=====================
LOL You still don't have a clue, do you, fool? It's not 'our' standards
that they should follow, it's their own, idiot. The ones they make big
pronouncements about and then never even try to live up to! You really are
this stupid, aren't you? And all this time I thought you were just playing.
One too many packings, eh pansy?


The
> vegan is free to make a logical argument to support animal rights and to
> operate as a human within a human world.
>
> There is a name for such a logical fallacy, but I'm not that interested
> in remembering or looking it up at the moment.

In article t>,
"rick etter" > wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > usual suspect > wrote:
> >
> >> Fudge-packed Ron wrote:
> >> >>>>>I have no way of knowing what farmers do what.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Stop feigning ignorance and innocence. You know they intentionally
> >> >>>>poison them and less intentionally run over and flood them.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I don't know which do this, if they really do.
> >> >>
> >> >>Bullshit. You know that most farmers don't employ the tactics of the
> >> >>Lundbergs to clear the fields of migratory birds (but not rodents,
> >> >>amphibians, etc.). You know that the use of pesticides kills a variety
> >> >>of non-targeted species. You know that storage facilities like
> >> >>granaries
> >> >>and warehouses pro-actively employ pest control measures in accordance
> >> >>with health agency requirements.
> >> >
> >> > Well then, any educated fool
> >>
> >> Glad you're here to speak for the educated fool community.
> >>
> >> > can see the difficulty is not in veganism
> >>
> >> It *is*, but an educated fool is still a fool.
> >>
> >> > but in the whores who are the growers and farmers.
> >>
> >> Whores who cut certain corners to fulfill even *more whorish* consumer
> >> demand for the least expensive products possible. Most consumers care
> >> nothing about dead mice or rats or frogs, they just want their food.
> >> Vegans, who brazenly lie about the impact their diet has on animals,
> >> have failed to address the issue of alternative production which might
> >> actually help their consumption match their rhetoric. They're hypocrites
> >> of the grandest magnitude.
> >
> > You still suffer the delusion that other must follow your standards.
> =====================
> LOL You still don't have a clue, do you, fool? It's not 'our' standards
> that they should follow, it's their own, idiot. The ones they make big
> pronouncements about and then never even try to live up to! You really are
> this stupid, aren't you? And all this time I thought you were just playing.
> One too many packings, eh pansy?

Ugh. Once again, please enlighten us on the requirements of humans to
follow the theoretical construct or logical argument.

*awaits the latest google"

> The
> > vegan is free to make a logical argument to support animal rights and to
> > operate as a human within a human world.
> >
> > There is a name for such a logical fallacy, but I'm not that interested
> > in remembering or looking it up at the moment.