 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article . net>, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article et>, > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > In article >, > >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" > >> >> >> food > >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. > >> >> > > >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. > >> >> ================= > >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to back > >> >> it > >> >> up. > >> > > >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork > >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. People who > >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty here, > >> > usual? > >> ================================ > >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try reading for > >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people that > >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're the > >> loons > >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew about > >> those > >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of those are > >> vegan foods, are they? > > > > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. > ====================== > Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. > > > Who are the rice growers > > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? > ===================== > Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers world-wide are > not vegan. > > Who are the people who use the > > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible > > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. > ========================== > Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not > vegan. > > > Who is > > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater or > > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. > =================== > Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now does > it, fool? > > > Some of us tolerate > > their violence in the world. > ======================= > And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... > > > > > > >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and > >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on your > >> > part. > >> ======================= > >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already proven > >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that claim to > >> be > >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their farming > >> will > >> still cause animals to die. > > > > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated by > > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and intellectually > > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. > ============================== > ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you > ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for > comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! Not > meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. > > > > > >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill > >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? > >> ============================ > >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are hardly > >> vegan > >> foods. > > > > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. > ===================== > Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response was to > Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, fool? > try reading for comprehension. > quoted text.... > Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" > food > > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the > > humane slaughter which they object. > > You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the > ingredients > for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who > rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such > products, continues to kill. > end quoted text.... > > You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... > > > > >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it is > >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having any > >> info, > >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however many > >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet they > >> still > >> kill them. > >> > >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. > > > > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is > > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some > > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory than > > actually being hands on with killing. > ======================= > Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... > > > > > > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of > > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no one > > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. > ============================== > ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I have > been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for the > actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you make > cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are trying > to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet > again,pansy-boy... I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there aren't children in your vicinity. The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article . net>, >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article et>, >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > In article >, >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" >> >> >> >> food >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. >> >> >> ================= >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to >> >> >> back >> >> >> it >> >> >> up. >> >> > >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. People >> >> > who >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty >> >> > here, >> >> > usual? >> >> ================================ >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try reading >> >> for >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people that >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're the >> >> loons >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew about >> >> those >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of those >> >> are >> >> vegan foods, are they? >> > >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. >> ====================== >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. >> >> >> Who are the rice growers >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? >> ===================== >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers world-wide >> are >> not vegan. >> >> Who are the people who use the >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. >> ========================== >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not >> vegan. >> >> >> Who is >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater or >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. >> =================== >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now >> does >> it, fool? >> >> >> Some of us tolerate >> > their violence in the world. >> ======================= >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> > >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on your >> >> > part. >> >> ======================= >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already >> >> proven >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that claim >> >> to >> >> be >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their farming >> >> will >> >> still cause animals to die. >> > >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated by >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and intellectually >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. >> ============================== >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! Not >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. >> >> >> > >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? >> >> ============================ >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are hardly >> >> vegan >> >> foods. >> > >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> ===================== >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response was >> to >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, >> fool? >> try reading for comprehension. >> quoted text.... >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> "vegan" >> food >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> ingredients >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> products, continues to kill. >> end quoted text.... >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? >> >> > >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it is >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having any >> >> info, >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however many >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet they >> >> still >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> > >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory >> > than >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> ======================= >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> > >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no one >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. >> ============================== >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I >> have >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for the >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you make >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are >> trying >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet >> again,pansy-boy... > > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > aren't children in your vicinity. > > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. =============== Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance and stupidity.... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article et>, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article . net>, > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > In article et>, > >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> >> ... > >> >> >> > In article >, > >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" > >> >> >> >> food > >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than > >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. > >> >> >> ================= > >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to > >> >> >> back > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> up. > >> >> > > >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork > >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. People > >> >> > who > >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty > >> >> > here, > >> >> > usual? > >> >> ================================ > >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try reading > >> >> for > >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people that > >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're the > >> >> loons > >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew about > >> >> those > >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of those > >> >> are > >> >> vegan foods, are they? > >> > > >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. > >> ====================== > >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. > >> > >> > >> Who are the rice growers > >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? > >> ===================== > >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers world-wide > >> are > >> not vegan. > >> > >> Who are the people who use the > >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible > >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. > >> ========================== > >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not > >> vegan. > >> > >> > >> Who is > >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater or > >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. > >> =================== > >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now > >> does > >> it, fool? > >> > >> > >> Some of us tolerate > >> > their violence in the world. > >> ======================= > >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and > >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on your > >> >> > part. > >> >> ======================= > >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already > >> >> proven > >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that claim > >> >> to > >> >> be > >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their farming > >> >> will > >> >> still cause animals to die. > >> > > >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated by > >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and intellectually > >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. > >> ============================== > >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you > >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for > >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! Not > >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill > >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? > >> >> ============================ > >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are hardly > >> >> vegan > >> >> foods. > >> > > >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. > >> ===================== > >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response was > >> to > >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, > >> fool? > >> try reading for comprehension. > >> quoted text.... > >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of > >> "vegan" > >> food > >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the > >> > humane slaughter which they object. > >> > >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the > >> ingredients > >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who > >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such > >> products, continues to kill. > >> end quoted text.... > >> > >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... > > Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? > > > >> > >> > > >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it is > >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having any > >> >> info, > >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however many > >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet they > >> >> still > >> >> kill them. > >> >> > >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. > >> > > >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is > >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some > >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory > >> > than > >> > actually being hands on with killing. > >> ======================= > >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... > >> > >> > >> > > >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of > >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no one > >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. > >> ============================== > >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I > >> have > >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for the > >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you make > >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are > >> trying > >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet > >> again,pansy-boy... > > > > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > > aren't children in your vicinity. > > > > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. > =============== > Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving > your ignorance and stupidity.... Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the other, but not vice versa. I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look bad. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote:
> "rick etter" > wrote: >> "Ron" > wrote in message ... [..] >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. >> =============== >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >other, but not vice versa. > >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >bad. Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those wrong actions to continue and to make themselves fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are showing a contempt for the rights of animals when buying vegetables. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article >,
Derek > wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: > > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > [..] > >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > >> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >> > > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. > >> =============== > >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving > >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > > > >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > >other, but not vice versa. > > > >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > >bad. > > Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > buying vegetables. You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Derek > wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> [..] >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >> > there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >> > made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >> > powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> >> > are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >> > respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >> proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >other, but not vice versa. >> > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >> >bad. >> >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> buying vegetables. > > You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about > his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. ================ LOL What discussion? You can't keep from lying, and cannot even keep track of the respones that are being made, fool. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . net>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > Derek > wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> [..] > >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope > >> >> > there > >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >> >> > > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has > >> >> > made > >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are > >> >> > powerless > >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They > >> >> > are > >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions > >> >> > respond. > >> >> =============== > >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work > >> >> proving > >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > >> > > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > >> >other, but not vice versa. > >> > > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > >> >bad. > >> > >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that > >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > >> buying vegetables. > > > > You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about > > his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. > ================ > LOL What discussion? You can't keep from lying, and cannot even keep track > of the respones that are being made, fool. The discussion above seems to be about responsibility and misplaced responsibility. Yet, I find nothing in your comments related to the issue of responsibility. Please clarify. Are you in agreement with Dutch and usual that I am responsible for the killing that others do, or not? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . net>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > Derek > wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> [..] > >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope > >> >> > there > >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >> >> > > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has > >> >> > made > >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are > >> >> > powerless > >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They > >> >> > are > >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions > >> >> > respond. > >> >> =============== > >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work > >> >> proving > >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > >> > > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > >> >other, but not vice versa. > >> > > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > >> >bad. > >> > >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that > >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > >> buying vegetables. > > > > You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about > > his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. > ================ > LOL What discussion? You can't keep from lying, and cannot even keep track > of the respones that are being made, fool. The discussion above seems to be about responsibility and misplaced responsibility. Yet, I find nothing in your comments related to the issue of responsibility. Please clarify. Are you in agreement with Dutch and usual that I am responsible for the killing that others do, or not? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:44:22 -0500, Ron > wrote:
>In article >, > Derek > wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message ... >> [..] >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >other, but not vice versa. >> > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >> >bad. >> >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> buying vegetables. > >You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about >his style and methods. Sorry for 'poisoning the well'. I certainly don't intend to enter into this debate to insult Rick, only for the discussion to be turned from it's original track and onto him instead. > We'll see how the discussion goes. I understand. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Derek > wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> [..] >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >> > there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >> > made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >> > powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> >> > are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >> > respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >> proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >other, but not vice versa. >> > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >> >bad. >> >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> buying vegetables. > > You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about > his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. ================ LOL What discussion? You can't keep from lying, and cannot even keep track of the respones that are being made, fool. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:44:22 -0500, Ron > wrote:
>In article >, > Derek > wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message ... >> [..] >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >> >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >other, but not vice versa. >> > >> >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >> >bad. >> >> Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that >> the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> buying vegetables. > >You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about >his style and methods. Sorry for 'poisoning the well'. I certainly don't intend to enter into this debate to insult Rick, only for the discussion to be turned from it's original track and onto him instead. > We'll see how the discussion goes. I understand. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Derek" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> "rick etter" > wrote: >>> "Ron" > wrote in message >>> ... > [..] >>> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >>> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >>> > aren't children in your vicinity. >>> > >>> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >>> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >>> > made >>> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >>> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >>> > are >>> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >>> > respond. >>> =============== >>> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >>> proving >>> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> >>Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >>killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >>responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >>actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >>other, but not vice versa. >> >>I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >>beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >>bad. > > Rick, like all the other buck-passers ==================== ROTFLMAO This from the greatest buck-passer on usenet!! What a hoot! Unlike you fool, I have never passed the buck on my culpability in the death and suffering of animals. You have, in spades, killer. Even after your pal Aristotle told you that you are culpable, in english! here insists that > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > buying vegetables. ================ Tap, tap, tap, killer. Keep dancing, you still know that it is the choices you make, even though you could make others, that lead to the death and suffering of animals that you falsely claim to care for. You are constantly passing the buck of your bloody hands onto others. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Derek" > wrote in message > ... > > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: > >> "rick etter" > wrote: > >>> "Ron" > wrote in message > >>> ... > > [..] > >>> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >>> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > >>> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >>> > > >>> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >>> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has > >>> > made > >>> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > >>> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They > >>> > are > >>> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions > >>> > respond. > >>> =============== > >>> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work > >>> proving > >>> your ignorance and stupidity.... > >> > >>Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > >>killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > >>responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > >>actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > >>other, but not vice versa. > >> > >>I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > >>beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > >>bad. > > > > Rick, like all the other buck-passers > ==================== > ROTFLMAO This from the greatest buck-passer on usenet!! What a hoot! > Unlike you fool, I have never passed the buck on my culpability in the death > and suffering of animals. You have, in spades, killer. Even after your > pal Aristotle told you that you are culpable, in english! > > > > > here insists that > > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > > buying vegetables. > ================ > Tap, tap, tap, killer. Keep dancing, you still know that it is the choices > you make, even though you could make others, that lead to the death and > suffering of animals that you falsely claim to care for. You are constantly > passing the buck of your bloody hands onto others. Make a case, Rick. All Dutch has managed to do is to reiterate the logically fallacies that can be found in law to support his argument. How about you? Are you going to tell us about 'aiding and abetting' also? A position that the laws takes very inconsistent and only in certain circumstances is hardly strong reasoning for a logical position. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Derek" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> >> "rick etter" > wrote: >> >>> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >>> ... >> > [..] >> >>> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >>> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >>> > there >> >>> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >>> > >> >>> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >>> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >>> > made >> >>> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >>> > powerless >> >>> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. >> >>> > They >> >>> > are >> >>> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >>> > respond. >> >>> =============== >> >>> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >>> proving >> >>> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> >> >> >>Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that >> >>the >> >>killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >>responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >>actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >>other, but not vice versa. >> >> >> >>I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >>beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans >> >>look >> >>bad. >> > >> > Rick, like all the other buck-passers >> ==================== >> ROTFLMAO This from the greatest buck-passer on usenet!! What a hoot! >> Unlike you fool, I have never passed the buck on my culpability in the >> death >> and suffering of animals. You have, in spades, killer. Even after >> your >> pal Aristotle told you that you are culpable, in english! >> >> >> >> >> here insists that >> > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> > buying vegetables. >> ================ >> Tap, tap, tap, killer. Keep dancing, you still know that it is the >> choices >> you make, even though you could make others, that lead to the death and >> suffering of animals that you falsely claim to care for. You are >> constantly >> passing the buck of your bloody hands onto others. > > Make a case, Rick. ================== Already have, pansy-boy. All Dutch has managed to do is to reiterate the > logically fallacies that can be found in law to support his argument. ==================== Where have I just discussed the law? > How about you? Are you going to tell us about 'aiding and abetting' > also? A position that the laws takes very inconsistent and only in > certain circumstances is hardly strong reasoning for a logical position. ==================== It's your stupidity that is logically inconsistant, fool. You claim that I am the one passing the buck and blaiming others, yet that is alll that you have done here. Thanks for continuing to prove your total lack of any knowledge on the subject, pansy-boy. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Derek" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> >> "rick etter" > wrote: >> >>> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >>> ... >> > [..] >> >>> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >>> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >>> > there >> >>> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >>> > >> >>> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >>> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >>> > made >> >>> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >>> > powerless >> >>> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. >> >>> > They >> >>> > are >> >>> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >>> > respond. >> >>> =============== >> >>> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >>> proving >> >>> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> >> >> >>Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that >> >>the >> >>killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> >>responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> >>actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> >>other, but not vice versa. >> >> >> >>I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> >>beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans >> >>look >> >>bad. >> > >> > Rick, like all the other buck-passers >> ==================== >> ROTFLMAO This from the greatest buck-passer on usenet!! What a hoot! >> Unlike you fool, I have never passed the buck on my culpability in the >> death >> and suffering of animals. You have, in spades, killer. Even after >> your >> pal Aristotle told you that you are culpable, in english! >> >> >> >> >> here insists that >> > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for >> > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those >> > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves >> > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, >> > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and >> > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are >> > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when >> > buying vegetables. >> ================ >> Tap, tap, tap, killer. Keep dancing, you still know that it is the >> choices >> you make, even though you could make others, that lead to the death and >> suffering of animals that you falsely claim to care for. You are >> constantly >> passing the buck of your bloody hands onto others. > > Make a case, Rick. ================== Already have, pansy-boy. All Dutch has managed to do is to reiterate the > logically fallacies that can be found in law to support his argument. ==================== Where have I just discussed the law? > How about you? Are you going to tell us about 'aiding and abetting' > also? A position that the laws takes very inconsistent and only in > certain circumstances is hardly strong reasoning for a logical position. ==================== It's your stupidity that is logically inconsistant, fool. You claim that I am the one passing the buck and blaiming others, yet that is alll that you have done here. Thanks for continuing to prove your total lack of any knowledge on the subject, pansy-boy. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article >,
Derek > wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: > > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > [..] > >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > >> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >> > > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. > >> =============== > >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving > >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > > > >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > >other, but not vice versa. > > > >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > >bad. > > Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > buying vegetables. You've known him longer than I have. I have my own observations about his style and methods. We'll see how the discussion goes. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Derek" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote: >> "rick etter" > wrote: >>> "Ron" > wrote in message >>> ... > [..] >>> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >>> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >>> > aren't children in your vicinity. >>> > >>> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >>> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >>> > made >>> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >>> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >>> > are >>> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >>> > respond. >>> =============== >>> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >>> proving >>> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> >>Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >>killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >>responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >>actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >>other, but not vice versa. >> >>I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >>beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >>bad. > > Rick, like all the other buck-passers ==================== ROTFLMAO This from the greatest buck-passer on usenet!! What a hoot! Unlike you fool, I have never passed the buck on my culpability in the death and suffering of animals. You have, in spades, killer. Even after your pal Aristotle told you that you are culpable, in english! here insists that > the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for > the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those > wrong actions to continue and to make themselves > fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, > his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and > enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are > showing a contempt for the rights of animals when > buying vegetables. ================ Tap, tap, tap, killer. Keep dancing, you still know that it is the choices you make, even though you could make others, that lead to the death and suffering of animals that you falsely claim to care for. You are constantly passing the buck of your bloody hands onto others. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article et>, >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article . net>, >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > In article et>, >> >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> > In article >, >> >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> >> >> >> "vegan" >> >> >> >> >> food >> >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, >> >> >> >> >> mutilation, >> >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. >> >> >> >> ================= >> >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to >> >> >> >> back >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> up. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork >> >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. >> >> >> > People >> >> >> > who >> >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty >> >> >> > here, >> >> >> > usual? >> >> >> ================================ >> >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try >> >> >> reading >> >> >> for >> >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people >> >> >> that >> >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're >> >> >> the >> >> >> loons >> >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew >> >> >> about >> >> >> those >> >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of >> >> >> those >> >> >> are >> >> >> vegan foods, are they? >> >> > >> >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. >> >> ====================== >> >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. >> >> >> >> >> >> Who are the rice growers >> >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? >> >> ===================== >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers >> >> world-wide >> >> are >> >> not vegan. >> >> >> >> Who are the people who use the >> >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible >> >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. >> >> ========================== >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not >> >> vegan. >> >> >> >> >> >> Who is >> >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater >> >> > or >> >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. >> >> =================== >> >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now >> >> does >> >> it, fool? >> >> >> >> >> >> Some of us tolerate >> >> > their violence in the world. >> >> ======================= >> >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and >> >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on >> >> >> > your >> >> >> > part. >> >> >> ======================= >> >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already >> >> >> proven >> >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that >> >> >> claim >> >> >> to >> >> >> be >> >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their >> >> >> farming >> >> >> will >> >> >> still cause animals to die. >> >> > >> >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated >> >> > by >> >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and >> >> > intellectually >> >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. >> >> ============================== >> >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you >> >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for >> >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! >> >> Not >> >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill >> >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? >> >> >> ============================ >> >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are >> >> >> hardly >> >> >> vegan >> >> >> foods. >> >> > >> >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> >> ===================== >> >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response >> >> was >> >> to >> >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, >> >> fool? >> >> try reading for comprehension. >> >> quoted text.... >> >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> "vegan" >> >> food >> >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the >> >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> >> ingredients >> >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who >> >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> >> products, continues to kill. >> >> end quoted text.... >> >> >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... >> >> Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it >> >> >> is >> >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having >> >> >> any >> >> >> info, >> >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however >> >> >> many >> >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet >> >> >> they >> >> >> still >> >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> >> > >> >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is >> >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory >> >> > than >> >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> >> ======================= >> >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of >> >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no >> >> > one >> >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. >> >> ============================== >> >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I >> >> have >> >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for >> >> the >> >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you >> >> make >> >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are >> >> trying >> >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet >> >> again,pansy-boy... >> > >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> > made >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> > are >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> > respond. >> =============== >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > > Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > responsible. ====================== Nice bit of ly there pansy-boy? I suggest you get whatever it is out of your mouth and learn to read for comprehension, fool. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > other, but not vice versa. ====================== Because you start with a ly about what I said, you have to fall back to even more ignorant spew. Thanks for proving yet again you have nothing... > > I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > bad. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . net>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article et>, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article et>, > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > In article . net>, > >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> >> ... > >> >> >> > In article et>, > >> >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> >> >> ... > >> >> >> >> > In article >, > >> >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of > >> >> >> >> >> "vegan" > >> >> >> >> >> food > >> >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, > >> >> >> >> >> mutilation, > >> >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" > >> >> >> >> >> than > >> >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. > >> >> >> >> ================= > >> >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to > >> >> >> >> back > >> >> >> >> it > >> >> >> >> up. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork > >> >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. > >> >> >> > People > >> >> >> > who > >> >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty > >> >> >> > here, > >> >> >> > usual? > >> >> >> ================================ > >> >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try > >> >> >> reading > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people > >> >> >> that > >> >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> loons > >> >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew > >> >> >> about > >> >> >> those > >> >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of > >> >> >> those > >> >> >> are > >> >> >> vegan foods, are they? > >> >> > > >> >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. > >> >> ====================== > >> >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Who are the rice growers > >> >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? > >> >> ===================== > >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers > >> >> world-wide > >> >> are > >> >> not vegan. > >> >> > >> >> Who are the people who use the > >> >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible > >> >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. > >> >> ========================== > >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not > >> >> vegan. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Who is > >> >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater > >> >> > or > >> >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. > >> >> =================== > >> >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now > >> >> does > >> >> it, fool? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Some of us tolerate > >> >> > their violence in the world. > >> >> ======================= > >> >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and > >> >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on > >> >> >> > your > >> >> >> > part. > >> >> >> ======================= > >> >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already > >> >> >> proven > >> >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that > >> >> >> claim > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> be > >> >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their > >> >> >> farming > >> >> >> will > >> >> >> still cause animals to die. > >> >> > > >> >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated > >> >> > by > >> >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and > >> >> > intellectually > >> >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. > >> >> ============================== > >> >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you > >> >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for > >> >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! > >> >> Not > >> >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill > >> >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? > >> >> >> ============================ > >> >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are > >> >> >> hardly > >> >> >> vegan > >> >> >> foods. > >> >> > > >> >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. > >> >> ===================== > >> >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response > >> >> was > >> >> to > >> >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, > >> >> fool? > >> >> try reading for comprehension. > >> >> quoted text.... > >> >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of > >> >> "vegan" > >> >> food > >> >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the > >> >> > humane slaughter which they object. > >> >> > >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the > >> >> ingredients > >> >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who > >> >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such > >> >> products, continues to kill. > >> >> end quoted text.... > >> >> > >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... > >> > >> Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having > >> >> >> any > >> >> >> info, > >> >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however > >> >> >> many > >> >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet > >> >> >> they > >> >> >> still > >> >> >> kill them. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. > >> >> > > >> >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is > >> >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some > >> >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory > >> >> > than > >> >> > actually being hands on with killing. > >> >> ======================= > >> >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of > >> >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no > >> >> > one > >> >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. > >> >> ============================== > >> >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I > >> >> have > >> >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for > >> >> the > >> >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you > >> >> make > >> >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are > >> >> trying > >> >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet > >> >> again,pansy-boy... > >> > > >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > >> > aren't children in your vicinity. > >> > > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has > >> > made > >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They > >> > are > >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions > >> > respond. > >> =============== > >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving > >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > > > > Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > > killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > > responsible. > ====================== > Nice bit of ly there pansy-boy? I suggest you get whatever it is out of > your mouth and learn to read for comprehension, fool. More of the same. Then please clarify if I am mistaken. (Something I view differently than a lie but that's me.) Do state your position for the record. Do you think that a vegan is responsible for the what the growers and food producers do as usual and Dutch have stated. > I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > > actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > > other, but not vice versa. > ====================== > Because you start with a ly about what I said, you have to fall back to even > more ignorant spew. Thanks for proving yet again you have nothing... That you jump to the conclusion that a possible mistake is a lie only creates suspicion for me about you. Please restate your position for the record. Does the vegan, as the example of the law has been provided, mean that you also agree that a vegan is also responsible for the killing of animals by others? > > I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > > beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > > bad. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article . net>, > "rick etter" > wrote: snippage... >> >> >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> >> >> ===================== >> >> >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response >> >> >> was >> >> >> to >> >> >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a >> >> >> refresher, >> >> >> fool? >> >> >> try reading for comprehension. >> >> >> quoted text.... >> >> >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> >> "vegan" >> >> >> food >> >> >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> >> >> ingredients >> >> >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater >> >> >> who >> >> >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> >> >> products, continues to kill. >> >> >> end quoted text.... >> >> >> >> >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your >> >> stupidity? ============== No comment? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually >> >> >> >> having >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> info, >> >> >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however >> >> >> >> many >> >> >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet >> >> >> >> they >> >> >> >> still >> >> >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence >> >> >> > is >> >> >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> >> >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less >> >> >> > satisfactory >> >> >> > than >> >> >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> >> >> ======================= >> >> >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions >> >> >> > of >> >> >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- >> >> >> > no >> >> >> > one >> >> >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for >> >> >> > everything. >> >> >> ============================== >> >> >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what >> >> >> I >> >> >> have >> >> >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck >> >> >> for >> >> >> the >> >> >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you >> >> >> make >> >> >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that >> >> >> are >> >> >> trying >> >> >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity >> >> >> yet >> >> >> again,pansy-boy... >> >> > >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >> > there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >> > made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >> > powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> >> > are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >> > respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >> proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> > Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that >> > the >> > killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> > responsible. >> ====================== >> Nice bit of ly there pansy-boy? I suggest you get whatever it is out of >> your mouth and learn to read for comprehension, fool. > > More of the same. ================= lack of intelligent response, noted. > > Then please clarify if I am mistaken. (Something I view differently than > a lie but that's me.) ==================== Read what is written. You continue to ly about what I have said. > > Do state your position for the record. Do you think that a vegan is > responsible for the what the growers and food producers do as usual and > Dutch have stated. ===================== They haven't been saying that either, fool. Nice strawman, too bad it gets blown to pieces. Oh, wait, that's why you build them, isn't it, pansy-boy? You, I, vegans are responsible for the actions we take. If we make choices that we know results in actions that are contrary to our stated beliefs, when other choices that do not result in those actions are available, then yes, we are culpable for the death and suffering that occurs. Does that absolve the farmer? No. And no one has said it does fool. Your strawman to the contrary. Your ignorance and stupidity, and obvious hatred is well displayed, pansy-boy. > >> I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> > actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> > other, but not vice versa. >> ====================== >> Because you start with a ly about what I said, you have to fall back to >> even >> more ignorant spew. Thanks for proving yet again you have nothing... > > That you jump to the conclusion that a possible mistake is a lie only > creates suspicion for me about you. ====================== Because you keep repeating it, like it's your new mantra, pansy-boy. > > Please restate your position for the record. Does the vegan, as the > example of the law has been provided, mean that you also agree that a > vegan is also responsible for the killing of animals by others? ======================== When he knowingly makes choices that result in the death and suffering of animals, despite the fact that he claims to care and make no effort to make other choices, then yes. > >> > I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> > beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans >> > look >> > bad. ==================== LOL I don't have to try. They do just by opening their mouths, fool. Now, so do you. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance, stupidity and hatred, pansy-boy. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > LOL I don't have to try. They do just by opening their mouths, fool. Now, > so do you. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance, stupidity and > hatred, pansy-boy. Hatred? Ah, ok. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > When he knowingly makes choices that result in the death and suffering of > animals, despite the fact that he claims to care and make no effort to make > other choices, then yes. I am not responsible for the outcome of your choices. When a producer of food kills to accomplish there goals they are responsible for the actions not each and every possible outcome. I give one animal an antibiotic and it lives. I give an animal and anitbiotic and it dies. I have performed the same ACT in both cases. The outcomes are independent of my actions. My actions are coincidental and not causal. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > LOL I don't have to try. They do just by opening their mouths, fool. Now, > so do you. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance, stupidity and > hatred, pansy-boy. Hatred? Ah, ok. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > When he knowingly makes choices that result in the death and suffering of > animals, despite the fact that he claims to care and make no effort to make > other choices, then yes. I am not responsible for the outcome of your choices. When a producer of food kills to accomplish there goals they are responsible for the actions not each and every possible outcome. I give one animal an antibiotic and it lives. I give an animal and anitbiotic and it dies. I have performed the same ACT in both cases. The outcomes are independent of my actions. My actions are coincidental and not causal. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article . net>, > "rick etter" > wrote: snippage... >> >> >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> >> >> ===================== >> >> >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response >> >> >> was >> >> >> to >> >> >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a >> >> >> refresher, >> >> >> fool? >> >> >> try reading for comprehension. >> >> >> quoted text.... >> >> >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> >> "vegan" >> >> >> food >> >> >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> >> >> ingredients >> >> >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater >> >> >> who >> >> >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> >> >> products, continues to kill. >> >> >> end quoted text.... >> >> >> >> >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your >> >> stupidity? ============== No comment? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually >> >> >> >> having >> >> >> >> any >> >> >> >> info, >> >> >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however >> >> >> >> many >> >> >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet >> >> >> >> they >> >> >> >> still >> >> >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence >> >> >> > is >> >> >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> >> >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less >> >> >> > satisfactory >> >> >> > than >> >> >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> >> >> ======================= >> >> >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions >> >> >> > of >> >> >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- >> >> >> > no >> >> >> > one >> >> >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for >> >> >> > everything. >> >> >> ============================== >> >> >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what >> >> >> I >> >> >> have >> >> >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck >> >> >> for >> >> >> the >> >> >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you >> >> >> make >> >> >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that >> >> >> are >> >> >> trying >> >> >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity >> >> >> yet >> >> >> again,pansy-boy... >> >> > >> >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope >> >> > there >> >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> >> > >> >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> >> > made >> >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are >> >> > powerless >> >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> >> > are >> >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> >> > respond. >> >> =============== >> >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work >> >> proving >> >> your ignorance and stupidity.... >> > >> > Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that >> > the >> > killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >> > responsible. >> ====================== >> Nice bit of ly there pansy-boy? I suggest you get whatever it is out of >> your mouth and learn to read for comprehension, fool. > > More of the same. ================= lack of intelligent response, noted. > > Then please clarify if I am mistaken. (Something I view differently than > a lie but that's me.) ==================== Read what is written. You continue to ly about what I have said. > > Do state your position for the record. Do you think that a vegan is > responsible for the what the growers and food producers do as usual and > Dutch have stated. ===================== They haven't been saying that either, fool. Nice strawman, too bad it gets blown to pieces. Oh, wait, that's why you build them, isn't it, pansy-boy? You, I, vegans are responsible for the actions we take. If we make choices that we know results in actions that are contrary to our stated beliefs, when other choices that do not result in those actions are available, then yes, we are culpable for the death and suffering that occurs. Does that absolve the farmer? No. And no one has said it does fool. Your strawman to the contrary. Your ignorance and stupidity, and obvious hatred is well displayed, pansy-boy. > >> I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >> > actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >> > other, but not vice versa. >> ====================== >> Because you start with a ly about what I said, you have to fall back to >> even >> more ignorant spew. Thanks for proving yet again you have nothing... > > That you jump to the conclusion that a possible mistake is a lie only > creates suspicion for me about you. ====================== Because you keep repeating it, like it's your new mantra, pansy-boy. > > Please restate your position for the record. Does the vegan, as the > example of the law has been provided, mean that you also agree that a > vegan is also responsible for the killing of animals by others? ======================== When he knowingly makes choices that result in the death and suffering of animals, despite the fact that he claims to care and make no effort to make other choices, then yes. > >> > I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >> > beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans >> > look >> > bad. ==================== LOL I don't have to try. They do just by opening their mouths, fool. Now, so do you. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance, stupidity and hatred, pansy-boy. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:52:14 -0500, Ron > wrote:
> "rick etter" > wrote: >> "Ron" > wrote in message ... [..] >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. >> =============== >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > >Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the >killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is >responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's >actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the >other, but not vice versa. > >I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the >beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look >bad. Rick, like all the other buck-passers here insists that the vegan must falsely take on the responsibility for the wrong actions of others, thereby enabling those wrong actions to continue and to make themselves fellow enablers of those wrong actions. In my view, his argument aims to recruit vegan apologists and enablers so he can then go on to insist that they are showing a contempt for the rights of animals when buying vegetables. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article et>, >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article . net>, >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > In article et>, >> >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> > In article >, >> >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> >> >> >> "vegan" >> >> >> >> >> food >> >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, >> >> >> >> >> mutilation, >> >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. >> >> >> >> ================= >> >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to >> >> >> >> back >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> up. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork >> >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. >> >> >> > People >> >> >> > who >> >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty >> >> >> > here, >> >> >> > usual? >> >> >> ================================ >> >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try >> >> >> reading >> >> >> for >> >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people >> >> >> that >> >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're >> >> >> the >> >> >> loons >> >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew >> >> >> about >> >> >> those >> >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of >> >> >> those >> >> >> are >> >> >> vegan foods, are they? >> >> > >> >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. >> >> ====================== >> >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. >> >> >> >> >> >> Who are the rice growers >> >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? >> >> ===================== >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers >> >> world-wide >> >> are >> >> not vegan. >> >> >> >> Who are the people who use the >> >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible >> >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. >> >> ========================== >> >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not >> >> vegan. >> >> >> >> >> >> Who is >> >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater >> >> > or >> >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. >> >> =================== >> >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now >> >> does >> >> it, fool? >> >> >> >> >> >> Some of us tolerate >> >> > their violence in the world. >> >> ======================= >> >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and >> >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on >> >> >> > your >> >> >> > part. >> >> >> ======================= >> >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already >> >> >> proven >> >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that >> >> >> claim >> >> >> to >> >> >> be >> >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their >> >> >> farming >> >> >> will >> >> >> still cause animals to die. >> >> > >> >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated >> >> > by >> >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and >> >> > intellectually >> >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. >> >> ============================== >> >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you >> >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for >> >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! >> >> Not >> >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill >> >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? >> >> >> ============================ >> >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are >> >> >> hardly >> >> >> vegan >> >> >> foods. >> >> > >> >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> >> ===================== >> >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response >> >> was >> >> to >> >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, >> >> fool? >> >> try reading for comprehension. >> >> quoted text.... >> >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> >> "vegan" >> >> food >> >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the >> >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> >> ingredients >> >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who >> >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> >> products, continues to kill. >> >> end quoted text.... >> >> >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... >> >> Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it >> >> >> is >> >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having >> >> >> any >> >> >> info, >> >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however >> >> >> many >> >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet >> >> >> they >> >> >> still >> >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> >> > >> >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is >> >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory >> >> > than >> >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> >> ======================= >> >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of >> >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no >> >> > one >> >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. >> >> ============================== >> >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I >> >> have >> >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for >> >> the >> >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you >> >> make >> >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are >> >> trying >> >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet >> >> again,pansy-boy... >> > >> > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a >> > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there >> > aren't children in your vicinity. >> > >> > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer >> > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has >> > made >> > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless >> > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They >> > are >> > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions >> > respond. >> =============== >> Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving >> your ignorance and stupidity.... > > Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the > killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is > responsible. ====================== Nice bit of ly there pansy-boy? I suggest you get whatever it is out of your mouth and learn to read for comprehension, fool. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's > actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the > other, but not vice versa. ====================== Because you start with a ly about what I said, you have to fall back to even more ignorant spew. Thanks for proving yet again you have nothing... > > I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the > beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look > bad. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article et>, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article . net>, > >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > In article et>, > >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> >> >> ... > >> >> >> > In article >, > >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" > >> >> >> >> food > >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than > >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. > >> >> >> ================= > >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to > >> >> >> back > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> up. > >> >> > > >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork > >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. People > >> >> > who > >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty > >> >> > here, > >> >> > usual? > >> >> ================================ > >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try reading > >> >> for > >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people that > >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're the > >> >> loons > >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew about > >> >> those > >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of those > >> >> are > >> >> vegan foods, are they? > >> > > >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. > >> ====================== > >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. > >> > >> > >> Who are the rice growers > >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? > >> ===================== > >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers world-wide > >> are > >> not vegan. > >> > >> Who are the people who use the > >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible > >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. > >> ========================== > >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not > >> vegan. > >> > >> > >> Who is > >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater or > >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. > >> =================== > >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now > >> does > >> it, fool? > >> > >> > >> Some of us tolerate > >> > their violence in the world. > >> ======================= > >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and > >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on your > >> >> > part. > >> >> ======================= > >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already > >> >> proven > >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that claim > >> >> to > >> >> be > >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their farming > >> >> will > >> >> still cause animals to die. > >> > > >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated by > >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and intellectually > >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. > >> ============================== > >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you > >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for > >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! Not > >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill > >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? > >> >> ============================ > >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are hardly > >> >> vegan > >> >> foods. > >> > > >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. > >> ===================== > >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response was > >> to > >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, > >> fool? > >> try reading for comprehension. > >> quoted text.... > >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of > >> "vegan" > >> food > >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, > >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the > >> > humane slaughter which they object. > >> > >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the > >> ingredients > >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who > >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such > >> products, continues to kill. > >> end quoted text.... > >> > >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... > > Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? > > > >> > >> > > >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it is > >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having any > >> >> info, > >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however many > >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet they > >> >> still > >> >> kill them. > >> >> > >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. > >> > > >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is > >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some > >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory > >> > than > >> > actually being hands on with killing. > >> ======================= > >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... > >> > >> > >> > > >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of > >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no one > >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. > >> ============================== > >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I > >> have > >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for the > >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you make > >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are > >> trying > >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet > >> again,pansy-boy... > > > > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > > aren't children in your vicinity. > > > > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. > =============== > Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving > your ignorance and stupidity.... Ah, rick! Hello! It is you that didn't respond. You have argued that the killers of animals are not responsible and that the consumer is responsible. I asked then, who is responsible for the consumer's actions? How can you logically state that one is responsible for the other, but not vice versa. I'm sorry you're looking foolish, rick. But this is the outcome of the beliefs that you are advocating here in your attempt to make vegans look bad. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article et>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article . net>, >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> > >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article et>, >> >> > "rick etter" > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > In article >, >> >> >> > usual suspect > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of "vegan" >> >> >> >> food >> >> >> >> production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> >> >> >> drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> humane slaughter which they object. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Killed, of course, by meat eaters. >> >> >> ================= >> >> >> You have proof of this bit of delusional insight, fool? Try to >> >> >> back >> >> >> it >> >> >> up. >> >> > >> >> > What is the difficulty? People who raise and kill pigs eat pork >> >> > products. People who raise and kill cows eat beef products. People >> >> > who >> >> > raise and kill seafood eat fish products. What is the difficulty >> >> > here, >> >> > usual? >> >> ================================ >> >> Don't know who you're talking to even anymore, eh fool? Try reading >> >> for >> >> comprehension, for a chnage. The comment was about those people that >> >> produce food for vegans. You remember them, don't you? They're the >> >> loons >> >> we've been talking about for weeks now. Now, you like to spew about >> >> those >> >> that produce beef, pork, and seafood. Seems to me that none of those >> >> are >> >> vegan foods, are they? >> > >> > Same group. Who does produce food for vegans. >> ====================== >> Not the same ones that rasie meat, fool. >> >> >> Who are the rice growers >> > of the world? Meat eater, or vegan? >> ===================== >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of rice growers world-wide >> are >> not vegan. >> >> Who are the people who use the >> > products and chemicals that you so kindly point out are responsible >> > (oops, there's that word) for the collateral death of animals. >> ========================== >> Have you checked? Prove that a fair number of organic growers are not >> vegan. >> >> >> Who is >> > that is killing the rodents, amphibians and such -- the meat eater or >> > the vegan. Farmers and growers are the killers. >> =================== >> Exactly. But that doesn't mean that all of them are meat-eaters, now >> does >> it, fool? >> >> >> Some of us tolerate >> > their violence in the world. >> ======================= >> And are culpable for it. Thanks for pointing that out, pansy-boy.... >> >> >> >> > >> >> Your request for proof suggests that the typical grower and >> >> > killer of animals would be vegan and that's just being silly on your >> >> > part. >> >> ======================= >> >> Why fool? Are you really this clueless? Oh wait, you've already >> >> proven >> >> that, haven't you. Try checking out any number of growers that claim >> >> to >> >> be >> >> 'organic'. I'd bet more than a few would be vegan, yet their farming >> >> will >> >> still cause animals to die. >> > >> > AH, a few might be vegan. Shall we do a comparison of farms operated by >> > vegans and meat eaters and killers. it's always easy and intellectually >> > dishonest to generalize to avoid reality. >> ============================== >> ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! It was you that generalized all growers, you >> ignorant fool! Man, what a maroon... Besides, if you could read for >> comprhension, you'd see that this discussion was about 'vegan' food! Not >> meats. Of course, we know that your comprehension is sorely lacking. >> >> >> > >> >> Occam's Razor: what is more likely that those raise and kill >> >> > animals are vegan or meat eater? >> >> ============================ >> >> And again, we aren't talking here about meat, fool. Those are hardly >> >> vegan >> >> foods. >> > >> > Do pay attention. Dutch specifically spoke to raising livestock. >> ===================== >> Not at the top of this thread were I responded fool. Your response was >> to >> Usual, and the discussion was not about livestock. Need a refresher, >> fool? >> try reading for comprehension. >> quoted text.... >> Usual>>> > This ignores the fact that animals die in the course of >> "vegan" >> food >> > production, too. Those deaths -- through poisoning, mutilation, >> > drowning, predation, etc. -- are significantly more "cruel" than the >> > humane slaughter which they object. >> >> You>>>>>>Killed, of course, by meat eaters. When the vegan buys the >> ingredients >> for the day's meal, the killing is usually done by the meat eater who >> rather than finding 'ethical' means of growing or harvesting such >> products, continues to kill. >> end quoted text.... >> >> You're an idiot, pansy-boy.... Lack of comment noted, pansy-boy.... Finally figure out your stupidity? >> >> > >> >> Besides, if you really understood the term, you'd realize that it is >> >> you that has made assumptions of farmers, without actually having any >> >> info, >> >> must less the minimun needed, fool. Have you questioned however many >> >> farmers there are? Remember, not all farmers raise animals, yet they >> >> still >> >> kill them. >> >> >> >> Keep up the good work in proving your ignorance, pansy-boy. >> > >> > You must raise livestock. Your propensity for abuse and violence is >> > familiar to those of us reading. And if not, you might find some >> > 'release' in those acts. I imagine eating meat is less satisfactory >> > than >> > actually being hands on with killing. >> ======================= >> Tell us all about your bloody hands, mr freud... >> >> >> > >> > But let's go another round of blaming the vegan for the actions of >> > others. It is consistent with our culture of passing the buck -- no one >> > is responsible for anything, everyone is responsible for everything. >> ============================== >> ROTFLMAO You really are a hoot! Thanks for stateing exactly what I >> have >> been saying. That vegans, and you now, continue to pass the buck for the >> actions they(you) take, knowing full well that the choices they/you make >> cause death and suffering to animals. It is vegans and you that are >> trying >> to deny their responsibility. Thanks for proving your stupidity yet >> again,pansy-boy... > > I'm glad that you are venting your hostility and aggression on a > keyboard and not on some unsuspecting person near to you. I hope there > aren't children in your vicinity. > > The vegan can't be responsible for their action, just as the farmer > can't be responsible for their own action. Your theory thus far has made > that clear. The farmer can't control their actions, they are powerless > before me. One word from me and they must kill. I command them. They are > my slaves. I throw in the promise of a few bucks and my minions respond. =============== Lack of any logical response noted, fool. Keep up the good work proving your ignorance and stupidity.... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The perfect G&T.... | General Cooking | |||
| The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
| Perfect BBQ was had | Barbecue | |||
| The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
| The perfect foil (and her moral confusion) | Vegan | |||
Hybrid Mode
