"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Derek" > wrote
>> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:13:15 -0500, Ron > wrote:
>> > >In article >, "Dutch" >
>> wrote:
>> > [..]
>> > >> It's not "one vague instance", it's a fundamental principle of law,
>> > >> morality, and logic.
>> > >
>> > >Really. Do tell. I have a passing interest in law. I would appreciate
>> > >what legal mind has declared this as a fundamental principle in law.
>> >
>> > Dutch claims to have been a police officer, so the "legal mind"
>> > behind this fundamental principle is his own, no doubt.
>> >
>> > "In my life I was many things, a farmer, a police officer, and
>> > a vegetarian, among other things."
>> > Dutch 29 Jun 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3kbsb
>>
>> That's irrelevant, everyone knows that accomplices and accessories to
>> crimes
>> are thereby also guilty of crimes.
>
> Of course, it was practiced in anciety Egypt as well. It is a common
> principle of Aboriginals and Native Americans. Using the current legal
> code of a few nations as measure of absolute morality, Dutch.
>
> As I've been stating, Dutch, using the legal system to support a
> circular argument of that which is moral is quite problematic.

I'm not doing that, I am illustrating that the law follows this same
principle which we apply in morality and in logic. 'If I help someone do
something in some way, I am a part of that act of doing.'