Mark Lipton wrote:
> Alt.food.wine FAQ - Version 0.6

Although this FAQ is still labeled 0.6, I found the addition of the
Rhone section, which I added to the web site at
http://winefaq.hostexcellence.com/ . Did I miss any other possible
additions or changes?

Note that you use 3g and 3h at the top of the page for Oregon and
Washington, but you use 3g for both of these in the body of the page. I
labeled these as on the top of the page on the website.

cwdjrxyz wrote:
> Mark Lipton wrote:
>> Alt.food.wine FAQ - Version 0.6
>
> Although this FAQ is still labeled 0.6, I found the addition of the
> Rhone section, which I added to the web site at
> http://winefaq.hostexcellence.com/ . Did I miss any other possible
> additions or changes?

No, that was the only change. Sorry for not detailing that atop the
post: I was just rushing too much to get it out last night.

>
> Note that you use 3g and 3h at the top of the page for Oregon and
> Washington, but you use 3g for both of these in the body of the page. I
> labeled these as on the top of the page on the website.

I'll correct that in v. 0.7. My plan is to complete most of the missing
sections in the next 1-2 months, at which point we'll "go public" with v
1.0.

Thanks for your help,
Mark Lipton
>

Still don't see the earlier version of an AFW FAQ---do I need to resend & to
who(m)
"Mark Lipton" > wrote in message
...
> cwdjrxyz wrote:
> > Mark Lipton wrote:
> >> Alt.food.wine FAQ - Version 0.6
> >
> > Although this FAQ is still labeled 0.6, I found the addition of the
> > Rhone section, which I added to the web site at
> > http://winefaq.hostexcellence.com/ . Did I miss any other possible
> > additions or changes?
>
> No, that was the only change. Sorry for not detailing that atop the
> post: I was just rushing too much to get it out last night.
>
> >
> > Note that you use 3g and 3h at the top of the page for Oregon and
> > Washington, but you use 3g for both of these in the body of the page. I
> > labeled these as on the top of the page on the website.
>
> I'll correct that in v. 0.7. My plan is to complete most of the missing
> sections in the next 1-2 months, at which point we'll "go public" with v
> 1.0.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Mark Lipton
> >

Joe "Beppe"Rosenberg wrote:
> Still don't see the earlier version of an AFW FAQ---do I need to resend & to
> who(m)

Joe,
Send it on to me. I snarfed up some of it from an archived copy of
Harms's website, but not all of it was available.

Mark Lipton