Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Headed to the city for a guys night with some old friends last night.
We gathered at Afghan Kebab House on 9th; I hadn't been there in a while and as always enjoyed it. We shared some pumpkin and spinach bulanee and a complimentary dish of meat dumplings as an appetizer; for main course I had lamb kebabs, plus we shared some eggplant and a lamb stew. The wines: NV Deutz Brut Champagne More elegant than powerful, bright, apples and orange peel with a biscuity note, quite a nice bottle of NV bubbly. I should drink more Deutz. Thanks Chris! B++ 1993 Gunderloch Nackenheim Rothenberg Spatlese* Not as petrolly as the '94, though there definitely is some there. White peaches, lots of citrus, flowers. Not quite as vibrant as the '94 was, but a nice wine (though maybe a bit better on nose than palate). Good match with the pumpkin appetizer. B+/B 2004 La Roquete Chateauneuf-du-Pape Sweet red fruit, decent acidity, some slightly gritty tannins. This could use some time, but nice potential is my initial impression. A retry later appeals a bit less, as there is a slight cough syrup note. I think others like more, and they have more affection for and experience with CdP than I. But for me, B/B- 1998 Galatrona Petrolo Merlot SuperTuscan. Okay, this is unabashedly modern/international, but very well done in the idiom. Dense black plum fruit, with a little minty note and lots of milk chocolate. The oak has integrated into those cocoa notes, good length, big warm mouthfeel. I really enjoy the first glass, not quite so much later- not because wine changed, but others wines had come between. This is the kind of wine for me that I love a glass, but not so eager to have a bottle for dinner. Solid B+ for that first glass. Thanks John for a nice wine! 1988 Maximin Grunhauser (Von Schubert) Abtsberg Spatlese This was another generous offering by John, and maybe bottle I was most looking forward to. It was a bit of a disappointment at dinner, a bit mute and tight. One could sense some coiled energy back there, but not a lot showing. However, I took the remainder with me and had a small glass on the train home. What a difference an hour makes. This was great (GREAT) wine. Light yet with a core of fruit that stood out purely, smoke and wet rocks. There's more, I hope that some of that greatness remains tonight. B-/B at dinner, A on the train. 1995 Ch. Lagrange (Pomerol) I seldom see this wine, and tend to think of it as "lesser" compared to it's St Julien name-share. But that's based on .....I'm not sure what! Only second time I remember having this, and it showed nicely. Mature, solid plum fruit, a light leafy note. Some cedar. B+/B 1986 Ch. Meyney (St Estephe) Arv commented how the whole Cordier stable (Meyney, Gruaud, Talbot) hit it out of the park in '86. Another nice showing for this old fave. Sweet dense fruit, some tobacco and cedar, still some tannins though not at all intrusive. This is coasting effortlessly, could even use a few more years. A- 1985 Ch. Canon (St Emilion) Thanks Ramon, my WOTN (at table, we'll leave the Grunhauser on train out of this), just edges the Meyney, mainly because it is totally and completely a pointe right now. Despite that ripe '85 fruit, there's a good backbone of acidity. Tannins are resolved, there beautiful red fruit- a melange of cherries, red plums, berries. Cigarbox, menthol, damp earth. A lovely wine. A- 1989 Ch. Oliver (Pessac-Leognan) Ramon says this is a great introductory Bdx for CA drinkers, I can see why. Ripe fruit, lighter tannins, low acids. There is an earthy note that says claret. Nice medium bodied wine, not the classic that WS called nor the dog that WA predicted. B Not a wine I wouldn't happily have at my table. Nor a person I wouldn't happily have at my table! Generous and fun group, Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. * |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 18, 10:03�am, DaleW > wrote:
> Headed to the city for a guys night with some old friends last night. > We gathered at Afghan Kebab House on 9th; I hadn't been there in a > while and as always enjoyed it. We shared some pumpkin and spinach > bulanee and a complimentary dish of meat dumplings as an appetizer; > for main course I had lamb kebabs, plus we shared some eggplant and a > lamb stew. > > The wines: > NV Deutz Brut Champagne > More elegant than powerful, bright, apples and orange peel with a > biscuity note, quite a nice bottle of NV bubbly. I should drink more > Deutz. Thanks Chris! B++ > > 1993 Gunderloch Nackenheim Rothenberg Spatlese� > Not as petrolly as the '94, though there definitely is some there. > White peaches, lots of citrus, flowers. Not quite as vibrant as the > '94 was, but a nice wine (though maybe a bit better on nose than > palate). Good match with the pumpkin appetizer. B+/B > > 2004 La Roquete Chateauneuf-du-Pape > Sweet red fruit, decent acidity, some slightly gritty tannins. This > could use some time, but nice potential is my initial impression. A > retry later appeals a bit less, as there is a slight cough syrup note. > I think others like more, and they have more affection for and > experience with CdP than I. But for me, B/B- > > 1998 Galatrona Petrolo > Merlot SuperTuscan. Okay, this is unabashedly modern/international, > but very well done in the idiom. Dense black plum fruit, with a little > minty note and lots of milk chocolate. The oak has integrated into > those cocoa notes, good length, big warm mouthfeel. I really enjoy the > first glass, not quite so much later- not because wine changed, but > others wines had come between. This is the kind of wine for me that I > love a glass, but not so eager to have a bottle for dinner. Solid B+ > for that first glass. Thanks John for a nice wine! > > 1988 Maximin Grunhauser (Von Schubert) Abtsberg Spatlese > This was another generous offering by John, and maybe bottle I was > most looking forward to. It was a bit of a disappointment at dinner, a > bit mute and tight. One could sense some coiled energy back there, but > not a lot showing. However, I took the remainder with me and had a > small glass on the train home. What a difference an hour makes. This > was great (GREAT) wine. Light yet with a core of fruit that stood out > purely, smoke and wet rocks. There's more, I hope that some of that > greatness remains tonight. B-/B at dinner, A on the train. > > 1995 Ch. Lagrange (Pomerol) > I seldom see this wine, and tend to think of it as "lesser" compared > to it's St Julien name-share. But that's based on .....I'm not sure > what! Only second time I remember having this, and it showed nicely. > Mature, solid plum fruit, a light leafy note. Some cedar. B+/B > > 1986 Ch. Meyney (St Estephe) > Arv commented how the whole Cordier stable (Meyney, Gruaud, Talbot) > hit it out of the park in '86. Another nice showing for this old fave. > Sweet dense fruit, some tobacco and cedar, still some tannins though > not at all intrusive. This is coasting effortlessly, could even use a > few more years. A- > > 1985 Ch. Canon (St Emilion) > Thanks Ramon, my WOTN (at table, we'll leave the Grunhauser on train > out of this), just edges the Meyney, mainly because it is totally and > completely a pointe right now. Despite that ripe '85 fruit, there's a > good backbone of acidity. Tannins are resolved, there beautiful red > fruit- a melange of cherries, red plums, berries. Cigarbox, menthol, > damp earth. A lovely wine. A- > > 1989 Ch. Oliver (Pessac-Leognan) > Ramon says this is a great introductory Bdx for CA drinkers, I can see > why. Ripe fruit, lighter tannins, low acids. There is an earthy note > that says claret. Nice medium bodied wine, not the classic that WS > called nor the dog that WA predicted. B > > Not a wine I wouldn't happily have at my table. Nor a person I > wouldn't happily have at my table! Generous and fun group, > > Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent > wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't > drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no > promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. > � I always prefered the Pomerol from Lagrange. A bit juicier and fleshy with the merlot content and a good QPR. |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-02-18 07:03:46 -0800, DaleW > said:
> > However, I took the remainder with me and had a > small glass on the train home. What a difference an hour makes. This > was great (GREAT) wine. Light yet with a core of fruit that stood out > purely, smoke and wet rocks. There's more, I hope that some of that > greatness remains tonight. B-/B at dinner, A on the train. All wines get an A on the train, if you ask me... |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ronin" > wrote in message ... > On 2009-02-18 07:03:46 -0800, DaleW > said: >> >> However, I took the remainder with me and had a >> small glass on the train home. What a difference an hour makes. This >> was great (GREAT) wine. Light yet with a core of fruit that stood out >> purely, smoke and wet rocks. There's more, I hope that some of that >> greatness remains tonight. B-/B at dinner, A on the train. > > All wines get an A on the train, if you ask me... > > > hmmm. Take the A train? greybeard |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 18, 10:03*am, DaleW > wrote:
> Headed to the city for a guys night with some old friends last night. > We gathered at Afghan Kebab House on 9th; I hadn't been there in a > while and as always enjoyed it. We shared some pumpkin and spinach > bulanee and a complimentary dish of meat dumplings as an appetizer; > for main course I had lamb kebabs, plus we shared some eggplant and a > lamb stew. > > The wines: > NV Deutz Brut Champagne > More elegant than powerful, bright, apples and orange peel with a > biscuity note, quite a nice bottle of NV bubbly. I should drink more > Deutz. Thanks Chris! B++ > > 1993 Gunderloch Nackenheim Rothenberg Spatlese* > Not as petrolly as the '94, though there definitely is some there. > White peaches, lots of citrus, flowers. Not quite as vibrant as the > '94 was, but a nice wine (though maybe a bit better on nose than > palate). Good match with the pumpkin appetizer. B+/B > > 2004 La Roquete Chateauneuf-du-Pape > Sweet red fruit, decent acidity, some slightly gritty tannins. This > could use some time, but nice potential is my initial impression. A > retry later appeals a bit less, as there is a slight cough syrup note. > I think others like more, and they have more affection for and > experience with CdP than I. But for me, B/B- > > 1998 Galatrona Petrolo > Merlot SuperTuscan. Okay, this is unabashedly modern/international, > but very well done in the idiom. Dense black plum fruit, with a little > minty note and lots of milk chocolate. The oak has integrated into > those cocoa notes, good length, big warm mouthfeel. I really enjoy the > first glass, not quite so much later- not because wine changed, but > others wines had come between. This is the kind of wine for me that I > love a glass, but not so eager to have a bottle for dinner. Solid B+ > for that first glass. Thanks John for a nice wine! > > 1988 Maximin Grunhauser (Von Schubert) Abtsberg Spatlese > This was another generous offering by John, and maybe bottle I was > most looking forward to. It was a bit of a disappointment at dinner, a > bit mute and tight. One could sense some coiled energy back there, but > not a lot showing. However, I took the remainder with me and had a > small glass on the train home. What a difference an hour makes. This > was great (GREAT) wine. Light yet with a core of fruit that stood out > purely, smoke and wet rocks. There's more, I hope that some of that > greatness remains tonight. B-/B at dinner, A on the train. > > 1995 Ch. Lagrange (Pomerol) > I seldom see this wine, and tend to think of it as "lesser" compared > to it's St Julien name-share. But that's based on .....I'm not sure > what! Only second time I remember having this, and it showed nicely. > Mature, solid plum fruit, a light leafy note. Some cedar. B+/B > > 1986 Ch. Meyney (St Estephe) > Arv commented how the whole Cordier stable (Meyney, Gruaud, Talbot) > hit it out of the park in '86. Another nice showing for this old fave. > Sweet dense fruit, some tobacco and cedar, still some tannins though > not at all intrusive. This is coasting effortlessly, could even use a > few more years. A- > > 1985 Ch. Canon (St Emilion) > Thanks Ramon, my WOTN (at table, we'll leave the Grunhauser on train > out of this), just edges the Meyney, mainly because it is totally and > completely a pointe right now. Despite that ripe '85 fruit, there's a > good backbone of acidity. Tannins are resolved, there beautiful red > fruit- a melange of cherries, red plums, berries. Cigarbox, menthol, > damp earth. A lovely wine. A- > > 1989 Ch. Oliver (Pessac-Leognan) > Ramon says this is a great introductory Bdx for CA drinkers, I can see > why. Ripe fruit, lighter tannins, low acids. There is an earthy note > that says claret. Nice medium bodied wine, not the classic that WS > called nor the dog that WA predicted. B > > Not a wine I wouldn't happily have at my table. Nor a person I > wouldn't happily have at my table! Generous and fun group, > > Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent > wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't > drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no > promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. > * so I saw John at Zachys today, he said Grunhauser was actually '89. Sorry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|