Notes from a dinner in West Van:

2000 Cedar Creek Platinum Pinot Noir - this was fun, as the restaurant had
mixed up the bags on the bottles, so I thought it was my wine, and was trying
to mentally reconcile the fairly typical Pinot notes with what I figured my
wine, a merlot, should be (I'd never tasted it before). Cocoa and cherry nose,
and dark fruit, in a medium weight well made wine. A revelation, I think, for
our out of town guest, unfamiliar with BC wine.

2001 Burrowing Owl Merlot - a bit green, a bit closed, and a bit atypical for a
merlot. Their first release of merlot was made much too young, and I was
reminded of that. Perhaps this one will come around - I have the 98, 99 and
2000, so it might be fun to do a mini-vertical some time.

2000 Epicurea Cote de Bourg - this Bordeaux satellite appellation produces some
very good values. I was not familiar with this one, but it showed not very much
on the nose, good fruit in the mouth, and tailed off with somewhat assertive
tannins that need a couple of years to resolve. Not bad, though.

1994 Havens Merlot Reserve - this was the one we/I were trying to fit into the
Procrustean Pinot Noir bed. Dark wine with cherry/chocolate nose, sweet and
soft on the palate, ending with soft well integrated tannins that will carry it
for a few more years, but IMO it will not get any better. A nice drink now.

1999 Yalumba 'The Menzies' Coonawara Cab - I have the 1998 but haven't tasted
it yet. Reticent nose witrh some mint, sweet on palate, with lots of acidity,
lots of tannin, a fair bit of oak. Needs time.

1993 Rene Engel Clos de Vougeot - I have a bottle of the 1989 that would have
made an interesting match - this wine showed atypically, or at least that was
the consensus. It had a mellow but not particularly Burgundian nose, showing a
bit of bacon fat, and the wine seemed younger based on the high tannin levels
of the vintage. No rush at all here! I bought a few of the 93's, selectively
(the only way to buy Burgs) and should start getting into them.

1994 Wynns Michael Shiraz -a young wine in terms of development, and a lot of
time ahead of it, dark and very smooth, a class act. I love this Shiraz, made
from the top selected 1% of fruit. This one was much more approachable than the
ginormous 98 I tasted earlier this year.

We then retreated to my place for:

1991 Leeuwin Estate Margaret River Cab - sweet ripe fruit and earth in the
nose, ample fruit and well balanced - perfect drinking now.

The Oz wines prompted me to pull a couple from the cellar blind:

1985 Mt. Langi Ghiran Cab - showing signs of break-up, fraying at the edges a
bit, but still showing some pleasant characteristics.

1985 Mt. Langi Ghiran Shiraz - in much better shape with a nice peppery nose
and better fruit.

In article >,
(Bill Spohn) writes:

>2000 Epicurea Cote de Bourg - this Bordeaux satellite appellation produces
>some
>very good values. I was not familiar with this one, but it showed not very
>much
>on the nose, good fruit in the mouth, and tailed off with somewhat assertive
>tannins that need a couple of years to resolve. Not bad, though.

Bill, I liked this wine quite a bit at release. I beleive it's the prestige
label from Chateau Martinat (only in Cotes de Bourg is a prestige label
Bordeaux under $20!). In spring and early summer it was an open, full-bodied
wine that paired well with rare meats (to match those tannins). But last bottle
I opened (last month) was comparatively reticent on the nose, as you note.
Seems to be closing down a little, best to leave alone for a couple of years. I
expect it to be re-awakened and at its peak in maybe 4 or 5. I find if these
right bank satellites shut down it's seldom for a long period. Some '98s seem
to be shaking off sleep, I see a lot of '98 Castillons, Fronsacs, Lalandes in
my drinking queue over next few years.
Dale

Dale Williams
Drop "damnspam" to reply