Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sitting down by the trusty old keyboard in a mood almost as foul as the
current weather, I decided not to spare you the vagaries of the Saturday Cab tasting with the Tastevin splinter group (Commando Mickey Mouse), which was held at our place. Anyway. Guests brought two bottles, we, two. Funnily enough, we had both opted for one Bordeaux and one 'over-seas'. Noone had any problem recognising which were Bordeaux, and which were from overseas - the French ones both having secondary aromas of maturation, stable, raw tobacco etc. The lady visitor got high marks for identifying our French offering as Pauillac, while her husband with some difficulty added that our 'over-seas' wine was South African. Self gained one minor point in correctly identifying the other transoceanic wine as Chilean. 1. Ch Ducru-Beaucaillou 1992 [C] Still fairly youngish purple, with only the barest hints of brick. [N] Pleasant tones of stable, even some green pepper [P] Minty, ceder, still tannines, ends of notes of coffee Overall impression: Apparently in 1992 this producer was in a state of decline and has improved considerably. Nevertheless, this was a very pleasant mature Bordeaux which, we guessed, would not develop any further 2. Montes Alpha 1997 [C] Deeper purple, no hints of brick [N] Starts with plain vanilla, after which a bowl of black currants travelling at supersonic speed hits you reight between the nostrils ... some notes of age, and herbs [P]Continues very fresh fruit, but also blackcurrant leaves, and, as it rests in the glass, some residual sugar is apparent. Overall impression: According to Oz Clark, Montes is a cronically irritating underachiever - I donīt know. This was a very pleasant wine, and still holding up the day after when we emptied the last glass from the bottle. 3. Neil Ellis 2002 [C] Comparable to 2. [N] Oddly, the old Swedish Sunday dinner standard 'chicken, rice and curry' which is a chicken, boiled with a white sauce laced with curry powder, and served with boiled rice ... anyway, that came strongly to mind. [P] Bit of blackcurrant, less fresh, more coarse, bit of RS, old Chinese box Overall impression: I like Neil Ellisī Sauvignon blanc. This, to me, has a lot of what I have come to associate with SA reds - a certain ... not quite enjoyable lack of freshness - I have sought for ways to express it but so far failed. The underachiever of the set. 4. Ch Batailley 1997 [C] Not unlike 1. [N] Had a lot of maturity despite its fairly young age. [P] Enjoyable, stable-y aromas, still with dark fruit - tannines more prominent than in 1., but supple and tasty. Overall impression: I suppose that normally, 7 years would be way too young for this producer, but, according to Hugh Johnson, and also two previous tastings, it appeared that it could drink OK now. No doubt it has a lot of potential to develop, only, not this bottle ... The wines accompanied a cantarelle risotto and lamb racks. PAvlova with wild berries as dessert and a bottle of I Capitelli, a passito made from Garganega, not bad but a bit anonymous, perhaps due to organoleptic fatigue. Next time itīll be Chenin Blanc. Password is 'swordfish'. Tell `em Joe sent you. Cheers Nils Gustaf -- Respond to nils dot lindgren at drchips dot se |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Clandestine Burn (Habenero Powder) | Mexican Cooking | |||
A very Clandestine Burn (Habenero Powder) | Barbecue | |||
Vintage Beer Tasting (no tasting notes, tho') | Beer | |||
Clandestine Lodges | Baking | |||
[TN] Walpurgisnacht in Helsingborg | Wine |