Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, three pieces in today's S.F. Wine section: one with reviews
of dozens of Grüners from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 vintages: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...IGMPGOPTP1.DTL One with what seems a nifty pairing of a Tunisian-Inspired Fish Soup: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...IGMPGOPTV1.DTL And the third which proclaims it to be "Groovy with Food": http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...IGJGGOSA11.DTL Cheers, e. __________________ www.winemonger.com |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
e. winemonger wrote:
> Actually, three pieces in today's S.F. Wine section: one with reviews > of dozens of Grüners from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 vintages: > http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...IGMPGOPTP1.DTL Good to see Johann Donabaum getting his due in that article, especially in such august company (Hirsch, Loibner, Brundlmayer, Gobelsburg). I didn't taste the wine they tasted when I was at VinoVenue, but I still think that they may have shortchanged him a star ;-) > And the third which proclaims it to be "Groovy with Food": > http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...IGJGGOSA11.DTL Hmmm... GV is just a poor excuse for Riesling?? Sorry, but I can't agree. As much as I appreciate the qualities of a good Riesling, GV is an even more versatile food wine IMO owing to its not being so aromatic. Mark Lipton |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Lipton wrote: >>Hmmm... GV is just a poor excuse for Riesling?? Sorry, but I can't agree. As much as I appreciate the qualities of a good Riesling, GV is an even more versatile food wine IMO owing to its not being so aromatic.<< I have to agree with you. I love Riesling on its own merits, but don't really see the point in comparing the two. And yes, absolutely they shortchanged Johann a star or two! ![]() But seriously, I do think that our low prices on his wines might be a factor in folks perceiving it as being somehow of lesser quality. It's something we have long suspected, and then the article as much as said so: "When it's grown in a superior location, cropped lower still and picked by hand, Gruner Veltliner can produce a superb wine that's complex and aromatic, typically dry, peppery or spicy (or a combination of freshly ground white pepper and grated nutmeg) and capable of aging. Expect to pay $30-plus at retail for this level of Gruner." Frustrating! e. BTW- the "boys" (Johann and Franz-Josef) will be back in town at the end of February. It's a shame you've moved! I think we'll do a few tastings at shops and perhaps a winemakers dinner. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[TN] Two Grüner Veltliners revisited | Wine | |||
"Points" discussion in today's SF Chronicle | Wine | |||
Grüner Veltliner | Wine | |||
TN: 2003 FX Pichler Grüner Veltliner Federspiel Loibner Klostersatz | Wine | |||
TN: 2001 Prager Grüner Veltliner Weissenkirchen Achleiten Smaragd | Wine |