must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

Perhaps a rhetorical question, but has anyone attempted to get must
through a 1 1/2" butterfly valve? Looks like it would be just a
little tight.

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

Can you tell me were this valve is located and which model it is?
Thank you
Stephen SG
"Patrick Heron" > wrote in message
om...
| Perhaps a rhetorical question, but has anyone attempted to get must
| through a 1 1/2" butterfly valve? Looks like it would be just a
| little tight.

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

Can you tell me were this valve is located and which model it is?
Thank you
Stephen SG
"Patrick Heron" > wrote in message
om...
| Perhaps a rhetorical question, but has anyone attempted to get must
| through a 1 1/2" butterfly valve? Looks like it would be just a
| little tight.

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

Pat,

The smallest we have is 2". It goes through ok.
Sorry I can't answer on 1 1/2"

Dave Stacy

On 2 Aug 2004 08:32:46 -0700, (Patrick Heron)
wrote:

>Perhaps a rhetorical question, but has anyone attempted to get must
>through a 1 1/2" butterfly valve? Looks like it would be just a
>little tight.

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

Pat,

The smallest we have is 2". It goes through ok.
Sorry I can't answer on 1 1/2"

Dave Stacy

On 2 Aug 2004 08:32:46 -0700, (Patrick Heron)
wrote:

>Perhaps a rhetorical question, but has anyone attempted to get must
>through a 1 1/2" butterfly valve? Looks like it would be just a
>little tight.

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

At the bottom of a 500L stainless tank. Without the valve, it looks
feasible. However, the valve itself occupies 25% of the throughput (or
appears it would).

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

At the bottom of a 500L stainless tank. Without the valve, it looks
feasible. However, the valve itself occupies 25% of the throughput (or
appears it would).

must through 1 1/2" butterfly?
 

At the bottom of a 500L stainless tank. Without the valve, it looks
feasible. However, the valve itself occupies 25% of the throughput (or
appears it would).