Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am interested in making a batch of port the non-fortified way (I want
to make it by adding sugar until the alcohol level is high enough). I'm not interested in a particular recipe as much as in figuring out some general guidelines for making port out of different types of fruit. By reading older posts on the subject of port, I gathered the following information: "Simplest way to do it is to start with your must around 1.120 using EC 1116, KV 1116 or Premier Cuvee yeast. When the SG drops to about 1.010, add enough sugar syrup to increase the SG to 1.020. Do this a couple of times (or until the yeast fails) and you will be in the alcohol range of about 18 to 20%. Sweeten it to about 1.020 SG, and either fortify with a brandy or neutral spirit if desired or bottle it and let it age for a year or two." OK, a few questions: 1) What should be a good range of TA before fermentation starts? 2) What about tannin extraction? Is it better to press early or late? 3) Out of curiosity, has anybody ever tried chaptalizing (I think that's the right term for the gradual addition of sugar) with grape concentrate instead of just sugar? Good or bad idea? How about using inverted sugar instead of regular sugar? Does it matter one way or another? 4) What levels of free SO2 should we have when we bottle it? Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Franco" > wrote in message ups.com... > I am interested in making a batch of port the non-fortified way (I want > to make it by adding sugar until the alcohol level is high enough). I'm > not interested in a particular recipe as much as in figuring out some > general guidelines for making port out of different types of fruit. By > reading older posts on the subject of port, I gathered the following > information: > > "Simplest way to do it is to start with your must around 1.120 using EC > 1116, KV 1116 or Premier Cuvee yeast. > > When the SG drops to about 1.010, add enough sugar syrup to increase > the SG to 1.020. Do this a couple of times (or until the yeast fails) > and you will be in the alcohol range of about 18 to 20%. > > Sweeten it to about 1.020 SG, and either fortify with a brandy or > neutral spirit if desired or bottle it and let it age for a year or > two." > > > OK, a few questions: > > 1) What should be a good range of TA before fermentation starts? Somewhere around 6 grams per liter for a grape wine. > 2) What about tannin extraction? Is it better to press early or late? I normally press at the end of the extended fermentation when using Zinfandel. But, that might produce too much astringency with grapes containing lots of tannin. > 3) Out of curiosity, has anybody ever tried chaptalizing (I think > that's the right term for the gradual addition of sugar) with grape > concentrate instead of just sugar? Good or bad idea? How about using > inverted sugar instead of regular sugar? Does it matter one way or > another? I have used concentrate before. It worked OK but didn't seem to provide any particular benefit. Using inverted sugar or regular sugar (sucrose) makes little difference. The yeast produce an enzyme that hydrolyses sucrose into fructose and glucose. > 4) What levels of free SO2 should we have when we bottle it? It depends on the style of Port you are trying to produce. If you are making a tawny Port, then you want some oxidation and would use little or no SO2. On the other hand, normal amounts of SO2 would be used if you are producing a ruby Port. At 18 to 20 percent alcohol, the wine will be biologically stable in any event. > Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions. Good luck with your Port, Lum Del Mar, California, USA www.geocities.com/lumeisenman |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Lum. One more question: what is a typical amount of residual
sugar (%) in port wine? Lum Eisenman wrote: > "Franco" > wrote in message > ups.com... > > I am interested in making a batch of port the non-fortified way (I want > > to make it by adding sugar until the alcohol level is high enough). I'm > > not interested in a particular recipe as much as in figuring out some > > general guidelines for making port out of different types of fruit. By > > reading older posts on the subject of port, I gathered the following > > information: > > > > "Simplest way to do it is to start with your must around 1.120 using EC > > 1116, KV 1116 or Premier Cuvee yeast. > > > > When the SG drops to about 1.010, add enough sugar syrup to increase > > the SG to 1.020. Do this a couple of times (or until the yeast fails) > > and you will be in the alcohol range of about 18 to 20%. > > > > Sweeten it to about 1.020 SG, and either fortify with a brandy or > > neutral spirit if desired or bottle it and let it age for a year or > > two." > > > > > > OK, a few questions: > > > > 1) What should be a good range of TA before fermentation starts? > > Somewhere around 6 grams per liter for a grape wine. > > > 2) What about tannin extraction? Is it better to press early or late? > > I normally press at the end of the extended fermentation when using > Zinfandel. But, that might produce too much astringency with grapes > containing lots of tannin. > > > 3) Out of curiosity, has anybody ever tried chaptalizing (I think > > that's the right term for the gradual addition of sugar) with grape > > concentrate instead of just sugar? Good or bad idea? How about using > > inverted sugar instead of regular sugar? Does it matter one way or > > another? > > I have used concentrate before. It worked OK but didn't seem to provide any > particular benefit. Using inverted sugar or regular sugar (sucrose) makes > little difference. The yeast produce an enzyme that hydrolyses sucrose into > fructose and glucose. > > > 4) What levels of free SO2 should we have when we bottle it? > > It depends on the style of Port you are trying to produce. If you are > making a tawny Port, then you want some oxidation and would use little or no > SO2. On the other hand, normal amounts of SO2 would be used if you are > producing a ruby Port. At 18 to 20 percent alcohol, the wine will be > biologically stable in any event. > > > Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions. > > Good luck with your Port, > Lum > Del Mar, California, USA > www.geocities.com/lumeisenman |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Franco" > wrote in message ps.com... > Thanks, Lum. One more question: what is a typical amount of residual > sugar (%) in port wine? > Franco, When I was a kid, the standard for California Port was 10 by 20, meaning 10% RS and 20% alcohol. These days the RS in Port seems to range anywhere from about 8% to 12%. My experience is that sweeter Ports sell better. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have only made port by fortifying so can't answer your questions
beyond what Lum has already done concerning questions that would apply whether fortified or not. Just wondering if anyone has tried port made from both methods? Assuming one used grape brandy to fortify would there be a taste difference in distilled alcohol vs alcohol produced strictly as a byproduct of fermentation? |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the comments Lum, and Franco I did the search you suggested
and found Jack Keller's comments from 1999 where their club compared ports made from both methods. Hope Jack doesn't mind me re-posting part of his post: "All of these were relatively young ports, 2-6 years old. In my opinion, the port made without brandy had a much deeper and richer flavor, while the ports made with brandy fortification were fruitier, more complex and somewhat more interesting." Not sure from this which style he actually preferred. Maybe Jack will see this and comment more. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Port wine can be made by fortification using different variations.
(1) To minimize the amount of brandy needed, most commercial Port is made by fermenting a couple of days, running off and then fortifying the liquid. The juice is exposed to the solids for just a couple of days, so extraction is limited. (2) Small producers often ferment for a couple of days, fortify the _must_ and then press a few days later. In this case, the liquid is exposed to the solids for a much longer time. The alcohol level is high so there is much more extraction. But, unfortunately, some brandy is discarded with the pomace. Note that the second method of making fortified Port more closely duplicates the extraction conditions that naturally exist when the extended fermentation method is used. Lum Del Mar, California, USA www.geocities.com/lumeisenman "miker" > wrote in message oups.com... > Thanks for the comments Lum, and Franco I did the search you suggested > and found Jack Keller's comments from 1999 where their club compared > ports made from both methods. Hope Jack doesn't mind me re-posting part > of his post: > > "All of these were relatively young ports, 2-6 years old. In > my opinion, the port made without brandy had a much deeper and richer > flavor, while the ports made with brandy fortification were fruitier, > more complex and somewhat more interesting." > > Not sure from this which style he actually preferred. Maybe Jack will > see this and comment more. > |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Making a Port | Winemaking | |||
3 port questions | Winemaking | |||
3 port questions | Winemaking | |||
Two port questions | Winemaking | |||
Making Port (again !) | Winemaking |